HEC-FDA Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Pete Andrysiak Sources: HEC-FDA Users Manual Version 1.0 Jan 1998 Metropolitan region of Louisville, Kentucky Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flood Risk Analysis – the USACE Approach
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
BUILDING STRONG SM Nonstructural Flood Risk Reduction Considerations for the Red River of the North.
Water Resources Planning and Management
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
International Workshop to Discuss the Science of Asset Management
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Lecture(2) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
The Hydrologic (Water) Cycle. Surface Water Oceans Rivers and streams Lakes and ponds Springs – groundwater becomes surface water.
HEC-RAS.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
Chapter 14 Risk and Uncertainty Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today’s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas Flood Risk Management Project Presentation to Kansas City Industrial Council.
Regional Flood Plain Management Council April 15, 2015 H-GAC December 2nd.
Beargrass Creek Case Study Description of the Study Area Hydrology & Hydraulics Economic Analysis Project Planning Assessment of the Risk Based Analysis.
Hydrologic Design and Design Storms Readings: Applied Hydrology Sections /18/2005.
1 Flood Hazard Analysis Session 1 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Hazard Assessment.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
VILLAGE OF PATCH, NM, FEASIBILITY STUDY Village of Patch Case Study Seattle Environmen tal Planning Class June, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Benefit-Cost Ratio Lecture No. 53.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Project Our group collaborated with students at the University of Zacatecas (UAZ) to accomplish the following: 1- Create an accurate hydrologic model which.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning Course FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Chuck Shadie Mississippi Valley Division.
St. Johns River Water Management District Special Publication SJ97-SP8 Water Management Alternatives: Effects on Lake Levels and Wetlands in the Orange.
Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.
Roseau River Flood Damage Reduction Project Roseau, Minnesota.
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) Cost-benefit analysis exercise RiskCity Cees van Westen
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.
BUILDING STRONG ® Trinity COMMON VISION Steering Committee September 10, 2015.
Methodology for Risk-Based Flood Damage Assessment David R. Maidment CE 394K.2, Spring 1999.
Penny Coombes Sarah Wharton Gary Davies Simon White River Bee, Desing FLOOD ALLEVIATION FEASIBILITY.
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
Floodplain Management D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L5 Water Resources Systems Modeling.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Stage Damage Without condition damage curve With condition damage curve This much water causes this much damage without a plan ‘with’ it causes this much.
Public Meeting April 2, 2015 Albany Park Stormwater Diversion Tunnel.
Hydrological Forecasting. Introduction: How to use knowledge to predict from existing data, what will happen in future?. This is a fundamental problem.
MRC-MDBC STRATEGIC LIAISON PROGRAM BASIN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING TRAINING MODULE 3 SCENARIO-BASED PLANNING for the MEKONG BASIN Napakuang, Lao PDR 8-11 December.
Chapter 21 Water Supply, Use and Management. Groundwater and Streams Groundwater –Water found below the Earth’s surface, within the zone of saturation,
March Urban Flood Risk Management. March Objectives Understand the Nature of Flooding & Flood Damage Alleviation Understand the Nature of.
Overview of the handbook Chapter 5: Levee inspection, assessment and risk attribution.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
1 Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Yolo Bypass Fisheries Enhancement.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
Flood in Austin - Economic losses assesment
Continuing Authorities Program
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Flood Frequency Analysis
Flood Frequency Analysis
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Presentation transcript:

HEC-FDA Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Pete Andrysiak Sources: HEC-FDA Users Manual Version 1.0 Jan 1998 Metropolitan region of Louisville, Kentucky Study of Beargrass Creek Basin Final Feasibility Report-Volume 1 Metropolitan region of Louisville, Kentucky Study of Beargrass Creek Basin Final Feasibility Report-Volume 2 COL Harry Spear, Commander Louisville District Jeffery G. Kleckner, Planning Division Chief Neil O’Leary, Economist

Objective Take the Hydrologic Engineering Center's Flood Damage Analysis (HEC-FDA) computer program and become familiar with its capabilities. Use a completed study, the Louisville District's experiences in conducting a risk-based analysis of flood damage reduction alternatives for the Bear Grass Creek, basin in Metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky.

HEC-FDA What is it? a next generation Flood Damage Analysis computer program for formulating and evaluating flood damage reduction plans. streamlines the study process following functional elements of a study involving coordinated study layout, hydrologic engineering analysis, economic analysis, and plan formulation and evaluation.

HEC-FDA What Does it do? Quantifies uncertainty in discharge-frequency, stage-discharge, geotechnical levee failure, stage-damage functions Incorporates these uncertainties into economic and performance analyses of alternative flood damage reduction plans. Evaluates plans by expected annual damage associated with a given analysis year or the equivalent annual damage over the project life of the plan. Provides Information on the flood risk performance in the results. Provides output tables and selected graphics of information by plan, analysis year, stream, and damage reach for the plan. Compares results of the various plans  Windows NT and 95, and Unix-based computer operating systems.

