From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.

Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance

Protocol Development.

Treatment Guidelines: Recommendations and Implications for Providers Dr. Robert Snyder, Medical Director Suzy Douglas, Moderator.

Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine

Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.

Assessing the Impact of the IOM Report on the Future of the National Guideline Clearinghouse Richard N. Shiffman, MD, MCIS Yale School of Medicine New.

Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.

American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Health and Science Policy Committee Orientation Program Part #1 General Overview and Structure.

April 2009 Netta Conyers-Haynes, Principal Consultant, Communications Kaiser Permanente National Guideline Program Implications of IOM SR Standards Wiley.

Patient Safety Conference National Clinical Effectiveness Committee

Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.

Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.

The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.

April 2009 Netta Conyers-Haynes, Principal Consultant, Communications Kaiser Permanente National Guideline Program (NGP): Implications of IOM CPG Standards.

Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research

Strengths and challenges of the CPG development process: Canadian Society of Nephrology Marcello Tonelli MD SM Chair, CSN-CPG Committee.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

Guidelines for the reporting of evidence identification in decision models: observations and suggested way forward Louise Longworth National Institute.

Clinical Practice Guidelines

Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines

International Collaboration in Guideline Production Prof. Günter Ollenschläger, Chairman, Guidelines International Network Director, German Agency for.

Criteria and Standard.

Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.

Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.

The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.

COMPREHENSIVE SEARCH Literature searched: List of established guideline websites, list of specialty websites related to the topic, Google, Ovid MEDLINE,

Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.

Applicability of the AGREE II Instrument in Evaluating the Development Process and Quality of Current National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Guidelines.

Research Techniques Made Simple: Evaluating the Strength of Clinical Recommendations in the Medical Literature: GRADE, SORT, and AGREE Mayra Buainain de.

The Challenges and Larger Significance of Implementing Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines Institute of Medicine Workshop: Next Steps: Implementation.

The ACC/AHA Perspective Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FAHA, FACC Professor of Medicine Boston University Medical Center Chair, ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.

Zen & the Art of Guideline Development Duncan Service Senior Information Officer.

Evidence, guidelines and practice: the way forward in a digital age SYDNEY 11 April, 2013 Bill Runciman Professor – Patient Safety & Healthcare Human Factors.

Using Guidelines: The Need for Adaptation Ian D Graham, PhD, FCAHS December 10, 2012 E-GAPPS.

NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.

MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?

Health Promotion as a Quality issue

TEACH LEVEL II: CLINICAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES STREAM Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Director, Center.

Origin and Process of Utah Guidelines Anna Fondario, MPH Utah Department of Health Violence and Injury Prevention Program.

Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.

BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.

CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.

Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Using the AGREE¹ Instrument CAN-IMPLEMENT Toolkit Version 1.0 April 2010 Modified from:

Clinical Practice Guidelines By Dr. Hanan Said Ali.

Standards for Systematic Reviews of Clinical Effectiveness Research Standards for Systematic Reviews of Clinical Effectiveness Research Institute of Medicine.

(MEDICAL) CLINICAL AUDIT

Adapting Guidelines for Local Implementation: Fusion Cuisine or Fast Food Leftovers Eddy Lang MDCM CCFP(EM) Head Department of Emergency Medicine Senior.

Implementing a new drug or technique (APA Cambridge 21. June 2013) Tom G. Hansen, MD, PhD, Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Odense University.

Domain Scoring Guide groupNon-Scoring Guide group ICC(95% C.I.)p-valueICC(95% C.I.)p-value Domain (-0.303~0.995) (-0.806~0.966)0.512 Domain.

RARE BEST PRACTICES COURSE ROMA (Feb ) Euro-HSP Madrid 2015 May 30 Jean Bénard May 31, GA 2015 Madrid.

Developing evidence-based guidelines at WHO. Evidence-based guidelines at WHO | January 17, |2 |

Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,

Emergency Health Services Translating Research Into Practice Andrew Travers MD MSc FRCPC Staff Physician, QE-II Emergency Provincial Medical Director Emergency.

Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.

Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines Washington, DC January 11, 2010 Marguerite Koster,

Workshop on Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines Institute of Medicine January 11, 2010 Vivian H. Coates, Vice President, ECRI Project Director,

Developing your research question Fiona Alderdice and Mike Clarke.

Clinical Practice Guidelines: Can we fix Babel? Eddy Lang Department Chair, Emergency Alberta Health Services Associate Professor University of Calgary.

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.

Evidence Informed Public Health

TREATMENT GUIDELINES- A NECESSITY DR LASEBIKAN NWAMAKA.

Systematic Review, Synthesis, & Clinical Practice Guidelines

APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH & EVALUATION AGREE II Instrument

Adapted from a presentation at the Rwanda First National Workshop on

Methods 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines Chapter 2

Taking the STANDARDS Seriously

Evidence-Based Public Health

Presentation transcript:

From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada

2 Overview Research evidence versus consensus/expert based CPGs Avoiding GOBSAT methodology Unique EMS aspects to consider A broader perspective about CPGs Other aspects that can influence this CPG project

3 Clinical practice guidelines Systematically developed statements or recommendations to assist practitioner about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. Institute of Medicine (1992). Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use.

4 The promise of guidelines Evidence Synthesis Reduced variation in care Guidance Improved patient outcomes Improved system efficiency Benchmarks

5 The pitfalls of guidelines Biased Overwhelming Confusing Directionless Driven only by evidence Not implemented

6 Evidence Mastery Primary Domains of CPG Development Options Questions Search Selection Appraisal Strength of evidence Combining studies Effect size

7 Evidence Mastery Context Risk/benefits Values Preferences Primary Domains of CPG Development

8 Graded Recommendations

9 Valid Reliable Clear Implementable Transparent UnbiasedCredible

10 What makes a great CPG? What domains are important? What criteria within each domain? Can a rigorously developed appraisal tool inform?

11 Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation

12 AGREE instrument Generic tool designed primarily to help guideline developers Developed by international collaborative group including 16 partners from 12 countries (including Canada, New Zealand, US) Reliability and some aspects of validity assessed Users guide available Translated into most European languages (including French)

AGREE STRUCTURE Six domains – 23 items 1. Scope & purpose (3) 2. Stakeholder involvement (4) 3. Rigour of development (7) 4. Clarity & presentation (4) 5. Applicability (3) 6. Editorial independence (2)

14 DOMAIN 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE 1. The overall objective(s) of the guideline is(are) specifically described. 2. The clinical question(s) covered by the guideline is(are) specifically described. 3. The patients to whom the guideline is meant to apply are specifically described.

15 DOMAIN 2. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT 4. The guideline development group includes individuals from all the relevant professional groups. 5. The patients’ views and preferences have been sought. 6. The target users of the guideline are clearly defined. 7. The guideline has been piloted among target users.

16

17 DOMAIN 3. RIGOUR OF DEVELOPMENT (1) 8. Systematic methods were used to search for evidence. 9. The criteria for selecting the evidence are clearly described. 10. The methods used for formulating the recommendations are clearly described. 11. The health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered in formulating the recommendations.

18 DOMAIN 3. RIGOUR OF DEVELOPMENT (2) 12. There is an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence. 13. The guideline has been externally reviewed by an expert panel prior to publication. 14. A procedure for updating the guideline is provided.

19 DOMAIN 4. CLARITY AND PRESENTATION 15. The recommendations are specific and unambiguous. 16. The different options for management of the condition are clearly presented. 17. Key recommendations are easily identifiable. 18. The guideline is supported with tools for application.

20 DOMAIN 5. APPLICABILITY 19. The potential organisational barriers in applying the guideline have been discussed. 20. The potential costs implications of applying the recommendations have been considered. 21. The guideline presents key review criteria for monitoring and/or audit purposes.

21 DOMAIN 6. EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE 22. The guideline is editorially independent from the funding body. 23. Conflicts of interest of guideline development members have been recorded.

22 A Whirlwind Tour of the CPG World

23 Guideline International Network

24 ADAPTE

25 Very few EMS-specific CPGs

26 Many existing CPGs address EMS

27 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

28 Closing thoughts Exciting times in CPG development Much accumulated wisdom Many challenges to meet Unprecedented opportunity to improve EMS patient care

29