The RISE Project Recognize Intervene Support Empower Permanent Families for LGBTQ Children and Youth A Project of the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Ensuring Educational Stability, Continuity, & Success of Children in Foster Care A COLLABORATIVE.
Advertisements

Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
“I can’t say who I am unless you agree I’m real.”
Maryland Choices “One Team – One Mission”. Regional CME Maryland Choices is …  The Northwest Regional Care Management Entity.
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
HARRIS COUNTY LGBTQ HOMELESS PREVENTION INITIATIVE
Reaching Rural Veterans A Partnership Model to Connect Rural Veterans with Aging and Disability Resource Centers for Options Counseling.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Collaborating with Courts to Reduce and Eliminate Disparities Michael Nash, Presiding Judge of Juvenile Court, Los Angeles County Superior Court Maryam.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Addressing the Health Inequalities of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGB&T) Mary Black May 2013.
Early Childhood Professional Development in Indonesia— Steps Toward a System.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
PROJECT SCHOOL SUCCESS— PHASE II NYC ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES OFFICE OF EDUCATION SUPPORT AND POLICY PLANNING (OESPP) & DIVISION OF POLICY,
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
United Advocates for Children of California 1401 El Camino Avenue, Suite 340 Sacramento, CA (916) direct  (866) toll free.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
The Iowa Pediatric Integrated Health Home Program (PIHH) is for children and youth, 0 to 18 years old, who are Medicaid eligible and have a Severe Emotional.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Vermont’s Early Childhood & Family Mental Health Competencies A story of Integration & Collaboration  How can they help me?
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Re-affirm DCFS’ role of surrogate parent Early identification and treatment of trauma Anticipate child development needs Recognize emotional attachments.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
State Government: Addressing Youth Homelessness Tracy D’Alanno Colorado Department of Human Services Supportive Housing and Homeless Programs
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Addressing Unhealthy Substance Use with Older Adults Dawn Matchett,LICSW Hearth, Inc. October 20, 2014.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
Early Childhood Coordinator
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
DCF Initiatives to Prevent and Intervene in Youth Homelessness
Chautauqua Tapestry Family driven ~ Youth guided ~ Culturally sensitive Community based ~ Evidence-based.
Bruce Grey Child and Family Services
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
A Project of the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
RISE T4T Child Welfare Curriculum
Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina Treatment and Study Overview for NC County Departments of Social Services September.
Presentation transcript:

The RISE Project Recognize Intervene Support Empower Permanent Families for LGBTQ Children and Youth A Project of the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center California Child Welfare Council Presentation, March 12, 2014 Curtis F. Shepard, Ph.D., Director, Children, Youth & Family Services Lisa Parrish, Director, RISE Project

Background Federal Permanency Innovations Initiative (PII) o The RISE Project: one of 6 PII projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, Administration on Children & Families, Administration for Children, Youth & Families, Children’s Bureau o 5-year demonstration project to improve permanency for LGBTQ children and youth in the child welfare system A public-private collaboration led by the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center with foster care providers, including:  Five Acres  Hathaway Sycamores Children & Family Services  Penny Lane Centers  Southern California Foster Family and Adoptions Agency  Vista Del Mar & key partners:  L.A. County Departments of Children and Family Services and Mental Health  The Children’s Law Center  Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law  Holarchy Consulting  National Institute for Permanent Family Connectedness, Seneca Family of Agencies  Westat

An Emphasis on Research & Evaluation RISE purpose at a glance: o Survey the number of LGBTQ children and youth in foster care o Test and evaluate the effectiveness of two new program interventions to reduce barriers to permanency for LGBTQ children and youth in the child welfare system  Outreach and Relationship Building (ORB) organizational support via training and coaching for public and private agency staff  Care Coordination Team (CCT) services for LGBTQ children and youth with open child welfare cases, including gender-variant children and dual-status youth involved with the Probation system

RISE Theory of Change When lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) foster youth and their families are competently identified and appropriately served, then they will be able to achieve safe and stable permanency.

Gathering Existing Information Advocates believe there is disproportionate representation of and disparities in experience and service provision within child welfare for LGBTQ children and youth --BUT-- Lack of data about this In 2011 RISE collected information about LGBTQ youth in the L.A. child welfare system: o Baseline data about residents of GLASS (Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services) group homes o 44 case reviews of current and former youth at DCFS o Youth Speak-Outs o DCFS Staff & Foster Care Agency Staff Speak-Outs o Expert Roundtable on Identification of LGBTQ Youth

Foster Youth Survey, Age 12+ Identification of and data collection about LGBTQ youth in child welfare system is not done systematically o Safety concerns are appropriate, given the prevalence of systemic anti-gay and anti-transgender bias RISE designed a one-time confidential telephone survey (sub-contracts with UCLA School of Law Williams Institute, Holarchy Consulting, Westat) Random sample of nearly 3,000 contacts generated by LA DCFS, stratified by age and 17+ to oversample older youth 786 (26%) completed telephone surveys in 2013 Preliminary results are generally demographically representative

Foster Youth Survey, Age 12+ cont’d RISE Foster Youth Survey Research Questions: 1.What percentage of youth in care identify as LGBTQ? 2.Is this percentage larger than that in the non-foster care population? 3.Are there key differences in experiences in foster care between LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ youth?

