Out response, Poles, and Zeros

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Advertisements

The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Solving Differential Equations BIOE Solving Differential Equations Ex. Shock absorber with rigid massless tire Start with no input r(t)=0, assume.
Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e
H(s) x(t)y(t) 8.b Laplace Transform: Y(s)=X(s) H(s) The Laplace transform can be used in the solution of ordinary linear differential equations. Let’s.
Chapter 4 Continuous Time Signals Time Response Continuous Time Signals Time Response.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
4. System Response This module is concern with the response of LTI system. L.T. is used to investigate the response of first and second order systems.
4.3. Time Response Specification in Design
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Feedback Control Systems
Lecture 17. System Response II
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
LTI system stability Time domain analysis
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Review last lectures.
Lect16EEE 2021 System Responses Dr. Holbert March 24, 2008.
Chapter 5 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition EE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete Objectives: Stability and the s-Plane Stability of an RC Circuit 1 st and 2 nd.
Automatic Control Theory-
1 Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5 In analyzing process dynamic and process control systems, it is important to know how the process responds to changes in the.
MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis Forced Response
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
It is the time response of a system to an input that sets the criteria for our control systems. Many quantitative criteria have been defined to characterise.
By Irfan Azhar Time Response. Transient Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for.
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
Chapter 3 Dynamic Response The Block Diagram Block diagram is a graphical tool to visualize the model of a system and evaluate the mathematical relationships.
INC 341PT & BP INC341 Frequency Response Method Lecture 11.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
1 More General Transfer Function Models Chapter 6 Poles and Zeros: The dynamic behavior of a transfer function model can be characterized by the numerical.
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
System Time Response Characteristics
Modeling Transient Response So far our analysis has been purely kinematic: The transient response has been ignored The inertia, damping, and elasticity.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning, M G I, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Lecture 3: Common Dynamic Systems 1. Identify common dynamic elements:  First order  Integrating (Non self-regulatory)  Second order  Dead time Predict.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
System Dynamics Dr. Mohammad Kilani
3.0 Time Response OBJECTIVE
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Lesson 20: Process Characteristics- 2nd Order Lag Process
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
Youngjune, Han Chapter 4 Time Response Youngjune, Han
Control Response Patterns
Time Response Analysis
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
Instructor: Jongeun Choi
Time Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Control Response Patterns
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Response of Higher Order Systems
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Second-Order Systems Chapter 5 Standard form:
CH. 3 Time Response Chapter3. Time Response.
B.Tech – II – ECE – II SEMESTER ACE ENGINEERING COLLEGE
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Time Response, Stability, and
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
By: Nafees Ahamad, AP, EECE, Dept. DIT University, Dehradun
Presentation transcript:

Out response, Poles, and Zeros The output response of a system is the sum of two responses: the forced response (steady-state response) and the natural response (zero input response) The poles of a transfer function are (1) the values of the Laplace transform variable, s , that cause the transfer function to become infinite, or (2) any roots of the denominator of the transfer function that are common to roots of the numerator. The zeros of a transfer function are (1) the values of the Laplace transform variable, s , that cause the transfer function to become zero, or (2) any roots of the numerator of the transfer function that are common to roots of the denominator.

Figure 4. 1 a. System showing input and output; b Figure 4.1 a. System showing input and output; b. pole-zero plot of the system; c. evolution of a system response.

A pole of the input function generates the form of the forced response. A pole of the transfer function generates the form of the natural response. A pole on the real axis generates an exponential response. The zeros and poles generate the amplitudes for both the forced and natural responses.

Natural response Forced response

First-Order Systems Figure 4.4 a. First-order system b. pole plot Figure 4.5 First-order system response to a unit step

The time constant can be described as the time for to decay to 37% of its initial value. Alternately, the time is the time it takes for the step response to rise to of its final value. The reciprocal of the time constant has the units (1/seconds), or frequency. Thus, we call the parameter the exponential frequency.

