Supporting Transition: Enhancing Assessment Feedback in First Year Using Digital Technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personalising Feedback Combining methods. Warm Up Turn to the person on your right and ask them…. Turn to the person on your right and ask them…. What.
Advertisements

Janet Bohrer Development Officer Development and Enhancement Group Student involvement in quality assurance processes of the QA agencies ENQA workshop.
Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
Dr Linda Allin Division of Sport Sciences The value of real life evaluation research for student learning and employability in Sports Development.
Exploring and utilising students' perspectives on feedback: a mixed method, longitudinal approach Kara Peterson, Simon Croker, Dr. Peter Hills and Dr.
FEEDBACK! WHATS FEEDBACK? Did you know that..... Feedback you receive is not just confined to coursework and formal assessments. It will not always come.
Perceptions of Feedback: Myth & Reality Jon Scott School of Biological Sciences.
Office of the DVC (S&E) Students as Change Agents Dr Cassandra Saunders Student Evaluation, Review and Reporting Unit (SERRU) Students Matter Forum 2013.
Student Leadership in Curriculum Development and Reform project Presented by Kylie Jackson - Project Manager (UWS) Supported by the Australian Government.
A quasi-experimental comparison of assessment feedback mechanisms Sven Venema School of Information and Communication Technology.
Motivations to deposit: Two approaches to Open Educational Resources (OERs) within Languages and Social Sciences Sarah Hayes Shared resources, unshared.
REAP Update 5 th April 06 Caledonian Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University.
Ritual or reality: do student evaluations have any effect on teacher thinking and practices? Presentation at the Australasian Higher Education Evaluation.
Deb Hearle and Nina Cogger.  Cardiff University: Periodic Review & Re-validation  Health Professions Council: Re-Approval  College of Occupational.
Presentation Name December 05 Embedding blended learning into mainstream Higher Education “Developments” Debbie Reynolds Clare Denholm.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Voice feedback on formative assigments Ian Greener School of Applied Social Sciences.
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
Experiential Learning, E-Learning And Social Learning: The EES Approach To Developing Blended Learning Dr Amanda Langley The University of Northampton.
Student Success Toolbox for Flexible Learners: Supporting Transitions from Thinking About Study to the First Weeks.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Module 3: Education Leaders Innovation Forum and Learning (ELIF) Lead Center: SEAMEO RETRAC, Vietnam.
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
EdTech 2009 – National College of Ireland May Sustainability through Staff Engagement: Applying a Community of Practice Model to Academic Staff.
Help or Hindrance: A Blended Approach to Learner Engagement A presentation to The Ako Aotearoa ‘Research in Progress’ Colloquium.
Educating for professional life Dr Mark J.P. Kerrigan, Dr Mark Clements, Dr Andrew Bond, Ms Federica Oradini, Ms Yanitsa Nedelcheva & Prof Gunter Saunders.
Professor Norah Jones and Alice Lau Putting Assessment at the Heart of Learning – The Story at The University of Glamorgan.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
@sparqs_scotland #AFA14 Student engagement in articulation Hannah Clarke Development Advisor.
Assessment Careers: Enhancing Learning Pathways through Assessment Dr Gwyneth Hughes Dr Holly Smith Tim Neumann.
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
INSTRUCTION DOMAIN #3. GROUP WORK How it works: 1.Look at your assigned group and move to the corresponding table. Everyone will take their materials.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 Technology enhanced formative assessment: Participant experiences, relative efficiencies and tutor learning.
Development and Delivery of a Science and Engineering Information Literacy programme at NUI Maynooth Mary Antonesa, Library Claire McAvinia, Quality Promotion.
Writing about data Helen Wrightson Adapted from Nic Dunham’s presentation.
Formative Assessment for Michigan Educators The District Perspective Michigan School Testing Conference Thursday, February 23, 2012 Session E4.
Higher Education Academy Conference 2010 : PEER OBSERVATION OF TEACHING Project Team Dr Martyn Chamberlain, Ms Meriel D’Artrey and Ms Deborah-Ann Rowe.
Evaluating and measuring impact in career development: extension workshop Presented by – Date – Just to identify strengths and areas to improve are no.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Evaluating E-Learning Efficacy University of York, UK Wayne Britcliffe and Simon Davis Edinburgh Napier Learning and Teaching conference 14 th June 2012.
Towards the Implementation of an Undergraduate Package for Self-Assessment to compliment the PASS Initiative Melanie Giles, School of Psychology Amanda.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright Information Copyright Karen St.Clair & Stan North.
Assessment Careers: getting better value out of feedback Dr Gwyneth Hughes and Dr Holly Smith.
Electronic Assessment Management Sue Lee
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE E- LEARNING STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AT WALTER SISULU UNIVERSITY Presenter: T. Mayisela E-learning Specialist Mthatha Campus;
Improving the Health Literacy Environment of Wisconsin Hospitals – A Collaborative Model Sue Gaard, RN, MS Wisconsin Primary Care Research & Quality Improvement.
Student Perceptions of Moodle Dr Mel Hudson Smith Graduate School of Management Plymouth University.
Educators’ perceptions of mindfulness in education Jacqueline Stone
Initial Project Aims To increase the capacity of primary schools in partnership with parents to implement a sustainable health and sexuality education.
ON LINE TOPIC Assessment.  Educational assessment is the process of documenting, usually in measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs.
Making the blend work – lessons learned in four years of cross college blended learning Peter Kilcoyne ILT Director Heart of Worcestershire College
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
Business Process Review Academic Registry Student Systems and Administration Business Process Review Team Karen Williams February 2008.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
To flip or not to flip: An exploratory analysis into student attitudes towards the flipped classroom approach to learning Enhancement Themes conference,
The Blended Learning Project. Session Objective  Introduce the Blended Learning Project  Explore and experience SOLA packs that have already been created.
Closing the loop: How to redesign a course for blended learning
Developing the reflective learner -
Overview of VAdata Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Dr. Peter Hills, Kara Peterson, Simon Croker, and Dr. Rachel Manning
Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview
Rights Respecting Schools:
Teaching Tools and Learning Platforms for PhD Teaching
SOLSTICE & CLT Conference 2016
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
OTLA Report Writing Training
Presentation transcript:

Supporting Transition: Enhancing Assessment Feedback in First Year Using Digital Technologies

Our Partners National Forum for the Enhancment of T&L (Funders) Maynooth University (MU) Athlone Institute of Technology (AIT) Dublin City University (DCU) Dundalk Institute of Technology (DKIT)

Our Aim The project will identify and develop technology enhanced assessment feedback approaches to facilitate feedback, feed-forward and peer- feedback in first year to support student transition to higher education.

Our Plan Phase 1 Establish the project Conduct a current practice review and literature review Identify technology enhanced feedback approaches Phase 2 Pilot feedback, feed-forward and peer feedback approaches and technologies Phase 3 Develop and share case studies of feedback approaches Disseminate via a National Symposium on Enhancing Feedback

Phase One – June 2015 Establish the project Plan and conduct a current practice review Establish a web presence Plan and conduct literature summary (ongoing)

Our Logo

@y1feedback

Current Practice Review Why? To get a snapshot of current assessment feedback practices across the four partner institutions from a staff and student perspective How? Staff survey Student focus groups Ethical approval

Student Focus Groups First year class representatives Developed focus group questionnaire Focus group at each partner insitution April participants in total

The Student Experience - Overview Students value feedback and recognise its’ importance for future learning No consistent experience of feedback Feedback received is predominantly grades, or grades with brief comments handwritten or orally provided The timing of feedback is largely lecturer/class size dependent Use of technology to support assessment feedback practice seems to be low

Student Voice Value Feedback “if you are doing something wrong from the start, you are going to probably do that wrong until somebody corrects you. And if someone nips it in the bud at the start, it is going to make a hell of a lot of difference…” Timing “It would take a while.., but whenever you do get it back, there is usually a good amount of feedback on it” “For one of the five if it comes, but for the other four it doesn’t come on time” (for the next assignment) Technology “You get the video recordings but you also just get to see what he is talking about” “Like the facility is obviously there for online feedback but I don’t know whether lecturers don’t want to do it or they don’t know how…”

Student Suggestions for Change “It would be nice to have some kind of a continuance between (modules), there's no point in us getting feedback in one module, it'd be nice to have…Consistency”. “Instead of just getting grades the whole time I think we should get more comments” “I've ed and ed and ed and now it's like she's a part-time lecturer so she's not here so I think it should be made clear to them, you're not going to see them again at least give them a little bit of feedback”

Staff Online Survey Staff who currently teach first year undergraduate modules Developed staff survey Survey open in May-June 213 respondents from across four partner institutions

Staff Experience of Assessment Feedback Assessment feedback is always (53%) or frequently (33%) provided Feedback is predominantly provided in handwritten or orally either individually or to class groups Majority of feedback usually provided within 1 (33%) or 2 weeks (21%)

Top 5 Technologies Used to Deliver Feedback 1.MS Word 2. 3.Moodle Gradebook Feedback Comments 4.Moodle Gradebook Feedback Files 5.Moodle Quiz

Top 5 Recommended Feedback Approaches 1.Face –to- Face/ One to One (30% of responses) 2.Detailed written feedback and one-to one discussion 3.Group/class discussions 4.Rubrics/Marking Schemes/Structured feedback sheets 5.MCQs

Challenges in Providing Assessment Feedback 1.Numbers 2.Time 3.Workload 4.Student engagement with feedback 5.Attendance 6.Technology  “While I provide feedback on all the assignments I set, not many students engage with it. However, those that do seem to benefit from it”  “One-to-one discussions can’t be replaced by technology”  “Some aspects of grade administration in Moodle are clunky”

Lecturer Suggested Solutions “To be able to provide effective feedback then you need to reduce the class size significantly” “Impact could be improved by providing feedback closer to the student submissions and introducing feedback in the first three 3 weeks” “More training on and availability of new technologies” “Training students on feedback might help”

Take Aways So Far Need for a conversation about feedback and a common understanding (staff and students) of what feedback is Perception that using technology for feedback is actually more time consuming – Myth or Reality? The biggest problem with technology, is the technology. We need approaches that cope with numbers! How can we replicate F2F feedback discussions online?

Literature Review (Ongoing) In progress Literature database in development Will inform feedback approach development Forms part of Baseline Report

National Impact Impact Evaluation Framework (IEF) for T&L projects (Weir, K. 2014) Reach of outputs Impact on teaching practice Impact on learners Impact on the project team Project Advisors Subject Matter Experts Student Advisors *Weir, K. (2014)Enhancing tertiary teaching and learning through Ako Aotearoa-funded project work: Part 1. Collated results of Impact Evaluation Framework conversations about National Project Fund projects completed from November 2009 to November Wellington: Ako AotearoaEnhancing tertiary teaching and learning through Ako Aotearoa-funded project work: Part 1. Collated results of Impact Evaluation Framework conversations about National Project Fund projects completed from November 2009 to November 2013

Top 3 Benefits to Higher Education 1.Research informed suite of technology enhanced feedback approaches for first year 2.Increased awareness, capacity, and take up of digital technologies to support assessment feedback practice 3.Enhanced feedback experience for first year students to support student success

Thank