Environmental Scan: The First Pass Ed Master Plan (EMP) Steering Committee Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) April 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STUDENT EQUITY: A PLAN FOR ACTION Planning Meeting May 23, 2013.
Advertisements

Educational Master Plan Review – pdf.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Colorado Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1 Who Are We? A Demographic Profile of SJCC November 20, 2007 Office of Research & Institutional Effectiveness San José/Evergreen Community College District.
San Jose Demographic Findings and Trends, Census 2010 Michael Bills, Senior Planner City of San Jose March 16, 2012.
Student Equity: Representation by Ethnicity Fall 2007 to Fall 2012 PaRC Presentation April 15, 2013 T. Margesson, M. Navi & E. Kuo FHDA IR&P.
Triennial Community Needs Assessment A Project of the Valley Care Community Consortium.
Educational Master Plan Data Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) May 28, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Environmental Scan: The Second Pass Ed Master Plan (EMP) Steering Committee Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) May 13, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Board of Trustees Presentation Trends in Student Enrollment and Demographics Foothill-De Anza Institutional Research & Planning Spring 2015.
Ohio Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Oh, the Places We Can Go! Our Educational Strategic Master Plan (ESMP) Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) March 18, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P 1.
1 Office of Institutional Research and Planning The mission of the Foothill-De Anza Community College District Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Open Forum Educational Master Plan (EMP) Toyon Room June 4, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Presentation to the Joint IPBT/SSPBT November 22, 2011.
De Anza Equity for All, Spring 2006 Equity for All Institutional Responsibility for Student Success Project.
West Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Board of Trustees Presentation 2014 Student Success Scorecard Report and District Strategic Plan Metrics Presented by Mallory Newell August 25,
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
New York Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Utah Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Tennessee Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
South Dakota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
1 Resources Pertaining to Student and Faculty Diversity A Presentation to the Equity Advisory Council Mallory Newell, Ed.D. Institutional Research and.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Key Components of the Planning Model at De Anza College: An Update to the Educational Master Plan Presented to Academic Senate May 23, 2011.
Iowa Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Town Hall Educational Master Plan April 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Minnesota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Educational Master Plan Update Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) November 19, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Rhode Island Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Educational Master Plan Update Open Forum November 11, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
Washington Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Educational Master Plan (EMP) Summer Timeline (Phase II) July 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Educational Master Plan (EMP) Summer Timeline (Phase II) July 29, 2015 revised August 18, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Illinois Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
San Jose Demographic Findings and Trends, Census 2010 Michael Bills, Senior Planner City of San Jose.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
 Independent Colleges and Universities of Texas, Inc. (ICUT)  Established in 1965  Public policy advocate of the 38 SACS accredited independent institutions.
New Hampshire Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
THECB 10/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Presentation for: 2007 Governing Board Conference David W. Gardner October 29, 2007.
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY CENSUS COUNTY DIVISION AND I-5 CORRIDOR DEMOGRAPHICS San Fernando Valley Economic Research Center Daniel Blake, Director California.
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu Student Enrollment:
Oregon Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu EMP Goals.
Michigan Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu Institutional-Set.
Environmental Scan Contra Costa Community College District
January 23, 2017 Academic Senate Meeting
Environmental Scan Planning Retreat
Master Plan Update A Presentation to College Council November 14, 2013
Resources Pertaining to Student and Faculty Diversity
Student Demographics and Success Trends
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Scan: The First Pass Ed Master Plan (EMP) Steering Committee Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) April 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P

Review EMP process Review internal and external scan data – Data about students – Data about community – This is overview data—at the 30,000 ft level Overview 2 There is an Educational Master Plan website!

The Roadmap: Process Update 3

Ed Master Plan Timeline 4

Spring Quarter Timeline Online input opens Community interviews Campus interviews Ed Master Plan meeting Discuss environmental scan data Town Hall 5

Spring Quarter Timeline Online input closes Webinar at 7pm All day workshop with EMP steering committee; Review data and identify initial goals Initial feedback period begins 6

Spring Quarter Timeline Follow-up/Debrief mtg with EMP steering committee; Review initial goals Second feedback period begins (if needed) EMP goals finalized Initial feedback period ends Second feedback period ends (if needed) 7

Summer and Fall Quarter Timeline Summer 2015 – Develop draft with identified institutional goals Fall 2015 – Engage campus with draft – Feedback – Editing – Board approval 8

Internal Scan 9

What do we need to know: – To determine what we are doing well – To determine what we could do better – To determine what we might focus on moving forward Our Students 10

How many students do we serve? 11 In Fall 2014 In Fall ,000 15,000 11,000

How many students do we serve? 12 In Fall 2014 In Fall ,000 15,000 11,000 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

How many students do we serve? 13 In Fall 2014 In Fall ,000 15,000 11,000 17,000 18,000 19,000

How many students do we serve? 14 In Fall 2014 In Fall ,000 15,000 11,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

What does trend line suggest? What does this mean moving forward? Are we serving the fewer students better? How many students do we serve? 15 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

How else are students identified? 16 Full-Time Equivalent Students (FTES) Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

