System Definition Review - AAE 451 - Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 1 System Definition Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Definition Review
Advertisements

Weight and Balance.
Introduction to Propulsion
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
AE 10 Airplane Design. Preliminary Aircraft Design Process 1. Mission Specification 2. Configuration Design 3. Weight Sizing 4. Performance Sizing 5.
System Definition Review AAE 451 Andrew Mizener Diane Barney Jon Coughlin Jared ScheidMark Glover Michael CoffeyDonald Barrett Eric SmithKevin Lincoln.
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
Preliminary Design Review
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
1 AAE 451 Senior Aircraft Design Spring 2006 Systems Definition Review Group VI Team Members: John Collins Chad Davis Chris Fles Danny Sze Ling Lim Justin.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
Oculus Superne 1 1.) Introduction 2.) Mission & Market 3.) Operations
1 Oculus Superne AAE 451 Team 2. 2 System Requirement Review Mission Overview Business Plan Customer Requirements Concept of Operations.
1 1 1 AAE Aircraft Senior Design TEAM III Sumitero (Calvin) Darsono Charles Hagenbush Keith Higdon Seung-il Kim Matt Lewis Matt Richter Jeff Tippmann.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Parts of an Aircraft. 8/7/2015Aerodynamics Day 12.
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Parts of an Aircraft Parts of an Aircraft Gateway To Technology®
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
PROPRIETARY James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith Daedalus Aviation Conceptual Design Review: “The Daedalus.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
System Requirements Review - AAE Team 5 February 20, 2007 Slide 1 System Requirements Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
1 Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Andrew.
Student Unmanned Aerial System FAMU/FSU College of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department (1) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department (2)
1. Systems Design Review Presentation Joe Appel Todd Beeby Julie Douglas Konrad Habina Katie Irgens Jon Linsenmann David Lynch Dustin Truesdell 2.
Final report and briefing
Conceptual Design Review - AAE Team 5 April 17, 2007 Slide 1 Conceptual Design Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
Propulsion PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 11, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
Summer Program Ground School Introduction to Flight.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
System Definition Review 3/27/07 Team 1
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
AAE Team 1 - 2/20/07 System Requirements Review 2/20/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce.
James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith.
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Team 5 Final Design Review
Preliminary Wing Sizing
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
Team 5 Final Design Review
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
FLIGHT MECHANICS BDA DR. ZAMRI BIN OMAR D
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Charlie Rush Zheng Wang Brandon Wedde Greg Wilson
Unmanned Powerline Surveillance Aircraft Group Name: Watchmen
Presentation transcript:

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 1 System Definition Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian Boyer Nick Gohn Charley Hancock Matt Schmitt Team 5

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 2 Outline of Presentation Concept of Operations Design Requirements Concept Selection Payload Analysis Constraint Analysis Sizing Studies Final Concept

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 3 Mission Statement Our mission is to provide an innovative advertising medium through the use of an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 4 Concept of Operations Continuous area coverage of South Florida metropolitan areas and beaches for advertising purposes Advertisements change based on location and circumstance –Targeted advertising for specific areas –e.g. advertising Best Buy near Circuit City locations Large, fuselage mounted LED screens will deliver adverts Business will be developed around this new technology

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 5 Concept of Operations Operations based at Sebring Regional Airport, serving 3 high population areas Continuous area coverage of city for 18 hrs (6am to 12am) –3 missions total with 6 hour loiter each Seven planes needed for 3 city operations with 1 spare Coverage area map:

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 6 Schedule Generation Application –13 destination choices within 175 nm –Sort schedule by Time, Destination, Plane, & Action –Allows detailed operations planning Concept of Operations

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 7 Major Design Requirements Customer Attributes –Advertisement visibility is paramount in order to meet customer’s needs –Must maintain a loiter speed which allows the public to retain the content of advertisements –For a successful venture, these two requirements must be clearly met in order to provide a superior service to the customer Engineering Requirements –Screen dimensions: 7.42’ x 30’ (each) –Loiter Speed: 60 kts –Loiter Endurance: 6 hrs

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 8 4 Concepts Must Be Evaluated 2-Screen MachineWing Screen 1-Screen WonderCessna with Banner 2 LED Screens on Fuselage 1 LED Screen on Fuselage 2 LED Screens Under Wings 1 Banner

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 9 Pugh’s Method – Close Competition

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 10 Modified Pugh’s Method – Justifying the 2-Screen Concept

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 11 Payload Component Selection and Sizing –Screen –Engine –Generator –Camera –Parachute

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 12 Screen Two High Intensity LED Screens –7.42 ft X 30 ft Viewable up to 1500 ft –500 lbs installed (each) –$120k cost (each) –Power Consumption 3.9 kw/5.2 hp, each –Daytime Viewable Brightness: 6500 cd/m² –Dynamic Display 60 fps video/text –Weatherproof

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 13 Honeywell TPE-331 Turboprop –Over 14,000 Manufactured –20+ Variants –HP ≈ –SFC ≈ 0.55 –Weight ≈ lbs P&W PT6A Turboprop –Over 36,000 Manufactured –50+ Variants –HP ≈ 500–1900 –SFC ≈ 0.60 –Weight ≈ lbs –Many 4000–8000 lb GTOW Single Engine Applications Propellers –Hartzell 3,4 Blade –McCauley 3,4,5 Blade –Diameter ≈ in –Weight ≈ lbs –Variable Pitch –Aluminum –η p ≈ 0.77 Cessna Caravan 208 Engine and Propeller Considerations

