Introduction to University Tech Transfer Fall Columbia Technology Ventures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Business Incubation at IIT Bombay- A journey Sushanto Mitra Chief Executive Officer Society for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Indian Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

2nd Panel, Best Practices: “ IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Dr. Tamar Raz, CEO Hadasit, the Technology Transfer Company of Hadassah.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Based on Limited Experience Many many exceptions.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Tech Tuesday Bryan Ritchie, Executive Director, TVC March 10, 2015.
Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Stretch Your TTO’s Budget Michael Rondelli, J.D., M.B.A Director, Technology Transfer Office San Diego State University Research Foundation.
Principal Patent Analyst
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
May 19, A Strategic Partner for the Transfer and Commercialization of Technology ITTC Technology Review May 2003 Tim Johnson, Executive Director.
1 University Based Technology Transfer Steve Bauer Director, RERC on Technology Transfer State of the Science Conference RERC on Advancing Cognitive Technologies.
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Title here Taking Discoveries from Lab Bench to the Marketplace Technology Transfer 101:
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer Bringing the benefits of discovery to the World. Wesley D. Blakeslee, B.S., J.D. Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer Medical.
Sustainable Smart Cities Symposium April 3, 2013 Richard B. Marchase Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Technology and business innovation Venture Backed Spin-Offs 7 th Venture Capital Forum Athens June 28, 2006 Spyros Trachanis NBGI Ventures.
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Technology Transfer and Assessment of Intellectual Assets Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing Katharine Ku October 1, 2012.
October 5, 2004FPTT 2004 TechExpo1 Ideas vs Intellectual Property: The Carleton University Technology Transfer Approach: “Building True Innovation Capacity.
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
An introduction to The University of Auckland’s Knowledge Transfer Company Dr Peter Lee, CEO.
BY THE NUMBERS IOWA IN FY 2011 $55 Million: NSF funds awarded 25 th : National ranking in NSF funds 17: NSF-funded institutions 218: NSF grants awarded.
1 Rutgers Sponsored Research and Technology Transfer Michael Breton, Ph.D Associate Vice President for Research.
Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.
Technology Transfer at Case Western Reserve University Casey Porto, Assoc. V. P.
Proprietary and Confidential Why Commercialize Intellectual Property And Technology? Looking at the Larger Picture Yalcin Suer February 3, 2005.
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
Technology Licensing at Stanford University
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY Clemson, South Carolina. Clemson University  History  A&M College  Land Grant  Engineering & Agriculture Centric  South Carolina.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Technology Commercialization “Boot Camp” Photonics Center Colloquium Room May 17, 2011 Dr. Ashley J. Stevens Special Assistant to the Vice President for.
The Role of Patents, Universities, and Non-Profits in the Promotion of Health Care Access Nina Gandhi.
Vermont's 21st Century Economy: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Dr. Corine Farewell Director, Office of Technology Commercialization University of.
Intellectual Property as Integral Part of S&T Strategy Dr. Nadya Reingand Patent Hatchery LLC Washington DC, USA © Nadya Reingand.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
- 1 - ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS AS GENERATORS, HOLDERS, AND TRANSFERORS OF IP Dr. Michael J. Cleare Executive Director, Science and Technology Ventures, Columbia.
Enabling Building Efficiency: The NYC Urban Technology Innovation Center TIMOTHY CROSS, COLUMBIA ENGINEERING IEEE INNOVATION DAY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE.
Welcome to Atlanta and Georgia Tech Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology Association of University Research Parks October 26,
Global Technology Transfer and Commercialization: Policies and Instruments Dr. Didier Kane The University of Texas at Austin (USA) IC² Institute – Global.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property 101
Universities and the Commercial World
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
Intellectual Property 101
I have an idea, now what! What’s the process?
Brendan Rauw, MBA, CLP Introduction
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
Effects of Patenting and Technology Transfer on Commercialization
NASA Kennedy Space Center
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to University Tech Transfer Fall Columbia Technology Ventures

1 What Is Academic Tech Transfer? Academic research Practical applications Benefit society on a local, national and global basis

2 Beware the Valley of Death “Somewhere between invention and commercialization, there’s a desolate place where new technologies go to die alone. It’s called the Valley of Death, and it’s littered with the decaying corpses of technologies that never get to realize their potential. Too many technologies will be left to rot on the lonely, dusty road.”

