The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence. 7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE ICP EXERCISE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE BUSINESS PLAN July 8, 2014 Kelley A. Packalen, PhD Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship, Queen’s School.
Advertisements

CEO Leadership Network PROTECTING YOUR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS FROM LIABILITY Sponsored by.
Page 1 Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited. Page 1 M&A Insurance: Forever Changing the Way Businesses are Bought and Sold.
EQUITY VALUATION: APPLICATIONS AND PROCESSES Presenter Venue Date.
VALUATION OF FIRMS IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS OKAN BAYRAK.
Venture Finance Fall 2002 Slide 1 Class 10 Notes Deal Structure: Ownership and Control © Andrew W. Hannah.
6-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Internal Control Evaluation: Assessing Control Risk.
M&A & Insurance Mergers & Acquisitions Capabilities Presentation RIMS Fairfield/Westchester Chapter May 14 th, 2013.
Nature of an Integrated Audit
A Framework for Financial Statement Analysis Chapter 11.
Strategic Financial Decision-Making Framework
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Page 1 Canadian Association of MoversDecember 2007 Buying A Business Damian Peluso Director PricewaterhouseCoopers Transaction.
Business Acquisition Process Implementation & transition Closing Negotiation of the transaction Due Diligence Engagement TargetIdentification.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF GLOBAL BUSINESS: PROTECTING YOUR BUSINESS INTERESTS Tyler T. Ray, Esq. Duffy & Sweeney, LTD
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Sapient Insurance Partners. Overview & Services We have almost four decades of combined experience in the property & casualty insurance and reinsurance.
Preparing for a Sale of the Business Marc D’Annunzio Siavage Law Group, LLC November 10, 2010.
1-1 CHAPTER 1 An Overview of Financial Management.
Negotiating M&A and Joint Venture Deals Rome, 8 June 2005.
Implementing and Auditing Ethics Programs
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
Mergers & Acquisitions – An Effective Strategy for Growth and Sustainability…and Issues Related to Implementation November 17, 2010 Legal Aspects Paul.
v2 Climate Change Disclosure for Canadian Public Companies Barbara Hendrickson Corporate Reporting: Climate Change & Related Environmental Disclosures.
Chapter 3 Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ChevronTexaco Corporation Peter Bijur Chairman & CEO Texaco Inc. Dave O’Reilly Chairman & CEO Chevron Corporation 1.
1 © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Accounting for Managers, 4th edition, Chapter 2 Accounting and its Relationship to Shareholder Value and.
Copyright  2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
CHAPTER NINETEEN Mergers And Acquisitions: Managing The Process The purpose of this chapter is to understand why the financial services industry undertakes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter Nineteen Acquisitions and Mergers in Financial Services Management.
Lahore School of Economics BBA III Summer Term II-2010 History & Balance Sheet Analysis.
CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Audit Planning and Types of Audit Tests Chapter Five.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5-1 Chapter Five Audit Planning and Types of Audit Tests Chapter.
Introduction to Accounting Topic 1 10/26/2015Topic 1: Introduction to accounting.
Part 2: Negotiating the Transaction. The Deal Team –Should comprise at a minimum: Corporate Finance lead; M&A Legal lead; Commercial/Business Lead; Integration.
Presentation made by 3D High School G.B. Bodoni.  What is it? Business Plan is a planning document that describe in detail the business project and allows.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter Nineteen Acquisitions and Mergers in Financial-Services Management Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Date: December 7 th, 2005 M&A-the boot on the other foot? Samir Dudhoria Partner Luthra & Luthra Law Offices Date: December 7 th, 2005.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
IFRS Professor Wayne H. Shaw May 26, 2011 IFRS. Where were we last year? Summary of SEC Position.
CHAPTER 3: BUYING A LOCAL BUSINESS. OBJECTIVES: To find the factors you need to consider when purchasing a local business. To get a better idea of what.
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the.
Sapient Insurance Partners. Overview & Services We have almost four decades of combined experience in the property & casualty insurance and reinsurance.
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS NEGOTIATING AND PREPARING THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT.
Mergers--Background Mergers are capital budgeting problems, but:  Benefits like “strategic fits” hard to quantify  Accounting, tax, and regulatory issues.
Marketing Research An introduction. Marketing Research Marketing research is a combination of two words i.e marketing and research Marketing is essentially.
Chapter 11 Contingency. Contingent 1.concept: past transactions or events of a situation, the results by the occurrence of uncertain future events occur.
Chapter 03 – International Accounting International Financial Statement Analysis 1.
Buying an Existing Business
An Overview THE AUDIT PROCESS. MAJOR PHASES IN AN AUDIT Client acceptance and retention Establish terms of the engagement Plan the audit Consider internal.
© 2008 by South-Western, Cengage Learning Chapter 19 Charles J. Jacobus Thomas E. Gillett.
18-1 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
AUDIT QUALITY AND ASSURANCE 2 ND AND 3 RD OCTOBER 2014 HILTON HOTEL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 1.
Rubi Suliman, Hi-Tech Leader
Drafting and Documentation DOCUMENTING THE TRANSACTION FROM START TO FINISH.
HOW TO PREPARE A BUSINESS FOR SALE M&A Counsel Substantial and recent experience representing both buyers and sellers Bench strength at the firm good,
Chapter 3 Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
and Types of Audit Tests
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
MERGER AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY
Auditing & Investigations II
Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests and Materiality
Katherine Coates, Partner
Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality
MERGER AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY
Pre-Close Rules of Engagement
VALUATION OF FIRMS IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies
Presentation transcript:

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence

7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 2

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 3

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 Panelists –Michael Belsley, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago –Damian Didden, Wachtell, New York –David G. Gibson, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Chesterbrook –George Magera, Federated Investors, Inc., Pittsburgh –Shaun Rixon, Gategroup, Zurich Moderator –Urs P. Gnos, Walder Wyss, Zurich Introduction 4

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 5

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Understanding the business of the target –Identification of synergies, potentials, strengths and weaknesses –Identification of risks related to the target –Determination viability of the transaction –Determination of the ideal deal structure –Determination of reps & warranties, covenants and indemnities –Identification of third party consents and governmental approvals (e.g. competition clearance) –Evaluation of a fair price –Integration Purpose, Role and Impact of DD 6

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 7

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –What can/what cannot be achieved by a Red Flag DD –Significant regulatory approvals –Significant customer consents –Financial statement accuracy and internal controls (e.g., revenue/expense confirmation, etc.) –Significant liabilities (known, unknown, contingent, or other) (e.g., off-balance sheet items, guarantees, litigation, investigations, etc.) –Significant integration concerns (e.g. labour law issues, integration issues) Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (1) 8

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Reasons to go for one or the other –Time (trade-off against potential risks) –Deal structure (auction) –Public deal vs. private deal –Regulatory approvals / third party consents –Costs (trade-off against potential risks) –Multiple jurisdictions DD –Scope of DD (e.g. environmental, IP) Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (2) 9

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Reasons to go for one or the other (cont’) –Target (e.g. regulated enties) –Limited Resources –New business line vs. ancillary business line –Public deal vs. private deal –Risk tolerance –Expectations of stakeholders (e.g. existing private equity investors) –Trend? Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (3) 10

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 11

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 Two facets regarding antitrust and diligence: 1.Antitrust regulation of information sharing governs generally the kinds of information that can be shared during diligence 2.Need for information to discern antitrust-related regulatory concerns posed by the transaction Antitrust Issues 12

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Agencies recognize that merger parties reasonably need to exchange information for valuation and synergies analysis –But, Agencies are concerned that competing parties’ activities in the marketplace become tainted as a result. –Hence limitations on information exchanged in diligence. –Direction of information flow: Cash deal –one way, stock deal – two way. –Non-public information such as pricing plans, customer lists, nonpublic strategy, detailed product/vendor costs, employee comp. can pose real issues –When this kind of information necessary, parties will use 3 rd party (accounting or consulting firm) or clean teams Antitrust and Information Sharing 13

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Filings analysis: details on turnover, asset info, and corporate structure to determine where filings might occur –Substantive analysis: Does the transaction face regulatory intervention, and what remedies? (Strategy documents, public documents, regulatory history, political sensitivity) –Other risks: Beyond the transaction risk, for buyers, does the target pose risk of cartel enforcement? (Past enforcement, industry structure, other sources) Antitrust – Regulatory Risk Assessment 14

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 15

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Issues: –Can the Company use the information gained during the due diligence to obtain a competitive advantage over its competitors? Is it the intention of the Company to simply obtain information in an information gathering exercise or does it have a genuine desire to investigate the takeover (acting in good faith) and proceed (if no unacceptable risks arise)? –Are there any anti-trust issues? Any duty of care by the Company or by the Target? –Is this exercise an efficient use of the Company’s ownership/resources? –Does this extensive due diligence significantly reduce the risks for the Company? –Can the Company claim that the Target did not act in good faith and lied about its true position before the extensive due diligence unveiled the true position? Can the Target be compelled to pay the due diligence costs of the Company? –Is a breakage fee possible? –Would a red flag due diligence exercise have produced a more commercial solution? Case Study 1 (see separate handout) 16

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Issues: –What facts might direct the Company to conduct a red flag diligence? –What facts might direct the Company away from a red flag diligence toward a tradition in- depth diligence review? –What other facts would be helpful to know before making a decision? –How might a limited red flag diligence be helpful? In what subject matter areas might a full diligence be warranted? –How would a red flag diligence operate in practice under this fact scenario? –What important information about the Target can neither a red flag diligence nor a full fledge diligence determine? Case Study 2 (see separate handout) 17

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence7 June 2014 –Introduction –Purpose, Role and Impact of DD –Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD –Antitrust Issues –Case Studies –Questions Content 18

Thank you for your attention