Rise time: Rise time is defined as the time for the waveform to go from 0.1 to 0.9 of its final value. Settling time: Settling time is defined as the time for the response to reach, and stay within, 2% (or 5%) of its final value.

Figure 4.7 Second-order systems, pole plots, and step responses

1. Overdamped response: Poles: Two real at Natural response: Two exponentials with time constants equal to the reciprocal of the pole location 2. Underdamped responses: Poles: Two complex at Natural response: Damped sinusoid with and exponential envelope whose time constant is equal to the reciprocal of the pole’s real part. The radian frequency of the sinusoid, the damped frequency of oscillation, is equal to the imaginary part of the poles

3. Undamped response: Poles: Two imaginary at Natural response: Undamped sinusoid with radian frequency equal to the imaginary part of the poles 4. Critically damped responses: Poles: Two real at Natural response: One term is an exponential whose time constant is equal to the reciprocal of the pole location. Another term is the product of time and an exponential with time constant equal to the reciprocal of the pole location

Figure 4.10 Step responses for second-order system damping cases

Figure 4.8 Second-order step response components generated by complex poles

Natural Frequency: The natural frequency of a second-order system is the frequency of oscillation of the system without damping. Damping Ratio: The damping ratio is defined as the ratio of exponential decay frequency to natural frequency. Consider the general system: Without damping,

Figure 4.11 Second-order response as a function of damping ratio

Underdamped Second-Order Systems Step response Taking the inverse Laplace transform where

Figure 4.13 Second-order underdamped responses for damping ratio values

Peak time: The time required to reach the first, or maximum, peak. Percent overshoot: The amount that the waveform overshoots the steady-state, or final, value at the peak time, expressed as a percentage of the steady-state value. Settling time: The time required for the transient’s damped oscillations to reach and stay within (or ) of the steady-state value. Rise time: The time required for the waveform to go from 0.1 of the final value to 0.9 of the final value. Evaluation of peak time: Setting the derivative equal to zero yields Peak time:

Figure 4.14 Second-order underdamped response specifications

Evaluation of percent overshoot ( ): Evaluation of settling time: The settling time is the time it takes for the amplitude of the decaying sinusoid to reach o.o2, or , where is the imaginary part of the pole and is called the damped frequency of oscillation, and is the magnitude of the real part of the pole and is the exponential damping frequency.

Figure 4.17 Pole plot for an underdamped second-order system

Figure 4.18 Lines of constant peak time,Tp , settling time,Ts , and percent overshoot, %OS Note: Ts2 < Ts1 ;Tp2 < Tp1; %OS1 <%OS2

Figure 4.19 Step responses of second-order underdamped systems as poles move: a. with constant real part; b. with constant imaginary part; c. with constant damping ratio

Find peak time, percent overshoot, and settling time from pole location. , ,

Figure 4.21 Rotational mechanical system Design: Given the rotational mechanical system, find J and D to yield 20% overshoot and a settling time of 2 seconds for a step input of torque T(t). Figure 4.21 Rotational mechanical system

Under certain conditions, a system with more than two poles or with zeros can be approximated as a second-order system tat has just two complex dominant poles. Once we justify this approximation, the formulae for percent overshoot, settling time, and peak time can be applied to these higher-order systems using the location of the dominant poles. Remark: If the real pole is five times farther to the left than the dominant poles, we assume that the system is represented by its dominant second-order pair of poles. Figure 4.23 Component responses of a three-pole system: a. pole plot; b. component responses: nondominant pole is near dominant second-order pair (Case I), far from the pair (Case II), and at infinity (Case III)

Figure 4.25 Effect of adding a zero to a two-pole system System response with zeros If the zero is far from the poles, then is large comared to and . Figure 4.25 Effect of adding a zero to a two-pole system

Figure 4.26 Step response of a nonminimum-phase system

Time Domain Solution of State Equations where is called the state-transition matrix.