San Antonio TransGuide Travel Time Program Roger L. Strain Research Analyst Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

The Traffic Management Center (TMC) of the Future.
Brian Kary and Terry Haukom - RTMC.  Provide Delay Information To Motorists  Potential for Diversion  Perception Tracking Survey Results.
North Carolina’s Integration of 511 and Workzone Information Jo Ann Oerter State Technology Implementation and Maintenance Engineer North Carolina Department.
HEADS UP H urricane E vacuation A nalysis and D ecision S upport U tility P rogram.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
ITS/CVISN Efforts in the Border Region Border Partnership Working Group January 11, 2006 Al Kosik Traffic Operations Division TxDOT.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Short Range AM or FM Radio Transmitters for Tourism and Economic Development ©1800FM.com B2BDatabaseTeam.com
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Lawrence Regional ITS Architecture Update. Today’s Agenda What is ITS? Review 2007 ITS Plans Review the proposed work plan Define project goals and objectives.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice January 10, 2007.
AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY. Intelligent Transportation System Technology AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice Nov 8, 2006.
The Use of IPASS to Improve Mobility and Safety Through Traveler Information April 2004.
Regional Traffic Monitoring System for Maryland’s Eastern Shore Dr. Gang-Len Chang Traffic Safety and Operations Lab University of Maryland, College Park.
Next Generation Traffic Management Centers Brian L. Smith and Robert Kluger Webinar series presented by MAUTC, University of Virginia and VDOT.
Research | consulting | technology safety and efficiency in transport through knowledge Moving people and freight in the urban.
GeoResources Institute Spatial Technologies for Freight Transportation Efficiency, Planning, and Safety Chuck O’Hara, Ph.D. Associate.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
By Syd Bowcott, URS Corp Bayne Smith, URS Corp.  Purpose of this Presentation  Overview of Project Area  Background  Project Goals  Stakeholders.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
Technology and Society The DynamIT project Dynamic information services and anonymous travel time registration VIKING Workshop København Per J.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
2 Background Lake County –24 x 20 mi area –Population 690,000 –52 municipalities Congestion –No freeways –Limited 4-lane arterials –Transportation controversies.
Rural Application of the Colorado Transportation Management System Presented at ITS America, June 2007, Palm Springs, CA By Raj Chaudhuri and Ken DePinto.
Travel Times on Dynamic Message Signs Brandy Meehan Transportation Information Management Team Federal Highway Administration September 28, 2005.
Arizona 511 Model Deployment Matt Burt – Battelle Talking Operations Webcast Rural Issues: 511 and Traveler Information July 27, 2005.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Overview of Advanced Traveler Information Systems Evaluations Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Manager, ITS Program Assessment U.S. Department of Transportation.
Smartphone Application for Road Rangers Tucker Brown Roger Strain Robert W. Heller, Ph.D. Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas USA.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
A Model for Improving Operations through Archived Data 2005 ITS America Annual Meeting Mark Carter – SAIC Robert Haas - SAIC May 2 nd, 2005 i Florida’s.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
Smart Work Zone Systems Presented by Prahlad D. Pant, Ph.D. PDP Associates Inc.
SMARTZONE Deployment on I-95 North Carolina Department of Transportation STAY ALERT Work Zone.
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
Status Report of the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority October 25, 2012.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
2007 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting July 17, 2007 Sirisha Kothuri Kristin Tufte Robert L. Bertini PSU Hau Hagedorn OTREC Dean Deeter Athey Creek Consultants.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Decision Support Needs for Transportation Systems December 5, 2000 Emil Wolanin Montgomery County, Maryland.
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
ITS PCB T3 Webinar October 21, 2008 Montgomery County, Maryland Advanced Transportation Management System Automated Parking Information System Operational.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Tennessee DOT SmartWay Update Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006 Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006.
Corridor Congestion Management Innovation for better mobility sm.
Clay Packard, PE ITS GC Software Project Manager Florida Department of Transportation WAZE – FDOT Integration.
Traveler Information Applications: How Can VII Improve the Quality of Travel? TRB Session 644: Using VII Data, Part 1 Ben McKeever, US DOT, ITS Joint Program.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Real-Time Information and Response Jon Nelson, P.E. MoDOT.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
Overview of Advanced Traveler Information Systems Evaluations
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

San Antonio TransGuide Travel Time Program Roger L. Strain Research Analyst Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX

Model Deployment Initiative (97-99) Created area-wide database of travel speeds –Real time data from instrumented segments of the freeway system –Arterial street information (incidents, lane closures, segment speeds) In-Vehicle Navigation (IVN) project –Transmission of real time link travel speeds and incident data from TransGuide to IVN units using FM subcarrier channel –IVN units provided point to point travel time estimate as part of route calculation Shortest time was one of three options for route selection –Alpine and Zexel manufactured IVN units Companies did not market units beyond MDI purchase

Travel Times Public Launch TransGuide automated display of travel times on Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) launched in November of 1999 –Data provided by Data Server process from MDI No formal outreach program Press Release sent out the Friday before system was activated –Resulted in stories on each local television news program –Front page article in San Antonio Express News Largely positive reaction as system went live

Travel Times in San Antonio Travel times calculated and displayed from DMS locations to major intersections and/or interchanges Point travel speeds used to calculate time from detector to detector based on distance between detectors –Loop Detectors –Video Detectors Travel time messages displayed on main lane DMS –6:00 AM to 10:00 PM –Seven days a week Travel time messages on TransGuide website use the same algorithm

Travel Time Calculation- - Segment travel speed is chosen as lower of upstream and downstream sensor speed - Point to point travel speed is summation of segment travel times - In this example the DMS is 5.5 miles from the IH 10 interchange, with 11 travel segments defined by 12 sensor locations. For this example, all segments are exactly ½ mile in length, although in the real world the segment lengths vary. Travel Time Algorithm

Display of Travel Time Messages Non Peak Usage –Travel Time messages appear alone Peak Usage –Travel Time messages can be combined with congestion warnings –Largely negative public reaction to messages reading only “CONGESTION AHEAD” –Adding limits and travel times results in more positive reaction Incident Interaction –Travel Times messages automatically overridden –Can be made second phase of any message with one click

Public Reaction and Use Display of travel times on DMS very well received by public Television and radio stations –Traffic reports use TransGuide web site travel times regularly –Station web sites link directly to or incorporate TransGuide web site for travel times and other traffic information Travel Times messages alleviate public concerns that signs are never used –Still in line with TxDOT policy of displaying only traffic related messages on DMS

Travel Time Accuracy Predictive Algorithms –Experimented with predictive algorithms during development –Attempted to compensate for speeds increasing or decreasing –Did not pursue because of low benefit for additional cost Accuracy –Test runs show approximately 85% of drivers arrive within predicted travel time range –Remainder almost evenly split between early and late arrival Public Confidence –Online surveys indicate greater than 85% confidence –Public reports quickly when travel times seem wrong

Investment in Travel Time Program Capital investment in TransGuide –$140,000,000: CCTV, DMS, telecommunications, speed sensors, etc. Investment in travel time program development –$60,000: initial development and integration –$10,000: upgrades and modifications (estimated) Necessary pieces already in place: Traffic Sensor subsystem, DMS subsystem, Scenario processes Only Travel Time specific development required –Relatively short development time –Relatively small development cost

Travel Time Significance Initially Travel Times seemed useful, but not critical Operator Impact –System automatically recalculates and updates messages once per minute –After starting system, operators do not have to continually monitor messages After more than 5 years of operation –Complaints from media when travel times are unavailable –Complaints from the public when travel times are incorrect –Complaints that travel times are not available through construction zones Public and media now EXPECT Travel Times, and they expect them to be ACCURATE

Predictive Travel Times- Government Agency Concerns Policy of providing data to private sector at no cost has resulted in multiple private sector information sharing agreements, but no real successful examples of private sector data marketing in this area While predicting congestion and weather related delays in travel time can be done using archived data, predicting incident related delays in travel times will be very difficult Current investment in travel time program is relatively small, making the case for major investment on government sector side in predictive travel times will be difficult

Travel Times Through Construction Zones San Antonio has begun installing Microwave Radar Detectors in construction zones so that travel times can be determined Side fire radar units are pole mounted at Right of Way line, have up to 200 ft. range Wireless radios transmit signal outside of construction zone

Future Travel Time Needs Intercity travel times –Toll Roads/Managed Lane projects being developed in many regions statewide, using electronic toll collection is increasing market penetration of AVI tags in Texas –Installation of AVI readers on rural highways could be used to determine intercity travel times Alternate route travel times –Encourage trucking industry to take IH 35 bypass, to avoid San Antonio/Austin traffic between Seguin, Tx and Georgetown, Tx –San Antonio is in the early stages of toll road implementation, toll lanes will have free alternates, will help to disseminate time savings for those using toll lanes

Contact: Brian G. Fariello, P.E.Roger L. Strain Traffic Management Engineer- Research Analyst TransGuideSouthwest Research Institute San Antonio District- TxDOTSan Antonio, TX (210)