Where to Begin Provide structure, many key players and elements that need to be brought together No portion can be done in a vacuum Proposed Structure (Decision Making Process) –Pick the Study Team –Define the problem and focus team for analysis –Conduct thorough analysis (each Team Member) gather facts develop logical assumptions present to team and manager focus plan development develop goals and objectives –Develop Courses of Action –Analyze and Compare Courses of Action –Decide

Pick the Study Team Louisville District Staff w/expertise in plan formulation Economics, engineering, cost estimating, real estate, and construction Local groups –Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) sponsor and team member –Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) –Beargrass Task Force appointed by Mayor of Louisville Government Officials with diverse backgrounds Educational Institutions Businesses Industry Non-profit Organizations  purpose to firmly establish the role of the creek in meeting the needs of the community in future recreation, education, and green space; to protect the cultural and natural heritage associated with the creek Federal –U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IAW provisions of Wildlife Coordination Act

Define the Problem Focus Team for Analysis

Beargrass Creek Background Development in the last two decades, particularly in the upper reaches of South Fork has resulted in additional rainfall run-off, and a corresponding increase in potential damage Flooding caused by locally intense rainstorms. Flood waters from the streams generally rise rapidly, with little warning time, and have high velocities. In the upper reaches of the South Fork, the duration of flooding is generally between minutes, once the water is out of bank. Expected depths of flooding on first floors of structures for a 1% chance event range up to 8.5' on South Fork and on Buechel Branch.

Approximately 85% of the structures are residential. A 1% chance flood event along the South Fork would damage 759 structures, valued at $219,123,000, and would result in about $45,590,000 in damages. On Buechel Branch, a 1% chance flood would affect about 170 structures valued at $15,286,000, and would cause damage estimated at $2,812,000. A 10% chance flood would cause an estimated $6,803,000 in total damages on South Fork, and $890,000 on Buechel Branch. Beargrass Creek Background

Define Damage Reaches Damage reaches are spatial floodplain areas. Used to define consistent data for plan evaluations and to aggregate structure and other potential flood inundation damage information by stage of flooding. Defined by the beginning and ending stations (river mile, kilometer, etc.) along the stream and can extend into the floodplain to include the largest flood deemed reasonably possible.

Thorough Analysis Using FDA by Hydro Guy The HEC-FDA program requires specific water surface profiles for the 50-, 20-, 10-, 4-, 2-, I-,.50-, and.20- percent chance exceedance frequency flood events For the above probabilities the returns periods are 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 years respectively. The profile data are normally imported from stream hydraulics programs such as the HEC River Analysis System package (HEC-RAS) or HEC 2 in this case

Exceedance Probability with Uncertainty

Stage-Discharge Uncertainty

Study Structure Occupancy Types

Depth Percent Damage

Econ Guy’s Nightmare

Structure Inventory Data

Stage Damage Function at Index With Uncertainty

Develop Planning Objectives Develop an array of alternatives, both structural and nonstructural, that will alleviate out-of-bank flooding problems Preserve or protect natural, cultural, and historical resources Work with local sponsor (MSD), taking into account their goals and considerations, and ID their goals and considerations, ID the NED plan, as well as the locally preferred plan if applicable Evaluate opportunities for environmental restoration that improve the aquatic and terrestrial habitat conditions ID a plan that will meet environmental, social, and economic criteria and is sound from an engineering standpoint

Develop Courses of Action Facts are presented to Study Team Team develops alternative plans which consist of one or more flood damage reduction measures and actions –Reservoirs –Detention Basins –Channelization –Levees and Floodwalls –Bridge Improvements –Nonstructural Measures –Combinations

Flood Reduction Measure Selection

The Process Screen out benefit/cost ratio of < 1 Next take the measure that provides greatest net benefits using incremental analysis Team identified a problem

National Economic Development Plan Consisted of 10 components: –8 detention basins –I-wall/earth levee –section of channel modification  Recalculate Hydro data for plans

Levee Height

Compare Courses of Action Evaluation of Plans by Year Compute expected probability function to get 5 percent or less residual damage associated with a.01 exceedance probability event

Evaluation Equivalent Annual Damage The damage value associated with the without- or with-project condition over the life of the project considering changes in hydrology, hydraulics, and economic conditions over the life. Expected annual damage is computed for each year and discounted to presented worth which is annualized to obtain the equivalent annual damage value. Rather than compute the expected annual damage for each year, it is computed for base year and most likely future year, and interpolated for other years. The years beyond the most likely future year are assumed equal to the most likely future year.

Equivalent Annual Damage

Expected Annual Damage The integral of the damage-probability function. In risk-based analysis it is equal to the average or mean of all possible values of damage determined by exhaustive Monte Carlo sampling of discharge-exceedance probability, stage-discharge, and stage-damage relationships and their associated uncertainties. or

Project Performance Stage associated with start of significant damage Probability of target stage being exceeded in 10-, 25, and 50- year period The chance of containing the specific.10,.04-,.02-,.01-,.004-, and.002- exceedance probability within the stage, should that event occur

The Bottom Line EAD reduced 69% from $3,015,000 to937, structure removed from 1.0% chance flood plane Remaining structure receive considerable protection more frequent or shallower depths of flooding

What is Next? GIS-based calculation of flood likelihood and damage at each location Risk-based flood plain boundary zone NEW!! HEC-FDA 1.1

Questions?