Geographic Routing of Toll Free Services Future of Numbering Working Group Presented by: David Greenhaus, 800 Response Information Services 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NANC Change Order 400 Joint FoN/LNPA WG Meeting April 14, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
Advertisements

COBIT® 5 for Assurance Introduction
IETF ECRIT SDO Emergency Services Coordination Workshop 5 & 6 Oct 2006 – New York Alain Van Gaever DG Information Society & Media European Commission.
Telecommunications Law CLE State Deregulation at the PUC December 2014 Pete Kirchhof Colorado Telecommunications Association.
Section 706 Broadband Progress Reports September 27, 2012.
US Constitution and Right to Privacy Generally only protects against government action Doesn’t obligate government to do something, but rather to refrain.
CRAMMING R&O FNPRM FCC John B. Adams Consumer Policy Division Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
COLLECTION HOT TOPICS WV HMFA Winter Educational Conference January 15, 2015.
CHARTERED SECRETARIES AUSTRALIA New Privacy Laws 6 June 2013.
Fiducianet, inc. tm 1 Presented by H. Michael Warren, President fiducianet, inc. VoIP Technology Perspectives Law Enforcement Concerns & CALEA Compliance.
Head in the Sand? Regulatory Requirements and Pitfalls for VoIP Providers in the U.S. Prepared by Kris Twomey Law Office of Kristopher E. Twomey, P.C.
Continuing Uncertainty Under FCC Network Neutrality Rules Prof. Barbara A. Cherry Indiana University Presented at EDUCAUSE Live! Webcast January 26, 2011.
Introduction to the APPs and the OAIC’s regulatory approach Presented by: Este Darin-Cooper Director, Regulation and Strategy May 2015.
The role of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in telecommunications Andrew Solomon Director, Policy.
Who’s Viewed You? The Impact of Feedback in a Mobile Location-Sharing Application Date : 2011/09/06 Reporter : Lin Kelly.
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
Tina Kraigher and Milena Podjed-Fabjančič 18 April 2010 Processing of Telephone Traffic Data of Employees ( a Case Study )
Marketing - Best Practice from a Legal Point of View Yvonne Cunnane - Information Technology Law Group 30 November 2006.
Banks and the Privacy of Medical Information 8 th National HIPAA Summit March 8, 2004 Joy Pritts, JD Health Policy Institute Georgetown University
RERC on Telecommunications Access Overview: Accessibility of Voice Systems and Services.
Payment Systems Debit Cards. Basic Concepts Cross between checking system and credit card system –No extension of credit; money must be in account at.
Privacy Law for Network Administrators Steven Penney Faculty of Law University of New Brunswick.
Ioannis Iglezakis Directive on privacy and electronic communications.
1 COMMUNICATIONS REGULATION COMMISSION Republic of Bulgaria MOBILE BROADBAND EUROPE – BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOBILE BROADBAND ACCESS.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
Unsolicited Commercial Meeting of Oftel Internet Forum 22 July 1999 EU Distance Selling Directive provisions on unsolicited .
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
NANC Report Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group FoN Tri-Chairs Suzanne Addington, Sprint Kathy Bakke, Wisconsin PSC Mark Lancaster, AT&T March 27,
Professional Practices: Referral & Documentation Melody Kipp, PhD, LMHC Life & Work Soulutions, Inc.
CALEA Discussion Institute for Computer Policy and Law June 28, 2006 Doug Carlson Executive Director, Communications & Computing Services New York University.
Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.
Surveillance techniques Essential surveillance techniques available to landlords, providing evidential footage for civil and criminal cases when tackling.
Privacy vs. Confidentiality.  IRB review of privacy and confidentiality protections is required under the Common Rule and the FDA regulations, as well.
Eliminating Disparities: Multicultural Strategic Summit Improving Meaningful Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) June.
MOBILE MARKETING AND DIGITAL CONVERGENCE Chapter 15 Spring 2011 Internet Marketing, 3 rd ed. Mary Lou Roberts & Debra Zahay-Blatz.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission November, 2006 Scott Henderson, Research In Motion FCC : E911 Requirements for IP- Enabled Service Providers.
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
Health Insurance portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‏
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Spectrum and the Concept of Net Neutrality Todd D. Daubert Partner Kelley, Drye & Warren, LLP.
E911
Privacy and Data Protection in e-Communications Sector Legislation, Codes of Practice and Standards Privacy and Data Protection in e-Communications Sector.
A Primer on Local Number Portability A Primer on Local Number Portability An Unsponsored Presentation at the Ministerial Workshop on a Regional Approach.
APEC Privacy Framework “The lack of consumer trust and confidence in the privacy and security of online transactions and information networks is one element.
PRIVACY IN THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS SECTOR IN BULGARIA.
Introduction to the Australian Privacy Principles & the OAIC’s regulatory approach Privacy Awareness Week 2016.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA) Public Law and Public Law Wireless RERC and CTIA Accessibility.
Internet Call Termination Rates How is the price of call termination influenced by national internet calling legislation?
Brussels Privacy Symposium on Identifiability
Prepared by Kris Twomey Law Office of Kristopher E. Twomey, P.C.
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Number portability Dr. ZOUAKIA Rochdi ANRT
Preparing for the Future
THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT: 2015 UPDATES TO FCC REGULATIONS
AFTER 20 YEARS, IT’S TIME TO UPDATE THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA). Howard Waltzman Partner
2016 Annual CPNI Training CPNI & PI Awareness Beth Slough,
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Consistent, Standardized Methods for Wireless.
Submission Title: [SGLECIM PAR & 5C comment resolution November 2010]
Presentation privacy law
 GDPR Readiness Quiz Quick Insight: Quick Insight: Quick Insight:
IAPP TRUSTe SYMPOSIUM 9-11 JUNE 2004
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Analysis of Final HIPAA Privacy Modification Rule
European Commission proposals for data protection
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Lecture 3: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Presentation transcript:

Geographic Routing of Toll Free Services Future of Numbering Working Group Presented by: David Greenhaus, 800 Response Information Services 1

Introduction Routing calls based on the caller’s location is an important aspect of many toll free services, whether a call originates from a wireline, wireless, or VOIP caller. Today, the on-going erosion in the geographic underpinnings of the North American Numbering Plan is gaining increased visibility and attention in the telecommunications industry. Taken together, the de facto nomadic nature of mobile telephone service, the proliferation of mobile devices, and their impact on determining an originating caller’s location have compromised the toll free carriers’ ability to route and bill mobile and nomadic VOIP originated calls on the basis of the TN. This white paper provides an overview of toll free location-based routing, identifies specific roadblocks to accurately routing those calls in the current environment, and offers up suggestions for overcoming those limitations within the context of current rules and regulations. 2

CPNI Rules In its Declaratory Ruling released June 27, 2013, Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers’ Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information, the Commission: Par. 8: did not adopt any new rules Par. 33: “We also reiterate that section 222(c) (1) [of 47 USC] allows a telecommunications carrier to use, disclose, or permit access to this CPNI ‘in its provision of (A) the telecommunication service from which such information is derived, or (B) services necessary to, or used in, the provision of such telecommunications service.” Note that Section 222 (b) of Title 47 states: “A telecommunications carrier that receives or obtains proprietary information from another carrier for the purpose of providing any telecommunications service shall use such information only for such purpose, and shall not use such information for its own marketing efforts.” The combination of these two provisions (in the statute) indicates that Congress contemplated the transfer of CPNI in the provision of telecommunications services, and specifically permitted it. Moreover, Section 222(b) clearly imposes upon carriers an obligation to use such information only “for such purpose.” 3

“Fuzzy Location” For the most part, toll free calls that are routed based on the originating callers’ location currently utilize the caller’s telephone number, which corresponds with a “fuzzy” location (usually within miles of the caller’s location). While “fuzzy” location data should be available to indicate the location to which the call is to be routed, that is different from transmitting “actual current location.” In determining the degree to which notice and consent requirements are warranted, consideration should be given to the granularity of location information passed through to the Toll Free Subscriber. 4

Opt-in / Opt-Out As a rule, callers want their calls to complete quickly, and do not want to deal with time-consuming, interactive voice response systems, which are frequently viewed as annoyances; this is especially true when callers do not expect to encounter an automated interaction. In addition, the longer a caller is on a call, the greater the likelihood that the call will be disconnected. Thus, the imposition of opt-in or opt-out requirements would be detrimental to both toll free customers and the callers attempting to reach them, while having at best a miniscule impact on the protection of the callers’ privacy. 5

Conclusion Where both the extent and frequency of access to protected information are limited and where the carrier is subject to the FCC’s strict CPNI regulations, as well as other obligations placed upon common carriers, there is no need or reason to impose an additional layer of protection. When a toll free telecommunications provider requires geographic originating location for the limited purpose of correctly routing toll free calls to its customers, and the location information passed on to Toll Free Subscribers is of a general "fuzzy" nature, that information should be provided free of the notice and consent obligations. Increasing customer and device mobility should not compromise seamless and accurate toll free geographic routing, and mechanisms to provide accurate location based routing of toll free calls should be developed with as minimal impacts on performance and added caller interaction as are consistent with the determination of caller privacy interests. 6