Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many Agencies, One Solution Welcome to Washington Silver Jackets Preliminary Meeting Bellevue, Washington 5 August 2010.
Advertisements

Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Interagency.
The Role of Levees in the National Flood Risk Management Program Pete Rabbon June 19, 2008 Hazards Caucus Alliance.
Slide1 Managing Flood Risk U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 July 2009 Presentation.
Flood Risk Management Pete Rabbon Association of State
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Center for Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security Integrating Critical Infrastructure into Emergency Management Programs.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
FEMA Update: Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP Presented on behalf of FEMA by David I. Maurstad, PBS&J.
> > > > Association of State Floodplain Managers.
Flood Risk Management Program Ed Hecker, Chief, Office of Homeland Security National Levee Summit February 2008 St Louis, MO.
FEMA’s Role in National Water Policy Supporting National Water Resource Policy Introduction Sandra K. Knight National Waterways Conference September 22-24,
What’s next in California's flood future? Finding answers: California Water Management Investment Strategy FEMA Region IX - CHARG Stakeholder Meeting July.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Background Roundtable of Federal Hazard Mitigation Partners in the Pacific Islands (FHMPPI) (2002 – 2003) Pacific Risk Management `Ohana (PRiMO) (2004.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Update Stephanie Bray 12/10/2013.
Disaster Reduction & Climate Change Adaptation by Fengmin Kan, UN-ISDR Africa Nairobiwww.unisdr.org.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Approaches As Being Practiced in Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States.
OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements.
Session 4Slide 4-1 Hazards Risk Management In the United States Session 4 Slide Deck.
Infrastructure Challenges in Kentucky Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water 2014 Governor’s Conference on Energy and the Environment.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
Locally Led Conservation Colorado State Conservation Board.
Risk Map Update FGCS Meeting Paul Rooney FEMA January 13 th, 2014.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
1 Slide1 THINGS WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEVEES: CURRENT INITIATIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Presentation to Association of State Flood Plain Managers.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Developing a National Levee Safety Program Mike Stankiewicz - NCLS Arizona Floodplain Management Association November 3, Update on the National.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
1 Slide1 Examples in Communicating Flood Risk: National Flood Risk Management Initiative Presentation to National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit U.S.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Chief, Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
National Levee Safety Act, Title IX, WRDA 2007 Update for Levee Summit Eric Halpin, P.E. Special Assistant for Dam and Levee Safety Headquarters, US Army.
Flash Flood Forecasting as an Element of Multi-Hazard Warning Systems Wolfgang E. Grabs Chief, Water Resources Division WMO.
A National Hazards Information Strategy (NHIS) Helen M. Wood Director, Office of Satellite Data Processing & Distribution “A coordinated approach for using.
IWRSS & Fusion Team Brief Missouri Basin River Forecasters’ Meeting Wednesday, January 29, 2014 Noreen Schwein National Hydrologic Services Policy Leader.
Natural Disaster Reduction and Risk Assessment – Role of USGS Tim Cohn Science Advisor for Hazards U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
St. Louis – February 25-28, 2008 Extremely Successful -Close to 500 Participants  Jointly Sponsored by ASFPM & NASMA – Supported by Corps and FEMA High.
Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.
Advanced Topics in Risk Communication: Skills and Techniques for Flood Risk Managers Sharing Responsibility of Risk 2012 USACE Flood Risk Management and.
Mitigation Directorate FEMA’s Mitigation Directorate and Hurricane Emergency Management The Mitigation Directorate supports Hurricane risk assessment and.
Mississippi River Recovery Task Force Bob Hainly Task Force Member 2012 USACE Flood Risk Management Representing: and Silver Jackets Workshop USGS Water.
Catharine Cyr Ransom Principal The Accord Group. Stafford Act Structured approach to disasters Partnership between local, state, Federal governments Authority.
Advanced Topics in Risk Communication: Skills and Techniques for Flood Risk Managers KY Risk Communication Toolbox 2012 USACE Flood Risk Management and.
FEMA’s Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration -- Leading the Nation to Build a Stronger, Smarter, Safer America MITIGATION WORKS Sandra K. Knight,
Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.
Dawn Ganje, Marketing Management and Colleen MacRae, Polk County Collaborative – MACMH September 2006 Challenge and Opportunity:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® December 2013 Update for the NAFSMA Annual Meeting.
How Katrina Impacted the Corps, and Implications for Those Living Near Water1 Slide1 Examples in Quantifying Flood Risk Presentation to National Flood.
0 FEMA Region 6 Floods: The Response and the Costs Bob Bennett Response Division FEMA Region 6.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Peter Gabrielsen Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Eastern Region NOAA’s.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
December 16 th, 2009 Presented by Jennifer DiLorenzo, M.S., CFM Sustainable Coastal Community Liaison Developed in Cooperation with the ASFPM 1 Floodplain.
National Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management Summit Cambridge, Maryland National Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management Summit Cambridge,
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
Introduction to Silver Jackets Flood risk management teams reducing flood risk through integrated planning, response and recovery. No Adverse Impact Workshop.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2011 Flood Recovery The Benefits of Collaboration Maria de la Torre Chief, Emergency Management Baltimore.
Dr. John T. Wells, Dean and Director, VIMS Dr. Mark W. Luckenbach, Associate Dean, VIMS Dr. Morris Foster, Vice President for Research, ODU February 24,
BUILDING STRONG SM Revitalizing and Expanding Partnerships Charles E. Shadie, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer Mississippi Valley Division U.S. Army Corps.
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
Silver Jackets Orientation
“Operationalizing” Inter-Agency Flood Risk Management
Presentation transcript:

Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Objective Develop an integrated national flood risk management strategy to protect public safety through a reduction in damage and suffering caused by flood and coastal storm events. Overriding principles of the Flood Risk Management Program are collaboration and partnership.

