Meaningful Use: Roadmap for Successful Attestations Presented by: Darlene Creech, MPH Assistant Program Manager Health Information Technology NC Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Next Flow Chart to Help Eligible Professionals (EPs) Determine Eligibility for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Electronic Health Records.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Nevada Medicaid EHR Incentive Program – FAQ for Ambulatory Setting
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
TWS July 2011 Stimulation. TWS July 2011 The ARRA Stimulus Reimbursement from an ifa Customer Perspective.
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Meaningful Use Overview (State of Affairs)
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Protecting Your Peace of Mind Meaningful Evaluation: Assessments for Meaningful Use Success September 21, 2010 Presented by: Beth Schultz, RN, Implementation.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
1 EHR Incentive Program Registration & Attestation Tips for the Eligible Professionals Marlene Hodges & Denise Warren June 8, 2011.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
The Auditing Process: Lessons Learned Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program July 23, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Filing with Ohio Medicaid for EHR Incentives in 2012 Cathy Costello, JD March 16, 2012.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Issues and Challenges for Medicaid Eligible Providers: From AIU to Stage 1 Meaningful Use Clint Kuntz, CEO Fairfield Community Health Center
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
The NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Presented by: Rachael Williams, Program Manager Layne Roberts, Data Specialist.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
EHR Incentive Program and Meaningful Use Presentation to the Texas Association of Community Health Centers Deborah Norris Project Manager, Health IT Texas.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Oregon’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Presentation transcript:

Meaningful Use: Roadmap for Successful Attestations Presented by: Darlene Creech, MPH Assistant Program Manager Health Information Technology NC Division of Medical Assistance 6/23/12

EHR Incentive Program Timeline 10-year program: EPs may participate in any 6 years (consecutive or non) Year 1: adopt, implement, or upgrade (AIU) to certified EHR technology Year 2: meaningfully use for a continuous 90-day period Year 3 and beyond: demonstrate MU for the entire year Last year to begin program and receive full incentive payments Program ends

4 EPs under the NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program include: Physicians (MDs and DOs); Nurse practitioners; Certified nurse midwives; Dentists; and, Physician assistants who furnish services in a Federally Qualified Health Center or Rural Health Clinic led by a physician assistant. EP Types

5 Incentive payments for EPs are tied to individual practitioners, however a third party can attest on his/her behalf (EP must personally sign attestation) Each EP is eligible for only one incentive payment per payment year, regardless of how many practices or locations at which he or she provides services Hospital-based professionals are not eligible EP Attestation

6 To qualify for an incentive payment under the NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, an EP must meet one of the following criteria: Have a minimum 30% Medicaid patient volume; Have a minimum 20% Medicaid patient volume (pediatrician); or, Practice predominantly in a Federally Qualified Health Center or Rural Health Center and have a minimum 30% patient volume attributable to needy individuals. EP Patient Volume Requirements

7 Medicaid PV Percentage: Medicaid PV = All encounters paid in part or whole by Medicaid in 90-day period Total PV = All encounters, regardless of the payment method in same 90-day period  Paid encounters, not billed claims  An encounter is service(s) rendered to a unique individual on any one day  Date of service (not date of payment) within the 90-day period  Pay attention to ‘attending provider’ and ‘billing provider’ issues  Make State aware of any unusual billing issues EP Patient Volume Formula

Progress! Eligible in NC: 3,524 EPs 92 EHs Paid to date: $41 million 1,133 EPs 21 EHs

EPs Participating To Date

Welcome to the NC-MIPS 2.0 Portal

MIPS 2.0 Changes Status Page Allows you to see past attestation years Shows you where you are in the current attestation process In process, submitted, awaiting provider response, validating, approved, paid, denied Demographics Page Shows both CMS and NC information so you can see if there is a matching problem Shows provider and payee MPN and asks if that is correct (gives link for where to go correct)

MIPS 2.0 Changes - Patient Volume Yes/No questions you will be asked for INDIVIDUAL methodology: Did you enter only those encounters attributable to the individual EP in the numerator and denominator, NOT the patient volume numbers for the entire group? Did you list the billing MPNs from ALL practices you included in the patient volume numbers? Did you include in the numerator all encounters covered by Medicaid, even where Medicaid paid for only part of a service? Did you exclude from the numerator denied claims that were never paid at a later date? Did you include encounters in the denominator where services were provided at no charge? Are your patient volume numbers based on date of service and not date of claim or date of payment? Do the numbers you entered represent encounters and not claims?

