1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module g – Multifunctionality, allocation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module b – Overview of LCA.
Advertisements

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment PSE 476/WPS 576/WPS Fall 2014 Richard A. Venditti Forest Biomaterials North Carolina State University Raleigh,
California Low Carbon Fuel Standard Discussion document : Coproducts Dr. Shoba Veeraraghavan – Author Dr. Clay Calkin - Presenter.
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE Dr Peter Olsen Scottish Environment Protection Agency UCCCfS:
Farrell article. Summary Evaluated potential effects of increased ethanol use Reviewed a number of previously published articles on corn ethanol Ethanol.
Masterthesis project Master thesis project Evaluate the Environmental Impacts of Implementing Lean in the Production Process of Manufacturing Industry.
Section 2.1 Solving Linear Equations
1 Co-Product Function Expansion A Methodology for Incrementally Considering the Effects of Co-Products in Multi-Product Systems Paul Worhach, Ph.D. InLCA/LCM.
Welcome to the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Learning Module Series
1 Chapter 11 The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows.
1 Chapter 10: The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows Overview and “vocabulary” Methods Payback, discounted payback NPV IRR, MIRR Profitability.
Additional Chemistry Calculations Relative atomic and Formula Masses The mass of an atom is too small to deal with in real terms, so we use ‘relative’
edgard.gnansounou The bio-refinery Concept Contacts Process Synthesis and Life Cycle Edgard Gnansounou +41 (0)21 / epfl.ch Laboratory.
Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment / Life Cycle Assessment and Green Design.
15/4/091 Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Assessment Energy, Material, flow.
SEDS Review Liquid Fuels Sector May 7, 2009 Don Hanson Deena Patel Argonne National Laboratory.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
AAEC 3315 Agricultural Price Theory
Life Cycle Analysis and Resource Management Dr. Forbes McDougall Procter & Gamble UK.
Understanding a life-cycle approach Learning unit B: exploring eco-efficiency DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE.
Obtaining alkalis/chlorine 7. understand that the first process for manufacturing alkali from salt and limestone using coal as a fuel caused pollution.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module j – Life cycle costing & eco-efficiency.
SOREME PROJECT (LIFE + 11 ENV/IT/109) EIGHTEEN MONTHS MEETING ENEA ACTIVITIES Faenza Research Laboratories Bologna Research Center LIFE + 11 ENV/IT/109.
METODE LCA: LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS dalam KAJIAN LINGKUNGAN
ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS. EQUATIONS AND SOLUTIONS  A correct equation is like a balance scale.  In order to determine if a given value for a variable is.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module d – Inventory analysis.
Input + Generation = Output + Consumption
Quantitative Chemistry
Growth of the Economy And Cyclical Instability
Fossil C emissions associated with C flows of wood products Kim Pingoud VTT Energy P.O.Box 1606 FIN VTT IEA Bioenergy Task.
Life Cycle Assessment of Organic Waste: Application and Relevance to New Zealand Simon Love.
Issues in Inventory Analysis Even though the methodology of inventory analysis seems relatively straightforward, it is – in fact – complicated by two important.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module c – Goal and scope definition.
Life Cycle Analysis. Topics  Definition  Use  Process  Limitations.
1 Comparison of energy systems: On methods, parameters and system boundaries Leif Gustavsson Mid-Sweden University September.
1 Global Connections: Forests of the World Activity 8 Making Consumer Choices.
Electrolytic Cell + - Electric Current AnodeCathode Iron Cathode Metallic Anode Asbestos/Teflon Permeable Diaphragm Each electrolytic cell includes an.
UNESCO Desire – Net project Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment, a sustainability decision-supporting tool Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (PROT.
Jan-Olov Sundqvist1 Case Studies on Waste Management in Sweden Jan-Olov Sundqvist IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm
1 Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology How to Benefit from Decision Analysis in Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Pauli Miettinen.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
CESI Barcelona May 2003 R.BERTI IT Session 1 – Block 2 1 Product Environmental Profile and Benefits for Electrical Utilities R. Berti CESI.
Institute for Environmental Protection  STØ Life Cycle Assessment of Leca products. Summary of results and experiences Cecilia Askham Nyland STØ.
Subgroup 6: Indirect Effects of Other Fuels Draft Recommendations and Issues for Consideration Presented to the LCFS Expert Workgroup Indirect Effects.
MATERIAL BALANCE METHODOLOGY Julia Brown Manager, Process Development.
Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Conversion Technologies April 15, 2004.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module h – The mathematics of LCI.
 Productivity  Economic growth and productivity  Main processes of a company  Productivity model  Illustration of the real income distribution processes.
A THENA  Institute The US LCI Database Project: Creating Publicly Available LCI Data Modules Presented to: American Center for Life Cycle Assessment By:
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Energy statistics, part 2 Production and use of energy 1 Business statistics and registers.
Attributional and consequential LCI modelling
Life Cycle Assessment: Framework. Goal: Life cycle THINKING Many “centers” on campus have seminars with lunch and drinks provided. How should drinks be.
Performance Indicators Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive Trade Statistics May.
 New substance produced  Determine chemical composition  Determine composition by mass  Convert mass to % = % composition  Use atomic & molar mass.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA). As corporations seek to improve their environmental performance they require new methods and tools. LCA is one such tool.
PSP Thermal stations. Thermal plant Electric power generation system block diagram Electric power generation system block diagram Steam station Major.
Stoichiometry Chapter 3 Chemical Formulas and Equations.
Warmup 2 AlBr 3 + ___  6 KBr + Al 2 ( SO 4 ) 3 Solve for the missing blank a. K 4 (SO 4 ) 2 b. 3 K 2 S 2 O 4 c. 2 K 2 SO 4 d. 3 K 2 SO 4 e. 3 KSO 4 Consider.
edgard.gnansounou The bio-refinery Concept Contacts Process Design and Life Cycle Edgard Gnansounou +41 (0)21 / epfl.ch Laboratory.
1 Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module d – Inventory analysis.
1 Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module h – The mathematics of LCI.
Environmental Responsibility
Environmental Health Management (EN481)
Objective 3.6 solve multi-step inequalities.
– the percent by mass of each element in a compound.
Real costs for example business economic costs
Solving Two-Step Equations
Solving one- and two-step equations
Do Now Solve. n + 9 = z = 55 n = x = z = -16
Presentation transcript:

