Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2010 Math Solutions 21 st Century Arithmetic: Developing Powerful Thinkers Session # 59 Renee Everling Model Schools Conference---Orlando, Florida June.
Advertisements

What Do Parents Need to Know About the Common Core State Standards.
DDI and Assessments in Mathematics: Designing Assessments that Provide Meaningful Data At the 6-12 Level February 4, 2014.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
Integration and Differentiation of Curriculum
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Technology and Motivation
Literacy in the Mathematics Classroom District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
1 Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Parent Math Information Night December 6, 2011 Rebecca Fleming & Noreen Haus.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
The Common Core State Standards at Robert J. Fite Elementary School Information for Parents Back to School Night, August 12, 2014 Adapted from CCSS for.
1.  Connections › Diploma › Standards › Essential Skills › Mathematical Practices › Effective Instruction  Putting it All Together 2.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 3 Content Session.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
Regional Interim Assessment Project (DCA) Session #1 TRICIA PROFIC, ANDREA TAMARAZIO, KIM LOUTTIT & STEVE GRASER.
Understanding the Common Core Kansas Development of Common Core Standards.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University.
STATE-OF-THE-STATE BRIEF: SCIENCE EDUCATION IN FLORIDA DATA BCI Florida Department of Education Bureau of Curriculum and Instruction.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Update for TN State Board of Education July 24, 2013 Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Approaches to Problem Solving. There are many approaches to problem-solving. What follows in this PowerPoint are several that provide an opportunity for.
Math Design Collaborative Overview Amy Lewis and Tiffany Schroyer.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics - Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University.
MH502: Developing Mathematical Proficiency, Geometry and Measurement, K-5 Seminar 1 September 28, 2010.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Next Generation Science Standards “Taking the Steps to Implement NGSS” March 29, 2013 TEEAM Conference.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Common Core State Standards in Kansas. The Common Core State Standards Initiative 2 Beginning in the spring of 2009, Governors and state commissioners.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
California Common Core State Standards for School Counselors.
Common Core State Standards
Teacher Training to Improve Student Learning
Craig T. Gabler KDSL Global Science Specialist
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Model-Eliciting Activities: Dr. Melissa Dyehouse, CPALMS MEA Specialist Dr. Adam Santone, CPALMS Science Specialist Applying Engineering Principles to Science and Mathematics 2012 FCR-STEM Conference

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Agenda  MEA overview and accessing MEAs on CPALMS  MEA activity – Plants vs Pollutants MEA  Group brainstorming and writing  MEA Initiative

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Realistic, open-ended problems with a client  Team-based  Product is the process for solving the problem  A model the client can use  Integrated across subjects  Mathematics  Science  English Language/Arts  Other context areas Model-Eliciting Activities

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Proposed, tested, and refined by hundreds of teachers, parents, and community leaders who worked with researchers. The goals of the project that led to developing the 6 principles were: 6 Principles for Developing MEAs o Solutions to problems should involve important mathematical ideas. o Tasks should emphasize the kinds of problem understandings, characteristics, and abilities needed for success in real-life situations – not just in school settings. o Teachers should be able to gather useful information about their students’ conceptual strengths and weaknesses for more effective teaching. From Lesh et al. (2000)

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Research  Learn about students’ developing knowledge  Formative assessment  Model eliciting = thought-revealing  Learning content  Example: Plants vs Pollutants MEA  Support 21 st century skills  Problem-solving, communication, teamwork How are MEAs used?

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Students read a problem statement (e.g., letter, RFP) from a fictional “client” stating a problem.  Students work in teams to develop a procedure, or model, to give to the client.  Student teams write a letter back to the client explaining their models/procedures.  Students receive a 2 nd problem statement, or “twist”.  Teams test and modify (if needed) their models and write another client letter.  The teams present their work. Basic steps of an MEA

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Toothpaste MEA (grades 2-4 and 3-5 versions): this MEA is based on a children’s book. Students must choose among criteria such as cost and taste to decide the best toothpaste recipes. MEA Examples Turning Tires MEA: 9-12 grade students design a procedure to select the best tire material for certain situations by applying geometric concepts through modeling. Water Filter MEA (grades 2-4 and 3-5 versions): students are asked to develop a procedure for ranking water filters to clean the water for a turtle. Energy Sources MEA (grades 9-11): Students must select the most promising, sustainable, and helpful energy sources to invest in for the future.

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Example Dataset at the Elementary Level  Using the data provided, students must write a letter back to the client explaining their procedure for selecting the best toothpaste recipe. Toothpaste MEA

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Example Dataset at the High-School Level  Using the data provided, students must write a letter back to the client explaining their procedure for selecting the best tire material to use in a given situation. Turning Tires MEA

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Navigate to  Under the “Resource Center” tab, do a keyword search for “MEA” Find MEAs on CPALMS

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University 1.Read the letter from the client. 2.In small groups or with a shoulder partner, develop a procedure for determining how to select the best plants for each research site. Activity – Plants versus Pollutants MEA

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Determine whether your procedure still works with the new data.  If the procedure works, determine if it can be improved upon.  If the procedure does not work, determine if it needs to be tweaked or if additional steps need to be added. Make these changes. Part 2 - Test your procedure Client letter 2 excerpt: Recent efforts in our program have identified a new set of plants that may be of use in our phytoremediation program (see Dataset 2; new plants are shaded) and we would like for your group to evaluate these plants against the earlier set of plants.