MIPS 2.0 – Patient Volume Additional for group methodology: Did you include all encounters? Can’t be limited in any way (count non-EPs such as phlebotomists and RNs encounters) Did you include all associated MPNs? Provide any/all MPNs associated with the group (even if an MPN is no longer being used but was used during the 90-day reporting period)

MU Overview The information in this presentation: Is relevant for Stage 1 MU Primarily applies to EPs Stage 2 MU: Finalized after the NPRM (published March 7, 2012) is determined

15 Electronic capture of health information Use the electronic information to track key clinical conditions Communicate electronic information for care coordination Implement clinical decision support tools for disease and medication management Engage patients and families Report Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) and public health information What is the Goal of Stage 1 MU?

MU Overview Reporting period is 90 days for the first year and 365 days thereafter Measures are reported by attestation for Stage 1 Must meet all the measures to receive a MU payment To meet certain measures, 80% of patients must have records in the certified EHR technology (at locations with certified EHR technology)

MU Overview If an EP works at more than one location: Not required to have certified EHR at all locations Must have 50% of total patient encounters at locations where certified EHR is available If locations have multiple certified EHRs, add together the numerator, denominators and exclusions

Exclusions Count as ‘meeting the measure’ in Stage 1 Allowed if the measure is not relevant to the provider’s scope of practice Allowed if the provider is unable to perform a measure, such as submission of public health data

Exclusions, cont’d Two automatic exclusions currently exist: Submission of data to NC Immunization Registry Submission of syndromic surveillance data to PH

Patient Volume Period Medicaid patient volume period: Exactly 90 days, not 3 months Within the previous calendar year for EPs Year 2012 payment – 90 continuous days between January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011

MU Reporting Period Exactly 90 days, not 3 months Within the current calendar year for EPs Year 2012 payment – 90 continuous days between January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012

MU Measure Denominators Depends on the individual situation Can be all the unique patients seen by the EP during the reporting period (one location with EHR technology) OR Those unique patients seen at locations during the reporting period where certified EHR technology is available (multiple locations with certified EHR technology for 80 percent of their patient encounters)

MU Structured Data Data entered into a specified field as opposed to free text in a chart note

MU Structured Data, cont’d The following core MU measures require structured data: Record demographics Maintain an up-to-date problem list Maintain active medication list Maintain active medication allergy list Record and chart changes in vital signs

Meaningful Use Reporting Requirements = MU Core Menu CQMs Meaningful Measures Measures Use = MU Core Menu CQMs Meaningful Measures Measures Use

Adopt, Implement, Upgrade (AIU) or Meaningful Use (MU) AIU or Meaningful Use Selection *Indicates a required field *EHR Certification Number: AX1 *Please indicate your approach: Adopt, Implement, or UpgradeMeaningful Use

Measure Selection Home Page Measure Selection Measure Set ActionsCompleteValid Meaningful Use Core MeasuresBegin Review X √ Meaningful Use Menu MeasuresBegin Review X √ Core Clinical Quality MeasuresBegin Review X √ Alternate Clinical Quality MeasuresBegin Review X √ Additional Clinical Quality MeasuresBegin Review X √

Core MU Measure Question 1 of 15 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective:Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local and professional guidelines. Measure:More than 30% of all unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP have at least one medication order entered using CPOE. Exclusion: Based on all patient records, any EP who writes fewer than 100 prescriptions during the EHR reporting period would be excluded from this requirement. Exclusion from this requirement does not prevent an EP from achieving meaningful use. Does this exclusion apply to you? Yes No

Core MU Measure Question 1 of 15, continued *Patient Records: Please select whether the data used to support the measure was extracted from all patient records or only from patient records maintained using certified EHR technology. This data was extracted from all patient records, not just those maintained using certified EHR technology. This data was extracted only from patient records maintained using certified EHR technology. *Numerator: The numerator is the number of patients in the denominator that have at least one medication order entered using CPOE. *Denominator: The denominator is the number of unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period.

Core MU Measure Question 2 of 15 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective: Implement drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality for the entire EHR reporting period. *Have you enabled the functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period? Yes No

Core MU Measure Question 3 of 15 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective: Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses. Measure: More than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry or an indication that no problems are known for the patient recorded as structured data. *Numerator: The numerator is the number of patients in the denominator who have at least one entry or an indication that no problems are known for the patient recorded as structured data in their problem list. *Denominator: The denominator is the number of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period.

