Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAA Viewpoint – Weather is like any other traffic. It occupies space in the NAS and generally needs to be separated from other traffic. NWS “bread and.
Advertisements

Complementary Use of Airborne Wx Radar & Datalink Graphical Wx Cheri Haynes – XCELAR Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather Forum October 31, 2012 What if…What.
Front Office Operations (Reservations)
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago The views expressed in this presentation are those.
Southwest Airlines AMDAR Participation and Benefits
Eastern Region – Mt. Holly Regional Aviation Conference Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 6/6/06
Hub and Spoke vs. Point to Point Evan Demick February 28, 2013.
A System Dynamics Perspective of the Air Transportation Industry Bruno Miller John-Paul Clarke Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Universities.
Weather and General Aviation Accidents: A Statistical Perspective Jody James National Weather Service, Lubbock, TX Warning Coordination Meteorologist FAA.
Aviation Climatology Andrew Rorke WFO LOX Los Angeles / Oxnard.
Forest Fire Detection Economics David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry University of Toronto Robert S. McAlpine Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Fire.
GreenCig/Vis Categories match Pale Green Situational awareness Orange 2 categories off, Multiple impacts Yellow 1 category off, Singular impact Red 3 categories.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Weather Impacts to Philadelphia Air Traffic Operations National Weather Service Workshop David.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
Aviation Meteorology A Northwest Airlines Perspective Tom Fahey, Manager Meteorology American Meteorological Society - Memphis Chapter 20 September 2005.
Weather Model Background ● The WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) model had been developed by various research and governmental agencies became the.
A4A Meteorology Work Group Rick Curtis 2/26/15. ◦ Affects of in-route icing can greatly vary in degree among carriers – due to equipment type, route structure.
Flight Delay Data Analysis CSE 140 A research to find major factors that cause a flight to be late.
Air Cargo Overbooking By Silvia Ito December 2 nd, 2009.
Airline On Time Performance Systems Design Project by Matthias Chan.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
How a Seemingly Minor Weather Concern Can Have a Significant Economic Impact on the Aviation Industry Aviation Case Study Kim Runk, NWS Las Vegas Southwest.
Location Models For Airline Hubs Behaving as M/D/C Queues By: Shuxing Cheng Yi-Chieh Han Emile White.
Winter Operations GENEVA CASE AIRPORT OPERATIONS IN EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS (winter )
Weather Satellite Data in FAA Operations Randy Bass Aviation Weather Research Program Aviation Weather Division NextGen Organization Federal Aviation Administration.
UNITED AIRLINES LEONARD J. SALINAS FLIGHT DISPATCH 21APR2010 Congressional Hazards Caucus Alliance.
1 O&D Forecasting Issues, Challenges, and Forecasting Results John D. Salch PROS Revenue Management, Inc.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Economic Impact of Improvements in Trade Facilitation Farrukh Iqbal Egypt, April 17, 2004.
1 Management Confidential Aviation Weather Friends and Partners John Foottit Manager Aviation Weather Services Las Vegas, 13 Oct 2004.
1 Southwest Aviation Weather Safety Workshop III Rick Curtis Myranda Muehlman.
1 NWS Aviation Weather Meeting Rick Curtis Myranda Muehlman Southwest Airlines April 15, 2010.
1 Botond Kovari: Crew Planning 1 st Int. Conf. on Research in Air Transportation - Zilina, Nov 22-24, 2004 Cost Optimisation Methods in Air Crew Planning.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations Safety % All US Accidents Efficiency --
MIT ICAT ICATMIT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Virtual Hubs: A Case Study Michelle Karow
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
Weather Operations at Western US Airports Rick Curtis Chief Meteorologist Southwest Airlines
Cost, Revenue, and Profit Glen Whitman Dept. of Economics CSUN.
11/18/081 Long Island - Aviation Weather Users Workshop Rick Curtis Chief Meteorologist Southwest Airlines November 18, 2008.
NOAA Satellite Conference Special Panel on the Importance of NOAA Satellites Tom Fahey, Mgr. Meteorology & Chair A4A Meteorology Work Group April 12, 2013.
1999 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
Austin Windsor Emily Waugh Tiffany Vidonish Feng Wang.
The Aircraft Dispatcher “One stop shopping” source of information for the pilot.
Space weather Operational Airline Risks Service (SOARS) Summary of SOARS Objectives Determine the Space Weather needs of Aviation industry Illustrate what.
Wilfrid Nixon, Ph.D., P.E. IIHR Hydroscience and Engineering University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA Operational Resilience in Maintenance Decision.
REALITY – The Cost of Error Wednesday 18 th October 2006 RAF Bentley Priory David King, Chief Inspector of Air Accidents.
WINTER OPERATIONS DC-9 AT MEM WINTER OPS WINTER OPS WINTER OPS BOEING DEICING.
UPS Airlines Randy Baker UPS Airlines Senior Meteorologist.
Quantifying Monetary Impacts of Forecasts National Weather Service Activities Kevin Stone NWS Aviation Services Branch November 1, 2012.
Quantifying Monetary Impacts of Forecasts Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 11/1/12.
WESTJET AIRLINES Michele Derry Director, Operations Control.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory CIWS D. Meyer 10/21/05 Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS)
Route and Network Planning
Ab Rate Monitoring Steven Petlick CAS Underwriting Cycle Seminar October 5, 2009.
Airlines and Aircraft Airline Services Airline Evaluation Airline Contracts.
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Eastern Region Aviation Overview Fred McMullen Regional Aviation Meteorologist Fred McMullen Regional.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AT AMERICAN AIRLINES
Copyright © , Dennis J. Frailey, All Rights Reserved Day 2, Part 1, Page 1 1/11/2004 Day 2, Part 1 Estimating Software Size Section 2 Calculating.
AAL CDM Message Sending Process CDM A&D Meeting January 24-25, 2001 Presented by: Roger Beatty - Operations Coordinator American Airlines - System Operations.
Weather Briefing February 11, 2013 National Weather Service Detroit/Pontiac, MI
F066-B © 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Predictability and Uncertainty in Air Traffic Flow Management Len Wojcik, Josh Pepper,
NWS Activities and Perspective Friends/Partners of Aviation Weather Forum Washington, DC July 24, 2013 Cyndie Abelman NOAA/NWS Aviation Weather Services.
Metron, Inc. 12/7/19991 RTO-37: En route User Deviation Assessment Mark Klopfenstein* Phil Smith** Dennis Gallus* Roger Chapman** Christine Lambert* Jodi.
NAS WITI vs. Combined WITI-FA and Delta (“forecast goodness”) Negative delta = Under-forecast of weather/traffic impact Positive delta = Over-forecast.
NAS WITI vs. Combined WITI-FA and Delta (“forecast goodness”) Negative delta = Under-forecast of weather/traffic impact Positive delta = Over-forecast.
1998 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines

Why again do we need this…? Airlines need: A quantitative way to compare operational performance with weather forecasting performance to: Build a history Identify trends Conduct post event analysis for decision review and improvement. Weather forecast producers need: A quantitative way to measure the value forecasts provide to the aviation community by: Measuring their value on a daily basis. Tracking and comparing forecast performance over time on an impact basis. Being able to provide a historical record of value to justify costs of production.

Two Distinct Problems to Consider Terminal weather forecasts impact: Staffing (Customer Service, Deicing, Overtime callouts, Dispatch, Reservations etc.) Hours of Operation Proactive Customer Accommodation (no charge changes etc.) Customer Behavior En route – (NAS Planning) ATC Delays (GDP, GS, AFPs, compression etc.) Fuel Planning Turbulence, Icing and Thunderstorm Avoidance

Example - Snow at an Airline Hub Light snow with good visibility (6 SM –SN) is forecast from 15Z to 18Z. Heavy snow with reduced visibility (1/4 SM +SN) is forecast starting at 18Z and lasting through 21Z. Precipitation tapers to light snow with improved visibility (3 SM –SN) from 21Z through 04Z.

Based on that forecast Typical strategic planning efforts would result in: Running a reduced operation between 14Z and 17Z by thinning flights wherever possible – 66 flights total – 22 flights affected during the forecast of light snow. Canceling operations between 17Z – 22Z -136 flights total 136 flights affected. Cancelled flights an hour ahead and an hour after forecast of heavy snow “just in case”. Resuming normal operations after 22Z – 182 flights scheduled during after 22Z.

