Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5 MeV Mott Measurement for CEBAF Operations group Joe Grames, Marcy Stutzman February 14 th, 2007 Sir Nevill F. Mott at the ceremony with his Nobel Prize.
Advertisements

CEBAF Photoinjector: What’s new, what’s the same since HAPPEx 2004? What needs to be done? M. Poelker, HAPPEx collaboration meeting, Feb. 18, 2005.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) April 07, Notes: 1.For each BPM, the wires are: +X+, +X-, +Y+, +Y- 2.There are only two injector BPMs we are not reading:
R. Michaels PVDIS at Nov 2009 Beam Requirements for PVDIS Property ValueRun-Avg Hel. Correl. 1-Day Hel. Correl. Energy 6 and 4.8 GeVdE/E < 1 ppm < 5 ppm.
HPS MPS OVERVIEW Dan Sexton & the Safety Systems Group JLAB 1.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies June & July 2006 Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
PN12 Workshop JLab, Nov 2004 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Parity Violating Neutron Densities Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons.
PQB Photocathode Analyzing Power Study May 19, 2009.
JLab Polarized Source Happex Collaboration Meeting May 18, 2007 P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
PAVI ’06 Milos May 20, 2006 Kent Paschke – University of Massachusetts Controlling Helicity-Correlated Asymmetries in a Polarized Electron Beam Kent Paschke.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Real-time Parity Feedback John Hansknecht & Riad Suleiman April 28, 2009.
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group November 10, 2008.
Hall A Parity Workshop (May 10, 2002), 1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
Digital Signal Processing and Generation for a DC Current Transformer for Particle Accelerators Silvia Zorzetti.
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
Polarized Injector Status QWeak Collaboration Meeting February 1, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman,
ExperimentEnergy (GeV) Pol (%) I (µA) TargetA pv (ppb) Maximum Charge Asym (ppb) Maximum Position Diff (nm) Maximum Angle Diff (nrad) Maximum Size Diff.
5 MeV Mott Polarimeter Progress Riad Suleiman April 10, 2012.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group September 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility G0 Collaboration Meeting, June 18-19, 2003 Updates G0 Tiger Laser High Polarization Photocathodes Mott polarimeter.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility FEL A Versatile.
Helicity Magnets Commissioning February 7, 2007 Hari Areti, Chao, Brad Cumbia, Jeff Dale, Richard Dickson, Joe Grames, Roger Flood, Scott Higgins, Matt.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
Re-designing the Helicity Board Riad Suleiman Injector Group March 19, 2009.
Source Systematics PITA - type effects The importance of controlling the analyzer-axis –Two Pockels cells –Half-wave plate Position asymmetries –Lensing.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
HCAL1 Status 2004 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance in 2004 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Stability in 2003 Led.
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
Mott Electron Polarization Results Riad Suleiman July 10, 2013.
G 0 Project Coordinator Report Joe Grames “Big Picture” Schedule Preparations Polarized Source Injector Accelerator Hall C Accelerator Plans for 687 MeV.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility Polarized e-Source - Talking Points for PV experiments: P. Adderley, M. BastaniNejad, J. Clark, S. Covert,
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
Polarized Injector & Upgrade Schedule QWeak Collaboration Meeting November 06, 2009 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Polarized Injector Update
Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements
with help from Riad Sulieman, Arne Freyberger, and Joe Grames
A Mini-Primer for Parity Quality Beam (as seen from the Accelerator)
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
Parity Violation Experiments at JLEIC
Parity Quality Beam (PQB)
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
QWeak Collaboration Meeting
UITF MPS system requirements
Bleedthrough (sometimes we call it “leakage”) Ops Staytreat June 28 – 30, 2016 Matt Poelker with help from John Hansknecht, Reza Kazimi, Todd Satogata,
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Polarized Source Development Run Results
Adiabatic Damping and Parity Quality of Low Energy
Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab
Riad Suleiman February 2, 2017
Injector Studies Using Superlattice Photocathode
Helicity Magnets for PQB Feedback Helicity Magnets for PZT Booster
Helicity Magnets’ Control Upgrade
Polarized Source: Recent Activities
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
UITF Conduct of Operations Review
Injector Commissioning & Optimization
Presentation transcript:

Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources

Gain-switched Diode Laser and Fiber Amplifier Attenuator PC WP LP Shutter Rotatable GaAs Photocathode Vacuum Window 15° Dipole PZT Mirror IHWP RHWP Pockels Cell Delayed Helicity Fiber HV Supply (0 – ±4000 V) HV Supply (0 – 90 V) CEBAF Hall T-Settle Fiber Charge Feedback (PITA) Electron Beam Helicity Flip Fiber Charge Feedback (IA) LP HWP LP IA Target BCM BPMs 5 MeV Helicity Magnets DAQ nHelicity Flip Fiber Position Feedback Helicity Control Board V-Wien Filter H-Wien Filter Spin Solenoids

Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector o VME Crate of Helicity Control Board is floating and powered with isolation transformer. o Helicity Board generates two real time helicity signals: Helicity Flip and nHelicity Flip. Current drawn by board does not depend on helicity state. o Helicity signal is generated by pseudo-random bit generator. No correlation between helicity signal and any other signal in Accelerator or in Hall. o Outside world receives only Delayed Helicity signal. This signal tells what helicity was in the past so there is no knowledge of real time helicity. o Helicity Magnets VME Crate which receives one of the two real time helicity signals (nHelicity Flip) is also floating and powered by isolation transformer. o Real time helicity signal (Helicity Flip) that goes to Laser Hut is isolated. All electronics that can see real time helicity are floating (next slide). o All helicity-correlated beam asymmetries (position, angle, charge, energy, and size – and thus beam scraping) are minimized so helicity is the only real time property of beam that is changing. o Programming of voltage setpoints of Pockels Cell and IA’s (both receive Helicity Flip signal) in Laser Hut passes through galvanic isolation card and there are no readbacks of these voltages.

FLOATING VME CRATE Helicity Control Board Normal Grounded VME CRATE (slow status and control - nothing occurs at helicity flip rate) 16 bit DAC: Pockels Cell (PC) ±HV setpoints (0 – ±4000 V) 16 bit DAC: Hall A, B, C Intensity Attenuator (IA) HV setpoints RS-232: Rotating half-wave plate (RHWP) and laser attenuators Discrete Digital I/O: Insertable half-wave plate (IHWP) Injector Service Building Injector Tunnel Laser Hut Galvanic Analog/Digital Isolation Card Floating Analog/Digital I/O Floating DC Power AC Power Source To Floating Components PC +HV Supply Fast High Voltage Switch Optical Switch Control Pockels Cell Floating Circuit Common Halls IA’s RHWP & Attenuators IHWP IA0 Fiber Helicity Flip Fiber IA HV Supply IA1 Fiber PC -HV Supply

Isolation Transformer Fiber Cable Ground Rod Power Cable with Ground Pin Cut Floating VME Crate

Helicity Flip nHelicity Flip Delayed Helicity T_Settle 8– flips delay