Improved Land Modeling for Drought Monitoring and Seasonal Hydrological Prediction Including Groundwater Mickael Ek, Rongqian Yang, Youlong Xia, Jesse.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land surface in climate models Parameterization of surface fluxes Bart van den Hurk (KNMI/IMAU)
Advertisements

Consortium October 4, Hits: Canadians Don’t Give Up.
Development of the Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RACM) --- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Dec, 2009.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
New Directions for WRF Land Surface Modeling 1 Polar WRF Workshop – 3 November 2011 Michael Barlage Research Applications Laboratory (RAL) National Center.
Some Approaches and Issues related to ISCCP-based Land Fluxes Eric F Wood Princeton University.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
Are the results of PILPS or GSWP affected by the lack of land surface- atmosphere feedback? Is the use of offline land surface models in LDAS making optimal.
Land Surface Models & Surface Water Hydrology Cédric DAVID.
Warm Season Precipitation Predictions over North America with the Eta Regional Climate Model Model Sensitivity to Initial Land States and Choice of Domain.
MODELING OF COLD SEASON PROCESSES Snow Ablation and Accumulation Frozen Ground Processes.
Improvement of Land Surface Parameters and States: Diagnosing Forecast and Model Deficiencies Michael Barlage (NCAR) Xubin Zeng (UA), Patrick Broxton (UA),
Rongqian Yang, Ken Mitchell, Jesse Meng Impact of Different Land Models & Different Initial Land States on CFS Summer and Winter Reforecasts Acknowledgment.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
NCA-LDAS Meeting, Sept 23, 2014 NCA-LDAS: An Integrated Terrestrial Water Analysis System for the National Climate Assessment “Water Indicators” Hiroko.
The role of vegetation-climate interaction on Africa under climate change - literature review seminar Minchao Wu Supervisor: Markku Rummukainen, Guy Schurgers.
UMAC data callpage 1 of 11NLDAS EMC Operational Models North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) Michael Ek Land-Hydrology Team Leader Environmental.
Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Evaluation of snow simulations from CAM2/CLM2.0.
1 G.-Y. Niu, 1 Z.-L. Yang, 2 K. E. Mitchell, 3 F. Chen, 2 M. B. Ek, 3 M. Barlage, et al. 1 DGS, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin 2 NCEP, NOAA-NWS,
Zong-Liang Yang Guo-Yue Niu, Enrique Rosero, Xiaoyan Jiang, and Lindsey Gulden Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson.
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
Enhancing the Value of GRACE for Hydrology
NW NCNE SCSESW Rootzone: TOTAL PERCENTILEANOMALY Noah VEGETATION TYPE 2-meter Column Soil Moisture GR2/OSU LIS/Noah 01 May Climatology.
1 NCEP Production Suite Review: “Land Surface Guidance Systems” EMC Land-Hydrology Team: Michael Ek, Jesse Meng, Rongqian Yang, Helin Wei, Youlong Xia,
Thrusts of Noah LSM Development and Land Data Assimilation at NCEP: recent ops upgrades, testbeds, validation, recent lessons, physics changes, calibration,
Diagram for the model structures Snow Cover and Runoff in Western China Guo-Yue Nu and Zong-Liang Yang The Dept. of Geological Sciences, The University.
NCEP Production Suite Review: Land-Hydrology at NCEP
Land Surface Processes in Global Climate Models (1)
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Regional Climate Simulations of summer precipitation over the United States and Mexico Kingtse Mo, Jae Schemm, Wayne Higgins, and H. K. Kim.
How much do different land models matter for climate simulation? Jiangfeng Wei with support from Paul Dirmeyer, Zhichang Guo, Li Zhang, Vasu Misra, and.
IUFRO_20051 Variations of land water storage over the last half century K. Laval, T. Ngo-duc, J. Polcher University PM Curie Paris/Lab Meteor Dyn /IPSL.
NCEP Production Suite Review: “Land Surface Guidance Systems” EMC Land-Hydrology Team: Michael Ek, Jesse Meng, Rongqian Yang, Helin Wei, Youlong Xia,
Rongqian Yang, Kenneth Mitchell, Jesse Meng NCEP Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) Summer and Winter Season Reforecast Experiments with the NCEP Coupled.
Progress of CTB Transition Project Team for Land Data Assimilation: Impact on CFS of: A) new land model (Noah LSM) B) new land initial conditions (from.
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
Part I: Representation of the Effects of Sub- grid Scale Topography and Landuse on the Simulation of Surface Climate and Hydrology Part II: The Effects.
1 Transitioning Land Surface Skin Temperature and Snow Improvement to Operation at NCEP/EMC Xubin Zeng (University of Arizona, Tucson) Zhuo Wang (NESDIS)
Sampling Network in Illinois Impact of Water Table Dynamics on Hydrological Simulation of the NCAR CLM Min Hui Lo, Pat J.-F. Yeh, and James S. Famiglietti.
Implementation and preliminary test of the unified Noah LSM in WRF F. Chen, M. Tewari, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, NCAR K. Mitchell, M. Ek, NCEP G. Gayno, J. Wegiel,
Current and Future Initialization of WRF Land States at NCEP Ken Mitchell NCEP/EMC WRF Land Working Group Workshop 18 June 2003.
Oceanic forcing of Sahel rainfall on interannual to interdecadal time scales A. Giannini (IRI) R. Saravanan (NCAR) and P. Chang (Texas A&M) IRI for climate.
The lower boundary condition of the atmosphere, such as SST, soil moisture and snow cover often have a longer memory than weather itself. Land surface.
NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting February , 2008 Boulder, CO.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 WP5.3 Assessment of Forecast Quality ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Kick Off Meeting, Paris, Feb 2005 Richard Graham.
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
Diagnosis of Performance of the Noah LSM Snow Model *Ben Livneh, *D.P. Lettenmaier, and K. E. Mitchell *Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Washington.
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
Matt Rodell NASA GSFC Multi-Sensor Snow Data Assimilation Matt Rodell 1, Zhong-Liang Yang 2, Ben Zaitchik 3, Ed Kim 1, and Rolf Reichle 1 1 NASA Goddard.
Initialization of the Noah Land Surface Model and its Coupling to CFS Ken Mitchell, Rongqian Yang, Jesse Meng and EMC Land Team Environmental Modeling.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
Land surface memory & hydrological cycle over the U.S. west coast states & monsoon region Yun Fan and Huug van del Dool CPC/NCEP/NOAA
Upgrading Community Land Model (CLM) Hydrology Incorporation of the VIC Surface Runoff and Baseflow Schemes Kaiyuan Y. Li and Dennis P. Lettenmaier University.
Rongqian Yang Ken Mitchell, Jesse Meng, Helin Wei, George Gayno NCEP Environmental Modeling Center Summer Season Predictions with the Next NCEP CFS Using.
North American Regional Climate Simulations with WRF/Noah-MP: Validation and the effect of groundwater interaction Michael Barlage Mukul Tewari, Fei Chen,
Community Land Model (CLM)
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Improving the Land Surface Component of the CFS Reanalysis
Improving the Land Surface Component of the CFS Reanalysis
Introduction to Land Information System (LIS)
Multimodel Ensemble Reconstruction of Drought over the Continental U.S
Runoff Simulations in Region12 (or almost the State of Texas)
Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties
Multimodel Ensemble Reconstruction of Drought over the Continental U.S
J.T. Kiehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Presentation transcript:

Improved Land Modeling for Drought Monitoring and Seasonal Hydrological Prediction Including Groundwater Mickael Ek, Rongqian Yang, Youlong Xia, Jesse Meng, and Jiarui Dong NOAA/NCEP/EMC Drought Task Force Telecon, 25 Feb 2014

Contributors to Drought Land and Sea Surface Temperature. Atmospheric Circulation Patterns. Soil Moisture (land surface modeling). 2

3 Land Surface Modeling Exchange processes with the atmosphere o oMomentum o oEnergy (reflected shortwave, emitted longwave, latent/sensible heat) o oWater (precipitation, evapotranspiration) o oTrace gases (CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O etc) Land-memory processes o oVegetation phenology o oSnow/ice cover o oSoil moisture o oGroundwater Intraseasonal to Interannual Variability

. A combined surface layer of vegetation canopy and ground. Such a layer structure impedes further developments on dynamic vegetation model. A bulk layer of snow and soil. The ground heat flux can not be accurately resolved for a thick snowpack. Too shallow soil column (2-meter deep) and free drainage at the soil bottom. Groundwater effects are neglected. Too impervious frozen soil; too strong runoff peaks in cold regions. Neglect of the effects of zero-displacement height (d 0 ) on CH; thus a smaller CH over forest regions. Limitations in Noah LSM 4

5 Noah-MP

Noah-MP is an extended version of the Noah LSM with enhanced Multi-Physics options to address critical shortcomings in Noah Canopy radiative transfer with shading geometry Separate vegetation canopy Dynamic vegetation Ball-Berry canopy resistance Multi-layer snowpack Snowpack liquid water retention Ground water/Interaction with aquifer Snow albedo treatment New frozen soil scheme New snow cover shaded fraction What is Noah-MP? 6

