UTILIZING SPENVIS FOR EARTH ORBIT ENVIRONMENTS ASSESSMENTS: RADIATION EXPOSURES, SEE, and SPACECRAFT CHARGING Brandon Reddell and Bill Atwell THE BOEING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Space Weather Week 11
Advertisements

G.Santin, P Nieminen, H Evans, E Daly
BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE INSTITUT D’AERONOMIE SPATIALE DE BELGIQUE BELGIAN INSTITUTE FOR SPACE AERONOMY BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Toward operational use of radiation belt models D. Heynderickx BIRA, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel, Belgium.
Forecasting the high-energy electron flux throughout the radiation belts Sarah Glauert British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK SPACECAST stakeholders meeting,
A particle monitor for LISA Pathfinder and Gravity Probe-B gyroscope charging in LEO Peter Wass, Henrique Araújo, Tim Sumner Imperial College London, UK.
Results from the GIOVE-A CEDEX Space Radiation Monitor B Taylor 1, C Underwood 1, H Evans 2, E Daly 2, G Mandorlo 2, R Prieto 2, M Falcone 2 1. Surrey.
ESA'S SPACE ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (SPENVIS): A WEB-BASED TOOL FOR ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IN SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS D. Heynderickx, B. Quaghebeur,
1 The QinetiQ Atmospheric Radiation Model and Solar Particle Events Clive Dyer, Fan Lei, Alex Hands, Peter Truscott Space Division QinetiQ, Farnborough,
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
The second exam is this Thursday. It will cover everything we have covered from since the first exam (until the end of class today). There will be a review.
D E S I R E Dose Estimation by Simulation of the ISS Radiation Environment Geant4 simulations of the Columbus/ISS radiation.
Impact of an Extreme Space Weather Event on European Space Assets Carlos Armiens Aparicio European Commission - Joint Research Centre Institute for the.
Overview of new work packages for the next SPENVIS phase D. Heynderickx BIRA, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel, Belgium.
B. Quaghebeur, J. Wera, (D. Heynderickx), H. De Witte BIRA, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel, Belgium H.D.R. Evans, E.J. Daly ESA/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, NL-2200.
Radiation Belt variations during current solar maximum
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
Danish Space Research Institute Danish Small Satellite Programme FH Space_Environment.ppt Slide # 1 Flemming Hansen MScEE, PhD Technology Manager.
1 4 th Geant4 Space Users’ Workshop and 3 rd Spenvis Users’ Workshop11/06/06-11/10/06 Total Ionizing Dose Environment for a Jovian Mission Using Geant4.
SPACE WEATHER Definition used by the US National Space Weather Plan: Conditions on the Sun and the solar wind, magnetosphere, ionosphere, and thermosphere.
What are the Forms of Hazardous Radiation? Stanley B. Curtis Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, ret. & Dept. of Environmental Health University of.
Direction - Conférence 1. Latest developments in MEO radiation belt Models D.Lazaro, A.Sicard-Piet, S.Bourdarie ONERA/DESP, Toulouse, France Session 2:
Geant4 simulation of the attenuation properties of plastic shield for  - radionuclides employed in internal radiotherapy Domenico Lizio 1, Ernesto Amato.
PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.
Dr. Scott R. Messenger SFA, Inc. SPENVIS & GEANT4 workshop Faculty Club Leuven, Belgium October 2005 Displacement Damage.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Accuracy assessment of the space weather characteristics forecasts used in the Russian Federal Space Agency Monitoring System V. Anashin 1, G. Protopopov.
1 Introduction The TOP-modelPotential applicationsConclusion The Transient Observations-based Particle Model and its potential application in radiation.
GRAS Validation and GEANT4 Electromagnetic Physics Parameters R. Lindberg, G. Santin; Space Environment and Effects Section, ESTEC.
Measurement and Simulation of the Variation in Proton-Induced Energy Deposition in Large Silicon Diode Arrays Christina L. Howe 1, Robert A. Weller 1,
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Space Environment (Natural and Artificial) Probabilistic model of fluences and.
PLANETARY PROBE LASER PROPULSION CONCEPT 7 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP JUNE 2009, BARCELONA LE, T. (1), MOBILIA, S. (2), PAPADOPOULOS,
Mars images courtesy of ESA Portal Multimedia Gallery Mars Radiation Environment Characterization Results, previous and ongoing activities Ana Keating.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
Normalisation modelling sources Geant4 tutorial Paris, 4-8 June 2007 Giovanni Santin ESA / ESTEC Rhea System SA.
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Nowcast model of low energy electrons (1-150 keV) for surface charging hazards Natalia Ganushkina Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
Solar Cycle Electron Radiation Environment at GNSS Like Orbit A. Sicard-Piet (1), S. Bourdarie (1), D. Boscher (1 ), R. Friedel (2), T. Cayton (2), E.
Currently the Solar Energetic Particle Environment Models (SEPEM) system treats only protons within the interplanetary environment, and the shielding analysis.
Is the Terrestrial Magnetosphere a Natural Radiation Shield on Moon Space Missions ? R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space.
Meteoroid and debris models and tools in SPENVIS H. Ludwig D. Heynderickx BIRA, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel, Belgium.
Space Environment SSE-120 Please type in your questions and raise your hand so we can answer it during class.
Exploitation of Space Ionizing Radiation Monitoring System in Russian Federal Space Agency STRUCTURE OF THE MONITORING SYSTEM The Monitoring System includes.
07/11/2007ESSW4, Brussels1 Coupling between magnetospheric and auroral ionospheric scales during space weather events M. ECHIM (1,2), M. ROTH(1) and J.
LIP & ESA 18121/04/NL/CH MarsREC An integrated tool for Mars Radiation Environment Characterization and Effects 5º longitude.
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Solar and Cosmic Ray Energetic Particle Models : Space Weather Aspects
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Approaches to forecasting radiation risk from Solar Energetic Particles Silvia Dalla (1), Mike Marsh (2) & Timo Laitinen (1) (1) University of Central.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
KMA Space Weather Service Presented to CGMS-44 on Working Group SWTT.
Gyeongbok Jo 1, Jongdae Sohn 2, KyeongWook Min 2, Yu Yi 1, Suk-bin Kang 2 1 Chungnam National University 2 Korea Advanced Institute of Science.
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
ESA SSA Measurement Requirements for SWE Forecasts
Multispacecraft observation of solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment at different orbits Vasily S.
A joint study of the University of Göttingen (1) and Astrium (2)
The most challenging consequences of Earth’s space environment occur in the inner radiation belt So far you have been hearing about sensational new results.
Martian Radiation Env. Modelling Tools (QinetiQ)
N. Stoffle University of Houston
SPACE RADIATION DOSIMETRY
P. Nieminen, E. Daly, A. Mohammadzadeh, H.D.R. Evans, G. Santin
VALIRENE WP5000 Toolkit and Validation
R-ESC.
Presentation transcript:

UTILIZING SPENVIS FOR EARTH ORBIT ENVIRONMENTS ASSESSMENTS: RADIATION EXPOSURES, SEE, and SPACECRAFT CHARGING Brandon Reddell and Bill Atwell THE BOEING COMPANY NASA Systems Houston, TX USA SPENVIS & GEANT4 Workshop Leuven, Belgium October 2005

ABSTRACT The SPENVIS, developed by the Belgium Institute of Aeronomy (BIRA), Brussels, Belgium, has been utilized to generate trapped proton and electron particle spectra for low-earth (LEO), medium- earth (MEO) and geostationary orbits (GEO) and to perform comparisons/benchmarking for several high-energy particle transport codes. A discussion of the proton and electron spectra and transport codes used in this study is presented. Results of the absorbed dose calculations and code comparisons using aluminum shielding are presented and discussed in detail. An example of a single event effects (SEE) analysis for the International Space Station (ISS) internal and external computers is discussed. Additionally, the application of SPENVIS to calculate spacecraft charging is also discussed in relation to the ISS. A comparison of the SPENVIS predicted structure potential with the Boeing ISS Plasma Interaction Model (PIM) prediction and measured data from the Floating Potential Probe (FPP) is shown. 2

Outline of Talk  Application of SPENVIS to generate trapped electron and proton spectra for various near-Earth orbits  Present dose comparisons for benchmarking radiation transport codes  MULASSIS/GEANT4, FLUKA, MCNPX, Shieldose 2, CEPXS  Other SPENVIS options under consideration/or being used by the Boeing ISS Environments Group  Single Event Effects  ISS vehicle structure charging predictions  Comparison with Boeing ISS Plasma Interaction Model predictions and on-orbit data  Conclusions 3

NEAR-EARTH REGIONS  LOW-EARTH ORBIT (LEO) – Typical ISS orbit  ~ 400 km X 51.6 deg  MEDIUM-EARTH ORBIT – Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) Orbit  20,200 km x 55 deg  GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT – 160 deg W long.  ~36,000 km x ~0 deg 4

LEO PROTON & ELECTRON SPECTRA  AP-8MIN PROTON INTEGRAL & DIFFERENTIAL SPECTRA  ISS ORBIT: 400 KM X 51.6 DEG  EPOCH: JUNE 2007  AE-8MAX ELECTRON INTEGRAL & DIFFERENTIAL  ISS ORBIT: 400 KM X 51.6 DEG  EPOCH: JAN

LEO AP-8MIN PROTON INTEGRAL & DIFFERENTIAL SPECTRA 6

LEO AE-8MAX ELECTRON INTEGRAL & DIFF. SPECTRA 7

MEO AE-8MAX ELECTRON DIFFERENTIAL SPECTRUM 8

MEO AP-8MIN PROTON DIFFERENTIAL SPECTRUM 9

GEO AE-8MAX INTEGRAL & DIFF. ELECTRON SPECTRA 160 deg W long. – Epoch: Jan

COMPUTER CODES  MULASSIS / GEANT 4  3-D Monte-Carlo transport code  Hadronic, Electromagnetic, Low-Energy Neutron Physics  FLUKA  3-D Monte-Carlo transport code  Precision Physics Default, with electromagnetic and low energy neutrons  SHIELDOSE 2  Uses pre-calculated, mono-energetic depth-dose data for an isotropic, broad-beam fluence of radiation incident on uniform aluminum plane media.  Proton transport considers Coulomb interactions only (no nuclear interaction), electron transport with bremsstrahlung  MCNPX  3-D Monte-Carlo transport code  For this study, only electron transport considered, including electromagnetic effects.  CEPXS  1-D planar-geometry discrete ordinates code for coupled photon-electron transport 11

LEO Proton Dose Comparisons MeV Proton incident on 1.0 g/cm 2 Aluminum Slab

LEO Electron Dose Comparisons MeV Electron incident on 1.0 g/cm 2 Aluminum Slab

MEO Electron Dose Comparisons 14

GEO Electron Dose Comparisons

GEO Electron Dose Comparisons

17 Single Event Effects

ISS Single Event Upset Observations 18 ISS Orbit

19 ISS Single Event Upset Observations MDM-DRAMMeasured SEU Count/238 days SEFA SEU Count/238 days FOM SEU Count/238 Days Lab-1 40 g/cm Lab-3 40 g/cm P1-2: 10 g/cm S1-1: 10 g/cm

ISS Spacecraft Charging 20

 Various models available to compute floating potential of structure with respect to plasma  SOLARC, PIX2, thin sheath, thick sheath models for solar array and structure  SOLARC gives best correlation to observed floating potential and Boeing ISS PIM results  SOLARC only accounts for solar array charging (i.e. no magnetic induction) 21 ISS Vehicle Charging FPP Unit

22 FPP Potential Data (April 11, 2001) PEAK 1 PEAK 2 PEAK 3 PEAK 4 PEAK 5 PEAK 6 PCU OFF

23 Potential Map for ISS Stage 11A Potential (V) V min = -31.1V V max = -18.3V Corresponding to April 11, 2001 (FPP Peak 1) Conditions

24 ISS Potential Comparison

 For LEO, spacecraft charging is highly dependent on plasma temperature, density, and geomagnetic field  For these reasons, a probabilistic approach must be used to address spacecraft charging:  Models like the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2001) are climatological in nature and provide average properties; not the short transients that occur near eclipse exit  The SPENVIS spacecraft charging models allow the user to input plasma temperature and density to compute floating potential – only compute solar array charging  SPENVIS will need to access a plasma database of measured/known values to calculate spacecraft charging 25 Spacecraft Charging

26 Spacecraft Charging Climatological models do not predict extreme plasma conditions properly For predictions, known plasma parameters must used to simulate transient plasma conditions PIM Results

CONCLUSIONS  SPENVIS was utilized to generate trapped electron and proton spectra for LEO, MEO, and GEO  Various computer codes were used to transport these spectra to compute absorbed dose  Dose rates computed in thin silicon detector behind finite & semi- infinite slab aluminum shielding  For all three regimes, the transport codes generally agree to within 10-15% of each other  Some deviations at extremely thin and extremely thick regions  Can infer differences in radiation transport model physics  SPENVIS can be used to study Single Event Effects  SPENVIS needs a choice of GCR models so that the user can generate preferred spectra  i.e. CREME 96 or Badhwar-O’Neil GCR Model  Recommend adding Figure of Merit (FOM) technique to SPENVIS  SPENVIS could be used to study spacecraft charging provided user knows a priori plasma conditions  SPENVIS needs a geomagnetic field induced potential (vxB·L) option/model. This is important for large spacecraft 27