Next Generation Strategic Planning for Educational Technology and IT: A Study of Process and Engagement Deborah Keyek-Franssen and Marin Stanek IT Initiatives.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries

Advertisements

Project Management Methodology for IT How much is too much? It depends! Copyright John Barden, David Allen, Doug Ryan This work is the intellectual.

No Money? Try Vision. Academic Issues and the Uses of Technology in Financially Tight Times Susanne Woods – SAC, 2002 Copyright Susanne Woods, This.

© Copyright Computer Lab Solutions All rights reserved. Do you need usage information about your computer labs? Copyright Computer Lab Solutions.

Merging Library and IT in a Liberal Arts College: Creating an Organization for the Times Barbara Doyle-Wilch, Judy Watts, Shel Sax Middlebury College March.

Using Value Disciplines in Organizational Change Peter D. Nordgren University of Wisconsin-Superior Educause Midwest Regional Conference March 13 th, 2007.

Copyright Princeton University This work is the intellectual property of Princeton University. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

Creating A More Educated Georgia Plagiarism Detection: Is Technology the Answer? USG Surveys Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies.

Copyright Dikran Kassabian and Gregory Palmer, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to.

On Beyond Z Building a Directory Service educause presentation #074 University of Colorado at Boulder Deborah Keyek-Franssen Marin Stanek Paula J. Vaughan.

Copyright Dickinson College This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

University of Notre Dame Office of Information Technologies March 26, Maintaining the Right Balance Using the Project Charter to Set IT Project Prioritization.

© 2008 Somerville Collaborative Design and Assessment: Learning ‘With and For’ Users 1 Collaborative Design and Assessment: Learning ‘With and For’ Users.

SEM Planning Model.

On Beyond Z Building a Directory Service educause presentation #074 University of Colorado at Boulder Deborah Keyek-Franssen Marin Stanek Paula J. Vaughan.

Project Governance: Avoiding “Administrivia” Lisa Kosanovich Project Manager Center for Instructional Design Brigham Young University

UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.

Beyond Basic Computer Skills: Implementing Technology Fluency Cynthia Edwards, Professor of Psychology Kristin Watkins, Computer Applications Specialist.

IT Strategic Planning From Technical Dreams to Institutional Reality

Dana C. Voss Manager, Decision Support Services, UIS University Information Technology Services INDIANA UNIVERSITY May 2003 Copyright Dana C. Voss, 2003.

Copyright Dong Chen, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright Copyright Chris Byrd and Jeff Farnham, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to.

Technologically Disinclined A presentation to EDUCAUSE Fall, 2002 Copyright Kathy Luker and Scott Manley, This work is the intellectual property.

So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual.

Information Security Governance in Higher Education Policy2004 The EDUCAUSE Policy Conference Gordon Wishon EDUCAUSE/Internet 2 Security Task Force This.

Funding Strategic Initiatives in Academic Technology A Process for Identifying, Cataloging, and Categorizing IT Needs Campuswide Copyright© D. Tebbetts,

C AMPUS-WIDE E -PORTFOLIO I NITIATIVE: WHY DID IT HAPPEN, HOW DID IT WORK? : Monique Fuchs Learning Technology Solutions Project Lead – E-portfolio Initiative.

Identity Management – Why and How Experiences at CU-Boulder Copyright Linda Drake, Director of Development and Integration, University of Colorado, Boulder,

The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.

Classroom Technologies Re-organization Copyright Kathy Bohnstedt, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for.

Collaborative Associate of Arts Degrees. Collaboration In thought a good idea Every one wants to be invited to the dance. Sharing sounds good. In deed.

Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.

Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.

Please Note: Copyright –David L. Snellman This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

Serving MERLOT on Your Campus Gerry Hanley California State University and MERLOT Seminars on Academic Computing August 7, 2002 Snowmass CO Copyright Gerard.

Counting the Costs Mark Piper - University of Newcastle Steve Robertson - Campus Consulting Copyright Steve Robertson and Mark Piper, This work is.

Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.

Copyright Michael White and Sandra Thompson, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.

Building the Integrated Learning Center Having the right people at the table Chris Johnson, Senior Consultant for Learning Technologies University of Arizona.

Middleware 101 Dave Tomcheck UC Irvine. Overview Drivers and Assumptions Objectives The Components of the Business Architecture Implications for Stakeholders.

Value & Excitement University Technology Services Oakland University Information Technology Strategic Planning Theresa Rowe October 2004 Copyright Theresa.

Curricular Collaboration with Technology Report on a three-year inter-institutional program Scott E. Siddall Scott E. Siddall Denison University Granville,

Stewardship of the Information Commons: Cultural, Service, and Operational Issues Stephen R. Acker The Ohio State University Copyright Stephen R. Acker,

UWM CIO Office Where Did These Customizations Come From? Do We Need Them? March 14, 2007 Jill Unglaub, Senior Application Analyst Information and Media.

March 21, 2006 NERCOMP 2006 Worcester, Massachusetts 1 Copyright Sunny Donenfeld, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.

