Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development Part 2: Tools and Strategies Cynthia Anderson, University of Oregon Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Advertisements

May 2008 Ensuring Success for Students with or at-risk of Emotional/Behavioral and other Disabilities through School-wide PBIS: The IL PBIS Tertiary Demonstration.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD & Nadia Katul Sampson, MA University of Oregon.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
2 Training Administrators Prior to and During Tier 1 Training Prior to and During Tier 2 Training Prior to and During Tier 3 Training/TA.
S200 Formalizing Selected Systems, Data, and Practices Social Academic Instructional Groups The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Session E10 The Changing Role of School- based Clinicians Sheri Luecking, Illinois.
SAIG – Everything You Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask Dana Kuehl Kent Smith Wisconsin RtI Center- PBIS Network Jodi Hubbard PBIS Coordinator Eau.
Building Tier 2/3 Creating a Seamless System of Support.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
Dr. Patricia Hershfeldt Sheppard Pratt Health System
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2010 Delaware PBS Cadre Meeting.
Building Systems Capacity at Tier 3 ISTAC/IL PBIS Network Lucille Eber, State Director Kimberli Breen, Technical Assistance Director Waukegan School District.
Tier 2/3 Coaching Functions & Skills Kimberli Breen Michele Capio Illinois PBIS Network.
School District School Board SW-PBIS Implementation Date Name(s)
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Building the Foundation for Advanced Tiers Susan Barrett Special thanks to the IL PBIS Network.
Social and Academic Instructional Groups SAIG
PBIS Tier 2: Building Fidelity in Tier 2
Data, Systems and Practices in CICO
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
The Kansas-Illinois SW-PBS Tertiary Demonstration Center: A Response to Intervention (RtI) Continuum of Support Model July 23, 2008 Lucille Eber, IL PBIS.
Virginia PBIS Conference | June 30, 2011 Building Capacity for Progress Monitoring within School-wide Systems of PBIS Lucille Eber IL PBIS Network
Tier 2 & 3 External Coaches Network Meeting Location Meeting Time October, 2012.
Jim Artesani, Ed.D. University of Maine October 22, 2010.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Rachel Saladis Kim Miller Kathy Halley.
Inclusion Activity. Give One to Get One On an index card, note the following: –Name –Role in your school –Hopes and expectations for today and secondary.
Counselor’s Meeting August 11, 2014 Michelle Coconate, RtI Facilitator Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention (RtI)
PBIS Targeted Level Orientation Webinar Presented By VTPBiS State Team January 21, 2015.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Emilie O’Connor & Stephanie Skolasinski Technical Assistance Coordinators - PBIS Erika Krasavage & Rebecca Achterberg Clay Lamberton Elementary, Berlin,
Virginia PBIS Conference | June 30, 2011 Behavior Intervention Planning within a School-wide System of PBIS Lucille Eber IL PBIS Network
Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention Michelle Coconate RtI Facilitator New Certified Staff Orientation August 4, 2015.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Data Analysis
PBIS Tier 2: CICO Data-based Decisions November 20/21, 2013 Michelle Coconate & Kristen McElligatt.
E11: Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development, Part 2: Tools & Strategies Michele Capio, Illinois PBIS Network Pam Horn, School District U-46 (IL)
Secondary Level Training Illinois PBIS Network Secondary Level Training S200i Formalizing Tier 2/Secondary Systems, Data & Practices.
S1: Tier 2/Secondary Series Training EMS sites August 30, 2011 Becky Pérez Sandy Washburn Deborah Reichmann
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Building Capacity at the State, District & Building for Wraparound at Tier 3 Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network Maura Burns, Frost Middle School.
PBIS Systems of Support: Tier2/Secondary The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Recognition Process Materials available on
Building Systems at the Tier 3/Tertiary Level Sheri Luecking, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network Sara Teeter, Springfield Public Schools Abbey.
Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention New Certified Staff Orientation August 6, 2013.
IL PBIS Network APBS Conference St. Louis March, 2010 Lucille Eber Ed.D. Statewide Director, IL PBIS Network.
Daily Progress Report (DPR) Sample NAME:______________________ DATE:__________________ Teachers please indicate YES (2), SO-SO (1), or NO (0) regarding.
IL PBIS Network Tier 2/3 Training Process National PBIS Leadership Forum Exemplar Presentation for Session B3 Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Advanced Tiers in High Schools Ali Hearn, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
CREC 111 Charter Oak Ave., Hartford, CT Donna Morelli and Cynthia Zingler.
Implementation in the “Real World”. Edie Banks, LCSWSarah Gafford, LCSW.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Rachel Saladis Kim Miller Kathy Halley.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
ELL PROGRAMS Presented to Hubble staff Making Choices for Excellence PBIS Team Leaders Presentation PBIS Positive Behavior Intervention Supports.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Lincoln, NE Tier 2 Building the Capacity for a Strong Continuum of Support at Tier 2.
Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development at District & School Levels Lucille Eber Illinois PBIS Network National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare,
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Tier 2 Coaching Jessica Swain-Bradway, IL PBIS Network
CREC 111 Charter Oak Ave., Hartford, CT Donna Morelli and Cynthia Zingler.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Behavior Education Program/ Check and Connect KENTUCKY.
D5. Brief FBA and BIP Dave Kunelius Jamie Ganske Tammy Olig
PBIS Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports
Division of Student Support Services
3-Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams)
Social Academic Instructional Groups
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Presentation transcript:

Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development Part 2: Tools and Strategies Cynthia Anderson, University of Oregon Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network

Description  Positive outcomes for students are achieved when evidence-based interventions are implemented within effective systems and data are used to guide decision-making. We describe the ways data can be used at Tiers 2 and 3 (e.g., for individual students, for a system) and share tools for using data effectively and efficiently.

Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network

Positive outcomes for students are achieved when…

…evidence-based interventions are implemented…  Provide guidance on selection of EBP  Organize EBP into a framework that makes sense to all stakeholders

Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems SIMEO Tools: HSC-T, RD-T, EI-T Check-in/ Check-out Individualized Check- In/Check-Out, Groups & Mentoring (ex. CnC) Brief Functional Behavioral Assessment/ Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP) Complex FBA/BIP Wraparound ODRs, Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc. Daily Progress Report (DPR) (Behavior and Academic Goals) Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc. Social/Academic Instructional Groups Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports: A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Illinois PBIS Network, Revised Aug.,2009 Adapted from T. Scott, 2004 Tier 2/ Secondary Tier 3/ Tertiary Intervention Assessment

Tools  Secondary/Tertiary Resources  Secondary/Tertiary Resources (annotated)  Secondary/Tertiary Guiding Questions  Blank Triangle Worksheet

Guiding Questions: Purpose Please fill in your school’s responses to the questions below to help you: a) design systems at the Tier 2/Secondary and Tier 3/Tertiary tiers of intervention, b) identify areas of strength and need in your current systems and c) support your team procedures to be consistent, proactive and objective (data-based).

Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5% _____________________ 1-5%Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions ___________________________ Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15% ___________________________ 5-15%Tier 2/Secondary Interventions ____________________________ Tier 1/Universal Interventions80-90% ________________________ 80-90%Tier 1/Universal Interventions ____________________________ School-Wide Systems for Student Success: A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Data and Support Staff Tiered Supports / Practices Adapted from Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, Adapted from “What is school- wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at

within effective systems  Creating a framework that supports the:  Creation Allocated time (incl. FTE) Protected time dedicated to ‘development’ (agendas) Systematized stakeholder input/feedback  Use Allocated FTE to Coordinate & Facilitate interventions Allowable out-of-seat student time (policy) Active stakeholder participation  Progress-monitoring of EBP Systematized stakeholder input/feedback Progress-monitoring of the actual interventions Progress-monitoring of the system

Secondary Systems Planning Team Meeting Agenda  Number of youth in CICO (record on TT)?  Number of youth responding (record on TT)? * Send Reverse Request for Assistance to teachers of all youth not responding  Number of new youth potentially entering intervention (share # of RFAs, Universal Screening info and/or # of youth who met the data-based decision-rule cut offs for Secondary support)?  Repeat for S/AIG, Mentoring & Brief FBA/BIP  If less than 70% of youth are responding to any of the interventions, the Secondary Systems team should review the integrity of the intervention and make adjustments as needed.