3 What is “The Valley of Death” Commercial value Government & Foundation Grants Industry & VC Funding Early Feasibility Studies Basic Research Technical Validation & Prototyping Product Development, Marketing, and Sales Early Market Testing The Valley

4 Pre-1980 Early-stage research innovations belonged to federal agencies However, government not motivated to actively commercialize –Only 5% of patents ever commercialized 1 Result: very few products, jobs or other public benefits History of Technology Transfer Bayh-Dole Act (1980) gave universities right and obligation to patent and commercialize federally-funded inventions Most universities broadened policies to include all inventions made with university resources Since 1980, rapid adoption among U.S. universities 1: Ashley Stevens, New England Journal of Medicine, Feb 2011

5 Increasing Focus by Industry on Patenting

6 300% Increase in Overall Patent Applications Since 1990 USPTO Activity,

7 US Tech Transfer Productivity “By The Numbers”: Cumulative Inputs and Outputs, ~$695B in Research funding Source: AUTM Licensing Surveys (FY91- FY11) ~165,000 patent applications ~59,000 patents awarded 57% 36% ~287,000 invention disclosures $2.4M / disclosure 48,064 active license & options, 7,495 start-ups, 130+ new drugs & devices, 300,000+ new jobs 17%

8 But the End of One Process is Just the Beginning of Another Only 1 in 6 inventions ever gets licensed Roughly 1 in 100 pharma compounds gets approved Roughly 1 in 10 venture investments is a significant hit University’s FunnelIndustry / VC’s Funnel Successful product on the market

9 Commercial Success is Not Easy Source: AUTM 2011Survey Data Columbia

10 Who Else Does Well, Commercially? (FY2011) Name of Institution License Income ($M) Research Expenditures ($M) Invention Disclosures Northwestern$192$ Univ. of California System$182$5, Columbia$146$ New York Univ.$142$ Princeton$115$19384 MIT$76$1, U Washington$67$ Stanford$67$806*504 University of Texas System$65$2, UW-Madison/WARF$58$1, Source: AUTM 2011 data except * AUTM 2010 data

11 Inventions Often Take Years to Get Licensed: Only ~50% of Deals Done by Year 3, only 70% by Year 5 # of licenses within elapsed year Cumulative % of deals done by year Source: Review of elapsed time from invention submission to executed license, for all 580 of Columbia’s executed licenses from 1982 until 2011 (29 years)

12 Elapsed Time from Invention to License Relatively Constant Only Slight Variation by Health Science vs. Phys Sci; Exclusive vs. Non-Exclusive Source: Review of elapsed time from invention submission to executed license, for all 580 of Columbia’s executed licenses from 1982 until 2011 (29 years) All Licenses Physical Sciences only Health Sciences only All Licenses Exclusive licenses only Non-ex licenses only

13 Columbia’s Experience Mirrors that of Other Institutions National Cancer Institute’s Licenses # of Years from Patent Filing to License (1995 – 2009)

14 “Blockbusters” Drive Most of the Revenue, But are Rare % of active licenses Less than 1% of licenses generate > $1M / year Source: AUTM Licensing Survey (FY04) (1)

15 And “Big Winners” Take Many Years To Develop... And Aren’t Always Obvious at the Time Columbia’s Four Biggest Revenue Producers (Revenue per Year)

16 CONFIDENTIAL Additionally, Patent Costs are Large and Incurred Early Source:Columbia University, Patent & Licensing Group

17 Columbia’s Tech Transfer Mission To facilitate the translation of academic research into practical applications, for the benefit of society on a local, national and global basis To support the research of Columbia faculty by generating funding for the University and facilitating partnerships with industry where appropriate To educate and serve as a resource for the Columbia community on matters relating to entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and technology commercialization

18 Columbia Technology Ventures Key Metrics FY08 – FY13 +24% vs % vs % vs. 2008

19 Columbia Technology Ventures Annual Activity Metrics Columbia Technology Ventures ~350 new inventions from University research ~70 licenses & options ~15 start-up companies ~$140M in gross IP revenues

20 Wait, Does the University Own Student Inventions?

21 Good Start… But Lots More to Do! ~400 technologies are currently licensed But ~1400 technologies are still available! Source: CTV database, Fall 2013

22 The Path to The Deal Research discovery Invention report filed Patent prosecution Marketing License negotiation Patentability analysis Commercial analysis Prioritization Post-contract compliance

23 Products Using Columbia Technology Arrow Catheter DISCOVERY STUDIO

24 Where Does the Money Go? University Policy On Distribution of License Revenues Gross Revenue First $125K Gross Revenues Over $125K Note: Certain caps and deductions may apply. Please refer to Appendix D of the Faculty Handbook for details.

25 Many Different Levers to Customize Deal Structure Sample Deal A Sample Deal B Remember, IP licensing is a “repeated game” … so treat people as you will want them to treat you next time!

26 Columbia’s License Boilerplate Has Evolved Over Time ~18 pages long Multiple versions for different situations Combination of legal and business issues

Startups Spun Out of Columbia in 20 Years Of those, 90+ still active, 40+ VC-backed, 9 gone public, 18 acquired System Management ARTS (SMARTS) Health Analytics Communications Cybersecurity & Corporate Computing Cleantech Media & Fashion Pharma & Devices

28 Many Resources Available! Columbia Departments Columbia Tech Ventures Columbia Business School Columbia Engineering Center for Advanced Technology Columbia Journalism Student & Alumni Columbia Venture Community Application Development Initiative

29 # of Columbia Start-ups Launched Involving CTV

30 Thank Columbia Technology Ventures