1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module g – Multifunctionality, allocation & system boundaries

The problem Definitions and typologies Solutions to the multifunctionality problem Allocation according to ISO System boundary and allocation Economic allocation Conclusion Contents D r a f t

The problem (1) electricity production with cogeneration of heat (CHP) electricitycoal generatorfly ash heat function 1 function 2 not a function D r a f t There are processes which have more than one function –“multifunctional processes” not a function

The problem (2) electrolysis of sodium chloride chlorine (Cl 2 ) caustic soda (NaOH) hydrogen gas (H 2 ) sodium chloride (NaCl) electricity 3 functions D r a f t

The problem (3) refinery process naphthakeroseneheavy fuel oil crude oil 3 functions D r a f t

6 6 The problem (4) Two problems; –How should the environmental impacts of these processes be allocated to the different product systems involved? –Which processes belong to the product system studied and which do not?

7 7 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (1) Functional flow –any of the flows of a unit process that constitute its goal product outflows of a production process waste inflows of a waste treatment process Multifunctional process –a unit process yielding more than one functional flow co-production (multi-output) combined waste processing (multi-input) recycling (input-output)

8 8 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (2) general process product waste product waste single-output process 1 functional flow

9 9 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (3) general process product waste product multi-output process 2 functional flows

10 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (4) general process waste product waste product waste single-input process 1 functional flow

11 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (4) general process waste product waste multi-input process 2 functional flows

12 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (5) general process product waste product waste product waste input-output process 2 functional flows

13 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (6) general process product waste product waste product multi-input-output process 4 functional flows

14 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (7) Allocation problem –partitioning (the inputs and outputs of) unit processes among product systems Multifunctionality problem –a broader issue cutting right across LCA inventory modelling what are the functional flows of every process? which processes are multi-functional processes? how to resolve the problems related to that?

15 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (8) Problem –whenever a product system needs product 1, it also produces product 2 Possible solutions –more refined data collection –system expansion –substitution –partitioning (=allocation) –surplus

16 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (9) (More refined data collection) –… not really allocation, but more re-iteration of data collection System expansion –add extra function(s) to the functional unit –… but are you still doing the LCA of a product?

