Effect of Circle Hooks and Bait on Target and Bycatch Species in Pelagic Longline Fisheries 2007 Inter-Sessional Meeting of the Subcommittee on Ecosystems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Processes ECOSYSTEM DEFINITION
Advertisements

Preliminary Estimates of Seabird Bycatch in the Alaskan Halibut Longline Fishery in 2013 Shannon M. Fitzgerald Jennifer Cahalan Jason Gasper Jennifer Mondragon.
Physiology Experiments Aimed at Reducing Pelagic Longline Interactions with Marine Turtles Yonat Swimmer, University of Hawaii Richard Brill, National.
Are the apparent rapid declines in top pelagic predators real? Mark Maunder, Shelton Harley, Mike Hinton, and others IATTC.
Peter Ward RAM Myers Dalhousie University The effects of soak time and depth on longline catch rates EB WP-3 EB WP-12.
“Weak hook” Research in the Atlantic: Results and Next Steps David W. Kerstetter, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center Pelagic Longline.
How fishing gears affect the ecosystem
Hawaiian Fisheries Bycatch Presentation by Mr. Jeremy Wilson, NOAA-NMFS, 2 October, 2007 Material not yet published does not represent the formal policies.
Proposal for a comprehensive assessment of key shark species SAR-8-15 Photo:
Marine Turtle By-catch Reduction in Long-line Fisheries in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Moises Mug (1), Carlos Drews (2) (1) Fisheries Program Leader for.
Fisheries and the World around Us What is a Fishery?What is a Fishery? Why are Fisheries important?Why are Fisheries important? What are the different.
Are pelagic fisheries managed well? A stock assessment scientists perspective Mark Maunder and Shelton Harley Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
Mark N. Maunder, John R. Sibert, Alain Fonteneau, John Hampton, Pierre Kleiber, and Shelton J. Harley Problems with interpreting catch-per-unit-of-effort.
Fisheries and Fishing Techniques. What are fisheries? A fishing ground for commercial fishing.
Application of Science in U.S. Sea Turtle Management
Hook locations in sea turtles where and why? Michelle Sims Duke University.
Lessons learned for bycatch mitigation in Indonesia - Tuna Longline Coral Triangle Fishers Forum Denpasar, June 15, 2010 Imam Musthofa Zainudin Fisheries.
Sustaining Fisheries and Catching Fish
Definition of Bycatch FIGURE 16 Definition of Bycatch CAPTURE = CATCH + BYCATCH + RELEASE.
NOAA Fisheries Dr. Jim Berkson, Dr. Yan Jiao Paige Barlow, Bonnie Coggins, Christopher Hayes, Melissa Hedges, Eliza Heery, James Thorson Biased length.
Humans and the Sea -- Fisheries, management, and sampling Millions of people depend on fisheries… in what ways? –Food 86 million tons/year –Jobs –Products.
Seabird and Shark Bycatches in the Pacific Ocean from Taiwanese Observer Data of ******** Shui-Kai Chang, Ju-Ping Tai & Chih-Hao Shiao.
REPORT OF THE 2007 MEETING OF THE SUB- COMMITTEE ON ECOSYSTEMS (Madrid, Spain - February 19 to 23, 2007)
Pelagic Longline Fishing Procedures & Gear
Humans and the Sea -- Fisheries, management, and sampling
Pelagic Longline Fishing Procedures & Gear
Report of Chinese Observer Program in the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2006 Xiao-jie Dai, Liu-xiong Xu and Li-ming Song Shanghai Fisheries University,
SIO 296: January 15, 2010 Highly Migratory Species: Research and Management SWFSC HMS Biology and Population Dynamics Group Antonella PretiJohn Childers.
Fisheries in the Seas Fish life cycles: Egg/sperm pelagic larvaejuvenile (first non-feeding – critical period – then feeding) (first non-feeding – critical.
Porto de Galinhas, Brazil ICCAT Porto de Galinhas, Brazil ICCAT 2009.
Historical and recent estimates of the body-size and abundance of pelagic species taken by longline Peter Ward RAM Myers Dalhousie University EB WP-7.
Fishing Methods I got 99 problems, but a fish ain’t one!
June 3, 2016 Research & Monitoring Activities. 2 Overview Research — Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs)/Scientific Research Permits (SRPs) — Selected Research.
Summary of Atlantic Swordfish Species Working Group Discussion (see also SCI -021)
Oceans 11. What is “fishing”? Exploitation of marine organisms for sustenance, profit, or fun. Examples: –Fish- cod, halibut, salmon, redfish, stripped.
CATCH LIMITS FOR INDIVIDUAL PURSE-SEINE VESSELS TO REDUCE FISHING MORTALITY ON BIGEYE TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN.
Pg. 114 RTW: What is one problem caused by invasive species?  Objective: I will be able to describe methods of commercial fishing and their impact on.
upwelling coastal areas Economy = $ 500 species regularly caught employs 15 million people worldwide In 2005: 137 million tons taken $70 billion.
California’s Sustainable Seafood Draft Protocols Public Comment Photos by Doug Perrine © Ocean Protection Council November 29, 2010, Sacramento.
Human impacts on Aquatic Biodiversity… Our large aquatic footprint.
Commercial Fishing and Fishing Techniques. Oceanography Check-In Focus: What do you notice about the ratio of water to salt in the ocean?
Fish. Characteristics of Fish Skeleton made of ________ _______________ bladder for buoyancy Mucus to reduce friction, ______________________________.
Oceans' Vocabulary Unit 4. GROUND FISH  fish that live on, in, or near the bottom of the body of water they inhabit.  Examples –cod, haddock, red fish,
Fisheries Fishing Methods.
A general covariate based approach for modeling the population dynamics of protected species: application to black footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes)
1 PIRO’s Pelagic Ecosystem Management Needs PIFSC External Science Review April 5, 2016.
Over-fishing. What is it? Over-fishing occurs when the catch is at a rate greater than natural reproduction can sustain. Worldwide, we are removing 180.
Problems With Sea Turtle Extinction By Alex Baker.
CPUE analysis methods, progress and plans for 2011 Simon Hoyle.
Seamounts hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean Telmo Morato, S. Hoyle, V. Allain, S. Nicol I.S.R Portugal, IMAR-Açores Portugal, Secretariat.
Priyum Koonjul Fisheries over view.
Fishing Techniques January 11, 2013.
New data on incidental captures of Leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea Vandelli, 1761) obtained by the IEO on board observer program in longline Spanish.
8.6 BLUE MARLIN AND WHITE MARLIN
TDW10: April 2016, Noumea, New Caledonia
September 2018 PFMC – Agenda Item H.6
Fisheries and the World around Us
WCPFC Ecosystem & by-catch Conservation and Management Measures
Longline CPUE standardization: IATTC 2006
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Bycatch Mitigation Information System
What type of animal is being tracked?
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Steve Brouwer Oceanic Fisheries Programme Pacific Community
Agenda Item H.6.b Supplemental Public Presentation 1 September 2018
Fifth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-5)
California Pelagic Fisheries Association
Ocean temperatures are projected to rise by 1. 4°C by 2050 and 2
Lessons from recent telemetric studies:
Stock Assessment section – use of tuna data
Presentation transcript:

