EU-India FTA: Overview and Concerns Shefali Sharma 22 November 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comments on What are the constraints on inclusive growth in Zambia? Elena Ianchovichina and Susanna Lundström Arne Bigsten University of Gothenburg.
Advertisements

Case Study On The EU.
The World Trade Organization
REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION ON SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MULTILATERAL DISCIPLINES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD.
Unit 13 International Marketing
EU-Canada Trade and Economic Relations – towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 5 May 2014.
Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) - Strengthening the World’s Largest Economic Relationship - 23 January 2014 Transatlantic Trade & Investment.
Civil Society Trade Seminar 2011 EU Trade Policy: Looking East Warsaw, 3 October.
1 The EU Trade Policy. 2 Contents 1.General background of the EU’s trade policy: how is the EU trading bloc structured?  The institutional setting 
Thom Achterbosch LEI EU - India regional trade agreement – a quantitative assessment.
The Economy and Marketing
Briefing on the Economic Partnership Agreement Christian Peters, Head of Macro-economic and Trade Section Delegation of the European Union to the Republic.
Objective Identify the phases of the business cycle and the economic indicators used to measure economic activities and trends. Assess how current.
Japan- Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (Kasunduang Pangkabuhayan ng Hapon at Pilipinas)
How can trade contribute to growth and jobs? The role of EU trade policy Signe Ratso Director Directorate General of Trade European Commission.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
Labour Market Inequality in India and Brazil: Comparing Labour Market Institutions in India and Brazil Taniya Chakrabarty 18th December 2014.
BEHIND THE BORDER ACTIONS AND APEC THE CASE OF INDONESIA Presented by Pos Hutabarat, PhD Ministry of Trade Republic of Indonesia.
Copyright ©2004, South-Western College Publishing International Economics By Robert J. Carbaugh 9th Edition Chapter 7: Trade Regulations and Industrial.
General orientation of international economic integration
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment – Georgia United Nations Development Programme.
Does Trade Liberalisation Leave Women Behind in South Africa Presented by Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu, HSRC, EPD unit J. Cockburn, B. Decaluwé, M.Chitiga-Mabugu,
1 U.S. and the WTO: overview Washington, DC, February 13,
1 Chapter 7 Section 1 Global Economics Objectives Describe how international trade benefits consumers. Explain the significance of currency exchange rates.
1 European Union – Korea Free Trade Agreement Sustainability Impact Assessment: Phase Two Presentation to Consultation Session, Brussels February 21, 2008.
Adeline Hinderer, Trade Counselor Delegation of the European Union to the United States WITA Seminar, Washington DC, 9 September The Transatlantic.
1 China’s WTO Accession: Some Lessons for Vietnam Will Martin World Bank 3 June 2003.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden The EU-India FTA negotiations – a European perspective Anders Ahnlid Director-General for Trade Ministry for Foreign.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
Brazil-Japan: Roadmap for an Economic Partnership Agreement Keidanren
1 UPDATE ON THE EPA NEGOTIATIONS CUTS/WTO Regional Outreach Workshop Nairobi. By: Ambassador Nathan Irumba SEATINI (Uganda )
WTO short introduction TURIN 16 July 2007 ITUC. WTO The WTO: Founded in 1995 after 50 years of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade – GATT Headquarters.
Japan-EU EPA Negotiation: Lessons from EU-South Korea FTA EU Institute in Japan, Kansai Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University Dr. Prof. YOSHII.
1 European Union – Korea Free Trade Agreement Sustainability Impact Assessment: Phase One Public Presentation November 30,
The Political Economy of Trade Policy. Government Policies.
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): A U.S. Perspective Prepared by the Trans-Atlantic Business Council.
Current Affairs-SADC-EAC-COMESA (TFTA)  Tripartite launched June 2011 in SA with objective to pursue FTA, cross- border infrastructure and regional industrial.
Chapter 6: The United States in the Global Economy
WTO Today: A New Negotiating Round Thomas Cottier Professor of Law of Counsel, Baker&McKenzie Santiago de Chile
Enterprise adaptation to enlargement. Overview The adoption of the acquis is costly Comply with standards: Environmental, Safety at work, Competition.
National Seminar on Intellectual Property and its Impact on Economic Development The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting International Trade and.
Globalization, Trade, Investment, and Environment Session Objectives: l Debate risks and opportunities of economic globalization l Identify SD requirements.
6/3/ The U.S. in the Global Economy Chapter 5.
Copyright ©2000, South-Western College Publishing International Economics By Robert J. Carbaugh 7th Edition Chapter 7: Trade regulations and industrial.
Priority Issues and Challenges for Competition Reforms in 7 UP 4 Countries Lahcen ACHY Carnegie Middle East Center Beirut Research Adviser for 7UP4.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC 1 COMPETITIVENESS AND WORLD TRADE.
1 Key issues emerging from the Trade Workshop held on 1 August 2013 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry – 10 October 2013 Ms.
External Trade Economic Integration in the EUROMED context National Conference on Harnessing Services for Sustainable Development Amman, 22 September 2010Christophe.
Economic Environment of Business International Trade. GATT and the WTO.
1 COMPETITION LAW FORUM Paris 21 June 2006 Competitiveness versus Competition Presentation by Humbert DRABBE Director for Cohesion and Competitiveness,
POLICY CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES.  Introduction  Overview of EAC  Challenges in Implementing EAC CU  Opportunities Abound  Lessons from the European.
Economic co-operation, globalisation, chemicals and OPCW OPCW Conference The Hague, 2 May 2016 Rob Visser.
EU-Indonesia Trade Cooperation Facility Module 2: EU as a negotiating partner Trends of EC trade negotiations 29 September
Dashnyam TSETSEGMAA Head of Promotion and Consulting Division Investment Environment in Mongolia.
EXTERNAL INFLUENCES These are factors that the business can not control (External constraints) PESTEL Analysis is a part of the external analysis that.
BREXIT: Which industries might see an impact if we fall off the cliff edge? Dr. Michael Gasiorek InterAnalysis & University of Sussex Going Global May.
THE POLOTICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
EMPLOYMENT : GROWTH, INFORMALISATION AND OTHER ISSUES.
ECON 331 INTERNATIONAL TRADE and ECONOMICS
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business Dr. Aravind Banakar –
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business
Overview of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
Visit for more Learning Resources
Topic 1: Overview of Business
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA )
EU Social Dialogue in the Food & Drink Industry
ASEAN-China FTA Prof. Philip Yang National Taiwan University
EU-India FTA: Overview and Concerns
Presentation transcript:

EU-India FTA: Overview and Concerns Shefali Sharma 22 November 2008

Timeline of the FTA 2005: EU-India Summit, decision to form High Level Trade Group (HLTG) to see if bilateral deal is possible 2006: HLTG defines areas to launch an FTA Oct 2006: EC ’ s Global Europe Strategy June 2007: Launch of FTA negotiations with goal WAS to end by December 2008 (now predicting Dec ’ 09)

Since then…. 5 Rounds of talks taken place Last one: Sept, in Brussels Next one: around November 24 What is the Content of the FTA … ?

Content of the FTA Negotiations on Trade in Goods –Manufacturing, Non- Ag: Fisheries etc –Agriculture Services Investment Intellectual Property Government Procurement Competition Dispute Settlement Rules (anti- dumping, CVD etc.) Trade Facilitation

Starting point on Goods…. Eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers on “ substantially all trade ” in non-ag and agriculture over 7 years India agreed to tariff cuts in 90% of tariff lines already; EU wants reciprocal cuts on 95% Sees India as Equal Partner: India ’ s entire GDP amounts to 3% of the EU ’ s!

What this means… India would have seven years to bring 90-95% of tariffs to zero (Ag and Manufacturing) India would like to designate some of these as “ sensitive ” sectors and not reduce some to zero and not over seven years List of offers in September; they were supposed to make requests for further cuts in October

But… EU Industry pushing for zero tariffs in seven years, reciprocity, and extreme limitation of the number of “ sensitive ” sectors EU wants market access to sectors that India wants to exclude completely Ex. Fisheries, Textiles, Wines and Spirits, Automobiles

Some studies on EU-India show Indian “sensitive sectors” as: Processed food, fisheries, tobacco, paper, furniture, bedding, plastics, chemicals, low- end machinery, textiles, electrical goods “ large expected negative changes in employment ” in: paper production, publishing, transport equipment, processed food and beverages, tobacco (EU commissioned “ Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment ” ; CARIS)

Current State of Play Negotiations far along Draft goods, investment and services, IPR, competition, TBT chapters already Discussing each others ’ regulatory regimes for services liberalisation Ironing out conflicts on investment (India wants to include investor protection; EU wants capital convertibility) Discussing areas where India has to change legislation for intellectual property

Goods… Round not just about tariffs (17% of Indian tax revenue) (75% of tariff lines of export interest to India are in manufacturing and EU will liberalize most of these … EU will protect around 1% of Tariff lines of export interest to India) FTA about non-tariff barriers on both sides (internal taxes on goods etc. … must be more or equally favorable to foreign providers) India wants SPS and TBT requirements removed in EU (health, env., safety standards)

No transparency in Negotiations!!! need to know what is being offered on both sides and WHY?