17 D r a f t Definitions and typologies (10) Substitution method –defining an “avoided” process with subsequent “avoided” interventions/impacts –… but which process is avoided? Partitioning method –effectively splitting the multifunctional process into several monofunctional processes –… but what basis for splitting? (Surplus method) –ignoring co-products

18 D r a f t Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (1) Allocation problem is artefact of wishing to isolate one function Artefacts can only be cured in an artificial way; there is no “correct” way, even not in theory Solution should be consistent in itself, and with main modelling principles

Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (2) What to do with the extra heat? electricity production electricity coalgenerator fly ash coal mining equipment generator production steel fly ash treatment gypsum heat D r a f t

20 D r a f t Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (3) Two main strategies for dealing with multifunctionality: –accept extra functions as composite reference flow (“system expansion”) –get rid of extra functions by an extra modeling step (“allocation”) subtracting “avoided” burdens (“substitution”) allocating only part of burden to function needed (“partitioning”)

Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (3) electricity production electricity coalgenerator fly ash coal mining equipment generator production steel fly ash treatment gypsum heat composite functional unit: 2 reference flows D r a f t System expansion –change system boundary –include extra function(s) in functional unit –must also do this for the other alternatives

Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (4) Substitution –change system boundary –add extra process –subtract “avoided” process –with consequences upstream and downstream electricity production electricity coalgenerator fly ash coal mining equipment generator production steel fly ash treatment gypsum heat heat production coal heat avoids avoided process D r a f t

Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (5) Partitioning –allocate only a part of the process to the function considered –with consequences upstream and downstream electricity production electricity coalgenerator fly ash coal mining equipment generator production steel fly ash treatment gypsum heat allocate only part of the inputs and outputs to single function D r a f t

24 D r a f t Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (6) Comparison of solutions on three aspects: functional unitflow diagramprocess data system expansionrevised (for all alternatives) enlarged (for other alternatives) same substitutionsameenlarged (with avoided processes) same partitioningsame changed (by multiplying with allocation factors)

25 D r a f t Solutions to the multifunctionality problem (7) Problems with the three solutions: problem system expansionyou don’t answer the question you started with substitutionwhich processes are avoided? partitioningwhat are the allocation factors?

26 D r a f t Allocation according to ISO (1) D r a f t

27 D r a f t Allocation according to ISO (2) Step 1: Wherever possible, allocation should be avoided by: –dividing the unit process to be allocated into two or more sub-processes and collecting the input and output data related to these sub-processes –expanding the product system to include the additional functions related to the co-products

28 D r a f t Allocation according to ISO (3) Step 2: Partition inputs and outputs in a way which reflects the underlying physical relationships between them –not necessarily mass of molar flows Step 3: Partition inputs and outputs in a way which reflects other relationships between then –e.g., in proportion to the economic value of the products

Allocation according to ISO (4) System expansion versus substitution A.-M. Tillman et al. Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2:1 (1994), p.24 D r a f t

30 D r a f t System boundary and allocation (1) electricity production waste treatmentTV use electricity fly ash price < 0 reference flow

31 D r a f t System boundary and allocation (2) electricity production chemical plantTV use electricity heat price > 0 reference flow

32 D r a f t System boundary and allocation (3) electricity production generator plantcoal mining coal generator price > 0 reference flow

33 D r a f t System boundary and allocation (4) electricity production pallet productioncoal mining coal wood waste price < 0 reference flow

34 D r a f t System boundary and allocation (5) Price/direction determines: –if a process is to be included –if allocation is needed for a process –extent to which a process in included There is something to say for economic allocation –price<0: exclude –price>0: include a bit –price>>0: include a lot

35 D r a f t co-product System boundary and allocation (6) electricity production downstream processTV use electricity by-product price > 0 reference flow price >> 0price < 0 waste

36 D r a f t Economic allocation (1) Allocation factors based on shares in proceeds –no absolute values needed –any monetary unit, if the same –any base year, if the same total amount produced  economic value/unit

37 D r a f t Economic allocation (2) Problems –market prices not known –fluctuating prices –inflation –trends in real prices –market distortions –markets not yet existing –… Some solutions suggested in CML’s Handbook on LCA

38 D r a f t Conclusions Transparency crucial in drawing system boundaries and solving the multifunctionality problem –what are the flow diagrams of the systems? –which flows are goods, which are wastes? –where are the multifunctional processes? –how is the multifunctionality problem solved in each of these? system expansion: what is the function added? (also in the other alternatives) substitution: what is the avoided process? partitioning: what are the allocation factors?