Online Course Enrollment 17 What does the trend line suggest? Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]

Where do they live? 18 In Fall 2014 Mountain View San Jose Sunnyvale Santa Clara Palo Alto 20% 10% 9% 7% 4% Other cities in top five between Fall 2010 and Fall 2014 include: Redwood City, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

Where do they live? 19 In Our Service Area Fall 2014 Decline by 5% among students from Foothill service area—from 25% in Fall 2010 to 19% in Fall 2014 Foreign Students Fall 2010 Fall 2014 Fall % 36% 12% 8%

International Students 20 China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea represent top five—795 in Fall 2014 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Open Doors]

What do they look like? 21 Has this distribution changed since Fall 2010? What about international students (F1/other)? African Americans: +3% Latino/as: +11% Filipinos: +2% African Americans: +3% Latino/as: +11% Filipinos: +2% Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet] As percent of Asians/PIs: +3% [12% to 15%] Whites: +4% [1% to 5%] African Americans: +7% [1% to 8%] As percent of Asians/PIs: +3% [12% to 15%] Whites: +4% [1% to 5%] African Americans: +7% [1% to 8%]

Are they successful? 22 Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query] What does the trend line suggest?

Are they successful? 23 What’s the course success gap by ethnicity? In Fall 2014: 21% In Fall 2010: 17% Where is the greatest gap? Asians and African Americans In Fall 2014: 75% vs. 54% In Fall 2010: 83% vs. 66%

Are they successful? 24 What does the trend line suggest? Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]

Are they successful? 25 Similar trend in course success gaps regardless of instructional method Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query] In Fall 2014: 21%In Fall 2010: 27% But online gap has narrowed

Are they successful? 26 Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query] What’s the success gap between online and not online courses? In Fall 2014: 9% In Fall 2010: 18%

Graduation 27 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Program Review/Degrees]

Who graduates? 28 What’s the graduation rate by ethnicity? Certificates Degrees Asians: 45% Whites: 31% Latino/as: 11% African Americans: 1% Asians: 24% Whites: 45% Latino/as: 19% African Americans: 3% Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Program Review/Degrees]

Transfer Rate What percentage of first-time Foothill students transferred to a four-year institution in six years? 66% 53% 30% 29

Transfer Rate What percentage of first-time Foothill students transferred to a four-year institution in six years? 66% 53% 33% 30 Source: 2015 Student Success Scorecard [Completion data] N=1,057; F08 students=19,107 Who’s being counted? All first-time students from Complete at least 6 units AND Attempt any English and Math in first 3 years Who’s being counted? All first-time students from Complete at least 6 units AND Attempt any English and Math in first 3 years

What’s the Trend? 31 Foothill College Transfer Rates by Ethnicity to Cohorts Source: 2015 Student Success Scorecard [Completion data] N=1,057

Community Interviews 32

Train for a supportive workforce – For high-tech industry and related businesses – Small business development Professional development for students – Soft Skills (key for workforce) – Internships Increase collaboration/partnerships Role of lifelong education Themes 33

External Scan 34

Are our students representative? 35 Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet] CA Dept of Finance [P-3 report]

Community Population 36 What is population for Santa Clara County in 2014? What is the projected population for Santa Clara County in 2020? 1.9 million 2 million Source: EMSI [ data] Centers of Excellence [Regional Labor Market Profile] Declining White population Increasing older population Declining White population Increasing older population 20 years or younger: 26%

Education Level 37 What percent of Santa Clara County adults have earned a bachelor degree or higher? 50% Source: EMSI [ data] Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015] 46% 42%

Education Level 38 What percent of Santa Clara County adults have earned a bachelor degree or higher? 50% Source: EMSI [ data] Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015] 46% 42% In California: 30% In United States: 29% In California: 30% In United States: 29%

English Language Speakers 39 What percent of Silicon Valley speaks a language other than exclusively English? 50% 46% 42%

English Language Speakers 40 What percent of Silicon Valley speaks a language other than exclusively English? 50% Source: Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015] 46% 42% In California: 44% In United States: 21% In California: 44% In United States: 21%

Largest industry gains this year include: – Healthcare services – Professional/Information/Technology Services Growing occupations: – Personal care/home care aides – Medical assistants/secretaries – Medical records technicians – Systems/data communication analysts – Secretaries/Administrative Assistants Labor Market 41 Source: EMSI [ data] Centers of Excellence [Regional Labor Market Profile]

Income gap (median household) – Silicon Valley: $94,534 – California: $61,320 Housing/rental prices – Median home sale price: $757,585 – California median: $397,585 – Average rental rate: $2,333/month Poverty (federal poverty thresholds) – Silicon Valley: 11% – 10 Years ago: ~9% – About 25% of total reside in Santa Clara County Cost of Living 42 Source: Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015] Silicon Valley Institute for Regional Studies [Poverty in the San Francisco Bay Area, 2015] Median household income is based on 2013 figures Federal poverty thresholds: $11,490 for single household; $23,550 for a family of four

Additional Comments? 43 Thanks for Participating!