Financial Services: David and Goliath European Banking Federation: 5,000 European banks, large and small, from 29 national banking associations, with assets of more than € 20,000 billion; India has 27 public sector banks and 29 private banks that represent 70% of market share in the Indian economy Large majority of Indians already face “ financial exclusion ”. FTA: increased exclusion; greater financial risk, insolvency, consolidation, job losses, lack of accountability

Services EU interested in Energy and Water Services (waste water treatment if not distribution) India complaining about NTBs in Services: mutual recognition agreements, licensing requirements (have to negotiate with 27 diff. Countries anyway) EU using Services talks as way to pressurize EU states in liberalising services internally

Investment Deregulate conditions for EU firms to establish within India Favorable terms of doing business as firms within India Repatriation of profits and flow of money in and out of country, residence permits for personnel EU not negotiating investor to state mechanism “ investment protection ”

Investment… EU States will engage in Bilateral Investment treaties with India France-India; Uk-India (already) EU carving out space for its own “ deep integration ” treaties with EU accession countries; but wants India to commit to MFN (giving EU same rights as India gives to others)

Intellectual Property Jeopardize biodiversity; access to medicine EU wants India to “ implement ” existing IPR laws Rights of plant breeders over farmers Wants India to strengthen “ Data exclusivity ” provisions … protection of data even before product registered or patented … up to 10 years at least IP protection 20 plus 5 years..they claim that Indian processes take too many years and cut into years of monopoly ownership

Government Procurement Right to bid for all state projects Typically used to boost economic activity in underserved areas, fulfill development objectives; boost domestic spending (deal with recession) EU GP: 99% to EU states, 1% to US, no DCs EU wants rights to India ’ s GP (11-13% of India ’ s GDP) and right to prior comment and access to information (transparency in GP)

Impact on Labour and Livelihoods Current Demographics … 92% of India ’ s Total Workforce of 457 million people in the Informal “ unorganized ” Economy (NCEUS) In 2005, 836 million people or 77% of the country ’ s population earning less than 20 rupees/day (~30 euro cents/day)

Current Demographics… 42% of working age population “ usually ” employed (according to last survey 04-05) Around 35 million people remain under or unemployed Link with Liberalisation …

Jobless Growth and Joblessness... b/w : Females: 1% increase in both rural and urban unemployment Males: No change in rural unemployment rate Males: 1% decline in urban unemployment (NSSO, GOI)

Manufacturing Growth and Livelihoods: Major proportion of organised labour; diversified into several industries (which will be targeted in the FTA) Past Experience: (boom in manufacturing output and investment) : 1.3 million employees lost jobs (1.1 were workers; not supervisors) Out of 15 major industries, 11 industries faced (80% of workforce) fall in jobs

Manufacturing Growth and Livelihoods: Impact on Women : share of women in manufacturing 24% Faced massive decline since 1983 Shifted to services (domestic worker, construction, wholesale, petty retail) Home-based contractual work (garments); no protection and lower wages Women increasingly as “ flexible ” labour force since liberalisation; informalisation …

Liberalisation and Impacts on labour Those who lost jobs shifted to informal sector Real wages remained stagnant Greater productivity per worker = retrenchment Growth strong in recent years, but not resulting in jobs Increased competition will create further vulnerability

Impacts of FTA FTA would eliminate close to 90% of tariffs in manufacturing and agriculture More sensitive products will come from agriculture at cost of Non-ag goods Small-scale Industries and both unorganised and organised workers at huge risk (experience of consumer goods sector in the 90s)

Agriculture and Livelihoods: 35 million people depend on production of a single crop for 35 crops (huge crop constituencies) Sharp Fall in “ self employed ” in agriculture (small and marginal farmers) between Proportion of Ag Workers increased from 42.6% in to 48% by 2000 (lowest paid out of any category of workers) 78% of women in rural areas working as Ag workers as of ; 48.9% of Men Faster rate of mobility for men out of Ag than women; Farmers suicides

Impacts of FTA Increased vulnerability of farmers, agricultural workers will create more “ job seekers ” in urban areas (already see migration trends); no viable safeguards in the FTA for this sector EU seeks Indian market in key industries such as chemicals, automotives and in sectors of major livelihood importance (fisheries) — will lead to further displacement Services such as construction at risk (where bulk of informal sector currently makes its living)

On the Social Clause… Lessons from WTO (Strong resistance from Developing Countries and does not address the core problems with free trade and loss of employment) India will not sign an FTA with a social or environment clause EU trade unions OK with env and social clause; but liberalisation of 90% of Goods sector will not prevent joblessness; Clause would only address existing jobs; NEED for mutual discussion with Indian trade unions

What Next? Livelihood concerns most critical issue of FTA Must Monitor and address govts Currently, very little trade union or civil society attention to the FTA (GoI and EC, working under the radar screen) NO TRANSPARENCY OR DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE IN NEGOTIATIONS Build Awareness in EU and India about FTA; examine livelihood implications in detail; Demand answers from govts; FTA is wrong framework for trade. ORGANIZE!!

Thank You