Jefferson County Parks Initiative David Heyman and Brian Wright.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acton Quarry – Proposed Extension Natural Environment Pre-Submission Liaison Committee Information Session January 22, 2009.
Advertisements

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Presentation of Hope Valley Nature is the living, visible garment of God. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ®
Chesapeake Bay Commission Meeting November 8, 2012 Vienna Community Center Protecting the Nanticoke River: Saving the Landscape Tim Brower Land Acquisition.
North-East Columbia Sub-Area Plan May 20 Informational Sharing and Gathering.
Essex Region Conservation Authority Brad Arsenault & Kaylyn Boyd.
General Management Planning Public Input Open House 2011 DNR Parks & Recreation Division Assisted by Birchler Arroyo Associates.
1 The Challenge Preserving forest cover, parkland and open space can help to meet needs for water quality, air quality, recreation and wildlife habitat.
Draft Kane County 2040 Green Infrastructure Plan Energy and Environment Committee November 14, 2013.
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Where Wildlife Comes First!
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Dead Man’s Pond – Gould Property Puyallup City Council March 27, 2012
April 22,  Since 1891, serving individuals with developmental disabilities  Originally 1,670 acres  In 1975 approx. 160 acres were transferred.
Coconino Parks and Open Space Program Coconino County Parks & Recreation Vision To provide recreational opportunities by developing and managing regional.
Land Chapter 14. Land Use, Land Cover  _________________: farming, mining, building cities and highways and recreation  ___________________: what you.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Green Infrastructure in Central Indiana Cliff Chapman Conservation Director Central Indiana Land Trust
Door County Comprehensive Plan 2030 Visioning Meeting: County Background and Trend Information Door County Planning Department April 18 th, 2007.
Overview of Watershed Systems
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources.
Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research and Science Presented by: Jessica Stubbs, Natural Resources Specialist.
Todd Ambs Water Division Administrator, WDNR October 26, 2009 Sustaining the Water Belt of North America.
Chapter 18 Land Resources and Conservation. Vocabulary  Urban- city/high density  Rural- sparsely populated areas.
Land Chapter 14.
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Development of Lantau Island. Background of the development Lantau Island is the biggest island in Hong Kong Well recognized for its nature conservation.
Community Forests: June, 2005 Changes in Timberland Ownership The New Hampshire Experience - By Paul Doscher Society for the Protection of NH Forests.
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
LandSection 3 Rural Land Management The main categories of rural land – farmland –rangeland –forest land –national and state parks, and wilderness Condition.
MARYLAND’S SMART GROWTH and LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS/PARTNERSHIPS State of Maryland Parris N. Glendening, Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Lt. Governor.
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Greenways enhance the visual character and walkability of.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Chapter 14. Objectives 1.Distinguish between urban and rural land. 2.Describe three major ways in which humans use land. 3.Explain the concept of ecosystem.
Land Chapter 14. How we use land  Land usage- –Rangeland= used for grazing and wildlife –Forest land= used for harvesting wood, wildlife, fish, and other.
PART I: COMMUNITY PRESERVATION Stewardship and Maintenance Christine M. Chale, Esq. Rodenhausen Chale LLP
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
Laguna Canyon Creek Protection and Restoration. Major Watercourse Laguna Canyon Creek is a major watercourse. The City identifies it as that and treats.
EPA-Great Lakes The US Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, applies the WBD to many facets of their programs. Using Subwatershed (5th-level, 10-digit.
PRIME WETLAND STUDY OF FITZWILLIAM – INITIAL FINDINGS Dr. Rick Van de Poll Ecosystem Management Consultants Sandwich NH.
White County Greenways Trails and Byways Presentation.
The Cascade Agenda: A New Model for Land Conservation Narragansett Bay Estuary Program Conference May 1, 2009 John Howell Board Member Cascade Land Conservancy.
Spatial Changes in Public School Enrollments in Wisconsin Mitch Collins.
Headwaters in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Ontario is a huge province, with extensive headwater areas. Given the size and variety of the landscape, this.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Potential Neighborhood Development Strategies 158 acres Close.
Terre Haute, IN Sara Fisher. Vigo County [highlighted] is in East Central Indiana The site is located in central Vigo County There are three main sections.
GMRPTC System and Criteria Tutorial Planning for Regional Parks & Trails in Greater Minnesota Tutorial instructions and information provided in red.
Art. X, Section 28, Fla. Const. Amendment I 2015 Cari L. Roth, Esq. July 20, 2016.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
Town of Harvard Conservation Commission
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
St. Croix County Land Acquisition Eckert Family, LLLP
Lancaster County Conservancy Long Range Protection Plan
Mission “The Natural Resources Department manages Larimer County's great outdoor places, including open spaces and water-based recreation areas, and fosters.
Reclaimed Water Funding
The Kootenai Valley parcel is 996 acres and is owned by the Hubbard family.
The Blackfoot Community Project
LMA Mapping Issue: To implement the planning principles, need a map identifying the various landscape management areas Solution: Create a map that identifies.
IMPLEMENTING AMENDMENT 1
Development of Lantau Island
The Silver Maple Forest (Belmont Uplands) & The Impact of Development
Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY – WISCONSIN
Presentation transcript:

Jefferson County Parks Initiative David Heyman and Brian Wright

Capstone Statement The Jefferson County Parks Department and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources have identified Jefferson County as a critical area to establish more outdoor recreational opportunities. We are proposing to enhance these two visions by selecting the most productive area within the county to establish a new a park area that would be complimentary with the existing park system, preserve natural features, and establish a diverse amount of recreational opportunities for the local and regional needs.

Factors: County is in the fastest growing area of the state Land value directly affects the acquisition of new public land Contains some the world’s beast examples of glacial drumlin areas Contains some of the best agricultural soils in the state The county needs to act now to acquire park and open space for recreation and preservation of natural resources. Jefferson County Parks Initiative Goal: Select the most ideal location that could provide an array of recreational opportunities, preserve unique physical attributes of the Wisconsin landscape, and expand existing park system within a contiguous area. Problem:To identify which park areas has diverse physical attributes and recreational opportunities that preserve to benefit to the public and the potential to expand into a an area 100 acres or greater in size.

The Importance of Recreation Background: Opportunities to expand recreational facilities in this landscape are diminishing as residential development continues to expand into the rural countryside. Our study focused on areas that could be restored to provide a wide range of activities in order to meet the future needs. Study Area: Jefferson County is located in south central Wisconsin between Milwaukee and Madison metropolitan areas. The county is also 70 miles northwest of Chicago, Illinois. These large urban areas greatly influence the population land use and recreational opportunities in Jefferson County.

County Statistics Is.44% Recreation Land Enough? County has 16 Townships 4 Villages 6 Cities Total county land area (acres):371,930 Surface Waters16,8324.5% Woodlands24,0096.5% Existing Recreational Uses % The most populous counties and urban areas surround Jefferson The most populous counties and urban areas surround Jefferson County. Wisconsin Department of Administration 2003.

Wisconsin Land Legacy Report Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Land Legacy Initiative Report- Draft areas were identified within 16 Ecological Landscapes. Jefferson County lies within the Southeast Glacial Plain and had five areas identified

Jefferson County Land Legacy Areas Upper Rock River Waterloo Drumlins Jefferson Marsh Lake Koshkonong A variety of terrain and land cover types, abundant lakes and streams can accommodate a broad range of water based recreation activities. To determine the value of these areas, buffering and linking to existing public lands was a determining factor that would create considerable amount of recreational opportunities with the least disturbance to natural areas

County Park Site Feasibility Study These areas were selected by Jefferson County as potential park acquisition because they contained important natural features and were large areas of 40 acres in size. These areas all contained water and forested land that has the potential to offer a variety of recreational opportunities.

Relative Scoring of Areas Recreational Opportunities: 1. A variety of activities that could accommodate the recreational needs of the public 2. Water features suitable for fishing, swimming, paddling and boating 3. Forested areas to provide hiking, bicycling and camping Accessibility to Residents : 1. Area’s proximity to urban areas 2. Area's accessibility to roads 3. Area’s ability to connect to existing public areas Scenic Value: 1. Maximize the visible and desirable landscape within the park area

Road Accessibility Two of the four strongest growth areas in Wisconsin are adjacent to Jefferson County, Dane County to the immediate west and Waukesha County to the immediate east (Wisconsin Department of Administration Population trends in Wisconsin: ) Over half of the state’s population lives within 50 miles of the areas bounded by Milwaukee, Madison, Found du Lac and Janesville.