Effect of Circle Hooks and Bait on Target and Bycatch Species in Pelagic Longline Fisheries 2007 Inter-Sessional Meeting of the Subcommittee on Ecosystems February 19-23, 2007, Madrid Spain

The ability of circle hooks to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles is a function of hook style and size and for cheloniid (hardshell) turtles, turtle size. Relative to 9/0 “J” hooks, 18/0 circle hooks reduce sea turtle bycatch significantly (U.S. Atlantic, Pacific and Ecuador data). Relative to 9/0 “J” hooks, 18/0 circle hooks reduce sea turtle bycatch significantly (U.S. Atlantic, Pacific and Ecuador data).

The ability of circle hooks to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles is a function of hook style and size and for cheloniid (hardshell) turtles, turtle size. Relative to 9/0 “J” hooks 16/0 circle hooks do not reduce the CPUE of pelagic/oceanic stage loggerhead turtles (Azores data; Canadian data) Relative to 9/0 “J” hooks 16/0 circle hooks do not reduce the CPUE of pelagic/oceanic stage loggerhead turtles (Azores data; Canadian data) 16/0 circle hooks do reduce pelagic loggerhead turtle CPUE when compared with smaller “J” (7/0 & 8/0) hooks and 8/0 ringed tuna hooks. (U.S & Azores data) 16/0 circle hooks do reduce pelagic loggerhead turtle CPUE when compared with smaller “J” (7/0 & 8/0) hooks and 8/0 ringed tuna hooks. (U.S & Azores data) 16/0 circle hooks reduced the CPUE for turtles relative to “J” hooks in the eastern Pacific (IATTC data). 16/0 circle hooks reduced the CPUE for turtles relative to “J” hooks in the eastern Pacific (IATTC data).

The ability of circle hooks to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles is a function of hook style and size and for cheloniid (hardshell) turtles, turtle size. Feeding studies indicate that hook size has a significant effect on ingestion of hooks of the size encountered on pelagic longlines (U.S. data). Feeding studies indicate that hook size has a significant effect on ingestion of hooks of the size encountered on pelagic longlines (U.S. data).

The ability of circle hooks to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles is a function of hook style and size and for cheloniid (hardshell) turtles, turtle size. Because a circle hook results in less foul hooking than “J’ hooks and leatherbacks most often are foul hooked, it is likely that any size circle hook with minimal offset will result in a reduction in leatherback bycatch. Because a circle hook results in less foul hooking than “J’ hooks and leatherbacks most often are foul hooked, it is likely that any size circle hook with minimal offset will result in a reduction in leatherback bycatch. Canadian observer data indicates a significant reduction in leatherback CPUE with 16/0 circle hook when compared to “J” hooks. Canadian observer data indicates a significant reduction in leatherback CPUE with 16/0 circle hook when compared to “J” hooks.

