The Family Drug and Alcohol Court Sophie Kershaw Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Copyright presentation: FDAC Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Solutions Towards Everyday Problems Debbie Mclean Senior Practitioner Family Support Workers Team Pali Obhi YISP Coordinator.
Maggie Carter Assistant Director, Learner & Family Support
Building futures for our most vulnerable children What do we need to change in law, policy and practice? Professor Gillian Schofield School of Social Work,
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
What is Take Two?. Take Two is a developmental therapeutic service for Child Protection clients who have suffered trauma and disrupted attachment due.
Leadership and Supervision. Reflective Practice and Critical Analysis Supervision provides an opportunity for reflection, challenge and the testing out.
Mike Shaw Tavistock Clinic. Role of the C&A Psychiatry Expert  Comment on ‘Significant Harm’  Whether there is “…an impairment of (mental) health or.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
1 C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Child.
Serious Case Reviews – key recommendations Clare Kershaw Lead Strategic Commissioner – Standards and Excellence.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Parental Substance Abuse and Child Welfare: Promising Programs for Early Intervention and Permanency Claire Houston S.J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School.
S.T.A.R.T. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams.
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
TRANSITION Correct as at March 2015
1 The role of social work in personalised adult social care and support Social Work and Personalisation: Skills for Care Wednesday 25 th June 2014 Lyn.
Commissioning social work to deliver personalisation Community Social Work in Derbyshire.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Our Roles and Responsibilities Towards Young Carers Whole Family Working: Making It Real for Young Carers.
Family Court Mediation and Counselling Service of Western Australia 1 The Columbus Program and its impact on the Family Court of Western Australia Kay.
The Role of Family Consultants in the Family Court- A Guide for the Effective Solicitor.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Suki Norris/Kristie Hill/Bernice Cooke Somerset Partnership
Hertfordshire’s Complex Needs Service Carol McNeil and Rebecca Plater.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
The Family Drug and Alcohol Court Sophie Kershaw Service Manager Copyright presentation: FDAC Team Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust and Coram.
Children in Care. What is a Corporate Parent? Either through agreement with their parents, or through court proceedings, children might come to be cared.
Framework for the Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers. Gani Martins Assistant Director.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.
 What is the Children’s Hearings system?  What does it do?  What are the key stages of the process?
Early Help and CART Barbara Egan – Principal Manager IWST Sandra Douglas – Principal Manager CART.
Changing Needs – Changing Responses for Children in Care Harriet Ward Centre for Child and Family Research Loughborough.
VOCABULARY. ADJUDICATE  TO HEAR AND SETTLE A CASE BY JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
Putting Corporate Parenting into Practice.
NEIGHBOURHOOD ENABLING TEAM (NET) Care Planning for Children - Risk Assessments and Packages of Support Arising from Problem Parental Drug Use Author:
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Safeguarding and Looked After Children’s Services Early Intervention and Prevention.
Mixing methods to research policy and practice Judith Masson Professor of Socio-legal Studies University of Bristol 2014 Legal Research Methods and methodologies.
Care planning and permanence Improving outcomes for looked after children.
TIME TAKEN TO ACHIEVE ADOPTION FROM PERMANENT CARE.
CRT/ MASH 2015 Overview of Safeguarding, Child Protection & Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) 2015.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Science & Politics – Synergy or Conflict? The Family Drug and Alcohol Court Prof Judith Harwin Brunel University SSA Conference November 2015, York
The Duties and Responsibility of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Fieldwork Services Report to Children & Learning Scrutiny Committee 15 th October 2007.
Presentation to Children’s Partnership Board 17 th July 2012 by Jill Forrest Head of Family Placements and Resources Slough Looked After Children, Young.
Revised Pathway to Children’s Services – the next phase Children’s Trust Stakeholder Briefings 29 October November November 2012.
Change Fund Specialist LAAC Health Visitors. Context  A proposal was submitted from health, social work and education to the Early Years Change fund.
Girfec Origins What is Girfec? Getting it right for every child is the national approach to improving outcomes for all children by placing the child.
Network Name Celebrating Good Practice Louise Burton & Jane Bhatti Safeguarding Health Practitioners 24 January 2012.
Brighton Oasis Project Our contribution to safeguarding children in the city February 26 th 2016.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
Being in Care. Joint priorities remain to… Improve outcomes for children, young people and families in Birmingham. In particular: Protect children from.
Dudley Children’s Services Multi-Agency Briefing Stefan Chapleo Helen Ellis 1.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
Department or Division1 2 B Me: Case Study Example Demonstrating Multi-Agency Working Georgie Doherty (2 B Me Team Manager) Emma Harding (Specialist Senior.
Family Service Unit Scotland
Executive Director of Children’s Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making
Therapeutic Access Point
Presentation transcript:

The Family Drug and Alcohol Court Sophie Kershaw Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Copyright presentation: FDAC Team

The Family Drug and Alcohol Court The ‘Family Drug & Alcohol Court’ protects children put at risk by parental substance misuse. It is an innovative multi-agency intervention involving: The family court A specialist multi disciplinary intervention team Parent Mentors Social services Treatment services Housing Probation etc

To improve permanency outcomes for children To achieve higher rates of control/cessation of substance misuse To increase the Court’s confidence in decision making without the need to receive reports from a wide range of external experts To develop a problem solving approach rather than adversarial Aims

FDAC devises a time limited trial for change with intensive support & compulsion

C Compulsion – Authority of the court Two dedicated District Judges and two others provide back up Judicial continuity for families Regular court reviews of the case without legal representatives Problem solving approach

Collaboration – Intensive Support for Families FDAC relies on our network of collaborators The FDAC team, sit at the centre of a vast network of court, social care, health, housing etc services We broker, coordinate and monitor the best possible intervention package “Houston we have a problem”

Timescales for the Child The majority of our cases are new born babies: The sensitive period for attachment is between 6-18 months. The decision on whether to return the child has to be taken before the child is 9 months. This allows permanent placement by the child’s first birthday whether or not they return to their parents. Other sensitive periods include: Aged 4-5 years when successful adoption becomes less likely. Aged years after which longterm foster care is more likely to fail. School transitions.

Trial for Change Families are given ‘a trial for change’ to test whether parents can overcome their problems and meet their children’s needs in the child’s timeframe. Families are given the maximum possible support via the FDAC team, Court and other agencies to: Abstain from street drugs and alcohol, Begin to address the difficulties driving the substance misuse, Strengthen their relationships with the children, and Create a child-centred lifestyle.

Problem solving court approach at all levels

Key Differences Therapeutic relationships with the FDAC team including the Judge Goal-based Swift assessment, testing, referrals and planning via the FDAC Specialist Team Promotes the family’s problem solving capacities Collaborative working FDAC team supports the family and coordinates, reviews and amends the interventions for up to a year Transparency Parent Mentors: credible role models of resilience and change Less adversarial court process Dedicated district judges Regular court reviews without legal representatives

FDAC Evaluation Outcome at the end of Proceedings: A higher proportion of FDAC parents had stopped misusing by final order Mothers (40% v 25%) Fathers (25% v 5%) A higher proportion of FDAC than comparison mothers both stopped misusing and were reunited with their children (35% v 19%) If reunification was not possible, placement with alternative permanent carers was not swifter Involvement in FDAC is an important contributory factor in difference in outcomes

Comparing outcomes of family reunification: follow-up after one year Most mothers still living with their children (83% v 78%). A similar proportion of cases returned to court (13% v 17%) Levels of support and services were variable post FDAC Supervision orders – directions rarely used New episodes of neglect or abuse took place in proportionately fewer FDAC families (25% v 56%) Fewer FDAC mothers relapsed (25% v 44%)

Qualitative findings FDAC operates in a distinctively different way to ordinary care proceedings Parents & professionals valued the role of the judge, the support of the team, and the hearings without lawyers – and the collaborative approach Parents felt the process gave them a fair chance

To download full evaluation report and highlights: To contact the National FDAC Unit –