1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Advertisements

Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
TVPPA Accounting & Finance Conference October 21, 2011 Cost of Service, Hydro Credit, Environmental Adder, and Fuel Cost Jim Sheffield 1.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
DO AMERICANS CONSUME TOO LITTLE NATURAL GAS?An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing. By Lucas W. Davis and Erich Muehlegger. Key words :Efficient pricing,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
1 City Light Rate Design- Review Presentation to Review Panel January 2013.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
1 Filename, Version Fair Rate Setting for a Renewable Future Renewable Cities Forum, Vancouver BC, May 2015.
Injection / Withdrawal Transmission Cost Allocation Updated Slides OMS CARP Group November 19, 2009.
LAKELAND ELECTRIC Pricing to Meet Net Meter Rules APPA 2009 Business & Finance Conference Sept 14, 2009 Jeff Sprague Manager Pricing & Rates.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Naperville’s MUNI Marla Westerhold I n Slide Show mode, the slides and audio should start automatically. If this doesn’t happen.
1 Load Forecast and Scenarios David Bailey Customer Energy & Forecasting Manager Soyean Kim Rate Design Manager.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER — Chris Pattas, General Manager - Networks ◦Consumer Challenge Panel — Hugh.
Managing Retail Rate Changes Presented by Walter Haynes, Sr. Project Manager, Patterson & Dewar Engineers Central District Power Accountants Association.
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Interconnection of Small Wind & Solar Systems to Distribution Utilities: A Cooperative Perspective Patrick Parke Midwest Energy Hays, KS September 26,
Incorporating an Affordability Rate Cap Into a Florida RPS Florida Public Service Commission July 26, 2007 Kim Owens, P.E. JEA Clean Power Coordinator.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
1  The IPM model projects increases in electricity prices as a result of the RGGI policy scenarios which, by themselves, would increase the household.
Smart Capacity Markets: Can they be Smart Enough? Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Smart Capacity.
Virginia Energy Purchasing Governmental Association (VEPGA) Primer On Rate Design Concepts & Practices And Explanation of VEPGA Rates & Schedules (What.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Santee Cooper Encouraging Energy Efficiency APPA National Conference June 15, 2009.
CIPCO Central Iowa Power Cooperative Iowa Industrial Energy Group April 9, 2013.
Northwest Power and Conservation CouncilProCost Version 2.2 RTF July 2007.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
COST OF SERVICE STUDIES Carryn Lee Manager-Water & Sewer Rate Design Branch Assistant Director-Financial Analysis Division KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
Eugene Water & Electric Board. Dave Churchman Manager, Power Operations Eugene Water & Electric Board.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
Talha Mehmood Chapter # 5 TARIFF. Introduction The electrical energy produced by a power station is delivered to a large number of consumers. The supply.
Reallocating Distribution Upgrade Costs for Farm Digester Projects by Ed Cubero, Sam Harms, Sam Shannon University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Rate Policy Discussion Presentation to Review Panel November 1, 2013.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
New Large Single Loads and Economic Development Considerations Draft Assessment.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
Economic Regulation of Distributed Energy Resources: Experience in USA/Lessons to Be Learned Fundacão Getulio Vargas Centro de Estudos em Regulação e Infraestrutura.
Powering a Reliable and Sustainable Energy Future for Ontario Bruce Campbell, President and CEO, IESO March 3, 2016.
Cost benefit analysis. Social costs Social costs are the costs of economic activity to society as a whole Social costs = private costs + external costs.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
1 Proposed Performance Tracker for PSC Working Group 1 of 3 CategoryMetricResults Project Costs Cost to Deploy: Capital vs total Capital deployment cost.
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Transmission and Distribution Loss Study
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Clean Energy Options for GRC Communities
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Wind Development & Policy Options
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012

2 Review Panel and Marginal Cost Allocation  Ordinance (March 2010) Established Review Panel, defined role …assess City Light's implementation of marginal cost allocation among customer classes to ensure that it provides a fair allocation of costs among customer classes and takes account of changes in costs and consumption.  Resolution (May 2012) Policy framework for City Light rate setting objectives, rate design policies and marginal cost allocation among customer classes.

