2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Module 7 STATION AREA PLANNING. Module 7 Station Area Planning Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed.

Advertisements

Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.

Sustainable Orange County Built Environment Subcommittee August 19, 2013.

Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.

February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:

Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor

An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP.

Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.

San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.

Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.

Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc Hartford, CT Study Advisory Committee Meeting #2 April 10, 2014; 4-6 PM Route 1 Corridor Plan Clinton, Westbrook, Old Saybrook,

1 Beyond What If? The Next Phase of the TPB Scenario Study Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Greater Washington 2050.

Community Opportunities The values associated with Smart Growth communities encourage affordable, mixed income housing; higher density; and a vibrant,

VISION FOR A KEARNY TOD February 27, 2008 Rob Lane Regional Plan Association.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.

Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.

Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.

New Trends in Urban Planning and Development and their Impact on Parking, Transit and Community Transportation Presented by: R. C. “Rick” Mobley, ASLA,

1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.

May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.

Official Plan Review - Phase II CITIZEN REFERENCE PANEL.

Public Workshops July 12, 2011 | Napa July 14, 2011 | St. Helena WELCOME!

1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.

TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.

ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.

Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.

Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.

BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.

PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.

Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.

April 15, A.Discussion of the Vision Statement for the 2040 LRTP B.Discussion of Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures C.Presentation and Discussion.

Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.

May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.

1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.

Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO February 2015.

1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.

Healthy Places: The Community of Tomorrow. USA Population 2000 –275 million people –Median age: 35.8 yrs 2030 –351 million people –Median age: 39 yrs.

Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.

EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.

DRAFT Clark County Land Use Categories – Urban Areas 10/8/2015 – Draft, for discussion1.

Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.

Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?

200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.

Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.

Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.

The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.

Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.

Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.

Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.

Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.

City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.

Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.

Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”

ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.

Voorhees Town Center Vision

City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.

Chelan County Transportation Element Update

Reducing GHG emissions from Transportation using Smart Growth

2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House

LRTP Modeling Status Update

LRTP Modeling Status Update

WWPNA General Member Meeting October 16, 2018

2045 LRTP Overview North District Citizens Planning Advisory Committee.

Public Workshop September 26, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014

Constrained Trend Socioeconomic Data Similar to the approach of previous LRTP updates Up to date and consistent with Comp Plans Committees supply a check for local accuracy Land Use Alternative Builds on the Trend Forecast Optimizes land use efficiency Collaborative process to test opportunities

Same Control Totals as the Trend scenario Highlight areas where compact, walkable development has the most impact Support multiple modes (transit, walking) Reduce reliance on regional highway system for everyday trips

1 mile (3 mph) Walk Drive 6 miles (18 mph) Bike 3 miles (9 mph) 20 minutes

An Atlanta Study measured: Land Use Mix Density Connectivity Correlated to: Lower VMT More walk/bike trips Lower emissions “This pattern holds true regardless of many other factors … age, whether they had a driver’s license, their household income, vehicles per household, household size, transit accessibility and regional location” - SMARTRAQ report

Development Focus Corridors DRIs Primary Transit Shed Secondary Transit Shed Special District Special District Shed The Characterization process identifies the most relevant characteristics of different areas within the study area

Make transit convenient and comfortable by promoting mixed use, higher density, and walkability near the transit stations and activity centers Primary Transit Oriented Development Shed -½ mile from station Secondary Transit Influence Shed - 2 miles from station

Appropriate density, mixed use development is necessary for viable multimodal transportation. Where: Along transit routes Along corridors with redevelopment opportunity Along future transit- ready corridors 1 to 4 stories -12 units/acre - 20 jobs/acre Primarily surface parking with one 2-level deck. Mixed Use Office Office Townhouse Residential Mixed Use Retail

The Land Use Subcommittee has been helping to identify characterization areas.

Intensity CategoryAverage Story Height Downtown10-12 stories High5-8 stories Medium3 stories with structured parking Medium-Low3 stories with surface parking Low (Residential)Single Family and Townhouse Other categories Special Districts Industrial Trend TAZ-based Rural Trend Major Existing Plans

Minimal or no difference Less than the trend More than the trend Jobs + Housing Growth Seminole County

GoalAlt. Reduce Congestion ✓ Improve Air Quality ✓ Reduce Energy Dependency ✓ Improve Safety ✓ Improve Accessibility/Reduce Vehicle Dependency ✓ Improve System Operating Efficiency ✓ Typical results from previous studies