Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
PLANTATION HIGH PDR PRESENTATION Team 1. VEHICLE DIMENSION & MATERIALS.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred Meissner, Cameron Borgal Preliminary Design Report Submission Deadline: October 29, 2012

Overview Objective Vehicle Design Materials and Justification Vehicle Safety Major Components Recovery Design Payload Design

Objective The UNH Rocket Cats aim to create a Rocket Based Deployable Data Network (RBDDN). The objective is to design a low cost data network that can be deployed rapidly over a large area utilizing rockets.

Vehicle Design Vehicle Dimensions 67.75” in length 4.014” Outer Diameter ” Span Diameter

Materials & Justification ComponentMaterialJustification Nose Cone  PNC-3.9 Plastic Nose Cone  16.75” length  3” Collar  Easily manufactured  Designed to contain electronics bay Vehicle  4” Blue Tube  51” length  Strength  Impact Resistance  Cost Bulkheads  Fiberglass  Rigidity  Strength Motor Mount  Fiberglass  Rigidity  Strength Fins  Fiberglass  Rigidity  Strength

Stability Margin Static Stability Margin – Center of Pressure – ” from the nose tip Center of Gravity – ” from the nose tip

Vehicle Safety Equipment Concerns: – Black Powder – Hazardous Materials – Motor Precautions: – Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for related material – Mentor and safety officer on site for supervision

Motor Safety Pre-Launch – Appropriate motor selection – Full inspection of motor assembly and compartment – Safe distance before launch Post-Launch – Allow motor to cool before handling

Motor Selection Cesaroni Technology Inc. K400-GR-13 Reloadable Motor Total Length: 15.9 in Diameter: 2.13 in Launch Mass: 54.7 oz Total Impulse: 1595 Ns Average Thrust: 399 N Maximum Thrust: 475 N Burn Time: 4 s Thrust to weight ratio: 5.9:1 Exit Rail Velocity: 55.5 ft/s

Motor Justification The primary reasoning for this motor choice is to reach the 1 mile apogee goal Sufficient thrust to achieve safe rail exit velocity Iterative approach to select motor based on OpenRocket simulations The size of the motor fits very well in our vehicle design

Launch Vehicle Verification and Test Plan Overview Verification of Vehicle Components – Perform tensile testing on all the load bearing portions of the recovery system – Perform compression testing on the tubing and all other necessary portions of the vehicle Conducting planned test launches – To ensure payload electronics are working – Parachutes deploy properly – Sustains stable flight

Recovery Subsystem 3 Event Recovery System: Drogue parachute deployment at apogee Payload deployment at Range Safety Officer announcement Main parachute deployment at 700ft

Vehicle Recovery System ComponentPart Choice AltimeterADEPT22 Drogue ParachutePublic Missile Works PAR-30 Main ParachuteSky Angle Classic 36 Electric MatchesRocketFlite MF-12 Fully redundant recovery circuit #4-40 nylon screws for shear pins Black powder charges for separation

Payload Recovery System Ejection charge initiated by signal from ground station Nose cone separates and lands independently with PAR-24 parachute Utilize one way bulkhead to ensure that vehicle recovery system is not compromised

One Way Bulkhead Ejection charges will remove bulkhead from only one direction Shear pins to hold in bulkhead

Payload Design Primary Payload – Raspberry Pi – Sensor Suite (coincides with SMD) – GPS – XBee Pro 900 Secondary Payload – Raspberry Pi – GPS – Xbee Pro 900

Payload Design

Payload Verification Power: Payloads will require power for a minimum of 2.5 hours. Our goal will be to have enough power for 5 hours. The amount of required power will be calculated and tested Data Acquisition: Testing will be done by collecting data from all sensors and analyzing the results Network: Both payloads will be tested by being able to successfully communicate with each other

Payload Verification Data storage: Payloads will be given data to store over the network. Successful storage will be tested Location tracking: Payloads will have a GPS module. Correct location data will be tested Network Range: Payloads will be required to be able to communicate and maintain a network at a distance of 1 mile. Our goal of 2 miles will be tested with a clear line of sight for 2 miles and analyzing signal loss