Methods

Conceptualization Where are the most productive areas in Jefferson County for creating parkland? Where are the most productive areas in Jefferson County for creating parkland? Areas with high recreation potentialAreas with high recreation potential Areas with high connectivity potentialAreas with high connectivity potential Areas with high landscape potentialAreas with high landscape potential

Site Selection 12 sites selected throughout Jefferson County 12 sites selected throughout Jefferson County 4 sites included in Wisconsin DNR’s Land Legacy Initiative Report4 sites included in Wisconsin DNR’s Land Legacy Initiative Report 8 sites selected by Jefferson County Park Site Feasibility Study8 sites selected by Jefferson County Park Site Feasibility Study 1000 acre buffer used to sample region 1000 acre buffer used to sample region

1 : 200,000

Recreation Potential Water Recreation Water Recreation Area of open water and length of shorelineArea of open water and length of shoreline Forest Recreation Forest Recreation Area of forests greater than 10 contiguous acresArea of forests greater than 10 contiguous acres

1 : 200,000

Connectivity Potential Areas that fit into existing park structure Areas that fit into existing park structure Higher score given from 0-3 miles from an existing state or county parklandHigher score given from 0-3 miles from an existing state or county parkland Areas that are accessible to populous Areas that are accessible to populous Higher score given from 0-3 miles from city or villageHigher score given from 0-3 miles from city or village Higher score given based on road hierarchyHigher score given based on road hierarchy Interstate –> U.S. Highway –> State Road Interstate –> U.S. Highway –> State Road

1 : 200,000

Landscape Potential Area of desirable landscape (forest / water) Area of desirable landscape (forest / water) 9 evenly viewpoints evenly spaced around site to determine visible area9 evenly viewpoints evenly spaced around site to determine visible area Non-desirable landscape eliminated from total visible areaNon-desirable landscape eliminated from total visible area

1 : 200,000

Results

NAMERECREATIONACCESSLANDSCAPETOTAL WEIGTED TOTAL Waterloo Drumlins7.05%71.43%15.76%46.29%47.95% Upper Rock River21.27%28.57%4.90%26.89%31.61% Jefferson Marsh1.16%28.57%3.09%16.12%16.89% Bark / Scuppernong Rivers46.20%28.57%16.14%44.66%52.99% Pipersville Drumlins35.23%14.29%3.81%26.20%33.50% Hope Lake25.18%57.14%6.81%43.79%50.01% Red Cedar Lake86.08%42.86%6.84%66.70%85.16% Holzhueter Farm9.15%85.71%20.84%56.84%58.70% Lake Koshkonong71.69%14.29%89.85%86.37%89.14% Cushman Pond100.00%14.29%10.33%61.21%81.12% Oakland Highlands60.71%42.86%100.00% North Shore Drumlins10.83%100.00%13.40%61.03%64.78% WEIGHTED SCORE = RECREATION + (0.75 * ACCESS) + (0.5 * LANDSCAPE)

Selected Sites Oakland Highlands - A large wooded area on the moraine with spectacular views, oak hickory woods, remnant prairie, and a blue heron rookery Oakland Highlands - A large wooded area on the moraine with spectacular views, oak hickory woods, remnant prairie, and a blue heron rookery Lake Koshkonong – The largest lake in Jefferson Co. Many Native American sites and mounds are found surrounding the lake as well as extensive wetlands Lake Koshkonong – The largest lake in Jefferson Co. Many Native American sites and mounds are found surrounding the lake as well as extensive wetlands Red Cedar Lake – One of the most pristine lakes in SE Wisconsin with several rare plant communities Red Cedar Lake – One of the most pristine lakes in SE Wisconsin with several rare plant communities Cushman Pond – Drumlins meet a millpond on the Bark River. This site has spectacular views, several pioneer sites and conoeing Cushman Pond – Drumlins meet a millpond on the Bark River. This site has spectacular views, several pioneer sites and conoeing

Prime Agricultural Land Prime Agricultural Land Waterloo Drumlin Potential Site Only.2 acres of Prime agricultural farmland would be removed from production

Improvements Use defined park boundaries instead of arbitrary buffer areas Take into account conservation value of parklands Wildlife habitat protection Groundwater recharge Preserve unique biomes Use land value to propose an acquisition schedule Geological features