2. Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Evaluation of snow simulations from CAM2/CLM2.0 Research was funded under NASA grant NAG5-12577

3. Outline  Brief Introduction of Snow-related Schemes Snowfall Snowpack physics Snow albedo Snow cover fraction  Evaluation of Wintertime Surface Albedo and Snow Depth Wintertime surface albedo and snow depth Main factors affecting wintertime surface albedo Sensitivity studies  A new Snow Cover Fraction Scheme  Evaluation of Snowfall  Summary and Future work

4. Introduction 1. Over the past century, the largest global warming has occurred in the high latitude areas (Houghton et al, 2001) 2. The CAM2/CLM2 produced a significant warm bias in snow-covered regions during wintertime 3. The goal of this study is to investigate how this warm bias is related to the representation of snow processes in CAM2/CLM2

5. Snow-related Parameterization Schemes in CAM2/CLM2 in Comparison with CCM3/LSM1.0 CCM3/LSMCAM2/CLM2 Snowfall Snowpack Physics Snow Albedo SCF Ts<Tfrz+2.0T(b3)<Tfrz–2.0 1-L No Liquid water No densification 5-L Liquid water Densification Marshall (1989)BATS LSM1.0 BATS Consequences in SWE – + + – – –

6. Snow Cover Fraction Schemes Two 12-year Experiments: 1.Control run with default SCF scheme 2. Modified run with the Yang et al. (1997) SCF scheme Yang et al (1997) scheme has been tested by Roesch et al (2000) at T106. Applicable to flat, non-forested areas.

7. Wintertime Surface Albedo (FEB) MODIS CLM2/Yang CLM2/ Default CLM2/default produced higher surface albedo in boreal forest regions, lower surface albedo in mid-latitude regions. However, CLM2/Yang improved the surface albedo simulations in mid-latitude regions.

8. Wintertime Surface Albedo – regional averages Mid-latitude grass/cropland Regions Boreal Forest Regions OBS Default Yang

9. Snow Depth – regional averages Mid-latitude grass/cropland Regions Boreal Forest Regions OBS Default Yang

10. Factors Affecting Wintertime Land Surface Albedo  Vegetation shading factors  Tree cover fraction  Leaf/stem area index  Vegetation height (canopy fraction buried by snow)  Snow on canopy  Tree cover fraction  Interception capacity  Meteorological conditions (wind, temperature)  Ground snow covered fraction (SCF)  Ground surface roughness length  Snow depth  Snow properties  Grain radius  Impurity

11. The model prescribed tree (needleleaf & broadleaf) cover fraction from the 1- km IGBP DISCover dataset and the 1- km University of Maryland tree cover dataset (Bonan et al, 2002) The tree cover fraction is between 40- 60% meaning a significant fraction of open areas for potentially high surface albedo. Tree Cover Fraction in CAM2/CLM2

12. The modeled effective leaf area index (after buried by snow) is higher than the AVHRR values, especially in boreal forest regions. LAI & SAI in CAM2/CLM2 (February) AVHRR CAM2/CLM2 CCM3/LSM

13. Over 80 percent of canopy is buried by snow in the high latitude tundra areas. Fraction of Canopy Buried by Snow in CAM2/CLM2

14. Four 1-month Sensitivity Experiments Mid-latitude grass/cropland Regions Boreal Forest Regions default: CAM2/CLM2 default run run1: No snow effects on canopy albedo run2:Yang et al. (1997) SCF scheme run3:Doubling LAI & SAI

15. S pectral-integrated albedo as function of (LAI+SAI)

16. Surface Air Temperature (February) The significant warm bias both in Eurasia and North America from the default CAM2/CLM2 is largely reduced by using the Yang et al (1997) SCF scheme CLM2/Yang – OBS CLM2/Default – OBS

17. Regional Averaged Snow Depth Yang et al (1997) SCF scheme produced too much snow and a cold bias in melting season Mid-latitude grass/cropland Regions Boreal Forest Regions EurasiaNorth America

18. Observed Depletion Curve in Melting Season in a Small Watershed Fractional Snow Covered Area Basin Avg. SWE / Maximum Basin Avg. SWE Upper Sheep Creek Watershed, Idaho (26 ha) From Luce & Tarboton (1999)

19. A New Snow Cover Fraction Need further validation with high resolution snow cover and snow depth data

20. Wintertime Surface Air Temperature Default-OBS (DJF) NEW-OBS (DJF)

21. Melting Season Surface Air Temperature Default-OBS (MAM) NEW-OBS (MAM)

22. Regional Averaged Snow Depth Mid-latitude Grass/cropland Regions Boreal Forest Regions EurasiaNorth America Improved simulations of snow depth in mid- latitude areas

23. Snowfall Estimation using Monthly T and Prec Observations Legates & Willmott (1990)

24. Evaluation of Snowfall (MAM) Global Air Temperature and Precipitation (V. 2.01) (Willmott and Matsuura, 1995) CAM2-CCM3 CCM3-OBS CAM2-OBS

25. Regional Averages of Snowfall Europe North AmericaEurasia Northwest NA CAM2/CLM2 improved the snowfall simulations in fall and spring seasons compared to CCM3/LSM, but underestimated snowfall in winter season.

26. Ongoing Work Using high resolution datasets of snow cover, land surface albedo and snow depth  To analyze the relationship between SCF and snow depth  To analyze the relationship between SCF and seasons  To analyze the relationship between SCF and sub-grid topography  To parameterize SCF as function of snow depth, canopy height (land cover), season, and sub-grid topography Funded by a 3-year NASA grant

27. Summary The snow simulations have been assessed using observed climatology of snow depth, temperature and MODIS-derived surface albedo. The CAM2/CLM2 produced shallower than observed snow depth and lower surface albedo, which coincide with a warm bias in mid-latitude regions in wintertime. The shallower snow depth and lower surface albedo may be largely due to an inappropriate SCF parameterization scheme. A new SCF scheme, which differentiates snow cover patterns during accumulation and melt periods, improves the simulations of snow depth, surface albedo, and surface air temperature. CAM2/CLM2 improved snowfall simulations in fall and spring seasons compared to CCM3/LSM, but underestimated snowfall in winter season.