ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Objective Evaluate the 2950 patients in the per-protocol cohort with a baseline CrCl of 30 to 49 mL/min who received.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
Advertisements

1 Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Benefits and risks Matthew Moles, MD December 4, 2012 University of Colorado.
Apixaban versus Aspirin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients ≥ 75 years old: An Analysis from the AVERROES Trial Kuan H Ng, Olga O Shestakovska, John W. Eikelboom,
New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Dr Dipti.
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese population in the RE-LY ® - Shinya Goto, MD., PhD. Tokai.
ARISTOTLE TTR Subanalysis
Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of INR control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
The Definitive Thrombosis Update
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
Bridging Oral Anticoagulation with Low Molecular Weight Heparin: Experience in 367 Patients with Renal Insufficiency Heyder Omran, Giso von der Recke,
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation
Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thrombroenbolism Group /06/11.
UK/CVS (1) | February 2013 Emerging technologies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation UK/CVS (1) | Date of preparation: February 2013.
Atrial Fibrillation Management Past, Present and Future
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
Shinya Goto,1 Jun Zhu,2 Liu Lisheng,2 Byung-Hee Oh,3 Daniel M. Wojdyla,4 Michael Hanna,5 John D. Horowitz,6 Lars Wallentin,7 Denis Xavier,8 John H. Alexander4.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D.,
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
1 Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation R3 Dae Ho Kim / Prof. Jin Bae Kim N Engl J Med 2011; DOI: Manesh R. Patel, M.D.,
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Denise Sutter, PharmD, BCPS
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Anticoagulant Safety Remains a Problem Emergency Hospitalizations for Adverse Drug Events.
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
US Guidelines US Guidelines Low-risk Patients.
New Strategies to Prevent CV Events After Hospital Discharge
Cardiovascular (CV) Safety and Severe Hypoglycemia Benefit of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 in Older Patients (≥65 years) with Type 2 Diabetes.
A New Era for NOACs:.
Disclosures. Evaluating Recent Clinical Trial Data in the Secondary Prevention of ACS.
The Safety and Efficacy of Full vs
POWER IN NUMBERS: REVISITING EFFICACY & SAFETY OF NOACS IN AF
Up to Date on Which NOAC for Which Patient
Oral Anticoagulants in AFa,b A Brief History.
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
NOAC Use in AF: REAL-WORLD Studies WITH REAL RESULTS
Applying Real-World Evidence in Atrial Fibrillation Into Clinical Care:
Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients With AF and HF
Relative Risk of Events by CHA2DS2-VASc Score
Dos and Don’ts for High-Risk Elderly Patients With AF
Anticoagulation and Thrombosis Management
What You Didn't Know About AF and Renal Dysfunction
A Case Challenge.
Improving Outcomes in AF: Do the NOACs Hold Their Promise In The Real World?
Elevated Admission Plasma Glucose Following ACS
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
For the HORIZONS AMI Investigators
Reassessing Risk Stratification in CAD/PAD
What's New in NOACs in AF?.
Translating Data From Trial to Practice
Presentation transcript:

ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Objective Evaluate the 2950 patients in the per-protocol cohort with a baseline CrCl of 30 to 49 mL/min who received a reduced-dose of rivaroxaban (15 mg/day) compared to those treated with dose-adjusted warfarin Background ROCKET-AF compared the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban 20 mg daily (15 mg for patients with CrCl mL/min) to standard dose-adjusted warfarin in 14,264 patients with AF and additional risk factors for stroke In the per-protocol cohort, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism Patients in the renal dysfunction substudy were older, had a higher CHADS2 risk score, and were more likely to have a history of stroke or systemic embolism than patients with normal renal function

ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Efficacy Endpoints on Treatment

ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Summary Findings from this substudy were consistent with those from the overall trial In patients with moderate renal impairment, reduced-dose rivaroxaban preserved the benefit of warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolus, and in the per-protocol analysis yielded lower rates than warfarin The rates of bleeding and adverse events with reduced-dose rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were similar, with fewer fatal bleeds Conclusions Patients with renal dysfunction are at a higher risk for stroke and bleeding events than patients with preserved renal function The reduced dose of rivaroxaban in this subgroup yielded efficacy and safety results consistent with the overall trial, with similar rates of bleeding and adverse events and fewer fatal bleeds, compared with warfarin