More Writing But Less Grading: Calibrated Peer Review™ Share The Future IV - Tempe, AZ John Wise The Pennsylvania State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Test Construction
Advertisements

Assessing Student Performance
What You See Is What You Get Document Preparation Choices at the University of Tennessee by Jennifer W. Spirko UT Graduate School.
An Introduction to Computer- assisted Assessment Joanna Bull and Ian Hesketh CAA Centre Teaching and Learning Directorate.
Calibrated Peer Review (CPR): Using Technology to Get the Most Out of a Writing Assignment Dr. Laurie S. Starkey Chemistry Dept., Cal Poly Pomona
TRAINING FOR CCE MENTORS
March 2007 ULS Information Literacy and Assessment of Learning Program.
Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
Session Outcomes Explain how assessment contributes to the learning process Use a model of feedback to enhance student learning Identify a range of feedback.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Pepperdine University Portfolio Assessment Background Research Recommendations Outcomes.
February  Founded  Located in Crystal Lake, IL.  offers six associate's degrees and 17 Associate of Applied Science degrees.  About 400.
E-content Generation and Delivery Management for Student Centric Learning CONTROL NUMBER : DE Dr DVLN Somayajulu Professor, PI and Institute.
JHLA Junior High Literacy Assessment. The school year saw the first administration of the Junior High Literacy Assessment. The assessment was.
1. 2 Writing to Learn, Learning to Write: Improving Medical Students’ Writing Competence.
Calibrated Peer Review TM Orville L. Chapman, Arlene A. Russell, and Michael A. Fiore University of California, Los Angeles.
Classroom assessment techniques (CATS). What are CATS?  How many of you have seen this book before? Please put your hands up.  Congratulations! You.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
The Professor Magda Vasillov General Education and Assessment Committee Rubrics for Lunch November 19, 2009 Gina Cicco, Ed.D.
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
Online Assessments: SafeAssign + Tips and Pitfalls “Whats” and “Whys” of assessments Assessment types Types of test questions Assignments Rubrics SafeAssign.
DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF THE SUMMER UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROGRAM IN GEOSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (SURGE) Tenea Nelson, PhD Assistant Dean, Office of Multicultural.
Understanding plagiarists and preventing plagiarism Caleb Owens Fiona White School of Psychology.
The Metacognitive Benefits of Self- and Peer Review Edward F. Gehringer Department of Computer Science North Carolina State University Our work in peer.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
MAINTAINING QUALITY IN BLENDED LEARNING: FROM CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TO IMPACT EVALUATION PART I: DESIGNING AND EVALUATING LEARNING Suzanne Weinstein, Ph.D.
©Joan Sedita, The Key Three Routine: Comprehension Strategies Joan Sedita, M.Ed. TM.
Special Education Plan Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed in only one way,
Making Clickers Work for You Dr. Stephanie V. Chasteen & Dr. Steven Pollock Workshop developed.
GE SLO Assessment Guide. Best Practices In the best practices for assessing GE SLOs, there are two dominant modes being used: – Common assessments – Common.
Developing & Using Portfolios Carlee K. Ranalli Coordinator of Assessment & Research W120B Smith Building
Chapter 8 Measuring Cognitive Knowledge. Cognitive Domain Intellectual abilities ranging from rote memory tasks to the synthesis and evaluation of complex.
Learning Unit Documents and Examples. Learning Units - basic building block of a course For iGETT a Learning Unit consists of –Three parts Instructor.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Online assessment: the use of web based self-assessment materials to support self-directed learning Online assessment: the use of web based self-assessment.
Wiley eGrade. What is eGrade? Web-based software that enables instructors to automate the process of assigning and grading homework and quiz assignments.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
Special Education Plan Hamilton High School Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed.
Student Preferences For Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski, Pre-Collegiate Mathematics Coordinator Institute.
Special Education Plan Hamilton High School Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed.
Assessment and Differentiation of Instruction. Assessment for Learning.
Assessment Driven Learning. Some Issues No state/central examinations upto grade 12 Children promoted to next grade irrespective of examination performance.
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Changing Library Operations Credo Reference Survey
Teaching and Learning with Technology ETEC 562 Chapter 2 Robert Calvery Elizabeth McMurphy.
Self and Peer Assessment All engaged – difficult during individual feedback. All recognise and understand the LLO. Information that develops skills. Information.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
Teaching Peer Review of Writing in a Large First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Class: Comparison of Two Methods Michael Ekoniak Molly Scanlon.
10 Ways Faculty Can Support Students' Success Using StudentLingo
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
DESIGNING GOOD SURVEYS Laura P. Naumann Assistant Professor of Psychology Nevada State College.
A Roundtable Discussion of Best Practices in Online Learning.
Assessment and Feedback using IT Types of assessment Formative Summative Norm-referenced Criterion-referenced.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop spring 2017.
Assessing Learning Outcomes
Department of Physics and Goal 2 Committee Chair
Disability Services High School vs. College.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Transitions through higher education:
Creating Meaningful Information Literacy Assignments for an Introductory Agriculture Course Marianne Stowell Bracke Purdue University Libraries
The purposes of grading student work
Providing Annotated Examples Increases Science Learning
Rubrics for academic assessment
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
AP World History Introduction.
Curriculum Coordinator: Janet Parcell Mitchell January 2016
Section 2.7 Mean, Median, and Mode.
Presentation transcript:

More Writing But Less Grading: Calibrated Peer Review™ Share The Future IV - Tempe, AZ John Wise The Pennsylvania State University

Engineering Instructional Services Penn State’s Engineering Instructional Services College of Engineering, University Park PA College of Engineering, University Park PA Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, Robert Pangborn Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, Robert Pangborn Support and Training for Faculty and Teaching Assistants Support and Training for Faculty and Teaching Assistants

Engineering Instructional Services Review of Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge Knowledge Comprehension Comprehension Application Application Analysis Analysis Synthesis Synthesis Evaluation Evaluation Bloom (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals

Engineering Instructional Services Problem Statement Large Classes in Particular: Large Classes in Particular:  Predominantly Lecture  Multiple Choice / “Scantron” Grading  Feedback and Writing Difficult All Classes All Classes  Student “Final” Papers Often First Drafts  Product vs. Process Orientation  Concept Misunderstandings

Engineering Instructional Services History of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) Large Molecular Science UCLA Large Molecular Science UCLA Science-Based Model Science-Based Model  Research, Write, Peer Review Now Can Serve Any Discipline and Educational Level Now Can Serve Any Discipline and Educational Level

Engineering Instructional Services How It Works Create (or Select) Assignment Create (or Select) Assignment Set Timing and Standards Set Timing and Standards Manage Assignments Manage Assignments Review Results Review Results

Engineering Instructional Services Create Assignment Choose Source Choose Source Define Writing Assignment Define Writing Assignment Write Exemplar Write Exemplar Write Moderate / Poor Examples Write Moderate / Poor Examples Generate Style and Content Questions Generate Style and Content Questions Assess Own Documents for Calibration Assess Own Documents for Calibration (sample)

Engineering Instructional Services Set Timing and Standards Control Over Text Entry Times Control Over Text Entry Times Control Over Calibration Standards Control Over Calibration Standards Control Over Scoring Scheme Control Over Scoring Scheme

Scoring Template: High Difficulty Calibrations To master each calibration students must: Answer 3.0 of 4 (75%) STYLE questions correctly, and Answer 5.3 of 7 (75%) CONTENT questions correctly, and NOT deviate by more than 2.0 points from the RATING of a calibration text Reviews To master reviews students must: NOT deviate by more than 2.0 points from the AVERAGE RATING of the reviewed text Self-Assessment To master self-assessment students must: NOT deviate by more than 1.0 points from the AVERAGE RATING of their text to receive full credit, or NOT deviate by more than 2.0 points from the AVERAGE RATING of their text to receive half credit

Directions: Enter the points you want associated with each assignment stage. All points must sum to 100. Each point total can range from 0 to Text quality:XX points 2. Calibrations: XX points over 3 Calibrations 3. Reviews: XX points over 3 Reviews 4. Self- assessment: XX points TOTAL:must sum to 100 points

Engineering Instructional Services Management Student Reminders Student Reminders Special Requests Special Requests  Late Submissions  Technical Difficulties

Engineering Instructional Services Review Results Scan Student Results Scan Student Results Identify “Problem” Scores Identify “Problem” Scores Ability to Randomly Review Some or All Student Submissions Ability to Randomly Review Some or All Student Submissions  Can also participate AS a student!

Engineering Instructional Services Student Name Overall Grade (Out of 100) Text Score (Out of 10) Reviewer Competency Index (RCI) (1-6)Complete [name] finished [name]9486finished [name]9175finished

Engineering Instructional Services Student Point of View Review Materials Review Materials Write Write Calibrate Calibrate  Review three examples, compared to professor Review 3 Random Peers Review 3 Random Peers Review Self Review Self

Engineering Instructional Services Calibrated Peer Review ™ (CPR) Available from UCLA Available from UCLA  Contact me for sample assignment Contact me for sample assignment   Contact UCLA regarding traveling workshops Contact UCLA regarding traveling workshops

More Writing But Less Grading: Calibrated Peer Review™ Share The Future IV - Tempe, AZ John Wise The Pennsylvania State University