Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cornell Rocketry PDR.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014

Team Structure

Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions

Key Design Features  Launch Vehicle Sections  CubeSat/Electrometer, Camera System, Parallel Boosters  Fin Style  Launch Vehicle Separations  Parallel Boosters, Booster Section, Drogue Bay/Detachable Bulkhead

Forward Section-CubeSat  Nose Cone  Electrometer  CubeSat

Avionics/Payload Section-Hazard Detection  Avionics/Payload components  Hazard Detection System  Drogue Bay disengagement

Booster Section-Parallel Boosters  Parallel booster attachment/detachment  Booster section disengagement  Fin material and shape  Positive motor retention

Final Motor Choice (18,500 ft) MotorBrand Engine CodeDiameterLengthBurn TimeImpulseThrust BoostersCesaroniJ240 RL54 mm in3.35 s Ns N MainCesaroniL61098mm in8.13s Ns N SustainerCesaroni L3150 Vmax98mm in1.57 s Ns N

Thrust Curve of Motors (18,500ft)

Table of Motor Events (18,500ft) EventTime (s)Altitude (ft)Velocity (ft/s) Motors Ignite000 Parallel Motors Burnout Separation of Parallel Boosters Main Motor Burnout Main Motor Separation Sustainer Ignites if within 5 degrees of the Z-axis Sustainer Burn Out Apogee

Final Motor Choice (9,000 ft) MotorBrand Engine CodeDiameterLengthBurn TimeImpulseThrust BoostersAerotech I229T 54 mm in1.73 s Ns N MainAerotechL339N98mm in8.43 in Ns N SustainerAerotechK1999N98mm in1.40 s Ns N Aerotech Motors were chosen over Cesaroni because of the motor mount sizes, should the team use Aerotech motors, the integration would only require the change of the type of motor casings used.

Thrust Curve of Motors (9,000 ft)

Table of Motor Events (9,000 ft) EventTime (s)Altitude (ft)Velocity (ft/s) Motors Ignite000 Parallel Motors Burnout Separation of Parallel Boosters Main Motor Burnout Main Motor Separation Sustainer Ignites if within 5 degrees of the Z-axis Sustainer Burnout Apogee

Static Stability Margin Stability Analysis From nose coneWith Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Center of Pressure ’” ” Center of Gravity ” ” Static Stability Margin Rail Size/Length1.5” (1515) / 144”

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Ascent Analysis (18,500ft) With Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Rail exit velocity (ft/s) Max velocity (ft/s) Max Mach number Max acceleration (ft/s 2 ) Peak altitude (ft) Thrust-to-Weight Ratio5:119:1

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Ascent Analysis (9,000ft) With Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Rail exit velocity (ft/s) Max velocity (ft/s) Max Mach number Max acceleration (ft/s 2 ) Peak altitude (ft) Thrust-to-Weight Ratio4.38:113.5:1

Mass Statement and Mass Margin SubsystemMass (oz)Mass Limit (oz) Propulsion (Including: motor mounts and centering rings) Structure (Including: body tube, coupling tubes, bulkheads, nose cones, fin sets) Recovery (Including: main parachute, drogue parachute, detachable components parachutes) Payload (Including: avionics bays, electrical components) Miscellaneous (Including: Paint scheme, dressings/coatings) 1620 Total

Mass Statement and Mass Margin

Recovery Subsystem 6-sided parachutes with Cd=0.75 Ripstop nylon 80 – 120 CFM 1 inch tubular nylon 4000 lbs 3/16 inch flat braided Dacron 600 lbs 3/8 inch brass grommets No 69 size “E” nylon thread 8.5 lbs

Recovery Specifications ParameterDrogueMainParallelBooster Diameter (in) Deployment Altitude (ft) Velocity at Deployment (ft/s) Descent Rate (ft/s) Harness Length (ft) Shroud Line Length (in)

Kinetic Energies ParachuteSection Mass of Section (lbs) Terminal Velocity (ft/s) Kinetic Energy (ft-lbs) ParallelParallel Motor Booster Booster Section Mini Avionics Bay Drogue Drogue & Main Bay Drogue Bay Main Avionics Bay Main Section

Predicted Drift from Launch Pad 0 mph5 mph10 mph15 mph20 mph 0 ft ft ft ft ft. 18,500 ft. Flight