Foster Youth Survey, Age 12+ cont’d Summary of Preliminary RISE Foster Youth Survey findings: o Disproportionate representation in out of home care o Some key differences in experiences in foster care o Perceived disparities in appropriate service provision for LGBTQ youth Foster Youth Survey Report will be submitted to the Children’s Bureau for review in April 2014 and available publically later in 2014.

Outreach and Relationship Building Training and Coaching Development o Most public and private agency staff reported little or no professional training on LGBTQ identity and practice application. LA County DCFS has a module for new hires and select other staff developed and delivered by Al Killen-Harvey, a Southern California LGBTQ expert trainer. o RISE developed an organizational level intervention component called “Outreach and Relationship Building (ORB)” designed to deliver six hours of LGBTQ training to public and private staff in the child welfare system o RISE also developed a “Coaching Network” so trained agencies meet regularly to build upon and sustain change in practice and policy

ORB Training Module One LGBTQ Foundations Module learning objectives: o Language about sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE) and education about LGBT experience (i.e. coming out) o Barriers to permanency experienced by LGBTQ youth in child welfare (i.e. anti-gay bias, heterosexism, anti-transgender bias) o Function and elements of LGBTQ affirming environments, symbols o Legal framework (AB 458) and professional responsibilities as social worker in child welfare system in California o Guidance on managing disclosures as it relates to child or youth’s sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression

ORB Training Module Two Social Work with LGBTQ Children and Youth learning objectives: o Review active listening, motivational interviewing, and self-awareness to use with LGBTQ youth o Asking about identity and using inclusive language o Support for the coming out process or experience for youth or family o Skills related to sustaining an affirming environment, responding to supporting/questioning comments, responding to negative comments o Challenges with managing disclosures about sexual orientation or gender identity o Integrating principles of healthy relationships into conversations with youth

ORB Coaching Network ORB Coaching Network Is… o A supportive peer network where coaches build capacity and skills to recognize barriers, intervene with best practice, and help agency staff strengthen skills that lead to safety, well being and permanency for LGBTQ youth. The monthly Coaching Network provides support in: o Sustaining agency training and continued education o Creating agency plans for implementation of best practices o Identifying changes to agency policy as needed

ORB Coaching Network Coaching Network Strategic Goals o 2/3rds of agencies trained by ORB will participate in the RISE Coaching Network in 2014 o Training Boosters and Learning Labs delivered to partner coaches with content related to building capacity to respond to anti-gay bias, heterosexism, and transgender bias  Booster – Skill and Knowledge Refresher  Learning Lab – Practice and application of skills o In 2014 partner coaches develop a mini-plans that address implementation and integration of coaching as a tool to sustain organizational change.

ORB Training and Coaching Progress o ORB Training Pilot from January-May 2013, 687 staff trained to test curriculum, fidelity assessment plan and evaluation instrument o 984 staff trained in total in calendar 2013  310 DCFS Staff  674 private agency staff (5 pilot foster care agencies)  Fidelity assessment of training delivery monthly began February 2013  Coaching Network started to sustain organizational practice and policy change in April 2013, meets monthly

ORB Next Steps and Evaluation o ORB Training and Coaching continues countywide for DCFS Offices and private child welfare agencies, projected training of more staff through 2015 o ORB Evaluation Plan target (voluntary research participation) of 470 participants for each of two more rounds of pre- and post-test training data collection focusing on knowledge acquisition, plus a web-based survey 2 months after completion of both modules focusing on application of training in practice o RISE is currently designing a foster parent curriculum to be tested in 2014

Care Coordination Intervention Design o RISE has created Child and Family Teams modeled on the Wraparound program, each with a Facilitator, Parent Partner and Youth Specialist o RISE includes Family Finding Specialist and the care coordination teams have been trained on Family Search and Engagement by Seneca’s National Institute for Permanent Family Connectedness o The RISE care coordination teams are also trained on LGBTQ identity and employ family education to increase LGBTQ support and acceptance under the direction of clinicians o Goals: to increase family acceptance, emotionally permanent connections and legal permanent status

CCT Progress o RISE tested care coordination services in 2012 – 2013 with 14 youth (ages 18 – 24) in Transitional Living Program at LAGLC  Focus on engaging and strengthening family connections for runaway and homeless LGBTQ youth very promising for their well-being o RISE care coordination enrollment for LGBTQ DCFS clients began in July 2013, clients ages 5 – 19 are now eligible, including children at home on family maintenance and dual status youth  7 clients are enrolled (currently ages ranging from 16 – 19)  1 more will enroll by 3/14/2014  40 slots are targeted to be filled by July 2014

Care Coordination Services, cont’d Westat evaluation of RISE care coordination services: o Baseline interview surveys of enrolled youth (n=40) on wellbeing and permanent connections (children under age 11) and sexual orientation and gender identity (age 11+) o Mid-point qualitative interview with youth focusing on services to date and environment of support and acceptance o End-point interview surveys on wellbeing and permanent connections (children under age 11) and sexual orientation and gender identity (age 11+) o Recruitment for an evaluation comparison group (n=20+) o Administrative data review on placement stability, legal permanency history o Evaluation will be completed by September 2015

Looking Ahead: Year Five and Beyond…. o Outreach and Relationship Building Training Evaluation Results o Care Coordination Evaluation Results o Implementation Case Study o Beyond 2015, continuing direct services in Los Angeles o Expanding training, coaching and services to other jurisdictions

Conclusion Questions and Answers This project is funded by the Children's Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, under cooperative agreement number 90-CT For more information please contact: o Curt Shepard –