But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Advertisements

Importance of Genetic Evaluation for Structure in the US Dairy Industry October 10, 2012 Sam Comstock, Ph.D.
2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2003 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Dairy Science An Introduction. Types of Dairy Cattle Operations Intensive Dairy Production- animals are raised in a more confined setting such as an open.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. What is the objective... ?  To produce a more efficient dairy animal  Milk producers want healthy cows, acceptable.
Selecting and Judging Dairy Cattle
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry 1. Terms Artificial Insemination (AI) Beef Butterfat Cattle by-products Crossbreeding Culling Dairy Herd Improvement.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
 87 of the top 100 active proven TPI sires are descendants of Planet, O Man, Shottle and Goldwyn.  58 descendants of O Man  32 descendants of Shottle.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
The Dairy Industry. Dairy Industry Provides milk and other dairy foods to consumers in North America and many foreign markets.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
December 2014 Proof Changes
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
Is our dairy cow sustainable for the future? L. B. Hansen University of Minnesota.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
Beef & Dairy Production. How to decide?? Type of production varies greatly. Depends on: type of animals Location Facilities overall producer goals In.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Dairy Breeds and Selection
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Semenzoo Italy Holstein HOLSTEIN BREED IN ITALY ( The past ) First holstein cattle has been imported from North America on 1930 Since 1930 to 1980.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Dairy Breeds and Selection. Dairy Breeds and Selection Overview Major Breeds of Dairy Cattle Dairy Terms and Definitions Parts of a Dairy Cow Dairy Traits.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Dairy Cattle Selection. Dairy Cattle Selection Overview Dairy Terms and Definitions Parts of a Dairy Cow Dairy Traits and Selection.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
USDA Dairy Goat Genetic Evaluation Program
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
A National Sire Fertility Index
Percent of total breedings
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Principles of Dairy Cattle Breeding
Presentation transcript:

But who will be the next GREAT one?

USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics. * Information is recorded and collected through Progeny Test Programs to compare the progeny of one bull to another. * The average of a bull’s daughters, compared to the average of the breed, determines the bull’s proof and Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA).

Compare his daughter with herd mates Typical goal: 120 daughters in 100 different herds Progeny Testing The Main Driver Behind Past Genetic Improvement

* Largest Progeny Test Program in the world. * More than 1,300 new bulls tested annually. * Large, diverse base of progeny test herds allow for comparisons of many herd- mates. * Higher number of bulls tested results in a better indication of genetic outliers and more unique genetic and pedigree combinations.

How does it work? A.I. stud distributes a set # of doses of each young sire into a minimum of 175 herds across the nation to for widespread usage in all regions. Random usage of the semen within the herd is encouraged to insure accurate progeny comparison. The herd accomplishes this by using the semen on one of the following groups of cows: The first cows in heat after the semen is received All first-repeat services All first-calf heifers (those that have calved once)

Hot and Humid Cool and Wet Hot and Dry Cool and Wet Cool Dry Cold

Tested in a Variety of Environments & Conditions Facilities –Feedlot –Free-stall –Stanchion barn –Grazing Production orientation –Organic –Conventional Herd Size –Small (10 cows) –Large (10,000 cows) Management style –Intensive –Low input

Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) National Association of Animal Breeders (NAAB) Certified Semen Service A.I Stations - 23 National Dairy Herd Information Association (NDHIA ) Purebred Dairy Cattle Association Quality Certification Services Dairy Record Processing Center HolsteinAyrshire Jersey Milking Shorthorn Guernsey Brown Swiss DRMS Ag.Source AgriTech Provo

ANIMALSIREDAMPGSPGDMGSMGD

NAAB number Recessive status Registration number Sire Stack Production Traits Type Traits Health and Fertility Traits Linear Type Traits

Total Performance Index – commonly used index for ranking Holsteins. Combines type, production and health and fertility traits. Net Merit $ – commonly used index for ranking dairy cattle of all breeds. Measures the expected lifetime profit that the offspring of an animal will provide over their lifetime based upon production, udder health, longevity, and body size. Predicted Transmitting Ability for Protein and Fat percent. This is an estimate of the percent of protein or fat in the milk that a daughter of the bull will produce throughout her lifetime. Predicted Transmitting Ability for Milk, Protein and Fat pounds. This is an estimate of the pounds of milk, protein or fat that a daughter of the bull will produce, above or below the average population, throughout her lifetime. Confidence in a sire’s production data based on pedigree, genomic and daughter information. Number of daughters in number of herds contributing daughter production information to milk, protein and fat PTA’s.

Jayven PTA Milk PTA F% +52 PTA Fat PTA P% +56 PTA Protein Emerald +532 PTA Milk PTA F% +88 PTA Fat PTA P% +46 PTA Protein Under equal management, and genetically equal dams, mature daughters of Jayven would produce 2,445 lbs. (1,111 liters) more milk per lactation, but fat percentage would be 0.46% lower, and protein percent would be 0.23% lower than daughters of Emerald. Using PTA Production Information

Jayven High milk production is best suited for markets where fluid milk volume is most important. Emerald High fat and protein production is best suited for markets where cheese or yogurt is produced. We learn this information through Progeny Test! Using PTA Production Information PTA differences do not make bulls good or bad. PTA differences do make bulls more or less appealing for specific markets.

Number of daughters in number of herds contributing daughter information to Type PTA’s. Percent reliability for type information based on pedigree and genomic information as well as the number of daughters in a bull’s proof. Predicted Transmitting Ability for Type. The ability of an animal to transmit genetics for type or confirmation improvement traits to its offspring. A composite score of udder traits as weighted by the contribution of each trait to increased longevity. A composite score of foot angle, rear legs rear view, rear legs side view, and foot and leg score. A composite score of linear frame traits including stature, strength, body depth and rump width. A composite score of dairy form and strength.

Sire Calving Ease – Percentage of assisted births expected when this bull is used on virgin heifers. The tendency of calves from a particular service sire to be born more or less easily than an average calf. Daughter Calving Ease - Percentage of daughters of a particular sire that have more (or fewer) problems at calving time and produce calves that are born more or less easily than calves produced by an average cow. Sire Still Births/Daughter Still Births – Measures the tendency of calves/daughters from a particular service sire to be stillborn or to give birth to stillborn calves. Somatic Cell Score measures the ability of a bull’s daughters to resist mastitis. The number of months that a cow is in production as compared to the average number of months in production for the breed. Daughter Pregnancy Rate measures the ability of a bulls’ daughters to become pregnant. Every 1% indicates 4 fewer days open. Sire Conception Rate is an indicator of the fertility of a bull based upon conception rate across all services.

* What genetics do work * Find the best bulls * For fertility * For production, health and type * Mate bulls to right cows * Utilize sexed and beef opportunities * Support farm fertility and management * Did our genetics work; validate!

World Wide Mating Service Building a Better Herd

 Professional breeding consultant = practical and accurate advice  Focus on profitability  Increased longevity  Herd uniformity  Reduction of inbreeding

The mating of related individuals Inbreeding decreases  Cow survival  Single lactation production  Reproductive performance  Cost of $3-$5/day open  Embryo Survival  Calf Vigor Inbreeding increases  Calf mortality  Age at puberty  Loss of replacement heifers prior to first calving  Prevalence of recessive genetic disorders in the population.