Predicted Drift from Launch Pad 0 mph5 mph10 mph15 mph20 mph 0 ft ft ft ft ft. 9,000 ft. Flight

Launch Vehicle Testing Test PurposeTest Status Subscale TestTo ensure safe stage separation is possible Completed Cluster Ignition Test To ensure parallel circuitry can cause simultaneous ignition Completed Nylon Tie- Downs To ensure rocket motors all ignite before rocket launches Planned Booster Section Separation Ground Test To ensure booster section can separate from main bay with attachment scheme Planned Airstart TestTo ensure Raven3 has appropriate output current to airstart sustainer Planned

Exploding Nylon Bolt Testing Test PurposeTest Status Exploding Nylon Bolt Test To ensure exploding nylon bolts can safely separate parallel boosters from the booster section Completed. 1.5 x 3/8 inch exploding nylon bolts with 1/8 inch wide cavity almost an inch deep. Kerf mark below head. Exploding Nylon Bolts Shearing Strength To ensure exploding nylon bolts have enough shear strength to withstand rocket launch. In progress

Recovery System Testing Test PurposeTest Status To ensure design of parachute can withstand forces Completed – Successful To determine velocity that the parachute will fly, and impact force of different rocket sections Planned To test static ejection charges of full scale parachutes Planned To demonstrate durability of bulkhead attachment scheme within the rocket. Planned

Electrical Components Testing Test PurposeTest Status Raspberry Pi Camera module To test functionality and accuracy Completed. Camera board communicated effectively with Raspberry Pi RockeTilTometerTo test functionalityPlanned ElectrometerTo test functionality and accuracy Planned Transceiver to Ground Station To test functionality and accuracy Planned Linx TM Series GPSTo test functionality and accuracy Planned

Scale Model Flight Test

Staged Recovery Test Deployment Testing o Static ground test for rocket separation and parachute deployment. Altimeter Testing o Ground testing barometric pressure sensor and accelerometer calibration

Hazard Detection System Overview Cancellation of the LiDAR System Cost Availability of Parts Eliminate moving parts Raspberry Pi Edge Detection Sobel Operator Minimal components Ease of integration

P.I.M.S. Payload Overview

Tesseract Payload Overview

Hazard Detection/Avionics Bay Integration

P.I.M.S. Payload Integration Raven3 integration Avionics Bay Above the Sustainer Mini-Avionics Bay Payload Sled Keeps Electronics upright throughout the flight Ease of payload retrieval Ease of manufacturing Raven3 diagram from manufacturer

P.I.M.S. Payload Integration RockeTiltometer Ignition Control System Ease of integration Compatible with Raven3 Image from manufacturer

Tesseract Payload Integration

Launch Vehicle Interfaces Internal Interfaces Nose cone and payload sections All-threads Bulkhead-like centering rings Nut locks Drogue bay, avionics bay, main bay, sustainer section, booster section and mini parachute bay. #2-56 nylon shear pins (x3 for each section) External Interfaces 1515 rail buttons Parallel booster attachment points

Payload Interfaces Structural Interfaces o All-thread rods o Aluminum chassis o Plywood sleds o Grid style pc board Electrical Connections USB Connections Raspberry Pi, Power Supply Arduino, GPS, Camera, Digital and Analog Connections Atmospheric Sensor Serial Connections Raspberry Pi ↔ Xbee, GPS Arduino ↔ Xbee, GPS

Status of Requirements Verification RequirementStatus Rocket must not fly higher than 20,000 ft. AGL.Complete Rocket must carry a scientific payload.Complete Rocket must have dual altimeters.Complete Rocket must have dual deploy recovery system.Complete Rocket must be reusable on the day of recovery.Complete Rocket must land within 5000 ft. of the launch pad assuming 20 mph wind.Complete Students must do all critical design and fabrication.Complete Team must use a launch and safety checklist.Complete Rocket must use a commercially available, certified motor.Complete Rocket must be capable of being prepped for launch in less than 2 h.Complete Rocket must be able to remain in a launch-ready configuration for at least 1 h.Complete Rocket must attain an altitude of 18,500 with 500 foot variance.Complete Drogue parachute successfully deploys at apogee and main at 1200 ft.Complete Rocket must be compatible with a 1.5’’ launch rail.Complete Sustainer motor will only ignite if angle of attack is between 0-5 degrees.Complete

Questions?