1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© IMEC SIMPLIFYING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESEARCH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES EPP HEARING - EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BRUSSELS, 1 SEPTEMBER 2010 Ingrid Reynaert.
Advertisements

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
Article 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006: Revenue-generating projects Impact of the revision 2010 Presented by Anton Schrag DG.
European Union Cohesion Policy
1 Unit C3 Finance, legal Affairs and Partner support CALL FOR PROPOSALS APPLICATION PROCEDURE SPECIFIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL ISSUES Version
Regional Policy Delegated Acts. Regional Policy 2 Delegated ActsImplementing Acts 32(10): Purchase of land and combination of TA with FI 33(3)(a):FI complying.
© Shutterstock - olly Joint Action Plan: Towards a management more focused on results Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the European territorial.
© Shutterstock - olly Delegated Acts ESF Art 14.1 Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 October 2013.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 July 2013.
European Union Cohesion Policy
3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010 Eligibility period and reporting eligible expenditure.
DG Research and Innovation
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
GRIP- IT Governance of Regionally Integrated Projects using Innovative Tools. (Structural Funds implementation in an integrated approach )EXPENDITURES.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
European Found Accounting Women in the main deck.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Current use and perspectives June 2014.
FINANCIAL REPORTING Rules and Regulations
Financial Management and Auditing Reporting by the Lead Partner 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
SOCRATES PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL HANDBOOK FOR BENEFICIARIES Selection 2005.
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on finances Partner Search Forum Poznań, Poland 16 – 17 December 2008.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Louis Vervloet, General director, ESF Agency Flanders
1 An introduction to Project Cycle Management PCM DAY 3 Gori, 31/3 – 3/4/2015.
SeaDataNet Pan-European infrastructure for Ocean & Marine Data management An Integrated research Infrastructure Initiative (I3) Kick-off Meeting June 8-10.
1 Hugo BERGER ICT - PSP Grant Agreement February 17 th 2009 Sofia.
1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy.
1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.
Slavica Srdanović Ćirić Mirna Jelčić OVERALL GOAL OF THE TRAINING Improving the quality of financial reporting by the Beneficiaries resulting.
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). …did we propose this new instrument? To focus more on outputs and results …do we believe it will work? Because focus.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Eligibility of Administrative Costs in Projects of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund 1.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
The 6th Framework Programme
Experiences from programming period Simplified costs
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
What is a grant? A direct financial contribution – donation – from EU budget An action - contributing to EU policy achievement Functioning of a body acting.
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Mark SCHELFHOUT& Laurent SENS DG Employment, Social.
Simplification in ESI funds for
Performance Framework
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
Presentation by Mrs. Isabel Serra, EMPL/F/3
COCOF 09/0025/00-EN The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Laurent SENS ESF coordination.
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
ESF Committee ad’hoc group on the future of the ESF Debriefing from the focus group on proportionality (simplification) Brussels, 2 February 2010.
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities 17 June 2010

2 Main lines of this presentation Objective to build a common understanding on lump sums grants… Reminder: General principles of the lump sums grants & consequences on the financial management Key points for the managing authorities: ideal lump sum?

3 Overview of the lump sums grants Pre-established lump sum in accordance with pre-defined terms of agreement on activities and/or results For all or part of the costs of the operation For small operations or small bodies (capping), but not exclusively Well adapted also when no quantifiable outputs exist to apply unit costs

4 An example of lump sum: new activity for a NGO managing a ‘crêche’ (childcare) 1.Draft detailed budget to calculate ex ante the amount of the lump sum 1.1 Internal personnel – remuneration Int. pers. - transport home/work Non depreciable consumption goods Equipment and immovable goods 347 (depreciation) 5.1 Administration, accountancy, management Telephone, post, fax Taxes and insurance External accountancy costs Lump sum amounting to 38,753 EUR to look after 10 additional children during one year. Ex anteClosure of operation 3.End of implementation: 11 additional children looked after during one year  Condition fulfilled  Payment of the lump sum grant of 38,753 EUR.

5 Key points for managing authorities Restricted to grants (reminder) Correlation between the realised operation and the payments Justification of the final amount of the lump sum Choice of the lump sum Calculation of the lump sum to be granted

6 Correlation between the realised quantities and the payments Basic principle: “Yes or No” payment (not proportional to “quantities” otherwise standard scales of unit cost)  envisage the possibility to have several levels of payments depending on intermediary steps. Shall be transparent ex-ante … via the grant agreement and/or conditions of the call for proposals, …

7 Another example of lump sum: intermediary steps Roma NGO organising (1) a seminar & (2) producing a toolkit on socio economic conditions of the Roma Community. Lump sum of € 45,000 split in 2 projects: €25,000 for the seminar, €20,000 for the toolkit. Closure of the operation: –Seminar organised? Yes €25,000 paid –Toolkit produced? No €0 paid Total: €25,000 paid

8 Justification of the final amount Define precisely in the grant agreement the basis on which payments will be issued and how/under which circumstances it may be reduced  “Yes or No” approach  Supporting documents for justification of the lump sum. When choosing a lump sum, the granting authority should also envisage the procedures & documents necessary to justify it ex post.

9 Choice of the lump sum The choice should reflect the type of operation funded, trying to mitigate external factors Purely outcome based systems may be risky and should not add risk to an existing “Yes or No” system.

10 Calculation of Lump sums grants No method defined by the Regulation but conditions that the methods will have to fulfil. MSs will define the method. 4 conditions to be respected: key issues for sound financial management –Established in advance –Fair –Equitable –Verifiable

11 Calculation of Lump sums grants: a few examples By group of operations / costs: Lump sums already used by national/regional authorities if they satisfy the conditions of the Regulation. At the level of calls for proposals Project specific lump sums: Ex ante estimation of total eligible costs and expected output / outcome

12 Ideal standard scale of unit costs and lump sum? Apart from being fair, equitable and verifiable, they should find a balance between: Clear link with the operation Easy and straightforward way to justify it Ensure the economic balance of the operation and of the beneficiary Lower the risk of creaming the participants or lowering standards …

13  THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION