Fluidized Bed Technologies for High Ash Indian Coals – A Techno-Economic Evaluation Dr. D.N. Reddy, Director Dr. V.K. Sethi, Research Adviser Centre for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Advertisements

1 The questions l Is economic growth leading to excessive exploitation of natural resources and to degradation of the ecosystem? l Are increases in welfare,
A novel IGCC system with steam injected H2/O2 cycle and CO2 recovery P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Low Quality Fuel but High.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) IGCC is basically the combination of the gasification unit and the combined cycle. It has high efficiency.
1 Clean Coal Technology Conference PDPU / CFSR Nov 09.
Steve Moorman Mgr Business Development, Advanced Technologies Babcock & Wilcox CO2 Emission Reduction from Coal Fired Plants FutureGen 2.0 CO2 Capture.
Triple Effect of Reject to Power on Joburg’s Waste Vision
IGCC for Power generation By Dr. D.N. Reddy, Director Er. K. Basu, Adviser Dr. V.K. Sethi, Research Adviser Centre for Energy Technology, University College.
1 ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT IN THE POWER SECTOR Presentationby BHEL - Corporate Engineering & Product Development 5 June 2008.
Lignite Project By Ramic, Haris. GLOBAL OUTLOOK FOR ENERGY World energy consumption is projected to increase at about 1.8%/year between 2000 and 2030(driven.
Cogeneration Facility The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cogeneration Systems Energy Services Department Phil Barner- Cogeneration Systems.
Sara Jones 24NOV08. Background  In most conventional combustion processes, air is used as the source of oxygen  Nitrogen is not necessary for combustion.
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
FLUIDISATION BED COMBUSTION (FBC) BOILERS
Coal Gasification : A PRB Overview Mark Davies – Kennecott Energy Outline Background – Our Interest History – Development of IGCC Current status – Commercial.
Advanced Biomass-based Combined Heat and Power System Combined Heat & Power in the Pacific Northwest October 15, 2002 Nathan E. Carpenter Manager, Energy.
Combined Heat and Power and Air Quality - Guidance for Local Authorities Ed Dearnley Policy Officer.
1 Framework Required to Ensure Long-term Sustainability - Environmental and Socio- cultural concerns.
Cogeneration.
Özgül AYYILDIZ.  Thermal Processing of Solid Wastes  Combustion Systems  Pyrolysis  Gasification  Case Studies  Conclusion.
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT
G.K.Pandey, Advisor, Ministry of Environment & Forests, (Govt. of India) S.K.Tyagi,Scientist, & B.Sengupta,Member Secretary Central Pollution Control Board,
Steam Power Station Presented By Ashvin G. Patel Asst. Prof. (E.E.)
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 13 Energy Efficiency Module 13: SUPPLY-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
SynGas Gasifier ALTERNATIVE ENERGY Technology Presentation.
“Sustainable Power Development through Green Power Technologies”
Mississippi Power Kemper County IGCC Plant
Prof. D.N. Reddy Director Centre for Energy Technology University College of Engineering Osmania University.
TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Dr. V. K. Sethi, Research Adviser CENTRE FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OSMANIA UNIVERSITY.
OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER Dr. V K Sethi & J K Chandrashekar Director Adviser Director Adviser University.
