Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
Advertisements

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
FDA: Food Safety Charlotte A. Christin Senior Policy Advisor U.S. Food and Drug Administration Sponsors 2011 World Seafood Congress.
Overview of Significant Issues and Identified Alternatives for Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Produce Safety Rule Michael Mahovic, Ph.D. Produce.
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
THE F OOD S AFETY M ODERNIZATION A CT P ROPOSED R ULES : M AIN I SSUES FOR F ARMERS OEFFA Webinar, September 2013 Ariane Lotti, National Sustainable Agriculture.
Produce Safety Rule Supplemental Proposal 1
Leadership by Egg Farmers for Egg Farmers Indianapolis, IN April 16, Egg Industry Issues Forum FSMA Update 2014 Egg Industry Forum.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
GAP/Food Safety for Fruit and Vegetable Growers
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Proposed Rule Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies
China Stakeholder Session China September 24-27, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Food Safety Modernization Act Supplemental Proposed Rules (Commenting period, Round 2 closes December 15, 2014!!)
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
GAP and Its Impact on Us as Growers Rich Bonanno UMass Extension.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
1 The Bioterrorism Act and Food 2217 Steven C Seideman Extension Food Processing Specialist Cooperative Extension Service University of Arkansas.
Exporting Food to the United States: What You Need to Know Prepared for Panhellenic Exporters Association Conference December 9, 2014 Erik R. Lieberman.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
FSMA Produce Rule and the Produce Safety Alliance Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance Director CASA 99 th Annual Meeting April 23, 2015.
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D says “Preventing problems before they cause harm is not only common sense, it is the key to food safety in the.
Food Safety Modernization Act The U.S. Food Safety Regulatory Revolution David Gombas, Ph.D. United Fresh Produce Association June 23, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Apple Cider Food Safety Workshop FDA’s Good Agricultural Practices Dr. Michelle A. Smith July 15, 1999.
Who’s Minding the Store - The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved Devon Zagory, Ph.D. Senior Vice President Food Safety & Quality Programs.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
Preventive Controls Rules: Coverage and Farm Definition 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Produce Safety Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) 1.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Final Rule on Produce Safety 1.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food to Wild Bird Feed Industry Annual Meeting 2015 by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. Director, Office of Surveillance.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
Food Safety Important? Aug 22-28, Food Safety recalls on FDA Website 25% for fresh produce – Salmonella, Listeria.
Produce Safety University Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Good Handling Practices (GHPs) 1.
16 Lesson Plans to Prepare Small and Mid-scale Farmers to Enter Food Hubs, Groceries, Restaurants and Cooperatives.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Primer on Act and the Final Rules June 8, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Final Rule on Produce Safety
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
California Grocers Association and United Fresh Produce Association
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
E. Coli & Fresh Produce: Some Lessons Learned
Lynn G. Turner, Ph.D. Department of Food Science
Food Safety Management Systems
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Presentation transcript:

Natural Resource Concerns

In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share Lawyers became rich

 Stakeholders and policy makers came together…

Produce Safety Standards - Published Jan. 16, 2013 Preventive Controls for Human Food - Published Jan. 16, 2013 Foreign Supplier Verification Program Preventive Controls for Animal Food Accredited Third Party Certification

 Confirm industry’s primary role on food safety  Risk-based and flexible Burden commensurate with risk  Address small business issues Additional time for small farms, businesses, to comply  Extensive government, stakeholder Input

 Considers risk posed by practices, commodities, conditions  Science- and Risk-based Focus on identified routes of microbial contamination Excludes certain produce rarely consumed raw Excludes produce to be commercially processed  Flexible Additional time for small farms to comply Variances Alternatives for some provisions

 Framework considers many factors associated with produce farming community Examples include diversity of operations and broad range of crops and practices  Proposing integrated approach that draws on past experiences Examples include CGMPs, HACCP, shell egg regulation

 One way or another just about every producer is impacted by this rule  Scale and risk based Exemptions under Produce Rule  Scale and Risk based Exemptions under Preventative Controls

 “Produce” defined as fruits and vegetables  Produce includes mushrooms, sprouts, herbs and tree nuts  Produce does not include grains  Some limitations on covered produce

 Produce for personal or on-farm consumption  Produce not a Raw Agricultural Commodity  Certain produce rarely consumed raw  Produce that will receive commercial processing  Farms with sales of ≤ $25,000 per year  Qualified exemption and modified requirements

1. Agricultural water 2. Biological soil amendments of animal origin 3. Worker health and hygiene 4. Equipment, tools, buildings and sanitation 5. Domesticated and wild animals Focus on 5 identified routes of microbial contamination Other requirements Growing, harvesting, packing and holding activities

Agricultural water: water used in covered activities on covered produce, where water is likely to contact covered produce.  Direct contact Irrigation water  Crop spraying  Washing and cooling of covered produce  Cleaning food contact surfaces  Hand during and after harvest activities

 Overhead Irrigation : 235 GEC per 100ml  Harvesting operations: 0 detectable GEC Dump tanks, cooling, ice, flumes, hydrocoolers  Hand Washing: 0 detectable GEC  Drip Irrigation : Not Ag water as defined by FSMA (Subject to FD& C act)

 Public Water System (SDWA) No Testing  Private Well: Every 3 months  Rivers or natural lakes: once every 7 days  On farm man made reservoir: monthly (if not subject to run off)

 Require treatment of agricultural water that you use if you know or have reason to believe that the water is not safe and of adequate sanitary quality for its intended use, including requirements for treatment methods, treating such water, and monitoring its treatment (proposed § );

 Alternatives  You may establish and use alternatives to the requirements established in proposed § (c) for testing water, and taking action based on test results, when agricultural water is used during growing operations for covered produce …using a direct water application method, provided you have adequate scientific data or information to support a conclusion that the alternative would provide the same level of public health protection as the § (c) requirements and would not increase the likelihood that your covered produce will be adulterated under section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

 If you want to water your crops with overhead irrigation from a pond, stream or river, you will test that water at least once per week, per source throughout the growing season.  No more wash tanks or flumes in the pack shed, continuous or recirculated sanitized flow only  If you want to do something different show us a science based alternative (FDA will not review just tell us you have it)

 FDA defines a farms purpose as producing and preparing its own “raw agricultural commodities” for commerce.  Anything beyond that and the farm becomes a facility (biosecurity act) and may fall under the Preventive Controls Rule.

 FSMA will drive up farms annual costs. Estimates from $14,000 annually for a small farm. Significantly more if farm falls under Preventative Controls  FSMA will place new demands on NRCS  FSMA may drive some farms out of business and lead to increased development pressure resulting in degraded water quality

 Educate our cooperators and partners  Comment on the rules by May  Ask and hope we can get an extension through Dec 2013  Demand FDA perform an Environmental Impact Statement on the rule