Collaborative Co-Design: An Evidence-Based User-Centric Approach for Assessment and Advancement of Organizational Learning. Mary M. Somerville, MA, MLS,

Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.

Getting Everyone "On Board" for a Major IT Project Presentation to CUMREC MAY 16, 2002 Warren Mills, CEO Copyright Advantiv, Inc This work is the.

Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.

Portals and Web Standards Lessons Learned and Applied David Cook Copyright The University of Texas at Austin This work is the.

Investing in Relationships The Alchemy of Strong Working Relationships in Enterprise Projects.

Welcome to Base CAMP: Enterprise Directory Deployment Ken Klingenstein, Director, Internet2 Middleware Initiative Copyright Ken Klingenstein This.

2007 Carnegie Mellon University 1 Copyright Kelley Anderson and Mary L. Pretz- Lawson, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.

Paved Path to a Learning Commons Elaine Allard, Coordinator of Library Technology & Access Services & Dwight Fischer, CIO Student-centered integration.

A Roadmap through State Education Networking and Interstate Cooperation: StateNets, I2-K20 Initiative, THE QUILT, State (K12) Technology Education Directors.

Advice for IT Leaders By Don Harris Vice Provost and CIO Emory University.

COUNTING NEW FORMS OF SCHOLARSHIP TOWARD TENURE AND PROMOTION Peter Angelos and Linda Deneen University of Minnesota Duluth October 2010 This work is the.

Copyright James Kulich This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Middleware Deployment Issues: The Institutional Environment Mark Crase, California State University Office of the Chancellor Internet2 Middleware CAMP.

Copyright Michael White and Sylvia Maxwell, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.

University of Southern California Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Breaking Down Barriers & Building Bridges Improves Customer Satisfaction & Efficiency Wendy Woodward | March 15, 2011 Copyright Wendy Woodward 2011.

Julian Hooker Assistant Managing Director Educause Southwest

Copyright Information

Defining an IT Workflow, from Request to Support

Blaine A. Brownell, President,

University of Southern California Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)

myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:

Presentation transcript:

Next Generation Strategic Planning for Educational Technology and IT: A Study of Process and Engagement Deborah Keyek-Franssen and Marin Stanek IT Initiatives Coordinators University of Colorado at Boulder Copyright Deborah Keyek-Franssen and Marin Stanek, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

Overview Describe our IT strategic planning processes Provide analysis of “Next Generation” planning model Highlight recommendations from CU-Boulder’s 2002 ITSP Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

CU-Boulder Quick Facts Research I flagship of four-campus system 27,000 students; 2000 faculty and instructors; 3500 staff IT Environment: Networks and wiring System administrative functions Four-tiered support model Both central and distributed services Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

First Generation of ITSP (1998) Drivers Small number of key decision makers Budget for process and implementation Results Planning led to technical improvements to infrastructure, services/support, and (somewhat) middleware layer affecting many users Appropriate approach when Upper administration consensus Fewer budgetary constraints Shared goals for infrastructure Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Cultural Changes IT planning is unrelenting, broad-based, includes increased faculty participation Planning luxuriates in data Planning becomes part of the campus culture, develops campus characteristics Ed Tech is a planning focus Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Environmental Changes Significant fiscal constraints Technological solutions are increasingly inter-related & drive new relationships Increasing academic use of technology Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

ETSP (2000, 2002) ETSP issues identification, major data gathering (ITEC in between, focused on IT academic programs and research, also touched on provision of ed tech support) ETSP 2002 I/IT Literach and Fluency Uses of Ed Tech (support, facilities, incentives) Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Next Generation ITSP (2002) First generation—small number of key decision makers, fewer fiscal restraints Next generation flat fiscal environment engaged a large number of people, which tackled and understood issues focused on educational technology & services culturally accepted and expected process dedicated support Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Next Generation Process Must-haves include: Continued, engaged support Data (and then some) from current and past processes Participation and delegated authority External facilitator Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

25 campus-wide working committees Political Champion(s) Next Generation Team Structure Political conduit and communicator Steering Team IT Council (composed of campus leaders and decision makers) Small group of four that met weekly to provide momentum, project management, data collection, and aggregate work Core Team

What worked, what didn’t Core team meetings Delegating committee leads External Reviewers Developing a report template Website Initial micromanagement of the committees Asking too much Not developing a financial template Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Next Generation Results Cultural shifts evident in many initiatives Ed Tech initiatives Support Facilities Lit&Flu IKR & Libraries Learning Management Systems Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Results Continued… Middleware ITSPI Security Web-based student services Balance between coordinated and distributed IT governance articulated and more participatory Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Lessons Learned Know what’s right for the campus and for participants (e.g. 1st gen vs. 2 nd gen) Provide adequate support, and then some Information, communication, and shared expectations are crucial (website, shared file space) Participation and delegated authority Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

Take Homes Next gen thesis (philosophy= academic use drives it, it needs to be a participatory process), framework Nuts-n-bolts process (structure of teams)(hints about how to get faculty involved—that is, short, intense planning period) Examples/new initiatives Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning

For more information Deborah Keyek-Franssen Marin Stanek Stanek and Keyek-Franssen: Next Generation Strategic Planning