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  In what ways is the MEA different from other lessons that you have used in your classroom?  What is something you would change in the Plants vs Pollutants MEA to modify for your students? Debrief

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University MEA-Specific Informational text Client letter 1 Dataset 1 Client letter 2 Dataset 2 Instructional suggestions Letter templates 1 and 2 Lesson Plan-Related Standards Title and description Learning objectives Assessment –Readiness/comprehensi on questions –Reflection questions Prior knowledge Accommodations and Extensions Primary components of an MEA

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Standards alignment  Quality vs quantity  Aligned to at least 2 subject areas for MEAs (e.g., Science and ELA) Standards

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  SC.912.L.17.16: Discuss the large-scale environmental impacts resulting from human activity, including waste spills, oil spills, runoff, greenhouse gases, ozone depletion, and surface and groundwater pollution.  SC.912.N.4.1: Explain how scientific knowledge and reasoning provide an empirically-based perspective to inform society's decision making.  SC.912.N.4.2: Weigh the merits of alternative strategies for solving a specific societal problem by comparing a number of different costs and benefits, such as human, economic, and environmental. NGSSS Science: Plants vs Pollutants

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  MACC.912.F-BF.1.2: Write arithmetic and geometric sequences both recursively and with an explicit formula, use them to model situations, and translate between the two forms.  MACC.912.F-BF.1.1: Write a function that describes a relationship between two quantities. Mathematical Practices  MACC.K12.MP.1.1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them  MACC.K12.MP.2.1: Reason abstractly and quantitatively  MACC.K12.MP.3.1: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others  MACC.K12.MP.4.1: Model with mathematics CCSS Mathematics: Plants vs Pollutants

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Writing Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects Grades 9-12  LACC.910.WHST.1.2: Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/ experiments, or technical processes.  LACC.1112.WHST.1.2: Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/ experiments, or technical processes. CCSS Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: Plants vs Pollutants

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  What skills should students already have in order to successfully learn the selected content standards?  Plants vs Pollutants  Know the structure and function of roots, leaves, and stems  Have a basic familiarity with elements including arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc  Know how to read and interpret data tables Prior Knowledge

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Readiness/comprehension questions  What is the problem?  Who is the client and what are they asking you to do?  What do you need to include in your letter?  What advantages and/or disadvantages might phytoremediation techniques offer?  What characteristics would describe an ideal plant for phytoremediation?  Reflective questions  What are strengths and weaknesses of each type of plant?  If the situation were slightly different, would your plant type need to change?  Who has a different strategy or procedure? Assessment Example: Plants vs Pollutants

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Pumpkins pull pollutants out of contaminated soil  Citation: Graham, S. (October, 2004). Pumpkins pull pollutants out of contaminated soil. Scientific American. Retrieved online from: pollutants&print=true General discussion questions:  Why do you think the researchers tested these five plants?  Why do you think that phytoremediation might be used rather than another technique to remove pollutants?  What are some advantages and disadvantages of phytoremediation? Text dependent questions:  Under what conditions does the article imply that phytoremediation works best?  Why did the researchers use soil from the Canadian Arctic? Informational Texts Example: Plants vs Pollutants

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University Client Letter 1  Provides a realistic context  Provides the problem  Usually a letter from a fictitious client  The first dataset is included with the letter and any additional materials that students need to solve the problem Client Letter 2  Provides a “twist” to the original problem.  The client usually presents a scenario in which new data need to be considered. Problem Scenario: Client Letters 1 and 2

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Open-ended – not a clear choice stands out  Adding a column of qualitative data helps make this more open-ended  If students use simple ranking procedures, it’s good to have ties so then students must prioritize  Typically around 5 columns of “plant types, etc.” and 5 rows of attributes (e.g., plant size, remediation capability) Dataset 1

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Dataset 2 encourages students to test their models and modify them if necessary to fit with new data.  The simplest Dataset 2 adds a couple more rows of data.  An additional column, or attribute, can be added for consideration as well. Dataset 2

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Goals  Publish original, high-quality MEAs on CPALMS  Aligned with Common Core Math and ELA  Freely accessible to all educators on CPALMS  Written so that they are easy to follow for the novice teacher CPALMS Innovative Initiatives with MEAs

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Problem  Scenario  Data Brainstorming SC.912.L.17.16: Discuss the large-scale environmental impacts resulting from human activity, including waste spills, oil spills, runoff, greenhouse gases, ozone depletion, and surface and groundwater pollution.

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  Get involved with the CPALMS MEA Innovative Initiatives and get paid for writing MEAs: Melissa Dyehouse for more information: How to get involved

Copyright ©2012 – Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning Systems Institute – Florida State University  For questions related to MEAs and MEA Development Initiative, contact:  Melissa Dyehouse, CPALMS MEA Coordinator  For questions related to phytoremediation, MEA content, or science standards, contact:  Adam Santone, Science Specialist For more information