Budget Platform. BACKGROUND: As Ohio’s mental health system crumbles, it is consumers and families who pay the price. We must provide sufficient funding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

MEDICAID REDESIGN – IDAHO What it would mean for Idahoans with disabilities. Presented by:
OHIO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH & MEDICAID FUNDING OACCA Legislative Briefing, 2011.
Gov. John Kasich’s State Fiscal Year Budget Mental Health and Addiction Services Highlights John R. Kasich, Governor Tracy Plouck, Director.
A BluePrint for Ohio’s Community Mental Health and Addiction System
MODULE ONE Understanding Marginalized Populations.
PPA786: Urban Policy Class 8: Homelessness. Urban Policy: Homelessness Class Outline ▫Definition of Homelessness ▫Counting the Homeless ▫Who Are the Homeless?
Georgia Department of Human Resources Blueprint for a New Mental Health System.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 35Seriously and Persistently Mentally Ill, Homeless, or Incarcerated Clients.
Lee County Triage Center and Low Demand Shelter Ann Arnall, Deputy Director Lee County Human Services
Homeless Youth. Homelessness Definition Having no fixed place to sleep at night Having no fixed place to sleep at night.
By the Numbers The Illinois Mental Health System.
Housing and Health Care Programs and Financing that Integrate Health Care and Housing Housing California Institute April 15, 2014 John Shen Long-Term Care.
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE Marketplace Virginia. SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE The Problem -Uninsured in Virginia -Direct Costs -Indirect Costs -Lost Opportunity.
Central Receiving Center Update (CRC) 5 Years of Operation June 10, 2008.
National Alliance on Mental Illness or Utah’s voice on mental illness.
Harri-Ann Ellis April 28 th, 2011 Meth and More Conference.
Policy Research Shop Support for the Policy Research Shop is provided by the Ford Foundation and by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education,
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Task Force on Behavioral Health Data Policies and Long Term Stays Meeting Two December 18, 2014 Beth Waldman and Megan Burns.
Metro Detroit’s Community Summit on Ending Homeless Supportive Housing Overview Cobo Hall Nov. 16, 2004.
Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing in Acute Care Settings.
Criminal Justice Mental Health and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Housing Strategies Ellen Piekalkiewicz Department of Children and Families Florida.
Children’s Mental Health Crisis Response Services Presentation to the Allied Health Caucus, Virginia General Assembly February 24, 2012.
Background Since 1984, Montgomery County has had two human services levies. One levy is about to expire and the county commissioners have put a replacement.
Providing supported employment and housing to people in recovery from mental illness since Stable Employment, Safe Housing & Supportive Peers: A.
Thank you to our Inspired Sponsors! Mental Illness is more common than cancer, diabetes or even heart disease.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
In Crisis: Clinical Solutions for the Revolving Door Mary Ruiz MBA, CEO Melissa Larkin Skinner LMHC, CCO Florida's Premier Behavioral Health Annual Conference.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
Delaware Health and Social Services NAMI Delaware Conference: January 24, 2013 Rita Landgraf, Secretary, Department of Health and Social Services ACA and.
Child and Adolescent Task Force Report Charlotte V. McNulty, Vice Chair Presentation to House Health, Welfare and Institutions General Assembly Building.
Region IV Behavioral Health Adult and Children. Population: 430,000 Employees: approx. 460 How many people do we serve? In October in SR alone: Processed.
Bridges of Hope Faith Communities and NAMI. Torrents of Mental Illness.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 10, 2011 Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Supportive Housing in Illinois: A WISE INVESTMENT The Heartland Alliance Mid-America Institute on Poverty Amy Rynell Director.
Magellan Training: Medicaid Rehabilitation Option MRO.
Families with Problems
DAUPHIN COUNTY ADULT MH RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS.
Problems facing group homes Institutions of Mental Disease (IMD) More than 16 mental health beds owned by one owner, even if in multiple locations (more.
One Voice Central Texas Put People First Imagine One Austin – Health and Human Services August 11, 2014.
UK HEALTH POLICY FORUM Behavioral Health in the Commonwealth -Past, Present, Future.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Testimony To The HEALTH CARE TASK FORCE Jim Rehder, Chairman Region II Mental Health Board.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus for The Council of State Governments Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus for The Council of State.
LONG TERM CARE Financing Long Term Care. THE NEED FOR LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN THIS COUNTRY IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE DRAMATICALLY.
Jason Bearden, CEO Highland Rivers Health Laurie Wilburn-Bailey, Clinical Director Advantage Behavioral Health Systems David Wallace, Director, Residential.
MENTAL ILLNESS. Approximately one-third of the adult population in the United States at some point in time meets the diagnostic criteria for a mental.
Families may require outside assistance to deal with serious problems.
Supportive Housing: Community and Economic Impacts
1 December 8, 2015 Crista M. Taylor, LCSW-C Director, Information, Planning and Development Adrienne Breidenstine, MSW Director of Opioid Overdose Prevention.
Opportunities to Address Homelessness in California Sharon Rapport, CSH.
THE IMPACT OF STRENGTHENING MEDICAID ON MISSOURI’S MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM March 2013.
MS BERNADETTE MCNALLY DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WORK BELFAST HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE TRUST UNITED KINGDOM Health and long-term care for older people: access, financing,
Discharge Destinations A Guide For Choosing the Correct Destination Option in HMIS.
House HSS - 1 Bringing (Keeping) the Kids Home Update – February 2009 A collaboration of Department of Health and Social Services, Alaska Mental Health.
Copyright © 2010, 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 1 Community-Oriented Nursing and Community-Based Nursing Carolyn A.
Accessing Housing Resources through the LME Understanding Shelter Plus Care Program.
Presentation to the Senate Committee on Health & Human Services June 16, 2016 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) Stephen.
The Research Behind Successful Supportive Housing September 2016.
Association of Indiana Counties Annual Conference September 27th, 2017
Budget Platform.
Fall 2018 NAMD Conference The Future of behavioral health integration in Medicaid November 14, 2018 Washington Hilton, Washington, D.C. Brian M. Hepburn,
Assertive community treatment webinar
Can be personalized to individual group needs.
Presentation transcript:

Budget Platform

BACKGROUND: As Ohio’s mental health system crumbles, it is consumers and families who pay the price. We must provide sufficient funding for community-based care for Ohioans with severe and persistent mental illness. Not only is this the compassionate thing to do, it will save money by reducing the use of expensive and inappropriate institutionalization such as hospitals, nursing homes, prisons, and jails. Recognizing that there will be fewer resources available to meet the needs of those with mental health disorders in the upcoming budget, NAMI Ohio calls on Governor Elect John Kasich and the 129 th General Assembly to prioritize basic services for those with severe and persistent mental illness. Join us – be a voice for change.

PROBLEM: Ohio’s Medicaid Program discriminates against people with mental health disorders because it does not pay for mental health services the way that it pays for physical health services. SOLUTION: Move the responsibility for paying Medicaid to the State where it belongs so that local communities can concentrate their resources on those in greatest need.

JUSTIFICATION: Today, state and local funds are used to pay the 40% Medicaid match for mental health services, yet only state funds are used to pay the 40% match for physical health services. The remaining 60% is paid by the federal government. NAMI Ohio believes that the state should treat mental health services the same way they treat physical health services, and pay for the entire 40% match.

PROBLEM: Ohio is in violation of the Mental Health Act of When Lawmakers made the decision to move individuals with mental illness from the State’s hospitals back to the community, they promised to use the dollars that were saved to support them in the community. Unfortunately, that is not what is happening. SOLUTION: Do not cut the current level of funding in the State’s budget for the purchase of community mental health services.

JUSTIFICATION: When the Mental Health Act of 1988 was passed, the state closed six mental health institutions. The money used to fund these hospitals was supposed to follow the clients back to the community and be used to pay for treatment, housing, transportation and other community support services. Over the years, these funds have eroded. The state has an obligation to take care of those who otherwise would be living in mental health hospitals today if they had not been closed. Instead, the state has come to rely on our jails, prisons, hospitals, nursing homes and homeless shelters to care for these individuals.

SOLUTION: Include language in the state statute directing local Boards to provide critical services and supports for adults and children with chronic mental illness before they can spend state or local dollars on less critical services. PROBLEM: Adults with severe and persistent mental illness cannot participate in their recovery if they don’t have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs, and someone who cares that they get well. Children with serious emotional disturbance cannot get well if they are torn apart from their families and placed into institutional care because there are no services or supports available to their families in the community.

JUSTIFICATION: Community Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health (ADAMH) Boards are required by law to fund, manage, and evaluate community-based mental health and substance abuse services. The federal, state, and local governments fund the Boards and in turn the Boards are responsible for ensuring that alcohol, drug addiction and/or mental health services are available to those who need them, regardless of their ability to pay. In a time of scarce mental health resources at all three levels of government, NAMI Ohio supports changing the law to prioritize the population who receives services and supports by the local Board to those with serious and persistent mental illness. In addition, NAMI Ohio believes that the scope of mental health services should be prioritized to ensure that the most basic of needs are met (ex. food, shelter, medication) are provided to the degree needed to remain safely in the community BEFORE funds can be spent on other services.

Families with a child with serious mental illness often come unraveled trying to figure out where to get help and support for their child and their family. Eventually, when the child’s behavior becomes so disruptive and help is not provided, the child ends up in a costly residential treatment facility or the juvenile justice system. Local communities need to have the flexibility to respond to the critical needs of families. Respite, door alarms, crisis counselors…these are the types of things that families often need to keep children with mental illness at home. Using levy dollars to meet the individual needs of families, rather than embracing a one size fits approach as we do currently, is the solution.

PROBLEM: Access to medication for those with severe and persistent mental illness often means the difference between life and death. SOLUTION: Prohibit limits being placed on access to mental health medications for those with severe and persistent mental illness.

JUSTIFICATION: Over the past 20 years, powerful new medications have revolutionized the treatment of mental illnesses, allowing people with even the most serious disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, to live in the community, maintain healthy relationships and pursue productive lives. Because of the budget crisis facing Ohio, it is likely that efforts will be undertaken to limit access to these life-changing, yet often expensive, medications. Restrictive strategies, such as prior authorization or fail first policies, may result in short term savings to the Medicaid program. However, they will be more than offset by increased costs in hospitalizations, incarceration, homelessness, loss of employment and out of home care for children. The cost in human suffering is incalculable.

PROBLEM: Psychiatric hospitalization in Ohio is not adequate because there are not enough beds; patients are released before they are stabilized; and patients are not linked to community services and supports upon release. SOLUTION: Offer incentives to hospitals that accept Medicaid patients to provide more psychiatric beds. Prohibit state hospitals from releasing patients until they are stabilized. Require that patients are linked to services and supports in the community, including appropriate housing, prior to being released.

JUSTIFICATION: The average length of stay for acute hospital care in a mental health hospital in Ohio is less than two weeks. The average length of time for most mental health medications to take full effect is well over three weeks. Needless to say, many people who are released from mental health hospitals are in no better shape to live in the community than they were when they were admitted to the hospital. Additionally, individuals who are released from the hospital often are unable to return to the place they lived prior to hospitalization for a variety of reasons. If hospitals cannot readily find a suitable living arrangement, they send them home to families who are unable and unprepared to manage their illness, or they are released to homeless shelters or the streets with no services or supports.

Help Spread the Word

?’s