The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Advertisements

Division I Institutional Performance Program Andy Louthain Steve Clar.
Principle 13 Community Engagement/ Game Environment.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering Student Chapter Standard of Excellence Training Program Webinar August 2007.
Building the CSUCI Division of Intercollegiate Athletics Presented by: Carl Reed II Director of Athletics.
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Supporting Quality After School Programs for Our Students Tuesday, September 23, 2014.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
DIVISION I GOVERNANCE UPDATE Brandy Hataway Kris Richardson 1.
Principle 3 AD Management. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
NADIIIAA Summer Forum June 6, 2006 Integration – Education & Athletics, A Model for Success Debbie Lazorik Bob Malekoff Ronda Seagraves Integration, the.
Governance Hot Topics National Office Dialogue 1.
Survey Coordinator Orientation For Technology Provider Surveys California State University IT Operations & Support Services.
Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.
Principle 10 Diversity and Inclusion. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the principle of diversity and inclusion.
Principle 16 Life Skills. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the total development of a student-athlete’s life.
Principle 20 Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Society of Ortho-Bionomy International® 2012 Annual General Meeting Sunday, August 12, 2012 Indianapolis, Indiana.
September The Division of Student Affairs provides student learning and leadership opportunities that enhance overall academic, professional and.
Institutional Advancement As of December 7, 2009.
Changing from the NAIA to the NCAA Division II “Life in the Balance” Teaching for Excellence McKendree University January 4, 2011.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
Best Practices: Enrollment Management Plan Lorie Hach Director of Student Success Lisa McLaughlin Institutional Data Coordinator.
Our Mission Intercollegiate Athletics at CU Boulder provides student-athletes a rewarding academic and athletic opportunity while embracing the principles.
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
Athletics Certification Orientation. Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification.
Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Campus Leaders Support For The Division II Collegiate Athletics Model.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
Campus Retreat –Schedule Full Day Half Day. Campus Retreat Timeline – Use the internet to show videos and resources – Introduction of the Strategic Position.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
NCAA Working Group on the Collegiate Model – Rules Overview March 2012.
Family Weekend 2014 Assessment Presented by: Jared Cates.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
Club Counselor Together Achieving Growth Serving the Children of the World ®
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
CSUSM Softball Digs Community Service. Topics Goal 1  Graduating Our Student- Athletes NCAA Eligibility Requirements NCAA Progress toward Degree Academic.
 Explain PBLG’s role  Quick review of what’s happened so far ◦ SWOT survey ◦ Extensive discussion about approaching the planning process ◦ The current.
Lynn Holzman Director of Academic and Membership Affairs, NCAA.
How: Overview of Action Plan and Data Utilization Shane McNeill, Director Office of Healthy Schools.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
Professional Learning Community WELCOME! Wednesday October 21, 2015 Guiding Passion into Practice with Technical Assistance Site Visits! Please call
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
Winning with Student Athletes HOLLY WEISS GRADUATE ASSISTANT LEARNING COMMUNITIES AND STUDENT LIFE FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY.
Lack of African-American Head Football Coaches in Div. I Institutions Ryan Dunham & Guy Phillips.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
NCAA Division III Institutional Performance Program Eric Hartung Nicole Hollomon Erin Irick.
Board of Trustee Support For The Division II Collegiate Athletics Model.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
The Marshall University Experience with Implementing Project Server 2003 August 9, 2005 Presented by: Chuck Elliott, M.S. Associate Director, Customer.
Athletics Certification Orientation
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
Task Force background:
Division II Strategic Plan
Institutional Committee Recommendations
IT Governance Planning Overview
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
Division II Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009

NCAA Division II Strategic Positioning Platform Defines the unique philosophy and position of Division II within the overall Association. Six Attributes: Learning Service Passion Sportsmanship Resourcefulness Balance

January, Division II Athletics Directors Association Officers Ed Matejkovic – President West Chester University David Williams – Immediate Past President Missouri Western State University Jon Carey – Former Past President Western Oregon University Greg Waggoner – First Vice President Western State College of Colorado Anita Barker – Second Vice President/Treasurer California State University, Chico Eric Schoh - Third Vice President/Secretary Wayne State College

January, 2009 Presentation Agenda Overview of goals of Implementation Plan Discussion of the 21 Guiding Principles Best Practices at Member Institutions Accompanying Materials

January, 2009 Goals of the Implementation Plan Research the needs and challenges with each principle on DII campuses Research best practices already discovered and proven to be effective on DII campuses Take research and develop examples of new and exciting strategies that may be useful to ALL the membership

January, 2009 Goals of the Implementation Plan Provide Tool Kit as option to make changes These are viewed as best practices at specific institutions, and may not work at all institutions Coordinate with DII Strategic Positioning Platform Utilize as an evaluation tool for DII new member process Overall, everyone learns some new strategy to utilize

January, 2009 Overview of the Implementation Plan The implementation of the 21 guiding principles has been conducted in two phases Phase I was completed in September 2007, and included the 10 guiding principles describing the “Who” Phase II was completed in August 2008, and included 11 principles describing the “What”

January, 2009 Overview of the Implementation Plan Phase I Tool Kit CD was mailed in October 2007 to all DII Athletics Directors Final Presentation of all 21 Guiding Principles and accompanying materials mailed to all DII Athletics Directors and currently provided on the DII Athletics Directors Association Web site at da-div2ada.html da-div2ada.html

January, 2009 Phase I Guiding Principles “Who” 1. Integration and Institutional Control 2. Chancellor/President Oversight 3. AD Management 4. FAR Involvement 5. SWA Involvement 6. Coach’s Role 7. SAAC Involvement 8. Athletic Trainers 11. Compliance 13. Community Engagement/Game Environment

January, 2009 Phase II Guiding Principles “What” 9. Academic Success 10. Diversity and Inclusion 12. Institutional Self-Study 14. Finances & Sport Sponsorship 15. Continuing Education & Professional Development 16. Life Skills 17. Assessment 18. Marketing, Promotions & Media Relations 19. Communication/Campus Relationships 20. Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics 21. Fundraising

January, 2009 How Data were Compiled Began by attending several meetings to introduce the plan Sent approximately 100 surveys for each Phase Conducted over 100 personal interviews Attended numerous NCAA, DII Conferences, and other Association wide meetings Thanks to all of you for your assistance!