Every young person served by DYS will become a productive citizen and lead a fulfilling life. Missouri DSS Division of Youth Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Judy Langford June 2011.
Advertisements

Eliminating Disparities In Children’s Mental Health: Improving Access in Rural Nebraska Beth Baxter, M..S. Regional Administrator Region 3 Behavioral Health.
Carnegie Schools for a New Society: Reflections on a National, Districtwide High School Reform Initiative ROCHELLE NICHOLS-SOLOMON & MICHELLE FEIST Academy.
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Video – Turning Lives Around Young people becoming law-abiding and productive citizens Missouri Division of Youth Services.
Every young person served by DYS will become a productive citizen and lead a fulfilling life. External Communications and Constituency Building CJCA New.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Common Solutions & Success to Reduce DMC Heidi Hsia, OJJDP Please visit often:
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Dallas County Juvenile Probation Department Dr. Terry S. Smith, Executive Director 1.
Introductions Agenda 10:00- 10:20am Introductions and Today’s Agenda 10:20- 10:40am Project Overview (large group) 10:40- 11:30am Definitions 11:30-
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Juanita Blount-Clark August, 2011.
National Center for Youth in Custody Creating the Foundation: Elements and Principles of an Effective Continuum of Services Alternatives.
Cambridge Safety Net Collaborative. Cambridge, Massachusetts  105,000+ Residents  6,000+ public school students  58% ethnic minorities  27% first.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
THE ABC’s of YOUTH LEADERSHIP Preparing Young People for a Future of Success and Excellence Sorrell Associates, LLC State Route 60 Warsaw, OH
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
OACCA Public Policy Presentation Theme: Fast & changing world of health care & social services.
Adair County System of Care Overcoming Obstacles to Helping Others.
Ch’eghutsen’ Logic Model Mission: To take part in the healing of our children, families, and community through a flexible evolving process that returns.
2006 System of Care Start-up Webinar Series1 System of Care: From Vision to Infrastructure Sandy Keenan, Education Resource Specialist, Technical Assistance.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
NW Minnesota Council of Collaborative’s: “Our Children Succeed Initiative” Overview 2/7/07.
The Forum for Youth Investment, Washington, DC ©2005 The Forum for Youth Investment/Impact Strategies, Inc.. All rights reserved. Youth as Policy Makers:
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Justice Grantmaking  Background and History  The MacArthur Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.
Strengthening Families Protective Factors Hays Kansas Kansas State Coordinators’ Meeting Nancy Keel, MS Ed, P-3 National Trainer Executive Director Kansas.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
ST. LOUIS FAMILY COURT Judge Jimmie M. Edwards July 21, 2011.
Ojjdp.gov Raise The Age Presented by Toni Walker.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Youth Services Institute Continuum of Care
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
DYS and Arkansas’ Juvenile Justice System Entrance Children age who are proven to have broken the law and are under the authority of a juvenile.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Innovation in Monroe County Jody Levison-Johnson Director Child & Family Service Quality & System Development Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Technical.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.
Strategic Plan Strategic Goals (Thrusts) 1. Achieve Performance Excellence CRJ uses metrics of performance to evaluate, manage and plan its.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Section I: Bringing The Community Together Center for Community Outreach Key Components of Afterschool Programs.
2 Patient Family Advisory Councils- Creating Lasting Impact Kris White, MBA, BSN, RN.
United Way of Mid Coast Maine Mental Health Initiative Presentation to Midcoast District Coordinating Council March 8, 2011.
: The National Center at EDC
Lois DeMott, Coordinator 2014 Soros Fellow with Michigan Council on Crime and Delinquency.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Positive Youth Development Origins, Research and Concepts.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Children’s Policy Conference Keeping Kids Closer to Home Peter Selby, PhD -- February 24, 2016.
Missouri Juvenile Justice separate juvenile circuits 24 locally operated juvenile detention centers At age 17, a youth is considered an adult Juvenile.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
The New Jersey Department of Children and Families Children’s System of Care.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Office of Juvenile Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice protects the public by providing safe and effective individualized services to youth, who will.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
AspireMN Member Meeting
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

Every young person served by DYS will become a productive citizen and lead a fulfilling life. Missouri DSS Division of Youth Services

Missouri Division of Youth Services Mo. Juvenile Justice 101 DYS a Division of the Department of Social Services DYS works with 45 separate juvenile circuits and 24 locally operated juvenile detention centers DYS administers a Juvenile Court Diversion program the purposes of strengthening local systems and reducing commitments DYS typically retains jurisdiction for juvenile offenders until discharged or until the youth reaches age 18 Juvenile court can retain jurisdiction until age 21 for abuse/neglect, status offenders, and law violators Missouri’s “age of majority” is 17 years of age for new offenses, which are then processed in the adult courts

