Attributable Ownership Public Hearing March 13, 2014: Alexandria, VA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PERE Real Estate CFOs Forum Regulation Coming? October 7, 2009 New York R. Eric Emrich Chief Financial Officer Lubert-Adler Partners, LP.
Advertisements

UK Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Filing an online request for an extension of time in proceedings procedure demonstration.
UK Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Filing an online notice of defence and counterstatement in opposition proceedings.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposal to Require Identification of Patent Owners Stephen S. Wentsler AIPPI/JFBA/AIPLA.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2013 Peggy Focarino Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office October 25, 2013.
1 Charts of: The Four Time Periods for Submitting an IDS and Their Corresponding Requirements “Changes to Information Disclosure Statement Requirements.
1 Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp July 19-20, 2010 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
REGISTRATION OF BUSINESS NAMES CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE © 2011 COPYRIGHT: CAIPO.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association RCE Practice: Pilot Programs and Delays in Examination Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP.
Chapter 6 B ASICS OF B USINESS T AXATION EBD 301 Accounting and Finance for Entrepreneurs.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
The America Invents Act: Approaching the Finish Line January 29, 2013 Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:
America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.
The Advisers Act Custody Rule
Q. TODD DICKINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) USPTO PUBLIC MEETING JULY 20, 2010 AIPLA Comments: Enhanced.
William R. Covey Deputy General Counsel for Enrollment and Discipline and Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline William R. Covey Deputy General.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Chapter 34 LLC’s and LLP’s
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Green Technology Petition Pilot Robert W. Bahr. 2 Green Tech: Discussion Points 1. Authority and Overview: resources / overview 2.Petition Requirement:
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 41 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships Chapter 41 Limited.
Gifts of Marketable Securities and Other Financial Assets.
Corporation A legal entity that is separate and distinct from its owners. Corporations enjoy most of the rights and responsibilities that an individual.
PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY IN INDIA
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Attributable Ownership Public Hearing March 26, 2014: San Francisco, CA.
Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Biological Deposits.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
Chapter 15 Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
Business Entities under the General Corporation Law of Delaware 1 Civil Service Bureau Reform & Development Department
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon February Defective Priority Claim Means No Priority Claim Each intermediate application in the chain of priority must.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule 1 Joni Y. Chang Senior Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration (571) ,
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.
World Bank International Standards and their Measures for Financial Institutions and Non-Financial Businesses and Professions to Prevent Money Laundering.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
1 Benefit Claims to Prior Applications under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119(e), 120, 121, and 365(c) Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc 2007 WL (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007)
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
1 PETITIONS PRACTICE Thurman K. Page Supervisory Petitions Examiner Office of Petitions Office of the Deputy Commissioner For Patent Examination Policy.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.
Final Rule on OTI Licenses - Docket NCBFAA Conference, Tucson AZ – April 19, 2016.
Chapter 7 B ASICS OF B USINESS T AXATION EBD 301 Accounting and Finance for Entrepreneurs Dr. David P. EchevarriaAll Rights Reserved1.
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
Chapter 31: Other Organizational Forms for Small Businesses
Chapter 7 Basics of Business Taxation
Claims and Continuations Final Rule
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
PTAB Bootcamp: Nuts and Bolts of IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Presentation transcript:

Attributable Ownership Public Hearing March 13, 2014: Alexandria, VA

Agenda TimeTopic 1:00 PM Welcome and Opening Remarks 1:20 PMPresentation of Proposed Rules Bob Bahr, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1:45 PM Witness Testimony Public Knowledge, Charles Duan Hewlett-Packard Company, Scott Pojunas Intellectual Property Owners Association, Herb Wamsley Inventor Network of the Capital Area, Raymond Van Dyke 2:45 PMBREAK 3:00 PMWitness Testimony (cont.) 3:55 PMClosing Remarks

Attributable Owner Rulemaking Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: –Changes to Require Identification of Attributable Owner, 79 Fed. Reg (Jan. 24, 2014); and –Notice of Public Hearings and Extension of Comment Period on the Proposed Changes to Require Identification of Attributable Owner, 79 Fed. Reg (Feb. 20, 2014) 3

Public Hearings Alexandria, VA: March 13, 2014 San Francisco, CA: March 26,

Written Comments Due April 24, 2014 Must be submitted by: 5 MethodAddress Postal MailMail Stop Comments-Patents Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA, Federal eRulemaking Portalhttp://

Attributable Ownership Landing Page _ownership.jsp 6

Introductory Remarks Michelle Lee Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce and Deputy Director of the USPTO

Proposed Rules: Changes to Require Identification of Attributable Owner Robert W. Bahr Senior Patent Counsel Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy

Attributable Owner Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Topics addressed in proposed rules: –Who is the “attributable owner” (definition)? –When must the attributable owner be identified? 9

Attributable Owner Definition

Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(a) and (b)) Attributable owner includes: –Titleholders, –Enforcement entities, and –The ultimate parent entity as defined in 16 CFR 801.1(a)(3) of any titleholder or enforcement entity. The ultimate parent entity is an entity which is not controlled by any other entity. 11

Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(c)) An entity cannot avoid being considered an attributable owner by creating or using any instrumentality with the purpose or effect of: –temporarily divesting itself of attributable ownership, or –preventing the vesting of such attributable ownership. 12

Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(d) and (e)) The definition of “entity” tracks the definition of entity in 16 CFR 801.1(a)(2). 13

Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(d)) The term “entity” includes: –Any natural person, corporation, company, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, estate of a deceased natural person, foundation, fund, or institution, whether incorporated, wherever located, and of whatever citizenship, –Any receiver, trustee in bankruptcy or similar official or any liquidating agent for any of these entities, –Any joint venture or other corporation which has not been formed but the acquisition of the voting securities or other interest in which, if already formed, would be an attributable owner, or –Any other organization or corporate form that holds an interest in an application or patent. 14

Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(e)) The term “entity” does not include: –any foreign state, foreign government, or agency thereof (other than a corporation or unincorporated entity engaged in commerce), –the United States, any of the States thereof, or any political subdivision or agency of either (other than a corporation or unincorporated entity engaged in commerce). 15

Identification of Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(f)) The attributable owner must be identified as: 16 Owner TypeItem of Information #1 Item of Information #2Item of Information #3 Public Company Name of companyStock symbol Stock exchange where the company is listed Non-Public Company Name of companyPlace of incorporation Address of principal place of business PartnershipName of partnership Address of the principal place of business Natural PersonFull legal nameResidenceCorrespondence Address OtherNameIf organized under the laws of a state, the name of that state and legal form of organization Address of the principal place of business

Identification of Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.271(g)) A shareholder or partner in a corporation, partnership, or other association must also be independently identified as an attributable owner if the shareholder or partner is an attributable owner, –even if the corporation, partnership or other association is separately identified as an attributable owner. Does not apply to shareholders of a public company. 17

Timing for Identification of Attributable Owner

Identification of Attributable Owner in Pending Applications The attributable owner must be identified in an application: –On filing (or in reply to a missing parts notice), –When there is a change in attributable owner, and –At allowance. 19

Identification of Attributable Owner on Filing (proposed 37 CFR 1.273) The attributable owner must be identified in each nonprovisional application, which includes: –reissue applications, and –international applications that commenced the national stage in the United States. The attributable owner need not be identified in provisional applications. 20

Identification of Attributable Owner on Filing (proposed 37 CFR 1.273) If an application does not identify the attributable owner: –The applicant will be sent a notice to file missing parts giving the applicant two months (which may be extended to seven months) to identify the attributable owner. –Failure to identify the attributable owner in reply to this notice will result in abandonment. The application may be revived under 37 CFR if the delay in identifying the attributable owner was unintentional. 21

Identification of Attributable Owner When There is a Change in Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR 1.275) If there is a change to the attributable owner during the pendency of an application: –The applicant has three months to identify the new attributable owner. –This three-month period is not extendable. 22

Identification of Attributable Owner At Allowance (proposed 37 CFR 1.277) If a notice of allowance has been sent to the applicant, –The applicant has three months to identify the current attributable owner of the application. If there has been no change to the attributable owner, the applicant may simply indicate that there has been no change to the attributable owner. –This three-month period is not extendable. –The failure to identify (or indicate no change) within three months would result in abandonment. The application may be revived under 37 CFR if the delay in identifying the attributable owner was unintentional. 23

Identification of Attributable Owner in Pending Applications Proposed Applicability Date: 24

Identification of Attributable Owner in Patents The attributable owner must be identified in a patent: –At each maintenance fee payment, –In PTAB proceedings, and –In supplemental examination and reexamination proceedings. 25

Identification of Attributable Owner At Maintenance Fee Payment (proposed 37 CFR 1.381) The attributable owner must be identified within the maintenance fee payment windows (37 CFR 1.362(d) or (e)), but prior to the date the maintenance fee is paid. If there has been no change to the attributable owner, the patentee may simply indicate that there has been no change to the attributable owner. 26

Identification of Attributable Owner in Patents Involved in PTAB proceedings (proposed 37 CFR 1.383) The attributable owner must be identified in the mandatory notice filed by a patent owner as required by 37 CFR 42.8(a)(2). If there is a change to the attributable owner during the trial proceeding, the patent owner has twenty-one days to file a notice identifying the new attributable owner. This twenty-one-day period is not extendable. 27

Identification of Attributable Owner in Patents Involved in Supplemental Examination or Reexamination (proposed 37 CFR 1.385) The attributable owner must be identified in a request for supplemental examination under 37 CFR for the request to be accorded a filing date. The attributable owner must be identified in a request for ex parte reexamination under 37 CFR by the patent owner for the request to be accorded a filing date. 28

Identification of Attributable Owner in Patents Involved in Reexamination Proceedings (proposed 37 CFR 1.385) The attributable owner must be identified in papers filed by the patent owner in an ex parte reexamination proceeding, unless the current attributable owner was previously identified by the patent owner. –Otherwise, the paper would be considered incomplete. If there is a change to the attributable owner during the reexamination proceeding, the patent owner has three months to identify the new attributable owner. –This three-month period is not extendable. 29

Identification of Attributable Owner in Patents Proposed Applicability Date: 30

Correction of Failures or Errors in Identifying the Attributable Owner (proposed 37 CFR and 1.387) If the applicant or patent owner has failed to identify a change to the attributable owner, or has indicated an incorrect or an incomplete attributable owner, and If there was a good faith effort to identify the attributable owner or any changes to the attributable owner, The failure or error may be excused on petition accompanied by a showing of reason for the delay, error, or incompleteness (and the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g)). 31

Public Access to Attributable Owner Information The USPTO would make attributable owner information available to the public for: –published applications, and –patents. The USPTO is working on a database to provide electronic access to current and historical attributable owner information –such as via the public side of PAIR. 32

Thank You 33

Witness Testimony

Charles Duan Public Knowledge

Scott Pojunas Hewlett-Packard

Herb Wamsley Intellectual Property Owners Association

Raymond Van Dyke Inventor Network of the Capital Area

Closing

Written Comments Due April 24, 2014 Must be submitted by: 40 MethodAddress Postal MailMail Stop Comments-Patents Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA, Federal eRulemaking Portalhttp://

Attributable Ownership Landing Page _ownership.jsp 41

Thank You 42