3-Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams) CICO SAIG Group w. individual feature Complex FBA/BIP Problem Solving Team Tertiary Systems Team Brief FBA/ BIP Brief FBA/BIP WRAP Secondary Systems Team Plans SW & Class-wide supports Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Standing team; uses FBA/BIP process for one youth at a time Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Sept. 1, 2009 Universal Team Universal Support

and data are used to guide decision- making  Progress-monitoring of the actual EBP Systematized stakeholder input/feedback Progress-monitoring of the actual interventions Progress-monitoring of the system  Progress-monitoring of youth response

Please list below how your school defines “responding” at each of the six levels: 1.Responding to CICO: 2.Responding to Social/Academic instructional groups: 3.Responding to Simple Tier 2 with Individualized Features (i.e. CNC): 4.Responding to Brief Function-Based Interventions: 5.Responding to Complex Function-based Interventions: 6.Responding to Wraparound Plans:

Tier 2/3 Tracking Tool  Structured to follow 6 levels/types of interventions from Secondary through Tertiary  Increases accountability  Schools have to count # of kids in interventions  Data-based decision-rules are necessary (Identify, Progress- monitor, Exit)  Must define ‘response’ to each intervention type/level  Shows % of kids who responded to each intervention  …..the tool assesses the success rate, or effectiveness of the interventions themselves  Connects each level of intervention to the next level

Systems-Response Tool “Finding” Students in Need of Tertiary Supports  Records the “system’s response” to youth behavior/circumstance  Administrators and team members need to find the #s of youth that meet each criteria  Using the tool IS engaging in a ‘systems-reflection’  Prevents the hiding or mis-labeling of youth (ex. “We don’t have any kids that need Wraparound”)

Systems-Response Tool System Response Options Total # of Students in Category for Time Period: List date at top of column & total # of youth in each box Date: A. Students being monitored by Secondary Systems Team (ex. CICO, CnC, FBA/BIP) B. Students being monitored by Tertiary Systems Team (ex. Complex FBA/BIP, Wraparound) C. Students being considered for Special Education Testing D. Students with Special Education process in progress (being tested, placement being considered, etc.) E. Students that were tested and did not qualify for Special Education F. Students suspended on one occasion G. Students suspended on two or more separate occasions H. Students placed (or at risk of placed) in separate setting or “Safe School” (ex. Alternative to suspension program) I. Students in Special Education setting, out-of-home school J. Students in “short-term” restrictive placement in clinical setting (hospitalization) K. Students with expulsion hearing in progress L. Students expelled

Progress-Monitoring in Illinois  Progress monitoring is critical at all levels  Student Per student, for individual progress-monitoring In aggregate, to monitor effectiveness of interventions themselves Ex. Is our ‘problem-solving’ group effective?  Building/District Per school, to monitor building-level systems Ex. Is our HS effective at keeping youth engaged? In aggregate, to make district-level decisions District as a whole (set goals, allocate resources) Cohort schools vs non-cohort schools (is an initiative working?)

Sample: Daily Progress Report Check-In/Check-Out EXPECTATIONS 1 st block2 nd block3 rd block4 th block Be Safe Be Respectful Be Responsible Total Points Teacher Initials Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken

Sample: Daily Progress Report for GROUP Intervention EXPECTATIONS 1 st block2 nd block3 rd block4 th block Be Safe Use your words Use deep breathing Be Respectful Keep arm’s distance Use #2 voice level when upset Be Responsible Ask for breaks Self-monitor with DPR Total Points Teacher Initials Adapted from Grant Middle School STAR CLUB Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken

0 = Try again 1 = Good 2 = Excellent! Be SafeBe RespectfulBe Responsible * Rip recycled paper * Only tap pencils (not pens) * Use “ voice level #1 ” while teacher is speaking (whisper) * Say “ I need help getting started ” when having difficulty Class Recess Class Lunch Class Class Total Points = _____ Points Possible = __36___Date: ________________ Today ______________% Sample: Daily Progress Report Behavior Intervention Plan

Mean CICO points per school 71 Illinois Elementary Schools 08-09

Comments/Questions