Assuming Forecast Verified Time FrameNumber of Canceled Flights Number of Operated Flights Cancellation Costs 14Z – 17Z 2244$ 165,000 17Z – 22Z1360$ 1,020,000 22Z through COB0182$ 0 Total158226$ 1,185,000 Forecast TimeForecast ConditionActual Weather 15Z – 18Z6 SM -SN Light snow; Vis > 3 SM 18Z - 21Z¼ SM +SN Mod/Hvy snow; Vis < 1 SM 21Z – 04Z3 SM -SN Light snow; Vis > or = 3 SM Average cost per flight cancellation approximated at $7,500 Average Diversion cost approximated at $5,000

Now assume the Heavy Snow Started 2 hours later than forecast and lasted 2 hours longer Forecast TimeForecast Condition 15Z – 18Z6 SM -SN 18Z - 21Z¼ SM +SN 21Z – 04Z3 SM -SN Actual TimeForecast ConditionActual Weather 15Z – 20Z6 SM -SN Light snow; Vis > 3 SM 20Z - 01Z¼ SM +SN Mod/Hvy snow; Vis < 1 SM 01Z – 04Z3 SM -SN Light snow; Vis > or = 3 SM Original Forecast Actual Weather

“On the Fly” Adjustments Since heavy snow started 2 hours later and hung on 2 hours longer, 1 hour of flights were diverted, and an additional hour of flights were cancelled. Also note that two hours of “thinned flights” in hindsight didn’t need to be thinned. However, once a decision is made flights can not be reinstated.

Cost Difference Due to the Change in Conditions From Forecast Cost ItemNumber of Affected Flights Forecast Penalty Thinned/cancelled flights in error 22$ 165,000 One hour of diverted flights 27$ 135,000 Additional hour of cancelled flights 27$ 202,500 Total158$ 502,500 Average cost per flight cancellation approximated at $7,500 Average Diversion cost approximated at $5,000

Now Assume that heavy snow forecast was narrowed down to 2 hours versus 3 Forecast TimeForecast Condition 15Z – 18Z6 SM -SN 18Z - 21Z¼ SM +SN 21Z – 04Z3 SM -SN Original Forecast Forecast TimeForecast Condition 15Z – 18Z6 SM -SN 18Z - 20Z¼ SM +SN 2oZ – 04Z3 SM -SN Modified Forecast

Based on the Modified Forecast Modified strategic planning efforts would result in: Running a reduced operation between 14Z and 17Z by thinning flights wherever possible – 66 flights total – 22 flights affected – No change Canceling operations between 17Z – 21Z -136 flights total 108 flights affected. – Saved 27 flights. Resuming normal operations after 21Z – 209 flights scheduled during after 22Z.

Cost Savings Due to the Modified Forecast Cost ItemNumber of Affected Flights Forecast Penalty Reduced flight cancellations 27$202,500 Total27$ 202,500 Average cost per flight cancellation approximated at $7,500 Average Diversion cost approximated at $5,000

Cost Summary Forecast verified as issued – “cost” to airline $1,185,000. Two hour delay in the heavy snow from the “planning forecast” resulted in an additional cost of $502,500. A “tighter forecast” for the heavy snow saved the airline $202,500.

Disclaimers Cancellation and diversion costs are industry estimates and may (and probably do) vary greatly among airlines. Many Customers do re-book on subsequent flights. The estimates take that into account, but this can be highly variable. Diversion costs include factors like airplane cycle time, Crew time, additional landing fees, and fuel. These fees assume that the flight will indeed make it to the original destination. They do not account for loss in Customer goodwill, hotel expenses, or “downstream effects” such as Crew duty time barriers, additional costs for maintenance routings, etc.

A number is a number…. It is advantageous to have as close to accurate costs as possible to best measure impact, however, forecast trends, forecast modifications, and forecast improvements can be measured using standardized (consistent) costs.

Going Forward….. SWA would like to partner with a local NWS WFO to perform this analysis on a few events this winter to see how difficult this method is to put in practice and see what is learned….