NEW Liaison and Site Coordinator Presentation Notre Dame of Maryland University PDS Coordinators: Drs. Stephanie Savick and Juliann Dupuis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mentoring New Educators
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
The Department of Communications and Engagement Jimmy Lee Peterkin, Jr., MBA District Business and Community Partnership Coordinator
Working Together to Prepare Urban Teachers Barbara Charness, Principal Sepulveda Middle School Los Angeles Unified Schools Nancy Prosenjak, Professor California.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
Knowing What We Learn and Demonstrating Our Success: Assessment and Evaluation of FLCs Andrea L. Beach, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Presented at.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
USA High Meets Notre Dame of Maryland University…and a PDS Partnership is Born… _______________, Site Coordinator, USA High ____________, Liaison, Notre.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 2009 PROJECT DIRECTOR’S CONFERENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DONNA M. SOBEL, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
The Why and How of Common Core and Afterschool/ Youth Development April 18 th, 2014.
SUNY, Buffalo State Shifting the Center of Gravity in Teacher Education PDS: A Clinically Rich Model.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Professional Development Schools Program "There's no word in the language I revere more than 'teacher.' My heart sings when a kid refers to me as his teacher,
PDS The Simultaneous Renewal of School & University Defining a vision Shirley Lefever-Davis Janice Ewing Wichita State University.
Preceptor Orientation
Building Strong University-School-Community Partnerships for Noyce Scholar Success Kevin Carr, Pacific University College of Education, Woodburn, Oregon.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The ILA in Detail. OBJECTIVES 1.To understand the purpose of the ILA 2.To have a clear understanding of how to complete the ILA 3.To have considered the.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
Professional Development School Partnerships: Governance and Accountability Elizabeth Heins Mercedes Tichenor Doug MacIsaac Stetson University.
Welcome Richard Montgomery Parents! Richard Montgomery PTSA Information Session on the MYP.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
2012 NASPA Annual Conference  Phoenix, Arizona  March 10–14, 2012 Overcome the Obstacle: Developing a Curricular Leadership Program Dr. Susan Komives,
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Moving from Partnerships to Professional Development Schools (PDS) Building Blocks For Success Leslie K. Day PDS Director SUNY Buffalo State.
Program Review Section III Training Sacramento City College Student Services Division Fall 2008.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
ATMCH meeting February 28, Outline Accountability Content Evaluation Communication and Outreach.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Professional Development School Collaboration PDS Benefits to School Systems (MSDE) MARYLAND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SCHOOLS School Systems and Institutions.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Principles of Good Governance
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Notre Dame of Maryland University
Presentation transcript:

NEW Liaison and Site Coordinator Presentation Notre Dame of Maryland University PDS Coordinators: Drs. Stephanie Savick and Juliann Dupuis

Welcome and Introductions

Partner Discussion Points  Choose ANY 3 discussion point prompts and share your responses with your partner:  Introduce yourself to your partner. Discuss the ways in which you each passed the time this summer.  Discuss your professional background and experiences as an educator.  Discuss how you ended up in your role as liaison and/or site coordinator. What are you looking forward to this year? What do you think might present as a challenge in your role this year?  Discuss what you each hope to gain from today’s training.

Introduction to PDS  What is a PDS? Defined by MSDE, a Professional Development School (PDS) is a collaboratively planned and implemented partnership for the academic preparation of interns and the continuous development of both school system and institution of higher education faculty. The focus of the PDS partnership is improved student performance through research-based teaching and learning.  Why do we have PDSs?  Why are YOU important in the PDS network?

PDS In Maryland  Maryland is the only state that requires the PDS structure for teacher preparation.  The PDS has been a part of the teacher preparation process in Maryland since 1995 when the Redesign for Teacher Education was written.  PDS offers a systemic approach to improving teaching and learning in schools. Therefore, teacher preparation is viewed in the broader context of school improvement.

PDS Nationally  The National Association for Professional Development Schools (NAPDS) was established in 2000  NAPDS offers membership, subscription to a peer-reviewed, professional journal and attendance at a national conference  Maryland is at the forefront of the growing PDS movement  Across the country, many teacher preparation programs run PDS sites, however many of these are small “boutique” programs

9 Essentials of a PDS 1. A comprehensive mission that is broader in its outreach and scope than the mission of any partner and that furthers the education profession and its responsibility to advance equity within schools and, by potential extension, the broader community; 2. A school–university culture committed to the preparation of future educators that embraces their active engagement in the school community; 3. Ongoing and reciprocal professional development for all participants guided by need; 4. A shared commitment to innovative and reflective practice by all participants; 5. Engagement in and public sharing of the results of deliberate investigations of practice by respective participants; 6. An articulation agreement developed by the respective participants delineating the roles and responsibilities of all involved; 7. A structure that allows all participants a forum for ongoing governance, reflection, and collaboration; 8. Work by college/university faculty and P–12 faculty in formal roles across institutional settings; and 9. Dedicated and shared resources and formal rewards and recognition structures.

