Critical Thinking Assessment Test CAT Critical Thinking Institute October 9, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Art of Critical Thinking. Critical Thinking CRITICAL THINKING is the active and systematic process of Communication Problem-solving Evaluation Analysis.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Presented by Barbara June Rodriguez Professor Trish Joyce Professor Joshua Kimber 14 th Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference February 16-18, 2014.
Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council 1 Team members: Steve Abid, Stephen Barton, Jennifer Batten, Erin Busscher, Dillon Carr, Laurie.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
NSE Assessment (Session 2): The Final Story Project
Faculty Champion Meeting March 2011
TEACHING CRITICAL THINKING. CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS Examine central issues and assumptions Recognize important relationships Evaluate multiple perspectives.
Assessing for Critical Thinking
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
Developing an Assessment Plan Owens Community College Assessment Day Workshops November 13-14, 2009 Anne Fulkerson, Ph.D. Institutional Research.
Daniel Fasko, Jr., Ph.D..  Definition of Critical Thinking  Critical Thinking Skills  Critical Thinking Dispositions  Instructional Strategies  Assessment.
Ideas to Action Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. January 9, 2008.
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Lisa J. Goodnight, Ph.D. Ralph V. Rogers, Ph.D. Purdue University Calumet Hammond, IN A New Model for Faculty Collaboration: Ensuring Rigorous Curriculum.
Topic #3 - CRITICAL THINKING Key Evidence 1 Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Assessment of GLOs: Background 12 years of working on Assessment of GLOs Faculty/Staff generated: in-service, workshop, teams, surveys, etc. Since 2006.
Assessing Critical Thinking Skills Dr. Barry Stein - Professor of Psychology, Director of Planning, Coordinator of TTU Critical Thinking Initiative Dr.
Educational Oversight Group.  Formed to review institutional data from critical thinking assessments and identify goals and objectives to improve student.
INtopFORM Assessment Plan Please sit with other faculty members from your program of study.
Embarking on the. “From this process, I’ve learned that the types of questions that we were to consider were nothing of the ordinary that I am used.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
PeopleProcessPlanPurpose $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
1 Sarah McManus and Hope Tesh-Blum North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section North Carolina High.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Developing a QEP for SACS What is the QEP? Quality Enhancement Plan Focused plan for improving student learning 5 year monitoring of progress Identified.
Is today’s math preparing your child for tomorrow’s world? November 19,2014.
Palomar College General Education/Institutional Learning Outcomes Overview Fall, 2015.
NEW ASSESSMENT. NEW RESULTS SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT What do families need to know? (Insert School Name) (Insert Date) INSERT LOGO.
Friday, August 28,  A pile of blackberries weighs 9 pounds but is 90% water. After sitting in the sun all day long, the berries are only 80% water.
Assessment in General Education: A Case Study in Scientific and Quantitative Reasoning B.J. Miller & Donna L. Sundre Center for Assessment and Research.
MDC Quality Enhancement Plan Mathematics Discipline Meeting Update March 5, 2009.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Data-Guided Faculty Development Planning University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
USING SCIENCE JOURNALS TO GUIDE STUDENT LEARNING Part 1: How to create a student science journal Part 2: How to assess student journals for learning.
Data-Informed Faculty Development Planning Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
Friday, April 24,  Deliverables  CAT  Critical Thinking Activity/RLO.
Rubric-based Reusable Learning Objects and Qualitative Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills in the Humanities.
Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
Friday, June 11,  Fall Critical Thinking Institute  Summer Deliverables  Reusable Learning Objects.
School-Wide Rubrics An Overview. Our Expectations NEASC required for accreditation Developed by a 20+ member leadership team with representation of many.
Friday, December 9,  Housekeeping  Return materials  PAARs  Completion of the Instructional Portfolio and Fall Deliverables  Recommendations.
784-1 Brooklyn College Sarah Kessar July 16, 2009.
UPDATE on the Status of the LSUA QEP Mary Treuting and Cathy Cormier, Co-Chairs.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
Department of Physics and Goal 2 Committee Chair
Support for English, maths and ESOL Level 3 Award in mathematics for numeracy teaching Summative workshop.
Critical Thinking.
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Problem Solving Institutional Learning Outcome Assessment
Faculty Champion Meeting
Faculty Champion Meeting
Critical Thinking is an active and systematic process.
Faculty Champion Meeting
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking Assessment Test CAT Critical Thinking Institute October 9, 2009

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute2 St. Petersburg College Objectives:  Summarize CAT data from 2008 and 2009 administrations  Panel Discussion: Feedback from CAT Scoring Workshop Participants

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute3 St. Petersburg College SPC’s definition of Critical Thinking: “Critical thinking is the active and systematic process of communication, problem- solving, evaluation, analysis, synthesis, and reflection, both individually and in community, to foster understanding, support sound decision-making, and guide action.”

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute4 CAT: Critical Thinking Assessment Test Overview CAT Overview Website:

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute5 CAT: Critical Thinking Assessment Test Skills Assessed by CAT ( )

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute6 CAT Assessment Skills Assessed by CAT ( )  Evaluating Information Separate factual information from inferences. Interpret numerical relationships in graphs. Understand the limitations of correlational data. Evaluate evidence and identify inappropriate conclusions.  Creative Thinking Identify alternative interpretations for data or observations. Identify new information that might support or contradict a hypthesis. Explain how new information can change a problem.  Learning and Problem Solving Separate relevant from irrelevant information. Integrate information to solve problems. Learn and apply new information. Use mathematical skills to solve real-world problems.  Communication Communicate ideas effectively.

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute7 CAT: Critical Thinking Assessment Test Administered by faculty champions in selected sections in Spring 2008; faculty scoring workshop held in July 2008 (87 assessments scored) Administered by faculty champions in selected sections in Summer 2009; faculty scoring workshop held in July 2009 (62 assessments scored) Future administrations in Spring sessions, possibly in mathematics general education classes (i.e. MAC1105, MGF1106, STA2023)

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute8 Distribution of Students by Course: 2008/ CourseDisciplinenMean SLS1101Life Skills138.7 PHI1600Ethics PHI1600Ethics EEC2300Education PCB3043CEducation CourseDisciplinenMean SPC1600Communication PHI2624Ethics PCB3043Education722.6 PLA3474Paralegal Studies918.3 RED4511Education1219.4

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute9 CAT Results by Gender

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute10 CAT Results by Age

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute11 CAT Results by Credits Earned

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute : Course by Credits Earned Course Credits EarnedSPC1600PHI2624PCB3043PLA3474RED4511 < > Total

Assessing for Critical Thinking October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute : CAT Score by GPA GPA nMeann Not reported to to

Assessing for Critical Thinking Held on July 10, 2009 at Epicenter 12 Faculty participated: 62 CAT assessments were scored October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute14 CAT Scoring Workshop  Christy Powers  Katie Woods  Cathy King  Anna Neuzil  Sarah Moseley  Chad Mairn  Jane Till  Mika Nelson  Arlene Gillis  Darlene Westberg  Holly Hoopes  Irene Hayrapetian

Assessing for Critical Thinking Arlene Gillis Irene Hayrapetian Holly Hoopes Jane E. Till Darlene Westberg October 9, 2009 Critical Thinking Institute15 CAT Scoring Workshop Panel

Assessing for Critical Thinking Questions ?? October 9, Critical Thinking Institute