Flood Risk Management Program Vision: To lead collaborative, comprehensive and sustainable national flood risk management to improve public safety and reduce flood damages to our country. Mission: To integrate and synchronize the ongoing, diverse flood risk management projects, programs and authorities within the US Army Corps of Engineers and with counterpart projects, programs and authorities of FEMA, other Federal agencies, state organizations and regional and local agencies. National Flood Risk Management Program

Flood Risk Management Program 1.Provide current accurate floodplain information to the public and decision makers. 2.Identify and assess flood hazards posed by aging flood damage reduction infrastructure. 3.Improve public awareness and comprehension of flood risk. 4.Integrate flood damage and flood hazard reduction programs across local, State, and Federal agencies. 5.Improve capabilities to collaboratively deliver and sustain flood damage reduction and flood hazard mitigation services to the nation. Strategic Goals

Current Activities FEMA flood map modernization Comprehensive National inventory and database of flood damage reduction structures Assessment of condition of flood damage reduction structures – levee certification for map modernization Strategy: USACE and FEMA working jointly throughout cycle of floodplain mapping and levee certification

Current Corps Activities with FEMA FEMA’s Interagency Levee Policy Review Committee – USGS is a participant Meetings between FEMA, Corps, National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies (NAFSMA), Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) (Interagency Flood Risk Management Committee) National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit hosted by NAFSMA and ASFPM

Potential Collaboration with USGS USGS Mission: USGS serves the Nation by providing reliable scientific information to describe and understand the Earth; minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water. USGS (along with NOAA/NWS) are leaders in flood information, flood data, and flood science. What are our challenges?

Flood Risk Communication Challenge  Lack of Understanding of True National Flood Risk  Perception of flood risk equates only to the presence or absence of mandatory flood insurance requirements.  There is no common vocabulary between Federal, State, and local agencies when dealing with public on flood risk issues. Strategy  Work with stakeholders to develop a flood risk communication strategy.

Flood Data Challenges  Communication of real-time flood data.  Funding for a stable network of stream gages.  FEMA support of National Streamflow Information Program (NSIP). Strategy  Improve Federal agency dialog.  USGS-NWS-FEMA-USACE collaboration.

Flood Research Needs Challenges  Improve flood risk information for flood risk management  Implications of using 1%-annual probability flood standard: How frequently does 1% event occur across multiple communities over time?  Changes in flood risk over time How have the consequences of flooding changed over time as development in floodplain has increased? How has the probability of flooding changed over time?

Bring together Federal, state and local agencies Initiate a team in each State Focus on State priorities Will not duplicate similar efforts  Establish relationships where they don’t exist  Strengthen existing relationships  Supplement successful teams Lead facilitators: USACE, FEMA, State flood insurance coordinators, and State Emergency Management Agencies Current Interagency Flood Risk Mitigation Efforts

Purpose of Silver Jackets Provide life-cycle hazard planning Develop and maintain strong partnerships Improve processes, identify gaps, and make recommendations Leverage resources and information Be active participants with State-wide planning

Will this work? Pilot Team - Ohio Team members: USACE, FEMA, USGS, NWS, NRCS, EDA, HUD, OEPA, ODNR, OEMA, ODOD Mission Statement:....is an implementation sub-team of the State of Ohio Mitigation Team dedicated to creating a collaborative environment to bring together Federal, State, local, and other stakeholders to develop and implement solutions to natural hazard response and mitigation problems. Started with pilot community – Marietta  Identify risks and different levels of risk.  Identify Marietta mitigation goals.  Identify agencies and POCs/programs/processes for each feasible measure.  Identify possible funding sources (federal, state, and local).

Silver Jackets in Ohio and USGS Jim Morris, District Chief, USGS – “The USGS Ohio Water Science Center supports the collaboration of the various Federal, state, and local agencies, as proposed by the Silver Jackets Program, to explore innovative options for natural-hazard mitigation at the local level. Of particular value is the effort to maximize taxpayers’ investment by using a collaborative approach to potentially combine various partners’ programs and resources, resulting in more complete and cost-effective solution strategies.”

Flood Risk Management Program 1.Provide current accurate floodplain information to the public and decision makers. 2.Identify and assess flood hazards posed by aging flood damage reduction infrastructure. 3.Improve public awareness and comprehension of flood risk. 4.Integrate flood damage and flood hazard reduction programs across local, State, and Federal agencies. 5.Improve capabilities to collaboratively deliver and sustain flood damage reduction and flood hazard mitigation services to the nation. Potential Collaboration with USGS