Missouri Division of Youth Services Missouri DYS Recognitions Hosted visits from over 25 states focused on humane therapeutic approaches, outcomes, and long-term cost effectiveness Designated Guiding Light of Reform by American Youth Policy Forum finding treatment and least restrictive care as far more successful than incarceration-oriented programs (2001) Named model juvenile justice site by the Annie E. Casey and Edna McConnell Clark Foundations and National Council on Crime and Delinquency (2003) Annie E. Casey Innovations in American Government Award in Children and Family System Reform from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Ash Institute (2008)

Missouri Division of Youth Services Changing Systems for Youth and Families Changing our end destination often involves starting from a fundamentally different place. Philosophy/Culture x Practice = Results

Current Challenge of Juvenile Justice Systems A NEW BALANCE Prevention Public Safety Treatment Positive Youth Development Missouri Division of Youth Services

Mo.DYS Beliefs and Philosophies values driven what works  People desire to do well and succeed - even the most resistant youth hunger for approval and acceptance.  We are more alike than different - everyone has fears, insecurities, and basic needs including safety, attention, and belonging.  All behavior has a purpose - behavior is often a symptom of unmet needs.  People do the best they can with the resources available to them – given limited behavioral and emotional options and resources and situations they have experienced, their behavior may seem logical.  The family is vital in the treatment process - family expertise and participation is essential in the youth's treatment process, and can also help facilitate system change within family.

Our Journey: From Correctional to Therapeutic and Developmental Fundamentally changing our view of young people and families, moving beyond behavior and stereotypes (youth and families) Values/mission as our foundation - unrelenting compassion, determined to find what works (e.g. hard heads, soft hearts) Young people and families in the “center” of everything we do Program and services fits youth (family); not the youth fits the program/services Systemic perspective, beyond programmatic/best practice model Results (change versus compliance ) Missouri Division of Youth Services

Key State Reforms Supporting Evolution of Mo.DYS  Closing of large institutional Training Schools  De-centralized administrative structure and continuum of care (5 regions)  DYS Advisory Board, Community Liaison Councils  Juvenile Court Diversion and technical assistance and partnerships with communities  Legislative (e.g. rehabilitative approach, indeterminate sentencing, school district status, dual jurisdiction)  Building and expanding resource base over time

Missouri Division of Youth Services Missouri DYS – Systemic Approach Beliefs Sustainable Practices and Exemplary Results 1. Leadership 2. Organizational culture change 3. Highly effective strategy or approach 4. Constituency building

Missouri’s Approach  Small programs, close to home Regionalized approach, geographic distribution Least restrictive continuum of care:  $4 million invested in juvenile court diversion – 39 circuit courts  Community care with wraparound services  11 day treatment and family resource centers  7 group homes  18 moderate care programs  7 hardware secure programs Allows for flexible use based on youth and family strengths/needs  Humane environments – safety building blocks creating physical and emotional safety Natural home-like environments; basic needs met Structure/facilitation; eyes-on, ears-on, hearts-on supervision Missouri Division of Youth Services

Missouri’s Approach  “Group systems” – therapeutic intervention, youth development, and social-emotional competence through group “circles”, daily group meetings, and experiential group projects.  Fully integrated treatment approach – trauma informed approach focused on emotional healing, self-awareness and cognitive-behavioral, youth development, family systems.  Healthy marriage between treatment and education – creating a therapeutic one-room schoolhouse.  Universal case management – continuity, youth and family advocacy – start to finish.  Family and community engagement – outreach to homes, responsive visitation policies, family therapy and engagement, interface with community liaison councils. Missouri Division of Youth Services

Correctional Vs. Rehabilitative Correctional Vs. Rehabilitative External Controls Lock-up External control Positional Power, Autocratic, No Relationship Inmates Majors, Lieutenants, Sergeants Correctional Officers, Security Workers, Security Family/Community as problem Regiment, rules Custodial supervision Behavioral Compliance Safety 1st Continuum of Services Facilitation Healthy Hierarchy, Boundaries, Relationship Young people Leaders, Managers, Directors Youth Workers, Service Coordinators, Counselors Family/Community as partners Structure, order Engaged interaction Internalized Change TRADITIONALTREATMENT Missouri Division of Youth Services

Correctional vs. Rehabilitative Traditional Youth CorrectionsTherapeutic & Developmental Missouri Division of Youth Services

Correctional vs. Rehabilitative Traditional Youth Corrections Therapeutic & Developmental Missouri Division of Youth Services

Correctional vs. Rehabilitative Traditional Youth Corrections Therapeutic & Developmental Missouri Division of Youth Services

Correctional vs. Rehabilitative Traditional Youth Corrections Therapeutic & Developmental Missouri Division of Youth Services