Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Advertisements

Math Extension Activity JCPS Analytical and Applied Sciences.
Smarter Balanced. OAKS Transition As my colleague Jason Zimba likes to say, you don’t teach standards you teach mathematics. Bill McCallum.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
An Introduction to PARCC Design Principles and Evidence Tables for ELA and Math June 12, 2013 Tennessee Department of Education, Division of Curriculum.
Classroom Assessment: Performance Based Math in Middle and High School. Understanding and Using the PARCC documents. Ted Coe, Ph.D. Grand Canyon University.
Using PARCC Tools to Develop Assessments in Grades 6-8 A Workshop Prepared for the Rhode Island Department of Education by Monique Maynard November 2014.
Mathematical Practices 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking October, 2013.
Understanding PARCC Evidence Statements for Mathematics Part I
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
Aspen Institute/Urban District Leaders Network May 21, 2013 Tampa, FL PARCC: Aligning Assessment Practices.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
Using PARCC Tools to Develop Assessments in Grades 3  5 A Workshop Prepared for the Rhode Island Department of Education by Monique Maynard November 2014.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
1 Instructional Data Division. 2 3 Outcome Outcome: Participants will be able to: understand PARCC’s historical context define PARCC’s components communicate.
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Understanding the Evidence Statement Tables for the PARCC Summative Assessments in Mathematics Welcome to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for.
COMMON CORE OVERVIEW Welcome. NYS Common Core 5 Strands (Same for Prek-12) (Number Sense, Algebra, Geometry, Measurement, Statistics and Probability)
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
MPs: Math Practice Standards grades 6-8 (CCSS) Welcome…
Achievethecore.org 1 Implementing Standards and Incorporating Mathematical Practices Sandra M. Alberti AMTNJ October 24, 2013.
Common Core and the Community College May 20, 2014.
Welcome! PLC Day October 7, Summer Work CCLS Power Standards Readiness Leverage Endurance Grade Level Expectations (GLEs) Assessments ICSD Common.
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach/Teacher at Highland High.
Launching the Common Core State Standards. Partnership for 21Century Learning presents: Above and Beyond MM387HNQk.
Introduction and Overview Rapid City Area Schools May 2011.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
PA Core Instructional Frameworks Structure of the Math Frameworks.
Common Core Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Carry across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Summary of Common Core Standards in Mathematics and Implications for Higher Education Math Faculty Conference September 20, 2012 University of Central.
CCGPS Mathematics Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent June 27, 2012  In CCGPS mathematics, content is divided.
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
WRITING SIMPLE EXPRESSIONS GOAL: I can write and interpret numerical expressions and compare expressions using a visual model.
CVEDC INTRODUCTION TO CCSS MATHEMATICS FOR GRADES
Mathematics Common Core State Standards Thursday, August 16 th, 2012.
May 8,  National standards developed by the National Association of Governors  Adopted by 45 states  Based on best practices in national and.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. 1.How many vertices are on a cube? 2.Subtract ½ from half a baker’s dozen. 3.How many prime numbers are between.
T 3 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP Make sense of problems & persevere in solving them Reason abstractly & quantitatively Construct viable arguments.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Common Core State Standards Adopted by NYS Board of Regents.
PARCC Assessments- What Do The Tasks Require Students To Do?
DELAC June 4, 2014 Transition To The Common Core Mathematics.
The College and Career Readiness Standards: An Brief Overview Troy Goracke, Program Administrator;
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
NGSS and Common Core State Standards. Mathematical Practices Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
Illinois State Board of Education A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking.
Understanding the Mathematics Evidence Tables Presenter: Carrie Piper Former Senior Advisor, PARCC Mathematics.
Ridgefield Public Schools PEARSON ENVISION MATH 2.0 March 23, 2017
ELEM 525.
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Elementary Math: What Should It Look Like?
NEA and AFT Item Review Boot Camp Working Session: Mathematics
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Presentation transcript:

Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems involving the additional and supporting content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-claim C: Students express mathematical reasoning by constructing mathematical arguments and critiques Sub-Claim D: Students solve real world problems engaging particularly in the modeling practice Sub-Claim E: Student demonstrate fluency in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3-6 Claims Driving Design: Mathematics Students are on-track or ready for college and careers

Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career ready (or “on-track” to being ready) in mathematics. The student solves grade-level /course-level problems in mathematics as set forth in the Standards for Mathematical Content with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Sub-Claim A: Major Content 1 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Major Content 1 for her grade/course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Sub-Claim B: Additional & Supporting Content 2 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Additional and Supporting Content 2 for her grade/course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Sub-Claim E: Fluency in applicable grades (3-6) The student demonstrates fluency as set forth in the Standards for Mathematical Content in her grade. Claims Structure: Mathematics Sub-Claim C: Highlighted Practices MP.3,6 with Connections to Content 3 (expressing mathematical reasoning) The student expresses grade/course- level appropriate mathematical reasoning by constructing viable arguments, critiquing the reasoning of others, and/or attending to precision when making mathematical statements. Sub-Claim D: Highlighted Practice MP.4 with Connections to Content (modeling/application) The student solves real-world problems with a degree of difficulty appropriate to the grade/course by applying knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for the current grade/course (or for more complex problems, knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for previous grades/courses), engaging particularly in the Modeling practice, and where helpful making sense of problems and persevering to solve them (MP. 1),reasoning abstractly and quantitatively (MP. 2), using appropriate tools strategically (MP.5), looking for and making use of structure (MP.7), and/or looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning (MP.8). Total Exam Score Points: 82 (Grades 3-8), 97 or 107(HS) Total Exam Score Points: 82 (Grades 3-8), 97 or 107(HS) 12 pts (3-8), 18 pts (HS) 6 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR) 12 pts (3-8), 18 pts (HS) 6 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR) ~37 pts (3-8), ~42 pts (HS) ~37 pts (3-8), ~42 pts (HS) ~14 pts (3-8), ~23 pts (HS) ~14 pts (3-8), ~23 pts (HS) 14 pts (3-8), 14 pts (HS) 4 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR) 14 pts (3-8), 14 pts (HS) 4 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR) 7-9 pts (3-6) 1 For the purposes of the PARCC Mathematics assessments, the Major Content in a grade/course is determined by that grade level’s Major Clusters as identified in the PARCC Model Content Frameworks v.3.0 for Mathematics. Note that tasks on PARCC assessments providing evidence for this claim will sometimes require the student to apply the knowledge, skills, and understandings from across several Major Clusters. 2 The Additional and Supporting Content in a grade/course is determined by that grade level’s Additional and Supporting Clusters as identified in the PARCC Model Content Frameworks v.3.0 for Mathematics. 3 For 3 – 8, Sub-Claim C includes only Major Content. For High School, Sub-Claim C includes Major, Additional and Supporting Content.