Operational Landing Distances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flight Operations View
Advertisements

LO OPERATIONAL SCENARIO. Operational Scenario: Arriving Aircraft 1.Covering all movements at and around the runway including the adjacent taxiways 2.Covering.
Performance Chapter 11.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Runway Safety Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing Sector By Fabrice.
Service technique de laviation civile The global runway safety symposium Efficient information on runway conditions.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing.
29 th Annual Airports Conference Hershey, PA Kenneth Jacobs FAA Airport Engineering Division March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Runway Friction Measurement & Reporting Procedures
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
Flight Operations Web Conference – 05 May 2009
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Landing in CONF 3 – Use of reversers Hélène REBEL Head of A330/A340 Operational Standard Presented by:
Quintin Watkins,P.E. Prime Engineering, Inc., Atlanta, GA
Presentation By: Timothy W. Neubert, MBA, A.A.E.
An Introduction to Threat and Error Management 1.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Malta Language Proficiency Requirements Implementation
Common Terms and Definitions Group Braking Action Reports.
Predicting Performance
September 2002-MoroccoARAB INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN SEMINAR Instrument Procedure Designer Training and continuous training How to get, improve.
August 7, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER RUNWAY CONDITION REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES.
Office of Safety Recommendations and Advocacy Previous Safety Board Recommendations Jeff Marcus Safety Recommendations and Advocacy.
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
Gerard van Es 58th annual Business Aviation Safety Seminar
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration WELCOME Runway Condition Determination, Reporting, and Report Dissemination Workshop Presentation.
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
AIRCRAFT GROUND DEICING/ANTI-ICING
Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather, Fall 2015, Las Vegas, NV Determining Runway Conditions in Real Time Using Data Obtained from Airplanes during.
Paved Runway Condition Assessment Matrix and New Winter Operations AC Overview Title too wordy.
New Approach  Aircraft specific tables and charts See:
Performance Charts.
Office of Aviation Safety Operations Bombardier CRJ-200 Pinnacle Airlines Traverse City, Michigan April 12, 2007.
Stord Airport, Norway Runway Safety Initiative (RSI) ARAST, Bangkok, Thailand Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael.
Approach funnel GENERAL REVIEW PERFORMANCE THEORY
NBAA Conference - Friends/Partners Aviation Weather (FPAW)
Integrating information towards Digital ATM Notices To Airmen Presented By: Lynette M. Jamison Date:August 29, 2013.
Rev: 00Page 1 A 320 PERFORMANCE COURSE TOF : TAKE OFF PERFORMANCE BEL PERFORMANCE – NORMAL FCOM REF QRH REF OM REF 1. Introduction 2. Dry Runway Weightbook.
State of the Art of Contaminated Runways Work at Airbus October 20133rd International Winter Operations Conference Presented by Logan JONES – Aircraft.
Available technologies Session 7 Presentation 1. ICAO Regional Runway Safety Seminar Runway Incursions, Confusion and Excursions are a leading cause of.
Background of the Trial Back in 2012 …  Aviation Community debate on rwy condition assessment  Need for update of national rules on rwy condition assessment.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
© AIRBUS all rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. An Active Safety Net for Runway Overruns Presented by Logan JONES Airbus Flight Operations.
Landing in CONF 3 – Use of reversers
Take Off and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA) - Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather NBAA Webinar Tom Lahovski, AFS-280 November 3, 2016.
TALPA Takeoff & Landing Performance Assessment
Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment
The global runway safety symposium
Available technologies
ABN PROC - ECAM PROCEDURES - ECAM PHILOSOPHY
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Available technologies
Malta Language Proficiency Requirements Implementation
LANDING PERFORMANCE The performance data for takeoff and landing an aircraft can be obtained from the aircraft's flight manual or pilot's operating handbook.
Mission Aircrew Course High Altitude and Terrain Considerations
Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions
Available technologies
Chet Collett – Director Flight Ops Engineering
CORSAIR Project Status Updates
TALPA/RCAM Year 1 Review MSP International Airport
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Available technologies
RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY RNAV-RNP EVOLUTION RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY2 On-Board Navigation Monitoring 2016.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
JFK AIRPORT Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)
Presentation transcript:

Operational Landing Distances Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 International Air Safety Seminar – Singapore November 1-3, 2011 Operational Landing Distances Implementing the TALPA ARC proposals Presented by Lars KORNSTAEDT / Performance Expert, Airbus Flight Operations Support

TALPA ARC Concepts Page 2 Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 TALPA ARC Concepts Common rules For all airports For all manufacturers For all operators Shared operational landing performance computation Realistic Air Distance Representative Friction All physical effects considered Standardized performance to match reported conditions Standardized runway condition assessment Allow performance determination for all types of reports Page 2

FAA TALPA ARC – Runway Assessment Matrix Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 FAA TALPA ARC – Runway Assessment Matrix Reporting Code Measured Friction Reported Braking Action Code 2 Runway Contaminant Greater than 1/8” of: Water Slush Mu (µ) ~29-21µ Deceleration and Directional Control Observation Brake deceleration and controllability is between Medium and Poor. Potential for hydroplaning exists. PiRep Medium to Poor DOWNGRADE ONLY Primary Assessment Differentiation by Temperature PiRep Guidelines

Always start assessment with contaminant type and depth Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Procedure Always start assessment with contaminant type and depth Use additional information to Degrade to lower friction code Never upgrade Careful with friction reports May be optimistic on fluid contaminants Do not hesitate to request additional information from ATC

Storm Cells above Airport Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Examples Compact Snow Braking Action Medium Wet in Heavy Rain Storm Cells above Airport MEDIUM MEDIUM POOR TO Dry Snow over Ice, Braking Action Medium Compact Snow OAT 1ºC Dewpoint 1ºC NIL MEDIUM POOR TO

TALPA Rules in a Nutshell Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 TALPA Rules in a Nutshell Provide Runway Status Reports Using Matrix and associated methodology In a performance oriented way Publish Realistic Landing Performance Data In accordance with agreed rules For all supported aircraft types Make Systematic Landing Performance Check In all cases except for dry runway Apply a 15% margin to the result

Situation for Airbus – BEFORE Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Situation for Airbus – BEFORE Publication for in-flight use Unfactored certified reference distances used for dispatch For incomplete list of contaminant types and depths Coverage of loose snow by equivalence only Inconsistent assumptions between dry/wet and contaminants for airborne phase Operators must define their own margins Pilots have difficulty in using published data with diverse runway condition reporting methods

Airbus Situation – AFTER Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Airbus Situation – AFTER For all Airbus aircraft At least “Minimum Compliance” with TALPA ARC Cover all 6 friction levels Accountability for Temperature effect Runway slope effect Matrix as entry-point All Performance data sources Flight Ops Engineer Software Flight Manual Operational Documentation Electronic Flight Bag Training Material

A320 in Tegucigalpa / Honduras Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 A320 in Tegucigalpa / Honduras MHTG/TGU RWY 02 LDA 5410ft / 1649m Elevation 3287ft CONF FULL / VREF+5 / no wind / OAT 20ºC LW Dry 64.5t Wet 59.9t Standing Water 53.8t Limited by MLW / Dispatch OLD FOLD Dry 1330m 1520m (no rev) Good 1600m 1830m (all rev) Med to Poor 1910m 2200m (all rev)

Airbus Implementation Schedule Airbus Operational Landing Distances 17th Flight Safety Conference International Air Safety Seminar 2011 21-24 March 2011 Airbus Implementation Schedule Feb 2010 Presentation of Octopus specification to EASA Aug 2010 Communication to Airlines Q1 2011 Start of PEP/LPC Validation Apr 2011 PEP/FM Approval by EASA Q2 2011 Finalisation of Publication Method and Format Q3 2011 Start of Production of Documentation Q4 2011 OCTOPUS v28 Certification by EASA Mid 2012 Publication for A318/319/320/321/330/340 Q3 2012 Publication for A306/310/380 Page 10

Operational Documentation - QRH Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Operational Documentation - QRH

EFB Landing Application Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 EFB Landing Application FOLD < RWY LENGTH

EFB Landing Application Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 EFB Landing Application FOLD > RWY LENGTH

EFB Landing Application Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 EFB Landing Application OLD > RWY LENGTH

Assessment & Reporting STANDARDS Airbus Operational Landing Distances International Air Safety Seminar 2011 Conclusion Airbus adopts TALPA ARC standard for in-flight landing performance including for non-normal and in ROPS Realistic computation basis for all winter runway conditions In current environment, pilot must compensate for non yet compliant Runway Condition Reporting Major safety step change requires SHARED Global Assessment & Reporting STANDARDS