Noah-MP is an extended version of the Noah LSM with enhanced Multi-Physics options to address critical shortcomings in Noah Canopy radiative transfer with shading geometry Separate vegetation canopy Dynamic vegetation Ball-Berry canopy resistance Multi-layer snowpack Snowpack liquid water retention Ground water/Interaction with aquifer Snow albedo treatment New frozen soil scheme New snow cover What is Noah-MP? 7

4-layer soil 3-layer snow What is Noah-MP? 8 Noah-MP is an extended version of the Noah LSM with enhanced Multi-Physics options to address critical shortcomings in Noah Canopy radiative transfer with shading geometry Separate vegetation canopy Dynamic vegetation Ball-Berry canopy resistance Multi-layer snowpack Snowpack liquid water retention Ground water/Interaction with aquifer Snow albedo treatment New frozen soil scheme New snow cover

9 What is Noah-MP? Noah-MP is an extended version of the Noah LSM with enhanced Multi-Physics options to address critical shortcomings in Noah Canopy radiative transfer with shading geometry Separate vegetation canopy Dynamic vegetation Ball-Berry canopy resistance Multi-layer snowpack Snowpack liquid water retention Groundwater Interaction with aquifer Snow albedo treatment New frozen soil scheme New snow cover

10 Water Table Depth Looks similar to terrain, 2 m are too shallow Courtesy of Mike Barlage

Noah-MP contains several options for land surface processes: 1.Dynamic vegetation/vegetation coverage (4 options – default: off) 2.Canopy stomatal resistance (2 options – default: Ball-Berry) 3.Canopy radiation geometry (3 options – default: shadows – f(sun)) 4.Soil moisture factor for stomatal resistance (3 options – default: Noah) 5.Runoff and groundwater (4 options – default: TOPMODEL) 6.Surface layer exchange coefficients (4 options – default: MP M-O) 7.Supercooled soil liquid water/ice fraction (2 options – default: no iter) 8.Frozen soil permeability options (2 options – default: linear effects) 9.Snow surface albedo (2 options – default: CLASS) 10.Rain/snow partitioning (3 options – default: Jordan f(T) ) 11.Lower soil boundary condition (2 options – default: fixed bottom T) 12.Snow/soil diffusion solution (2 options – default: flux boundary) Total of ~50,000 combination can be used as multi-physics ensemble members Ensemble surface Physics with Noah- MP 11

12 Comparisons of Noah-MP Simulation with Satellite LAI and GVF Yang et al. (2011) LAIGreenness Vegetation Fraction Model Satellite Offline Simulation Very good agreement in global average

Comparison of Noah-MP Water Storage Change with GRACE 13 Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Total Water Storage, with ground water an important component) Niu et al. (2011) Yang et al. (2011) Offline Simulation

What Noah-MP can be used for? Facilitate physically-based ensemble climate predictions (incl. drought). Identify optimal combinations of parameterization schemes. Identify critical processes controlling the land- atmosphere coupling strength. 14

Application in CFS Experiments Design and Configurations Cntrl CFS (Noah 2.7) Ops GFS + Noah 2.7 with old ssib veg + zobler soil Exp CFS (Noah MP) Ops GFS + Noah MP with new modis veg + statsgo soil 1.Use 4 ensemble members with Initial Conditions from 00z of May 1-4 over 2.Selected 11 years:82,86,87,88,91,96,99,00,07,11,12 (MJJ, Ňino 3.4) 3.Including warm, cold and neutral ENSO indices 15 Coupled warm-season prediction

16 CFS JJA Precipitation ACC Skill Noah MP Noah 2.7 Noah MP performs better A nomaly C orrelation C oefficient (centered)

Soil Moisture Climatology 17 Noah MP Noah 2.7 (layer 4; 11 yrs.) Averaged over July + August Noah MP with ground water wetter

Latent Heat Climatology 18 CFSR (31 Yrs) Noah 2.7 (11 Yrs) Noah MP (11 Yrs) NARR (31 Yrs) Averaged over July + August Noah MP predicts the similar LH gradient/patterns shown in the reanalyses

Summer Precipitation Anomaly (2011 Texas Drought ) 19 July August

Precipitation Comparison (2011) July August 20 Noah 2.7 Noah MP Obs

Summer T2m Comparison (2011) July August 21 Noah 2.7 Noah MP Obs

Summary/Future Plan Enhanced Noah land model: Noah MP with ground water, improved vegetation phenology, and snowpack improves CFS precipitation performance, which is important to drought prediction. The Multi-Parameterization (MP) framework allows for multi- hypothesis testing and understanding of parameterization interaction. New ICs needed (GLDAS, especially ground water). Add river routing. Assimilate GRACE data into Noah-MP to improve NLDAS and USDM drought monitoring task. 22