 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
INDIVIDUALIZED PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN Implementation of YOUR PGP.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
1 UW-Whitewater & CESA 2 Licensure Renewal & Support Center.
NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.
The Quality Educator Initiative PI 34
What it means for New Teachers
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Peninsula School District
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Consolidation Experience Consolidation 2012 The senior level consolidation is a 168 hours ( hr shifts or hr shifts) of concentrated.
Working Smarter, Not Harder (making Educator Effectiveness and Licensure work together for your benefit)
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
QUICK START An Orientation to PI 34 Information for Today and Tomorrow presented by Chippewa Valley Regional PI 34 Network.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
PDP for the Initial Educator Modified from the South West Education Association.
APS Teacher Evaluation
KSU Faculty Retreat Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Statutory Induction Arrangements for Newly Qualified Teachers.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
PI 34 Synopsis Wisconsin Quality Educator Initiative.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
September 2013 DO NOW! On a note card write down One success of your CLT today One challenge your CLT today faced today One way the Professional Learning.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
DPI PDP Verification Refresher Growing the Profession: Educator PDP Verification The Top Ten Things to Remember When Reviewing Educators’ PDPs for.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Where are you in the process? What do you want to know? What kind of support do you need?
CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.
 Morning Ice Breaker: › Only child, oldest child, middle child, or youngest child  What do you like best about your familial position? What drove or.
REFLECTING, WRITING, AND REVIEWING THE PDP PRESENTED BY: MARY T. CIESLEWICZ SEWNTP PI-34 COORDINATOR
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
House Bill 97: Recent Legislation Impact on Educator Preparation Dr. Rebecca Garland Deputy State Superintendent Joyce Gardner Dr. Andrew Sioberg NCDPI.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
What it means for New Teachers
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Dissemination Training
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
A Guide for Wisconsin’s Initial Educators By: Cynthia L. Teal
Creating the Professional Development Plan (PDP) – Verification
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Resident Educator Program
PI -34 “The Big Picture” MAS Mentor Forum.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
PI-34 (It is 3-4, not 34).
Presentation transcript:

 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.

You will know:  When you should have your PDP written  What PDP is  Why to write a PDP  How to write a PDP And you will begin to write your PDP.

 Prior to August, 2004 = 6 credits or PDP  After August, 2004 (PI34)= PDP  On a Contract (Not Subbing) for at least 3 years

3- Year 4- Year 5- Year Expectations 111 Step I. Reflect. Step II. Decide upon a goal. 2 Step II. Write plan. Initial educators submit for approval. Step III. Write a yearly reflection. 223 Step III. Work on activities in the plan. Write yearly reflection. 334 Step III. Work on activities in the plan. Write yearly reflection. 45 Step IV. Final reflection, documentation. Submit final plan.

 A description of your work  A goal for your professional growth that will impact student learning.  A multi-year plan for meeting the goal.  Evidence that the plan was completed.  Reflections on growth.

 Job-embedded  Sustained effort  Verifiable professional growth  Demonstrated effect on student learning

 Initial Educators submit their goal and plan (Steps I & II) for approval after year 1 and the completed PDP during year 5  Professional Educators submit the completed PDP during year 5  MMSD will arrange for reviewers approve or return for revisions

 Initial Educators  Peer  Administrator  Institute of Higher Education Representative  Professional Educators  3 Peers

 Completed PDPs are due January 15 of the final year of the plan. (the year the license expires)  MMSD has 5 review dates –  October  December  February  April  May

 mmsd.org – staff only

 Set the context for reviewers.  View it as a time capsule.  All MMSD schools are urban.

 1 Goal: Where do I want to go?  2-3 Objectives: How do I get there?  Activities to accomplish the objectives and reach the goal.

 What do you want to be different with your performance in 5 years?  If that happened, what would be different with your students?

I will ___________ (my professional learning and growth) so that ________________ (the impact of my learning on student growth.)

 What is happening now that makes you want to change? Refer to what you learned by your reflection.  Identify which 2 standards will promote your professional growth.

What can you collect that will show:  the changes you are making to grow over time?  the effect your professional growth on student learning?

 Lesson plan changes you have made  Video taken over time  Comparisons of your work over time  Student learning data  Behavioral data  Work samples  Rubrics

 1 Goal: Where do I want to go?  2-3 Objectives: How do I get there? 1.increase your knowledge and skills 2.implement your new knowledge and skills 3.collect data, analyze, and make revisions

 1 Goal: Where do I want to go?  2-3 Objectives: How do I get there?  Activities for each objective: What will I do to accomplish the objectives, so that I reach my goal?  Meet with a mentor.  Meet with accomplished people in education.  Shadow / observe others.  Complete a course.  Try a new approach and document the results.  Participate in readings, watch videos, search the web.

 Use specific dates over at least three years.  May be with peers, college or university representatives, a mentor, etc.  Meeting with a colleague to share notes, get ideas, or gather feedback;  Working with other educators on similar activities and objectives;  Conferencing with a colleague who can provide ongoing feedback.

 By January 1 of year 2 (for a 5-year plan)  By spring of year 1 (for a 3 or 4-year plan)  MMSD will arrange for reviewers to approve the plan or to return the plan for revisions.

I. Reflection II. A personalized plan for professional growth III. Annual review IV. Documentation

 First year of employment  Self-examination to improve professional practice.  Reflection on teaching standards  Analysis of relationship between student learning and professional practice.  Forms the foundation of the Plan.

 Description of School Situation  Description of the professional growth goal: “I will ____ so that students will____.”  Rationale for the goal, teaching standards  Plan for assessing and documenting achievement of the goal  Plan to meet the goal

 Completion dates for objectives and activities.  Reflections of professional growth  Reflections of the impact of professional growth on student learning  Description of any substantial revisions made in the goal, objectives or activities.

 Professional growth related to the standards  Effect of professional growth on student learning  Collaboration with others

 3-5 pieces of evidence  Collected throughout the licensing cycle.  Samples of work, surveys  Assessment data  Journal summaries  Curriculum adaptations  Summaries of mentor comments

 January 15, the year your license expires

 PACs – you are eligible for up to 6.  LOG BACK IN and submit your verification form to DPI.  Download application form and send it with a check to DPI.