by Mr. V.S. Verma Member (Planning) Central Electricity Authority
Overview of CO 2 Capture Processes John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Workshop on CCS, KEPRI, 19 th October 2007.
OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER Dr. V K Sethi & J K Chandrashekar Director Adviser Director Adviser University.
PRESENTED BY: S.Neelakandan, R.S.Karthikeyan, P.Ashok, GUIDED BY: V.S.Venkatesan, Prof. S.Vijayaraj Final Year Mechanical, (HOD/MECH) A.V.C College of.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210) 14/15 Semester 4 Instructor: Rama Oktavian Office Hr.: M-F
1 FUTURE EU ENERGY MIX - WILL COAL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE? International Conference in Gliwice 29 May 2006 Matthias Dürr RWE AG.
The Future of Coal Matt Jahnke February 13, 2006.
RM GEP/SMG 05/17/ Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development Barbara Bauman Director, Washington Relations EPRI World Environment Center May.
Ansaldo Ricerche S.p.A. Carbon Dioxide capture Berlin, March 2008.
AN OVERVIEW PROF. D.N. REDDY DIRECTOR CENTRE FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OSMANIA UNIVERSITY.
Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Dr. V K Sethi Director – UIT, RGPV, Bhopal Major Contradictory Challenges Faced by Developing world Quest for increased Generation capacity – A Terawatt.
WELCOME.
Workshop of St Petersburg - 27 th October 2009 Expert sub-group on Emerging Technologies/Techniques EGTEI - Emerging technologies/ techniques for LCPs.
CARBON EMMISION FROM COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Cogeneration Facility
A Govt of India Undertaking Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Program on 3CC27 th Aug 2012.
SURATGARH SUPER THARMAL POWER STATION
Can Coal be used for Power Generation by an Environmentally Responsible Society? An Overview of “Clean Coal” Technologies Ben Bayer November 20, 2006 ChE.
Advancements in Coal Technology 2006 Mid-America Regulatory Conference Columbus Ohio Tom Hewson Energy Ventures Analysis Inc Arlington Virginia June 20.
2.14.  In 1970 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established  Required to set and enforce air quality standards  Air quality standard –
Black Liquor and Recovery boilers
Prof. D.N. Reddy Director Centre for Energy Technology and Principal University College of Engineering Osmania University Hyderabad – 7. THEME PAPER ON.
S.K.Thapa General Manager BHEL, Kolkata EFFICIENT CYCLE IN POWER GENERATION AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE.
Biomass Power Generation : Recent Trends in Technology and Future Possibilities Narasimhan Santhanam Energy Alternatives India,
OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
CFBC BOILER UPDATE Coal Based Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Boiler Technology By :Asad Mehmood.
FLUIDISATION BED COMBUSTION (FBC) BOILERS
ADVANCED COAL-BURNING POWER PLANT TECHNOLOGY
Technology Comparison - IGCC
Government Engineering College Valsad
Ryan Anderson April 22, 2008 Climate Change: Science and Society
Director – UIT, RGPV, Bhopal
Power Plant Technology Combined Cycle and Renewable Energy Power Systems (Lecture 1) by Mohamad Firdaus Basrawi, Dr. (Eng) Mechanical Engineering Faculty.
Managing Director (Bajaj Power Ventures Ltd)
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Michigan Air Quality Division
Utilization of Coal Fines : Fluidized bed Gasification
Presentation transcript:

Fluidized Bed Technologies for High Ash Indian Coals – A Techno-Economic Evaluation Dr. D.N. Reddy, Director Dr. V.K. Sethi, Research Adviser Centre for Energy Technology, University College of Engineering (Autonomous) Osmania University, Hyderabad – , India.

INDIAN POWER SECTOR - TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT Total Installed Capacity … 103,000 MW Thermal Generation … over 70 % Although no GHG reduction targets for India but it has taken steps through adoption of Combined cycles, Co-generation, Coal beneficiation,Plant Performance optimization Long term measures like adoption of Clean coal technologies; IGCC, FBC, Supercritical technologies Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) conceived to reduce cost of GHG mitigation, while promoting sustainable development as per Framework Convention on Climate change (FCCC) is being implemented

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PRESENT STUDY... Environmentally benign Clean Coal Technology of advanced Fluidized Bed Combustion is an ideal technology for high ash coals Statutory use of washed coal for TPS >1000 km from the pit head calls for setting up of washeries > 85 Million tons / annum. Use of Washery rejects & Middling for Power generation calls for adoption of CFBC technology The present paper deals with the techno-economic and transfer of technology aspects of Clean coal technology in general and CFBC in particular for inferior coals & in refurbishment of old polluting plants

Energy Efficient Technologies Technologies on Anvil for Power generation using high ash Indian coals: Supercritical (SCR) & Ultra – supercritical (USC) Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Fluidized Bed Combustion

VISION 2020 PROGRAM Post combustion Clean-up- Desulfurization (FGC systems) Supercritical In-combustion Clean-up Fluidized bed combustion (CFBC, PFBC, AFBC) Gasification using + fluidized bed, moving bed or Entrant bed Gasifiers Pre combustion Clean- up beneficiation/washing Technologies for utilization of Coal for Power Generation with minimal pollutants discharged to the atmosphere (Reduced CO 2, So x, No x, SPM) at high conversion efficiency……….W.C.I. CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES

The Principal advantages of supercritical steam cycles are :- Reduced fuel costs due to improved thermal efficiency CO2 emissions reduced by about 15%, per unit of electricity generated, when compared with typical existing sub-critical plant Well proven technology with excellent availability, comparable with that of existing sub-critical plant Very good part-load efficiencies, typically half the drop in efficiency experienced by sub-critical plant Plant costs comparable with sub-critical technology and less than other clean coal technologies. Very low emissions of nitorgen oxides (Nox) sulfur oxide (Sox) and particulate achievable using modern flue gas clean-up equipment etc.

Front line issues are to be reolved Development of high temperature creep resistant alloy steels Turbine material development

Super Critical Technology- Indian Perspective Mega power policy of setting up of coal fired supercritical/Ultra Supercritical units at pit-head Cost of generation is least for pithead washed coal- fired unit amongst all other supercritical units. The optimum parameter for Indian conditions is suggested as 246 kg/cm2 & 538/566C. Based on transfer of technology model as per logic diagram (shown next) the velocity of transfer of technology for supercritical units is 2 ½ from the year 2000.

IGCC TECHNOLOGY... Gasification of coal is the cleanest way of utilization of coal, while combined cycle power generation gives the highest efficiency. Integration of these two technologies in IGCC power generation offers the benefits of very low emissions and efficiencies of the order of 44-48%. The comparative indices show that in case of IGCC, emission of particulate, NOx and SOx are: 7.1%, 20% and 16%, respectively, of the corresponding emissions from PC plant.

Environmental performance of IGCC thus far exceeds that of conventional and even supercritical plants. Three major areas of technology that will contribute to improvements in IGCC are :  hot gas de-sulfurisation  hot gas particulate removal  advanced turbine systems

Commercialization of IGCC needs technology demonstration at an intermediate scale of about 100 MW to address the issues such as: hot gas clean ups and system optimization and to establish reliability and performance. This would also enable to design an optimum module for air blown gasification, which in multiples would constitute a commercial size plant in the range of MW. Technology transfer related issues and techno-economic analysis vis-à-vis CFBC are covered in the paper

Identified R&D Areas in IGCC are: Process optimization of selected gasification process Improvement of design and reliability of plant components & Resource Optimization Optimization of overall plant heat integration and layout Hot gas cleanup

COAL GASIFICATION – SELECTION OF GASIFICATION PROCESS The fluidised bed process has many technical and environmental advantages over the moving bed process, such as, The fluidised bed can use any amount of fines whereas in the moving bed only 10% of fines can be used. In the fluidized bed process, hydrocarbon, liquid by- products such as tar, oil and gas-liquor are not produced and, hence, the pollution is reduced. High ash coals can also be successfully gasified in the fluidised bed.