3 Why City Light Uses Marginal Costs/Prices  Economic theory = social welfare maximization (best way to allocate society’s resources) Customers will consume to the point where marginal value to them = their marginal price If not worth the price to the consumer, society is better off by not consuming  Encourages energy conservation Customers will not consume more that it is worth to them on the margin (i.e., at the marginal price) Rates can be structured to reflect marginal cost (i.e., the marginal price), but… Average rate paid by class = average cost for class

4 Marginal Cost at City Light  Revenue Requirement: total $ City Light needs from customers.  Marginal cost allocation is a method of assigning a portion of the revenue requirement to each customer class  The results of calculating marginal costs are percentages (“marginal cost shares”) Example: Class x is responsible for 10% of the marginal energy cost. Class x will be assigned 10% of the revenue requirement related to energy.  Rates: City Light does NOT charge customers the marginal costs. Average rates by customer class come from the revenue requirement. Price signals in rates can reflect marginal costs.

5 Categories of Marginal Costs CategorySources of data Marginal Energy Cost ($/MWh by time period) Market price forecasts + Environmental externality cost + Transmission cost Distribution ($/peak MW) Current replacement costs per MW of capacity Customer Service ($/meter) Accounting cost data for customer services divided by # of meters

6 More on Marginal Cost Data Sources: Marginal Cost of Energy ($/MWh)  3 rd -party Mid-Columbia price forecasts by HLH and LLH: Ventyx, Kiodex prices (e.g., $31.01)  + Cost of environmental externalities--CO 2 emitted when energy is generated: IRP research (e.g., $5.07) (e.g., American Wind Energy Association, EPA, U.S. Forest Service, Dept of Energy, National Renewable Energy Lab)  + Long-distance transmission cost: BPA transmission price (e.g., $4.42)  Total Marginal Cost of Energy: $40.50/MWh

7 Example: Forecasts of Market Prices, $ / MWh

8 Example: Annual Environmental Externality Costs

9 Example: Market Price Forecast with Environmental Externality Price

10 More on Marginal Cost Data Sources: Marginal Cost of Distribution ($/MW)  Capital: In-service area transmission: SCL engineers-recent cost experience with line replacement (e.g., $80,000) Substations: SCL engineers-recent cost experience (e.g., Denny substation estimate) (e.g., $110,000) Distribution wires and related equipment: SCL engineers-recent cost experience (e.g., $200,000) Meters: Recent SCL meter purchase costs-12 types (e.g., $100/meter but $10,000/MW)  O&M: recent costs from in FERC accounts (e.g., $18,000)  Total Marginal Cost of Distribution: $418,000/MW

11 More on Marginal Cost Data Sources: Marginal Cost of Customer Service ($/meter)  O&M: recent costs recorded in FERC accounts Meter reading costs (e.g., $20) Costs of uncollectibles (e.g., $2) Customer records and collections costs (e.g., $78)  Billing and account maintenance  Credit and collections  Customer engineering  Account executives (large customers)  Customer assistance (small customers)  Total Marginal Customer Cost: $100/meter

12 Marginal Costs

13 Simple Example of Allocating Revenue Requirements Using Marginal Cost Shares Step 1: Forecast consumption inputs by customer class Step 2: Multiply inputs by marginal costs by function Step 3: Calculate marginal cost shares (percentages) Step 4: Separate Revenue Requirements into functions Step 5: Allocate RR functions by marginal cost shares Step 6: Calculate average rate by customer class

14 Step 1: Consumption Inputs-- Forecasts of Load, Peak MW, & Meters

15 Step 2: Consumption Inputs x Marginal Costs Slide 12 x Slide 14 Example: Residential $40.50/MWh x 3.1 M MWh = $126 M (Energy) $418,000 x 590 MW = $246 M (Distribution) $100 x 357,000 meters = $36 M (Customer Svc) Total = $408 M

16 Step 3: Shares of Marginal Costs From Slide 15 Example: Residential $126/$378 = 33% (Energy) $246/$631 = 39% (Distribution) $36/$43 = 84% (Customer Svc) $408/$1,052 = 39% (Total)

17 Step 4 : Revenue Requirements

18 Step 5: Allocation of Revenue Requirement Slide 16 x Slide 17 (e.g., Residential Energy: 33% of $460 M = $153 M)

19 Step 6: Average Rates Slide 18 / Slide 14 Example: Residential $277,000,000 / 3,100,000,000 kWh = 8.9 ¢/kWh

20 Some cost allocation issues from customers  Low-Income Cost All customer classes (current policy) Residential only  Conservation Cost All customer classes (current policy) According to $ spent on specific classes  Net Wholesale Revenue Credit By shares of all other costs (current policy) By shares of energy costs