Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Name of Community Date:. Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Advertisements

October 10, 2013 Federal Transportation Revenue Options Discussion.
Street Maintenance Funding Issues City Council Workshop April 1, 2013.
Presented by presented by David M. Laney September 2005 Funding of Highways: Crisis and Solutions.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
A Public Opinion Research Project Exploring Attitudes About Government Emily Ekins | Polling Director at Reason Foundation reason.com/poll.
#13362 Data from a statewide survey of 500 registered voters in Arizona, conducted October 3, 6-7, A survey commissioned by the Conducted by:
Teens 2 lesson eight cars and loans. the costs of owning and operating a car Ownership (fixed) costs: Purchase price Sales tax Registration fee, title,
Process the sale to complete the exchange.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.
Quarterly Economic Snapshot Survey Quarterly Economic Snapshot Survey.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
Chapter 11 Public Finance in Texas. The Budget The state constitution requires that the legislature operate within a balanced budget. The Texas budget.
Innovations in Transportation Infrastructure Development: A Road Less Traveled Perspectives of the Public Owner.
1 MET 12 Global Warming: Lecture 12 Transportation Shaun Tanner Outline:   Energy use   Petroleum   Hybrid   Electric   Fuel Cell   Biofuels.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Attitudes to alternative transport funding Graeme Colman Principal, Horizon Research Limited NZCID 25 July 2012.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
April 30, 2010Subcommittee on Public Transportation Funding Idaho Task Force on Public Transportation Summary Report February 2004.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
Congestion Pricing I. Introduction II. Need and purpose of multimodal system Traffic gridlock reflects an imbalance between road supply and road demand.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
Highway Trust Fund Primer Published July 27, 2015 National Journal Presentation Credits Producer: Chris Danello, Katharine Conlon Director: Jessica Guzik,
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Farmer Risk Perceptions and Demand for Risk Management Education Keith H. Coble, Mississippi State University Thomas O. Knight, Texas A&M University George.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
Presented to: Ontario Sustainable Energy Association (OSEA) June 2008 Public Perceptions of a Possible Green Energy Act darn:
Cerbone Unit Eight cars and loans. the costs of owning and operating a car Ownership (fixed) costs: Purchase price Sales tax Registration fee, title,
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 I-66 Corridor: Westbound Traffic Issues Within the I-495 Beltway Community Involvement Survey December.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings December 13, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
Michigan Road Funding Bhavdeep Singh
Keeping Texas in Business. Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State In part, our.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Marketing Resource Group for The Michigan Chamber of Commerce A survey of 600 likely voters was conducted by live interview April 2-6, A random sample.
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Presentation to the River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC August 19, 2014.
What do Texans Think about Transportation Funding and Finance Options? Richard “Trey” Baker November 7, 2015.
Advancing the Agenda Richard Joy VP Policy & Government Relations Toronto Board of Trade Moving Forward Forum May 11 th, 2012.
1 Alternative Financing Methods and Roles of Different Levels of Government Presentation to the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing.
Impacts of Rising Gasoline Prices: The Public Finance Issue Presented by Charles E. Olson Visiting Associate Professor Robert H. Smith School of Business.
HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION FUNDING. Highway Transportation Funding Federal and State Revenue has been flat since 2005, not including the one time stimulus.
2/2/2016US DOT/Volpe Center1 Distributional Impacts of Congestion Pricing Douglass B. Lee, Jr. International Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, FL.
An Optimal Economic Growth Strategy for Alabama Dr. Sam Addy Associate Dean for Economic Development Outreach & Senior Research Economist Montgomery, AlabamaJanuary.
PG Funding and Management Strategies Paris Some thoughts on Road Pricing.
OVERVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCE OPTIONS SEPTEMBER 28, 2011.
Finance and Fiscal Policy Chapter 13. Learning Objectives 13.1 Assess the fairness of Texas’s budgeting and taxing policies. 13.2Describe the sources.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
FY11 Guiding Budget Principles Survey Results Hampton City Council March 10, 2010.
Marketing Foundations What is Marketing? What is the goal of Marketing?
2005 TWG Legislative Recommendations. Fix It First ? WSDOT recommends first priority be Alaskan Way Viaduct, SR-520 with new state revenue Does the TWG.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Farmer Risk Perceptions and Demand for Risk Management Education
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Presentation transcript:

Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select Committee on Transportation Funding, Expenditures and Finance September 16, 2014

What are Texans saying about transportation? TTI’s attitudinal survey confirms what we have been hearing anecdotally: 64% of respondents: increase funding, but not out of their pockets. Most Texans do not understand the specifics of the fuel tax. Texans are dependent on their cars and feeling the squeeze of gridlock and higher gas prices. Four in ten travelers have adjusted behavior in response to congestion. Better traffic signal timing and faster clearance of accidents were the most popular ideas (of 15 options). Transportation service providers received mixed reviews from their customers.

Texas Transportation Poll Biennial survey by TTI’s Policy Research Center Initial poll: March-May 2014 Questions cover four areas: – How do you travel? – What are the solutions? – How do you want to pay? – What do you think about the service provided by transportation agencies? Mail, phone and online 5000 responses, margin of error of ±3% Cross-tabulations shed light on views by demographics and geography (12 regions)

Is there a need to increase transportation funding in Texas?

Nearly two thirds of Texans believe there is a need to increase transportation funding in Texas. The data suggest a majority agreement on this sentiment across all socio-economic groups. Support was strongest among more highly educated Texans and Texans that primarily use modes other than the personal auto.

Is the fuel tax a flat tax or a sales tax?

Respondents were told that the majority of transportation funding in Texas was from revenue generated by the fuel tax. When asked if the fuel tax was a flat tax or a sales tax, a slight majority (51 percent) of respondents correctly reported it was a flat tax. However, almost that many (49 percent) either reported it as a sales tax or did not know. Of those correctly reporting the fuel tax as a flat tax, 71 percent of respondents commented that they did not know the amount of fuel tax paid for every gallon of gasoline purchased. Of the 29 percent that reported knowing the correct amount, only two percent correctly identified the total gas tax (Federal and state) as 38-cents per gallon of gasoline purchased. This translates into less than one percent of respondents knowing the correct amount they pay in fuel tax for every gallon of gasoline purchased. The data clearly suggest that respondents have a low level of knowledge about the specifics of the fuel tax.

Mean scores assigned to potential transportation funding mechanisms *Rated on scale of 0 to 10: 0 = strongly oppose, 10 = strongly support

Mean scores assigned to potential transportation funding mechanisms Texans were not overly supportive of any potential transportation funding mechanism offered. Among those offered, respondents were most supportive of dedicating the state sales tax on vehicles to transportation and least supportive of increasing vehicle registration fees by $50, from $65 per year to $115 per year. The data suggests that Texans are more comfortable with transportation funding mechanisms that do not require any perceived additional spending on their part (dedicating to transportation an existing tax) than those that do (increasing vehicle registration fees or the state fuel tax).

Level of support for strategies to resolve regional transportation issues *Rated on scale of 0 to 10: 0 = strongly oppose, 10 = strongly support

Level of support for strategies to resolve regional transportation issues Texans are most supportive of timing traffic signals more effectively and doing a better job of managing accidents as strategies to help resolve regional transportation issues. Building more toll roads was, by far, the least- supported strategy. The lack of support held true in both metropolitan areas and rural areas, as well as areas with and without toll roads. The data suggest that demographic and geographic characteristics not only influence travel behavior, but also one’s perception of the utility of transportation management strategies.