Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flying Bison.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
PLANTATION HIGH PDR PRESENTATION Team 1. VEHICLE DIMENSION & MATERIALS.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Critical Design Review
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation

Contents Vehicle Specifications Performance Characteristics Recovery System Flight Predictions and Testing Payload

Vehicle Design Modified Ultimate Darkstar kit with dual deploy UAV deployment at apogee Three split fins AeroTech L2200 motor 24" Von Karman nosecone

Vehicle Dimensions Length: 126 in Diameter: 6 in Component dimensions shown:

Final Motor Choice Aerotech L mm motor, Aeropack retainer and adapter

Motor Characteristics Max Thrust N Average Thrust N Total Impulse 5104 Ns Mass pre Burn10.55 lbs Post Burn 5.55 lbs

Stability Analysis CG 14.4 inches above CP Static stability margin of 2.34 Marginally overstable, but well within acceptable bounds

Takeoff Characteristics Using an 8ft high, 1.5 in standard launch rail, the predicted takeoff characteristics are: Thrust to weight ratio: 13.5 Rail exit velocity: 73.7 ft/s These are well within acceptable ranges for normal launch conditions

Vehicle Mass For detailed vehicle mass, view section 3.1 G. All weights in pounds. Nosecone: 2.04 Upper Airframe and Coupler: UAV and Piston: 6.73 Booster Airframe and Motor: Parachutes and associated hardware: Total, on the pad:

Recovery System Overview

Recovery System Characteristics Dual deployment system, with Two redundant Stratologger altimeters for charge control Telemetrum for GPS and tracking Independant switches and batteries for all altimeters SkyAngle 36 in Classic 2 Drogue, ~74 ft/s terminal velocity Rocketman 18 ft Main, ~ 17.4 ft/s terminal velocity

Kinetic Energy at Key Phases Kinetic Energy During Descent (ft-lb) Under drogue: Nosecone:172.5 Upper airframe/ coupler:913.4 Booster airframe: UAV:431.3 Under main: Nosecone:6.57 Upper airframe/ coupler:34.77 Booster airframe:69.38 UAV descends separately from rocket.

Predicted Performance For the final launch vehicle: Drift during test flight was 772 ft with 8 mph winds; this is with the expected range for this speed. Drift calculations have been altered from CDR to reflect changes to stability margin. Wind Speed (mph)Altitude (ft)Maximum Drift (ft)

Predicted Performance Final launch vehicle predicted performance

Test Plans The only remaining testing to be done on the launch vehicle are tests involving the UAV, including a second full scale test flight. Final charge testing of piston, UAV, and drogue Second full scale test flight All other tests have been completed.

Recovery System Testing Charge testing and one full scale flight test have been successfully completed. All charges successfully deployed at proper times during flight, and there was no unexpected separation. Future charge testing will occur after the new design components are completed and the UAV is prepared for charge testing, to ensure continued successful deployment. Only one charge test remains to be done.

Full Scale Flight Test Stability During first flight test: CG: 107 in CP: 122 in Stability: 15 in Margin: 2.5

Simulated Full Scale Flight Test The rocket was flown with a four foot upper airframe and the original nosecone, weighing 54 lbs.

Full Scale Flight Test Results The final apogee is observed as 5007 ft, which a 315 ft (~6%) overshoot. Overshoot correlates to that found from subscale flight test.

Summary of Verifications Full summary in section 3.4 All requirements for the launch vehicle are currently met, and no changes are expected to occur.

Payload Design Changes since CDR: No longer mounting a camera onboard the UAV; will instead attempt to add Raspberry Pi 5 megapixel sensor Controls and other systems are retained

Payload Integration The payload needs to be carefully loaded into the rocket to ensure successful deployment; full instructions for loading payload into rocket found in section 5.1 of FRR. Rocket is contained completely separately from all other avionics, and thus cannot interfere in any way with parachute deployment or other launch vehicle functions.

Testing UAV will undergo a battery of tests to ensure flight readiness, including: Static test article for controls testing Ground, charge, flight, deployment, and full scale flights testing

Interfaces Physical interface on the vehicle are quick links and eye bolts connecting different sections through shock cord, and the Defy Gravity tether, holding the UAV to the shock cord before deployment. Communication with the ground happens through two channels: An X-Bee transceiver on the UAV allows communication with the ground station A Telemetrum Altimeter allows tracking of the vehicle during flight

Tether The Defy Gravity tether will be used to secure the UAV to the launch vehicle, via the recovery harness, until the RSO gives permission to release. The vehicle will be released and will descend under parachute until stable, then unfold and fly autonomously.

Status of Requirements A full summary of the status of requirements is given in section 4.4 of the FRR for the payload. - UAV performs well mechanically - Structurally capable of withstanding large forces - Unfolds successfully during separation from rocket - X-Bee modules communicate effectively with the quadrotor - Ground station command confirmation from the UAV - Range tests of up to 2 miles - Flight tests guarantee the stability of the system - Reliable data being read from the on-board sensors - Successful deployment of both parachutes (main and emergency)

Questions?