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 14 Generator Used to power screens, avionics, etc Screen requirements: –12.89 kW (17.3 hp) AC –30% efficiency AC-DC-DC conversion. –12.89 kW/screen X 2 screens X 30% = 7.7 kW DC (10.3 hp) Options: –Gas-powered APU + Generates excess power, provides emergency backup power - Uses considerable fuel, heavy –External propeller-powered APU + Provides emergency backup power - Increases drag, adds complexity –Electric generator driven by accessory gearbox + Simple, supplied and designed by engine manufacturer - Increases engine cost, no emergency power

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 15 Camera Micropilot MP-Dayview –High resolution CCD camera –Designed for UAV applications –Roll and elevation control via joystick –Two-axis gimbal for image stabilization –25x optical zoom –Weight: 2 lb

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 16 Parachute Recovery System Ballistic Recovery Systems –Largest current application: Cessna 182 (3100 lb GTOW) Cost: $17,445 System Weight: 85 lbs –Extrapolated specifications: Cost: $32,053 System Weight: lbs Used in the event of catastrophic failure

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 17 Constraint Analysis Major performance constraints: – Service Ceiling: Steady, level h = 15,000 ft and V = 135 kts – Rate of Climb: 1,500 ft/min climb sea level and V = 135 kts – Maximum Acceleration: Acceleration of 15 ft/s 2 in level h = 10,000 ft and V = 60 kts – Maneuverability: 1.5g h = 10,000 ft and V = 135 kts – Loiter: Steady, level h = 1,000 ft and V = 60 kts – Stall Velocity: 30% lower than loiter sea level – Takeoff Ground Roll: 2500 ft takeoff ground sea level – Landing Ground Roll: 2500 ft landing ground sea level

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 18 Constraint Analysis Equations for Constraint Diagram: –Excess Power: –Stall Velocity: –Takeoff Ground Roll: –Landing Ground Roll:

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 19 Constraint Analysis Aircraft Data Assumptions for Constraint Diagram Construction: Standard Atmosphere 30°F Fuel Weight Fraction1 Airspeed135 kts (Cruise) 60 kts (Loiter) Maximum Lift Coefficient (CLmax)1.2 Parasite Drag Coefficient (Cd0)0.03 Oswald’s Efficiency Factor0.8 Aspect Ratio14 Propeller Efficiency.85 /.75 Landing and Takeoff Ground Roll 2,500 ft. Braking Friction Coefficient0.3

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 20 Constraint Diagram

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 21 Constraint Diagram - Relevant Region

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 22 Constraint Diagram From the Constraint Diagram: –Estimate for ideal starting design for current sizing estimates: Wing Loading: 8 lbs/ft 2 Power-to-Weight Ratio:.18 hp/lb –Using these values as a starting point, the next step is to create carpet plots

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 23 Screen Trade Study Primary Driver: –Can the screen be seen clearly? Screen size Loiter velocity Loiter altitude Initial Reference: –Billboard advertising - 15 ft X 45 ft –Current LED billboards visible from 2000 ft Normalized target parameters: –Angular diameter of screen > 0.4° /sec –Angular velocity of aircraft < 1.0°/sec 10 ft 1000 ft

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 24 Sizing Approach Design Mission –Sizing done with MATLAB script using empty weight fraction regression from existing UAVs –Future studies to use FLOPS/ACS Basic assumptions –L/D: 17 –AR: 14 –Propeller Efficiency: 0.8 –Cbhp: 0.55

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 25 Aircraft Concept Isometric Drawing “Walkaround” Drawing Internal Layout Drawing Requirements Compliance

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 26 Isometric and 3-View Drawing CONCEPTUAL DRAWING ONLY

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 27 Aircraft Concept – Walk Around Chart 7.42’ x 30’ advertising screen T-tail empennage configuration High wing configuration High aspect ratio, zero sweep wing Single hp piston engine with propeller Retractable tricycle landing gear configuration CONCEPTUAL DRAWING ONLY

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 28 Internal Layout Drawing Fuel Rear Landing gear Nose Landing gear Screen Engine Generator Avionics Nose Camera Tail Camera Ballistic Recovery System

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 29 Design Requirements Review Design requirements review was carried out to verify design requirements. Further research of requirements led to alteration of design requirements for the mission profile based on the “voice of the customer.” Design requirements compliance shows the current, target, and initial values. Initial values changed to target values as a result of the design requirements review.

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 30 Design Requirements Compliance RequirementCurrentTargetInitial Screen Dimensions (each) 7.42’ x 30’ 8’ x 45’ Loiter Velocity60 kts< 65 kts< 55 kts Loiter Time6 hrs> 6 hrs> 8 hrs Cruise Range400 nm> 400 nm Loiter L/D (clean)16.6> 16> 22 Specific Fuel Consumption 0. 5 lb/BHP/hr < 0.5 lb/BHP/hr Cruise Velocity135 kts> 80 kts> 135 kts

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 31 Next Steps Detailed design in specific disciplines: –Aerodynamics –Structures –Propulsion –Flight Mechanics and Performance Detailed aerodynamic sizing. Finalize internal layout and component weights. Select structural materials. Internal structural component design. Landing gear design. Compile necessary carpet plots. Select an engine and finalize propeller dimensions. Investigate the fuselage color that gives optimized screen visibility.

System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 32 Questions? Thank you for your time! Comments and Questions?