Experience on the fluidized bed process is, very limited in the country. Internationally, the experience gained so far is only for low ash coals. Thus there is a need for taking up extensive R&D on IGCC Pilot Plant using high ash (40- 50% Ash) Indian Coal

Technology-related issues in IGCC Design of Advanced gasifiers (optimum gas composition, optimum scale-up etc.) Hot gas cleaning (de-sulphurisation and particulate removal) Advanced gas turbines (blade design to sustain ash laden gas) CO 2 emission abatement in IGCC Power Plants Operating conditions of IGCC plants in transient stage Configuration of an optimized system for IGCC

Fuel – related issues In a Raw Pet-Coke and refinery residue based IGCC Plant System optimization, particularly the balance of plant Optimized Heat balance diagrams Scaling up of gasifiers to optimum size In a Coal/Lignite based IGCC Plant Process & Plant conceptual design De-sulfurization of syngas of high sulfur coal and lignite Optimized Heat balance diagrams Super critical Vs IGCC in Indian context Application of ASME PTC-47 code for IGCC for high ash coals and lignite

SOME IMPORTANT FINDINGS ON TECHNOLOGY ASPECTS OF IGCC... Reactive solid sorbent de-sulfurization combined with hot gas cleaning through ash and sorbent particle removal provides for higher energy efficiency to the extend of 4-7%. The current Capital cost of building an IGCC power plant is of the order of Rupees 6 Crore/ MW. Improvements in hot gas cleaning coupled with Cycle optimization shall bring down the cost drastically to a level of $ 1000/kW or about Rupees 4.5 crore/MW

 The efficiency of refinery bottom based IGCC unit will be about 2% higher than that of coal based IGCC unit.  Refinery based IGCC plants - Advantages  Co-generation of steam  Co-production of hydrogen gas & recovery of sulfur element  No use of limestone, as required for CFBC technology  No requirement of extra land for disposal of solid waste  In the long run the refinery based IGCC technology is equally attractive to coal based IGCC from economic and environmental considerations.

A GENERALIZED SCHEME FOR TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY The first step in the scheme is to disintegrate the Power plant concept into components, sub systems, production chain, production technologies Next step is the Value addition to each element of the production chain Assessment of necessity of Import and Calculation of indigenous production share Calculation of Velocity of the Transfer of Technology both at normal pace as well as accelerated pace

Typical results of the velocity of TOT are : - (With year 2000 as base)  IGCC (oxygen blown) - Pet coke Normal pace----5 years Accelerated  years  IGCC (Air Blown)----Coal Normal pace----7 years Accelerated----5 years )

SOME FINDINGS RELATED TO TRANSFER OF TECHNOLGOY (TOT)  At present it may be prudent to implement the project in phased manner to absorb the risk of gasifier in the total project wrap-up guarantees  A Technology Transfer model for determination of velocity of Transfer of Technology (TOT) is an useful tool for TOT of a frontier technology from a developed economy to a developing economy

PHASED CONSTRUCTION

Circulating fluidized Bed Combustion Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) technology has selectively been applied in India for firing high sulphur refinery residues, lignite, etc. In the overall terms the CFBC is superior to PC as follows: - Lower NOx formation and the ability to capture SO 2 with limestone injection the furnace. - Good combustion efficiencies comparable to PC -The heat transfer coefficient of the CFB furnace is nearly double that of PC which makes the furnace compact. - Fuel Flexibility: The CFB can handle a wide range of fuels such as inferior coal, washery rejects, lignite, anthracite, petroleum coke and agricultural waste

 CFBC Vs Other Clean Coal Technologies At present pulverized fuel firing with FGD are less costly than prevailing IGCC technology. However, firing in CFB Boiler is still more economical when using high sulfur lignite and low-grade coals and rejects. ITEMCFBCPF+FGD/SCRIGCC Cycle Eff. % Relative Capital Cost/kW Relative O&M Cost/kW

Revamping of Old Polluting PC Boilers by CFBC Boilers Renovation & Modernization (R&M) and Life Extension (LE) of old power plants is a cost-effective option as compared to adding up green field plant capacities. Growing environmental regulations would force many utilities within the country to go for revamping of these polluting old power plants using environmentally benign technology. A mere refurbishment by the same type of new boiler would not provide the right solution today. There is desperate need to revamp aging power boilers in India with environmentally friendly technology, which will improve the thermal as well as environmental performance. CFBC offers a promising technology on this front. This calls for boiler sizing within the constraints of an old polluting plant Some representative results follow...