Summarizing (Marzano, 2001, p. 29). From the research of (Anderson, V. & Hidi, 1987) and (Anderson, V. & Hidi, 1988/1989) three generalizations can be.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frayer Model Definition Characteristics Concept Examples Non-Examples.
Advertisements

RAPIDES PARISH SYSTEMIC INITIATIVE BOOK STUDY: CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION THAT WORKS BY Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, Jane E. Pollock.
Classroom Instruction That Works Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock August 19, 2008.
An Overview and Application of Classroom Instruction That Works Marzano’s Research-based High Yield Strategies.
Instructional Strategies: Summarizing & Note Taking Facilitated By Sara Fridley Region 3 Education Service Agency
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Unlocking Expository Text
Concept of Definition Map
Cues, Questions and Advance Organizers Karen Richardson.
By Jacqueline McCann Middle GA RESA
CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION THAT WORKS
Marzano’s Classroom Instruction that Works Robyn Lopez and Anne Laskey July 22, 2015.
Reflective practice Session 4 – Working together.
Comprehension Strategy Routine Cards
Welcome!.
Summarizing & Note Taking
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Created by The School District of Lee County, CSDC in conjunction with Cindy Harrison, Adams 12 Five Star Schools Cues, Questions & Advance Organizers.
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Based on Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created.
Marzano’s Instructional Strategies that Work
Marzano Instructional Strategies. Research-Based Instruction Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock reviewed hundreds of studies on instructional.
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Note Taking Summarization
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by.
Summarizing And Note Taking Presented By Arts Markville.
Effective Classroom Strategies1 Summarizing and Note Taking.
Classroom Instruction that Works Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, & Jane Pollock.
Classroom Instruction that Works – Marzano Chapter 3: Summarizing and Note Taking /Chapter 4: Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition.
Reflect on Note Taking On a post-it on your table… Write one note taking strategy you have tried with your students Place it on the closest chart paper.
ACES Professional Development School Improvement ACES Professional Development School Improvement, October 2006 Summarizing and Note Taking.
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Marzano. Warm Up List 3 similarities and 3 differences between apple pie and meatloaf.
Fainer/Lewellen Grade 8: Note Taking and Summarizing.
Learning Target As a result of this presentation I can:
Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement by Marzano, Pickering,
Inferential Questions
Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers New Hanover County Schools Instructional Services
Classroom Instruction That Works Barb Rowenhorst ESA 7
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Created by The School District of Lee County, CSDC in conjunction with Cindy Harrison, Adams 12 Five Star Schools Cues, Questions & Advance Organizers.
HYIS Review of Strategies Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback Summarizing and Note Taking.
HYIS Review of Strategies Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback Summarizing and Note Taking.
Effective Classroom Strategies1 Summarizing and Note Taking.
Check Your Progress 3 A Review of our Skills 5 th Grade Mrs. Williams.
Reading Strategies To Improve Comprehension Empowering Gifted Children.
Effective Teaching Strategies Day 2
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
The Art and Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano A Comprehensive Framework For Effective Instruction Review of Chapter 2.
Foldables and Interactive Notebooks to Support Literacy Learning Karen Sumner, WRESA Spring 2015.
S. Boucher S. Coston H. Fitch W. Johnson STRATEGIES THAT WORK: Summarizing and Note Taking.
CHARACTER, SETTING, PLOT Characters: people or animals that appear in the story Setting: time and place in which the story happens Plot: action or events.
Classroom Strategies That Work. Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers Helping Students Activate Prior Knowledge.
Scaffolding Professional Learning. What should scaffolding look like to support ALL learners? How does gradual release fit into scaffolding and why is.
Instructional Practices For Middle School By: Alexandra Adams.
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement From Classroom Instruction that Works by R. Marzano, D. Pickering, J. Pollock Created by The.
Review Nonlinguistic representation Advance organizers.
Review Nonlinguistic representation Advance organizers.
Looking closer... Chapter 3 Summarizing and Note Taking.
COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES
District Inservice November 25, 2009
AVID Ms. Richardson.
Assessment.
Ways to help students think about new knowledge
Assessment.
Instructional Strategies: Summarizing & Note Taking
COMPREHENSION Tool Kit K-3 1 1
Cognative Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction
Effective Instructional Strategies
Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers
Presentation transcript:

Summarizing (Marzano, 2001, p. 29)

From the research of (Anderson, V. & Hidi, 1987) and (Anderson, V. & Hidi, 1988/1989) three generalizations can be extracted

1. Delete some information, substitute some information, and keep some information. (p.30) 2. To effectively delete, substitute, and keep information, students must analyze the information at a fairly deep level. (p.31) 3. Being aware of the explicit structure of information is an aid to summarizing information. (p.32) “In general, research has demonstrated that making students aware of the specific structure in information helps them summarize that information.” (Anderson, Armbruster, & Ostertag, 1987; Raphael & Kirschner, 1985)

 Rule-Based  Summary Frames  Reciprocal Teaching

 Developed by (Brown, Campione, &Day, 1981)  Steps  Delete trivial material that is unnecessary to understanding.  Delete redundant material.  Substitute superordinate terms for lists.  Select a topic sentence, or invent one if it is missing.

 Summary frames are a series of questions that the teacher provides to students.  Six types of summary frames. 1.Narrative Frame 2.Topic-Restriction-Illustration Frame 3.Definition Frame 4.Argumentation Frame 5.Problem/Solution Frame 6.Conversation Frame

The narrative or story frame is commonly found in fiction and contains the following elements: 1. Characters 2.Setting 3.Initiating event 4.Internal response 5.Goal 6.Consequence 7.Resolution

T-R-I stands for topic, restriction, and illustration. This pattern is commonly found in expository material. The T-R-I- frame contains the following elements: Topic-General statement about the topic to be discussed. Restriction-Limits the information in some way. Illustartions-Exemplifies the topic or restriction.

The purpose of a definition frame is to describe a particular concept and identify subordinate concepts. Definition patterns contain the following elements: 1.Term -the subject to be defined 2.Set -the general category to which the term belongs 3.Gross characteristics -those characteristics that separate the term from other elements in the set 4.Minute differences -those different classes of objects that fall directly beneath the terms

Argumentation frames contain information designed to support a claim. They contain the following elements: 1.Evidence: Information that leads to a claim. 2.Claim: The assertion that something is true. The claim is a focal point of the argument. 3.Support: Examples of or explanations for the claim. 4.Qualifier: A restriction on the claim or evidence for the claim.

Problem/solution frames introduce a problem and then identify one or more solutions to the problem.

A conversation is a verbal exchange between two or more people. Commonly, a conversation has the following components: 1. Greeting:Some acknowledgment that the parties have not seen each other for a while. 2. Inquiry:A question about some general or specific topic. 3. Discussion:An elaboration or analysis of the topic. Commonly included are: Assertions Requests Promises Demands Threats Congratulations 4. ConclusionThe conversation ends in some way.

 Developed by (Brown & Palincsar, 1984,1985)  The strategy contains four components (p. 42): 1.Summarizing 2.Questioning 3.Clarifying 4.Predicting

Note Taking (Marzano, 2001, p. 43)

 Note taking is related to summarizing  Students must synthesize information  Students that learn to take useful notes will be more successful

 Verbatim note taking is, perhaps, the least effective way to take notes.  Notes should be considered a work in progress.  Notes should be used as study guides for tests.  The more notes taken the better.

 Teacher Prepared notes  Formal and Informal Outlines  Webbing  Combination Notes

 Teacher gives the students copies of the notes they have made  Clear picture of what the students should learn  Provides a model for note taking

 Formal Outlines  Has headings  Key phrases  Follows a specific pattern  Informal Outlines  Uses indentation to indicate major ideas  Details are listed under main ideas

webbing Lines indicate connections Size indicates Importance Visual limited bigger small

Combination Notes Left SideRight Side  Informal outline  Main Ideas  Details  Students stops periodically to synthesizes information  Webbing or a variation  Pictures  Portrayed in a visual manner Summary Of The Two Sides Put Together

Cues and Questions (Marzano, 2001, p. 111)

 Cues= “hints” about what going to learn  Questions= analyze new information

 80 percent of what occurs in classrooms on a daily basis happens through cueing and questioning  (Davis, O.L, and Tinsley, 1967, Fillippone, 1998, as cited in Marzano, 2001, p.113).  Should focus on what is important not unusual ◦ Unusual might stimulate interest ◦ More detail definitely stimulates more interest  (Alexander and Judy, 1988, Alexander, Kulikowich, and Schulze, 1994, Risner, Nicholson, and Webb, 1994, as cited in Marzano, 2011, p.113).  Can come before a lesson to set a mindset  Can come after a lesson to review new information

 Should get students thinking about what they already know about a subject.  Allows for new synapses to be created between old information and new information.

 Things/People ◦ What action does this thing or person usually perform? ◦ How is this thing usually used? ◦ Does this thing have a particular emotional state? What is it? ◦ When this thing is used, does it present a particular danger to other things or to people? What is it?  Actions ◦ What effect does this action have on the taste, feel, sound, or look of this thing? ◦ How is the value of a thing changed by this action? ◦ How does this action change the size or shape of a thing? ◦ How does this action change the state of a thing? Marzano, 2001, p. 115

 Events ◦ What people are usually involved in this event? ◦ During what season or time of year does this event usually take place? ◦ What does this event usually take place? ◦ What equipment is typically use in this event? ◦ How long does this event usually take?  Staes (of Being) ◦ What is the basic process involved in reaching this state? ◦ What are the changes that occur when soemthing reachers this state? Marzano, 2001, p. 115

 Questions that make students analyze information are higher level questions  (Redfield and Rouseeau, 1981, as cited by Marzano, 2001, p.113)  Most teachers use lower order questioning  (Davis, O.L. and Tinsley, 1967, Fillippone, 1998, Guszak, 1967, Mueller, 1973, as cited by Marzano, 2001, p. 113)

 Analyzing Errors ◦ What are the errors in reasoning in this information? ◦ How is this information misleading? ◦ How could it be corrected or improved?  Constructing Support ◦ What is an argument that would support the following claim? ◦ What are some of the limitations of this argument or the assumptions under- lying it? Marzano, 2001, p. 116

 Analyzing Perspectives ◦ Why would someone consider this to be good (or bad or neutral)? ◦ What is the reasoning behind his or her perspective? ◦ What is an alternative perspective, and what is the reasoning behind it? Marzano, 2001, p. 116

 After cueing or questioning allow for wait time ◦ A few second pause that lets students collect their thoughts  Wait time is associated with students interacting with one-another providing a better learning environment  (Swift and Gooding, 1983, Folwer, 1975, Honea, 1982, as cited by Marzano, 2011, p. 114)

Advanced Organizers (Marzano, 2001, p. 117)

Advanced Organizers David Ausubel 1968 Made popular psychologist Focus on important information Organize information Produce higher level of thinking Different types: ExpositoryNarrative Skimming Graphic Describe new info Present in story format Brief look Visual representation

Advanced organizers were popularized by psychologist David Ausubel in 1968 (Marzano, 2001, p. 117) Ausubel indicates that advanced organizers are, “designed to bridge the gap between what that learner already knows and what he needs to know before he can successfully learn the task at hand” (Marzano, 2001, para. 2).

Focus on what information is significant Produce a higher and deeper level of learning Organize information Provide a knowledge base prior to exposure Types of advanced organizers

Four Types of Advanced Organizers Expository Narrative Skimming Graphic

Expository (Marzano, 2001, p. 118)  Describe the new content to which a person is exposed Example: Career day- the teacher provides a brief explanation of about each career to students prior to speakers giving their presentation

Narrative (Marzano, 2001, p. 119)  Present information in a story format Example: Tornadoes- the teacher tells students about a personal experience with tornadoes prior to watching a video on tornadoes

Skimming (Marzano, 2001, p. 119)  Looking over information prior to reading it; becoming familiar with, not being an expert Example: Science class- the teacher gives students two maps of the stars to “skim over” prior to taking a field trip to a Planetarium

Graphic Organizers (Marzano, 2001, p. 119 & 120)  A non-linguistic representation of information  Mind map Example: French class- prior to showing a slide show about French painters, the teacher presented the class with a graphic organizer identifying the painters and their work-students are able to take notes as they watch the slide show