G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Robot Localization and Mapping using the Kalman Filter
Advertisements

EKF, UKF TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Jose-Luis Blanco, Juan-Antonio Fernández-Madrigal, Javier González University of Málaga (Spain) Dpt. of System Engineering and Automation Sep Nice,
Rickard Karlsson IEEE Aerospace Conf 2007 Target Tracking Performance Evaluation A General Software Environment for Filtering Rickard Karlsson Gustaf Hendeby.
Kalman Filter CMPUT 615 Nilanjan Ray. What is Kalman Filter A sequential state estimator for some special cases Invented in 1960’s Still very much used.
Introduction to Mobile Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
Sam Pfister, Stergios Roumeliotis, Joel Burdick
Probabilistic Robotics: Kalman Filters
Reliable Range based Localization and SLAM Joseph Djugash Masters Student Presenting work done by: Sanjiv Singh, George Kantor, Peter Corke and Derek Kurth.
SLAM: Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Part I Chang Young Kim These slides are based on: Probabilistic Robotics, S. Thrun, W. Burgard, D. Fox, MIT.
Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Estimation with A Focus on Particle Filters Prasanth Jeevan Mary Knox May 12, 2006.
Discriminative Training of Kalman Filters P. Abbeel, A. Coates, M
Prepared By: Kevin Meier Alok Desai
Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization 11/24/2006 Aliakbar Gorji Roborics Instructor: Dr. Shiri Amirkabir University of Technology.
Probabilistic Robotics
Stanford CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2006 Lecture 11 Filters / Motion Tracking Professor Sebastian Thrun CAs: Dan Maynes-Aminzade, Mitul Saha, Greg.
Estimation and the Kalman Filter David Johnson. The Mean of a Discrete Distribution “I have more legs than average”
Course AE4-T40 Lecture 5: Control Apllication
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
Novel approach to nonlinear/non- Gaussian Bayesian state estimation N.J Gordon, D.J. Salmond and A.F.M. Smith Presenter: Tri Tran
Overview and Mathematics Bjoern Griesbach
G. Hendeby Performance Issues in Non-Gaussian Filtering Problems NSSPW ‘06 Corpus Christi College, Cambridge Performance Issues in Non-Gaussian Filtering.
ROBOT MAPPING AND EKF SLAM
EKF and UKF Day EKF and RoboCup Soccer simulation of localization using EKF and 6 landmarks (with known correspondences) robot travels in a circular.
Kalman filter and SLAM problem
Muhammad Moeen YaqoobPage 1 Moment-Matching Trackers for Difficult Targets Muhammad Moeen Yaqoob Supervisor: Professor Richard Vinter.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Project Report Unscented kalman Filter Information.
1 Mohammed M. Olama Seddik M. Djouadi ECE Department/University of Tennessee Ioannis G. PapageorgiouCharalambos D. Charalambous Ioannis G. Papageorgiou.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
David Wheeler Kyle Ingersoll EcEn 670 December 5, 2013 A Comparison between Analytical and Simulated Results The Kalman Filter: A Study of Covariances.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
Probabilistic Robotics Robot Localization. 2 Localization Given Map of the environment. Sequence of sensor measurements. Wanted Estimate of the robot’s.
Kalman Filter (Thu) Joon Shik Kim Computational Models of Intelligence.
Jamal Saboune - CRV10 Tutorial Day 1 Bayesian state estimation and application to tracking Jamal Saboune VIVA Lab - SITE - University.
Complete Pose Determination for Low Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using Stereo Vision Luke K. Wang, Shan-Chih Hsieh, Eden C.-W. Hsueh 1 Fei-Bin Hsaio.
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations.
Young Ki Baik, Computer Vision Lab.
Overview Particle filtering is a sequential Monte Carlo methodology in which the relevant probability distributions are iteratively estimated using the.
Human-Computer Interaction Kalman Filter Hanyang University Jong-Il Park.
HQ U.S. Air Force Academy I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Improving the Performance of Out-of-Order Sigma-Point Kalman Filters.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
Mobile Robot Localization (ch. 7)
NCAF Manchester July 2000 Graham Hesketh Information Engineering Group Rolls-Royce Strategic Research Centre.
Twenty Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI 2007 Improved State Estimation in Multiagent Settings with Continuous or Large Discrete State.
Unscented Kalman Filter 1. 2 Linearization via Unscented Transform EKF UKF.
Boosted Particle Filter: Multitarget Detection and Tracking Fayin Li.
Mixture Kalman Filters by Rong Chen & Jun Liu Presented by Yusong Miao Dec. 10, 2003.
Short Introduction to Particle Filtering by Arthur Pece [ follows my Introduction to Kalman filtering ]
Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) CSCE 774 – Guest Lecture Dr. Gabriel Terejanu Fall 2015.
Using Kalman Filter to Track Particles Saša Fratina advisor: Samo Korpar
Tracking with dynamics
By: Aaron Dyreson Supervising Professor: Dr. Ioannis Schizas
Extended Kalman Filter
Nonlinear State Estimation
Cameron Rowe.  Introduction  Purpose  Implementation  Simple Example Problem  Extended Kalman Filters  Conclusion  Real World Examples.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
G. Casalino, E. Zereik, E. Simetti, A. Turetta, S. Torelli and A. Sperindè EUCASS 2011 – 4-8 July, St. Petersburg, Russia.
The Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Estimation Young Ki Baik.
VANET – Stochastic Path Prediction Motivations Route Discovery Safety Warning Accident Notifications Strong Deceleration of Tra ffi c Flow Road Hazards.
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
H.L. Tanaka and K. Kondo University of Tsukuba
PSG College of Technology
Unscented Kalman Filter
Unscented Kalman Filter
Jose-Luis Blanco, Javier González, Juan-Antonio Fernández-Madrigal
Unscented Kalman Filter
Kalman Filtering COS 323.
6.891 Computer Experiments for Particle Filtering
Gaussian Process Based Filtering for Neural Decoding
Presentation transcript:

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors G. Hendeby, LiU, Sweden R. Karlsson, LiU, Sweden F. Gustafsson, LiU, Sweden N. Gordon, DSTO, Australia

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Motivating Problem  Known to be difficult to estimate  Highly nonlinear, especially at short range  Previously used to demonstrate usefulness of new methods  Methods and performance measures will be discussed Track a target during close fly-by using bearings only sensors

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Filters The following filters have been evaluated and compared  Local approximation:  Extended Kalman Filter ( EKF )  Iterated Extended Kalman Filter ( IEKF )  Unscented Kalman Filter ( UKF )  Global approximation:  Particle Filter ( PF )

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Filters: (I)EKF EKF: Linearize the model around the best estimate and apply the Kalman filter ( KF ) to the resulting system. IEKF: Relinearize the model after a measurement update with a (hopefully) improved estimate, and restart the update with this linear model.

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Filters: UKF Simulate carefully chosen “sigma points” to transform involved covariance matrices and use in the KF.

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Filters: PF Simulate several possible states and compare to the measurements obtained.

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Filter Evaluation Root mean square error ( RMSE )  Standard performance measure  Bounded by the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound ( CRLB )  Ignores higher order moments Kullback divergence  Compares the distance between two distributions  Captures effects not seen in the RMSE 

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Test Setup  Measurements from:  Initial estimate:  Initial estimate covariance:  Different target positions along the -axis have been evaluated.  Poor initial information

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Test Setup: Measurement Noise  Gaussian noise:  Gaussian mixture noise:  Generalized Gaussian noise:

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Test Setup: True Inferred Distribution  True inferred state distribution for one noise realization,  Some non-Gaussian features  Computed using gridding, not feasible for use in practice  CRLB for this situation:

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Comparison: RMSE  The PF is overall best, however CRLB is not reached  ( I ) EKF sometimes diverges, iterating then could be catastrophic  Difficult to extract information from non-Gaussian measurements  Higher moments are ignored in this comparison  Gaussian mixture noise Generalized Gaussian noise 50 measurements

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Comparison: Kullback divergence The Kullback divergence has been used to capture other differences between estimated and true distribution. Note, the results represents only one realization. Here: Gaussian mixture noise and FilterNo. measurements EKF IEKF UKF PF

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Conclusions A bearings-only estimation problem, with large initial uncertainty, has been studied using different filters. As a complement to comparing RMSE, the Kullback divergence has been used to capture more than the variance aspects of the obtained estimates.

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham Conclusions, cont’d  (Iterated) Extended Kalman Filter – ((I)EKF)  Works acceptable with good initial information, but has difficulties with bad initial information  Iterating often slightly improve performance, but sometimes backfires badly  Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF)  Results are not bad, but not as impressive as suggested in recent literature  Particle Filter (PF)  Works well at the price of higher computational effort

G. Hendeby Recursive Triangulation Using Bearings-Only Sensors TARGET ‘06 Austin Court, Birmingham