NDMU PDS Schools ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Arnold ElementaryChurch Creek Elementary Belvedere ElementaryForest Hill Elementary Lothian ElementaryAberdeen Middle Severn River MiddleAberdeen High Broadneck High BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Oakleigh ElementaryJohn Ruhrah Elementary/Middle Hillcrest ElementaryMedfield Heights Elementary Johnnycake ElementaryWestern High Stemmers Run Middle Kenwood High Woodlawn High

Roles and Responsibilities of PDS Partners  NDMU PDS Coordinator  University Liaison  School-Based Site Coordinator  University Field Placement Coordinator  University Program Coordinator  School-Based Administration  School System Representative  University Supervisor  School-Based Mentors

Overview of NDMU Certification Programs  Undergrad/CAUS Students  Accelerated Certificate for Teaching (ACT)  Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT)  Graduate Education Internship (GEI)  Master of Arts in Teaching English for Speakers of other Languages (MATESOL)

How do we measure PDS success in MD?  Standards: Statements of expected performance in the areas of: Learning Community, Collaboration, Accountability, Organization, Roles and Resources, and Diversity and Equity  Components: Teacher Preparation, Continuing Professional Development, Research and Inquiry and Student Achievement  Indicators: Examples/Expressions of how a standard might be met for each component  Developmental Guidelines: Further description of the Indicator Source: “Professional Development School Assessment Framework for Maryland”

MD PDS Standards

Developmental Guidelines  Developmental guidelines, outlined in the “Professional Development School Assessment Framework for Maryland” help PDS Partnerships understand how to measure their progress in each cell of the previous chart.

The Artifact Box  What is it?  Why do we have one each our school?  Organization of the box  Artifact box review  Annual PDS Status Determination Process using Developmental Guidelines

Artifacts  What are artifacts?  Why do we collect them?  Required and school- specific artifacts  What makes a strong artifact?  Check out some of the artifacts in your artifact box…what observations can you make about these artifacts?

Coding and Coversheeting the Artifacts  How do you determine which standard/component to place an artifact?  What needs to go on a coversheet?  Checking out some cover sheets in your artifact box…what observations about this process can you make?

Coordinating Council  Governing body for PDS partnership for each school site  Co-chaired by liaison and site coordinator  Committee members vary across schools  Meets 4 times each year  Goal: Support interns, mentors, faculty, and school improvement efforts at the school  Responsible for strategic planning and quarterly check-ins in “working the plan”  Efforts and updates shared verbally during university liaison meetings, and in the forms of quarterly reports and quarterly coordinating council meeting minutes

Strategic Planning FAQs  WHO (is involved in strategic planning)?  WHAT (is the purpose of strategic planning)?  WHERE (does strategic planning take place)?  WHEN (does strategic planning take place)?  WHY (do partners participate in strategic planning)?  To support school improvement efforts cited in school improvement plans, faculty needs assessments, and/or TPIPs  Allows stakeholders to evaluate the “fruits of their labor,” by reflecting on their identified goals and objectives.  Allows stakeholders to set new goals and objectives for the upcoming year(s).  HOW (often are strategic planning efforts revisited)?

Best Practices in Strategic Planning  Establish a collaborative atmosphere where all voices are represented/welcomed;  Establish clearly defined short and long-term goals that address improvements in student achievement and intern/faculty effectiveness;  Develop timelines and responsibility checklists;  Generate expected outcomes based on short and long-term goals;  Document results of outcomes achieved;  Include opportunities for celebration and relationship-building.

Mentor Training  Who is Responsible for Mentor Training?  When Does Mentor Training Take Place?  What Does Mentor Training Look Like?  What are Some Suggested Formats for Mentor Training?  Pull out key ideas from the mentor handbook and place them in a bowl/hat/bag. Have mentors take turns pulling out one idea at a time to predict why this topic is important to the mentoring experience.  Ask mentors to peruse the Mentor Handbook Table of Contents to identify a section about which they are most interested. Have each mentor skim through the section they chose to identify key ideas, questions they have, or comments they would like to make about their chosen topic.  Have mentors brainstorm ideas they believe will be covered in mentor training and then categorize them by most important to least important, defending their ratings in the process. Relate their comments/evaluations to the contents of the Mentor Handbook.

Guiding Our Work  InTASC Standards  The Danielson Framework  SoE Conceptual Framework (RSVP)

Professional Conferences Maryland PDS Conference  Late April National Association of Professional Development Schools Annual Meeting (NAPDS)  Late February/early March School and School-System Mini- Conferences for the Sharing of Intern Action Research

Welcome Aboard! Questions or Comments for the Good of the Group?