Core MU Measure Question 11 of 15 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective: Implement one clinical decision support (CDS) rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority along with the ability to track compliance with that rule. Measure: Implement on CDS rule. *Have you implemented one CDS rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority along with the ability to track compliance to that rule? Yes No *Enter the CDS rule that was implemented:

Menu MU Measure Question 2 of 10 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective: Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR as structured data. Measure:More than 40% of all clinical lab test results ordered by the EP during the EHR reporting period whose results are in either a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in certified EHR technology as structured data. Exclusion: Based on all patient records, any EP who orders no lab tests whose results are either in a positive/negative or numeric format during the EHR reporting period would be excluded from this requirement. Exclusion from this requirement does not prevent an EP from achieving meaningful use. Does this exclusion apply to you? YesNo

Menu MU Measure Question 2 of 10, continued *Numerator: The numerator is the number of lab tests whose results are expressed in a positive or negative affirmation or as a number which are incorporated as structured data. *Denominator: The denominator is the number of lab tests ordered during the EHR reporting period by the EP whose results are expressed in a positive or negative affirmation or as a number.

Menu MU Measure Question 6 of 10 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Objective: Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient if appropriate. Measure: More than 10% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided patient-specific education resources. *Numerator: The numerator is the number of patients in the denominator who are provided patient education specific resources. *Denominator: The denominator is the number of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period.

CQMs Overview Focus on disease conditions and help measure if a patient gets the right treatment, in the right amount, at the right time EPs must report a total of 6 CQMs* *The total could be as high as 9 depending on how many core CQMs have zeros

CQMs Overview, cont’d CQM Core Requirements: 3 core or alternate core CQMs Note: For each core measure with a zero denominator, EPs must report an alternate core measure. CQM Additional Requirement: 3 from a list of 38 additional CQMs

CQMs All CQMs for 2012 are NQF-endorsed There is no requirement to meet a certain value for any of the CQMs For Stage 1 MU, CQM reporting will be by attestation CMS is working on aligning CQMs across programs (PQRI, CHIPRA) JCAH, NCQA, and AMA are also aligning standards

CQMs Question 1 of 3 (*) Red asterisk indicates a required field. Instructions: All three Core Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) must be submitted. For each Core CQM that has a denominator of zero, an Alternative CQM must also be submitted. NQF Hypertension: Blood Pressure Management Description: Percentage of patient visits for patients aged 18-years and older with a diagnosis of hypertension who has been seen for at least two office visits with blood pressure recorded. *Numerator: *Denominator:

Lessons Learned from 2011 Attestations Ensure that information in CMS Registration agrees with Medicaid information on file Enter the same payee in CMS Registration as for Medicaid (can change if desire) Wait until receipt of a welcome from Medicaid before attesting Processing the attestation won’t begin until a signed copy is received Respond to outreach – after 45 days a denial of eligibility occurs

Lessons Learned, cont’d For group methodology, include all encounters in the group FQHC/RHC can count core as well as other services Make sure vendor contracts include ongoing maintenance and upgrades FQHC EPs who are part-timers may have matching issues (address from other practice location is in Medicaid system) – communicate with Medicaid! When calling for assistance, have EP’s SS# and NPI ready

Stage 2 MU Proposed Changes More emphasis on patient engagement More emphasis on actual exchange of information rather than simply testing Patient volume – recent 12 months preceding attestation instead of prior year Would include encounters not paid by Medicaid Would include MCHIP encounters

Stage 2 MU Proposed, cont’d MU measures remain at 20 total but include 17 core and 3 menu Compliance rates increased on many measures EPs would report 12 CQMs electronically Data standardization would be required (for certifying EHRs) Implementation of Stage 2 criteria would be delayed until 2014 calendar year for EPs

Moving Forward... Establish all practice workflows affected by EHR implementation Perform the security risk analysis and address any deficiencies Implement policies and procedures outlining staff responsibilities Implement workflow changes as necessary Implement documentation methods and maintain relative documents for 6-years post-attestation

Contact For questions about the program or process, contact: To see the Medicaid Special Bulletin, visit Bulletin-EHR.pdf Bulletin-EHR.pdf To access the NC-MIPS Portal, visit