Jose Luis Sirvent Supervisor: Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 24 October 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© DIAMOND SA / X-BEAM / / 1 X-BEAM Connector Up to 4 channels SM and MM optical connections based on Expanded Beam technology.
Advertisements

Why we need optical communication ?
The waves spread out from the opening!
Note on Fresnel transmission coefficient: Consider n1>n2  t>1 We still have conservation of Energy! Fresnel Coefficients:
Announcements Homework for tomorrow…
Two identical slides in air are illuminated with monochromatic light. The slides are exactly parallel, and the top slide is moving slowly upward. What.
SLAC National Accelerator Center
OPTICS. I. IMAGES A. Definition- An image is formed where light rays originating from the same point on an object intersect on a surface or appear to.

Lecture 33 Review for Exam 4 Interference, Diffraction Reflection, Refraction.
Interference & Diffraction
Nature of light Ray or geometrical optics Wave or physical optics Quantum theory: W p =hf.
Fiber Optics Defining Characteristics: Numerical Aperture Spectral Transmission Diameter.
Physics 102 Wave Optics Moza M. Al-Rabban Professor of Physics Lecture 8.
Basic Detection Techniques Quasi-optics Wolfgang Wild Lecture on 03 Oct 2006.
Newton’s Rings Another method for observing interference in light waves is to place a planoconvex lens on top of a flat glass surface, as in Figure 24.8a.
Chapter 35 Interference (cont.).
Calibration Bench for Fast Wire Scanners: Optical Design and Issues Student Meeting Jose Luis Sirvent.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Fraunhofer Diffraction
BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
Jose Luis Sirvent Supervisor: Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 31 October 2011.
Eusoballoon optics characterisation Camille Catalano and the Toulouse team Test configuration Calibration of the beam Exploration of the focal plan.
Optical Position Sensor: Radiation Hard glasses for lenses and new electronics Jose Luis Sirvent Blasco Student meeting
Physics 1809 Optics 3: Physical Optics Purpose of this Minilab Experiment with and learn about - Light intensity - Polarization - Diffraction - Interference.
Laser news AWAKE performance meeting Overview There was a meeting on with the supplier of the laser system (AMPLITUDE) No new information.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned
Advanced Optics Lab at San Jose State University Ramen Bahuguna Department of Physics.
Physics 1B03summer-Lecture 11 Interference of Light Light is an electromagnetic (EM) wave. Wave properties: Diffraction – bends around corners, spreads.
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
Jose Luis Sirvent Supervisor: Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 19 September 2011.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
Electron Spectrometer Work Package Simon Jolly 19 th May 2014.
The waves spread out from the opening!
Chapter 38: Diffraction and Polarization  For a single opening in a barrier, we might expect that a plane wave (light beam) would produce a bright spot.
ABSTRACT The design of a complete system level modeling and simulation tool for optical micro-systems is the focus of our research . We use a rigorous.
Modern Optics Lab Lab 7: Diffraction and Interference Experiments  Slit width and slit separation dependence of diffraction pattern for single and double.
1 Brilliant Pattern Problem Problem Suspend a water drop at the lower end of a vertical pipe. Illuminate the drop using a laser pointer and observe the.
The Nature of Light. Light Can Act Like Waves or In 1801 Thomas Young an English scientist did an experiment. –Double slit experiment Passed a beam of.
13.4 Double slit interference. From one source and two gaps 1 st bright fringe 1 st bright fringe central fringe.
The Fresnel Lens. In 1822 the Fresnel lens was invented. An unlimited number of flashing combinations, could be produced. Ships found the lights to be.
Current Status of LASER FRAME for KEK-Nano BPM (Tentative results of resolution test) Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004.
Jose Luis Sirvent Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 08– May
Gaps in Light Guides H.O. Meyer, Indiana University HOM, 2/8/8, nEDM.
Jose Luis Sirvent Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 12– February
Physical Optics 1 st year physics laboratories University of Ottawa Winter
High power fibered optical components for gravitational waves detector Matthieu Gosselin, PhD Student at EGO ELiTES : 3 rd general meeting February 10.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Synopsis of the pyramidal surface parametrization. Figure Legend: From: Modeling.
Progress Report Speaker: Shiuan-Li Lin Advisor : Sheng-Lung Huang Solid-State Laser Crystal and Device Laboratory.
Image formation with lenses. Operating Principle Lenses use the principle of refraction to change the shape of a light beam. -Bending of light – Why?
BWS Design meeting Jose Luis Sirvent PhD. Student XX/03/2014
Diffraction Monochromatic light Polychromatic light
Subject Name: Optical Fiber Communication Subject Code: 10EC72
Interference Requirements
Tbit/s Optical Data Transmission
Basic Camera Function The camera converts an optical image into electrical signals that are reconverted by a television receiver into visible screen images.
MICROMACHINING AND MICROFABRICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTIVE OPTICS
Diffraction Monochromatic light Polychromatic light
Diffraction vs. Interference
3.1 Single slit vs. double-slit
Types of Microscopy Type Probe Technique Best Resolution Penetration
FRESNEL BIPRISM.
The waves spread out from the opening!
Curved Gradient Index Micro Lens (patent pending)
Performance Specifications
Fig. 1 Experimental setup.
L2036H1 grid6 First cut x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
100W Fiber Collimator PRODUCT BRIEF Advantages Overview
Presentation transcript:

Jose Luis Sirvent Supervisor: Jonathan Emery Student Meeting 24 October 2011

 1. Status  2. Contact with companies  3. Simulations with zemax  4. Comparation

 A) Initial analysis and new approaches  B) Search of new components ◦ Collimators (4), Focusers (2) ◦ Circulators (5), cables, adaptators

 C) Initial Estimations of losses ◦ Study of possible limiting effects  Fresnel, Franhouer diffraction  Interferences  Fresnel reflection  Light Coupling efficiency  Estimate maximal separations ◦ Initial comparations in terms of power coupling LOSSES (Lc)TransmissionReflectionReflection (Collimator) Fresnell Disk-Vacuum dB Fresnell Fiber-Vacuum000dB Insertion Losses ST dB Insertion Losses SMA 1*2222dB Optical Fiber1.75 dB Free Space dB Splitter 10/ dB Total Losses dB Pr0.04% 5.71%Ps

 A) Meeting with VaqTec ◦ Fibers for Vacuum ◦ Custom Lenses? ◦ Aligners XYZ and angular  B) Contact with AccuGlass ◦ Lenses & Collimators for Vacuum  Characteristics and models ◦ Fibers for Vacuum ◦ Feedthroughs

 Lensed fibers: ◦ ◦   Vacuum Optical Components: ◦   Others Factories: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦

 1. Intro: ◦ Optical simulation software package. ◦ Simulation under geometric and physic optics approach. ◦ Simulation of fiber coupling efficiency. ◦ Interferences and diffractions ◦ Lens modeling and validation.

 3.1 Initial simulations: ◦ Transmission approach  Coupling efficiency: 0.15%  Distance limit: 1.5 mm  < Fresnell distance  Coupling 0.08%

 3.1 Initial simulations: ◦ Reflection approach  Coupling efficency: 0.27%  Distance limit: 2mm  < Fresnell distance  Coupling 0.08%

 3.1 Initial simulations ◦ Double Pattern approach  Wavelenth: 850nm & 1550nm  Disks Thickness: 1mm  Pattern used: 50um (Both positions On & Off)  Distance Between Disks: Variable  Screen distance: 1mm

 3.1 Initial simulations ◦ Double Pattern approach:  In account 2 conditions  A) Transmission  B) Reflection  (Perfect reflection)

 3.1 Initial simulations ◦ Double Pattern approach (Transmission)

 3.1 Initial simulations ◦ Double Pattern approach (Reflection)

 3.1 Initial simulations ◦ Double Pattern approach  Transmission 850nm (Absorption 92%)  Reflection 850nm (Reflexivity 60%)

 Focusing the beam ◦ Initial results with lenses. ◦ A) Usage of Double Convex lenses:  Edmund Optics has Possible Lenses which could fit in Accu-Glass Collimator.  Initial Simulations are showing errors in focusing distances. ◦ B) Usage of plano-convex lens combination:  Two collimators from Accu-Glass faced  Necessity of cutting one of them ◦ C) Using Defocusing defect:  Accu-Glass Collimator as a Focuser

LOSSES (Lc)TransmissionReflectionReflection (Collimator) Fresnell Disk-Vacuum dB Fresnell Fiber-Vacuum000dB Insertion Losses ST dB Insertion Losses SMA 1*2222dB Optical Fiber1.75 dB Free Space dB Splitter 10/ dB Total Losses dB Pr0.04% 5.71%Ps Power BalanceTransmissionReflexionReflection (Collimator) Ps 555mW dBm Pr mW dBm Free space loses comparing initial with Zemax (dB) TransmissionReflectionDouble pattern Initial Zemax