The post-hooking mortality associated with circle hooks is estimated to be less than that of “J” hooks in cheloniid turtles. Circle hooks engage in the jaw and less often are swallowed by cheloniid turtles; a much higher proportion of “J” hooks are swallowed. Circle hooks engage in the jaw and less often are swallowed by cheloniid turtles; a much higher proportion of “J” hooks are swallowed. Post-hooking mortality associated with a mouth hook is estimated to be lower than a swallowed hook. Post-hooking mortality associated with a mouth hook is estimated to be lower than a swallowed hook. Hooks in the mouth can be removed; seldom can swallowed hooks be removed safely. Hooks in the mouth can be removed; seldom can swallowed hooks be removed safely.

The post-hooking mortality associated with circle hooks is estimated to be less than that of “J” hooks in cheloniid turtles. Effective gear and techniques have been developed to safely remove longline gear from entangled, foul hooked, and mouth hooked turtles. Effective gear and techniques have been developed to safely remove longline gear from entangled, foul hooked, and mouth hooked turtles.

More Seabirds May Be Caught on “J” Hooks Than On Circle Hooks Observer data from the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fishery indicates that sea bird CPUE was six times higher for “J” hooks than for circle hooks. Observer data from the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fishery indicates that sea bird CPUE was six times higher for “J” hooks than for circle hooks.

Effect of Circle Hooks on Blue Sharks Blue shark CPUE was nominally increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait in the North Atlantic swordfish fishery (U.S. data) Blue shark CPUE was nominally increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait in the North Atlantic swordfish fishery (U.S. data) Blue shark CPUE was significantly reduced with 18/0 circle hooks and mackerel bait (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data). Blue shark CPUE was significantly reduced with 18/0 circle hooks and mackerel bait (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data).

Effect of Circle Hooks on Bycatch Release Mortality Circle hooks engage in the jaw and less often are swallowed than “J” hooks resulting in a lower rate of release mortality for bycatch species. Circle hooks engage in the jaw and less often are swallowed than “J” hooks resulting in a lower rate of release mortality for bycatch species. Preliminary studies and anecdotal information suggest that circle hooks result in a better quality fish due to an increase in live fish boarded. Preliminary studies and anecdotal information suggest that circle hooks result in a better quality fish due to an increase in live fish boarded.

The effect of bait type varies by hook style and species. 300 – 500 gram mackerel bait significantly reduces turtle bycatch compared to squid bait. (U.S. data) 300 – 500 gram mackerel bait significantly reduces turtle bycatch compared to squid bait. (U.S. data)

The effect of bait type varies by hook style and species. 300 – 500 gram mackerel significantly increases the catch of swordfish compared to squid bait (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data). 300 – 500 gram mackerel significantly increases the catch of swordfish compared to squid bait (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data).

The effect of bait type varies by hook style and species. 300 – 500 gram mackerel bait significantly reduces the catch of bigeye tuna, albacore tuna, mahi mahi, opah, and wahoo (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data). 300 – 500 gram mackerel bait significantly reduces the catch of bigeye tuna, albacore tuna, mahi mahi, opah, and wahoo (U.S. Atlantic and Pacific data).

Circle hooks effect target species catch. The CPUE of swordfish is reduced significantly by circle hooks with squid bait (U.S. Atlantic data). The CPUE of swordfish is reduced significantly by circle hooks with squid bait (U.S. Atlantic data).

18/0 circle hooks with squid bait significantly reduced mahi mahi CPUE (U.S. Atlantic data). 18/0 circle hooks with squid bait significantly reduced mahi mahi CPUE (U.S. Atlantic data). Circle hooks effect target species catch.

The CPUE of bigeye tuna in swordfish-directed sets is nominally increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait (U.S. data). The CPUE of bigeye tuna in swordfish-directed sets is nominally increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait (U.S. data).

16/0 circle hooks significantly increase yellowfin tuna catch compared to “J” hooks. (U.S. Atlantic data). 16/0 circle hooks significantly increase yellowfin tuna catch compared to “J” hooks. (U.S. Atlantic data). Circle hooks effect target species catch.

Results from Gulf of Mexico tuna-directed research indicates a significant reduction in yellowfin tuna catch with 18/0 circle hook compared to 16/0 circle hook when used with sardine bait (U.S. data) Results from Gulf of Mexico tuna-directed research indicates a significant reduction in yellowfin tuna catch with 18/0 circle hook compared to 16/0 circle hook when used with sardine bait (U.S. data)

Circle hooks effect target species catch. The CPUE of albacore tuna was significanly increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait in swordfish-directed sets in the U.S. North Atlantic fishery (U.S. data). The CPUE of albacore tuna was significanly increased with 18/0 circle hooks and squid bait in swordfish-directed sets in the U.S. North Atlantic fishery (U.S. data).